Hunting Washington Forum

Equipment & Gear => Scopes and Optics => Topic started by: coyotecrazy on October 26, 2016, 03:30:07 PM


Advertise Here
Title: Sig2000 ranger finder vs vortex 1500, which one?
Post by: coyotecrazy on October 26, 2016, 03:30:07 PM
So between the two pros and cons?
Title: Re: Sig2000 ranger finder vs vortex 1500, which one?
Post by: vandeman17 on October 26, 2016, 03:55:17 PM
I picked up the sig a few months ago. Great set up
Title: Re: Sig2000 ranger finder vs vortex 1500, which one?
Post by: D-Rock425 on October 26, 2016, 04:05:58 PM
At the northwest mountian challenge the Sig was the only rangefinder that worked in the fog out of two groups of archers with multiple rangefinders.
Title: Re: Sig2000 ranger finder vs vortex 1500, which one?
Post by: opdinkslayer on October 26, 2016, 06:12:24 PM
Sig Kilo 2000 is awesome and in the latest cabelas flyer for 379.99. Vortex rangefinders are mediocre at best.  :twocents:
Title: Re: Sig2000 ranger finder vs vortex 1500, which one?
Post by: Bob33 on October 26, 2016, 06:17:29 PM
I can't comment on the Vortex, but I have a Sig Kilo and a Leica, and I prefer the Sig.
Title: Re: Sig2000 ranger finder vs vortex 1500, which one?
Post by: Sakko300wsm on October 26, 2016, 06:26:09 PM
I've had both - Sig Kilo hands down! Hits super fast repeatedly where the vortex would sometimes take several clicks . The vortex stuff is still a good product tho
Title: Re: Sig2000 ranger finder vs vortex 1500, which one?
Post by: washingtonhunter121 on October 26, 2016, 06:37:15 PM
Same as everybody else buy the sig and don't look back. Only way your going to get quicker and faster readings for long ranges are going to probably be almost twice as much. Can hit a deer around 1400 and in good light have got 2100 yards on rock faces or a tree line
Title: Re: Sig2000 ranger finder vs vortex 1500, which one?
Post by: coyotecrazy on October 29, 2016, 10:52:29 PM
Ordered the sig, thanks for the input
Title: Re: Sig2000 ranger finder vs vortex 1500, which one?
Post by: lamrith on October 30, 2016, 07:34:24 AM
SWFA has the SIG on sale for $349.99

I have been starting to think about a rangefinder to use to longer range rifle since my bow one is 600max.  You guys are gonna cost me $$!!
Title: Re: Sig2000 ranger finder vs vortex 1500, which one?
Post by: coyotecrazy on October 30, 2016, 08:17:10 PM
349 is a great price, I paid just under 4 with free shipping and no tax. Can't wai to give it a go.
Title: Re: Sig2000 ranger finder vs vortex 1500, which one?
Post by: Bob33 on October 30, 2016, 08:44:39 PM
my bow one is 500max and does not do well in fag (never an issue here in Western WA.. :rolleyes:  ) 
:yike:
Title: Re: Sig2000 ranger finder vs vortex 1500, which one?
Post by: JJB11B on October 30, 2016, 08:48:51 PM
my bow one is 500max and does not do well in fag (never an issue here in Western WA.. :rolleyes:  ) 
:yike:
there's lots of fag in western wa. That's why I stay over here on the east side.
I really like Vortex optics. I haven't had a chance to play with the sig ones but I have heard some good things about it
Title: Re: Sig2000 ranger finder vs vortex 1500, which one?
Post by: lamrith on October 30, 2016, 08:50:32 PM
Gahhh corrected that typo, sorry about that.  You guys want to nuke the quotes to keep this on topic and family friendly..?
Title: Re: Sig2000 ranger finder vs vortex 1500, which one?
Post by: dscubame on October 30, 2016, 08:55:58 PM
What's wrong with a little fag?
Title: Re: Sig2000 ranger finder vs vortex 1500, which one?
Post by: JJB11B on October 30, 2016, 08:56:46 PM
What's wrong with a little fag?
It was messing with his rangefinder
Title: Re: Sig2000 ranger finder vs vortex 1500, which one?
Post by: JJD on November 01, 2016, 09:36:51 AM
Testing the Sig against the Vortex, I found the Sig gathered light better than the Vortex.  Most of my archery game shots have come at dusk and dawn, just as light was fading.  I had a cheaper Bushnell that I had primarily used in dog training.  It's light gathering was poor at best.  Before I upgraded I tried everything from a G7 to a Halo.  The Sig got the nod, best bang for the $.
After getting it home, I experimented with measured distances and the sigs ability.  I thought, just cuz it gives me a number does not mean it's accurate, especially on non-reflective targets.  I was a little surprised and very pleased with the little units accuracy.  Only real down side is no tripod tread in the units base. 
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal