Hunting Washington Forum
Community => Trail Cameras => Topic started by: jtrammell on November 16, 2016, 01:35:11 PM
-
Cody Wood and Nathan Allison of Roy, WA were caught trying to steal my trail camera. They both were officially charged and during his arraignment, Cody plead not guilty. Nathan's arraignment is in December. Below is the link to SOME of the videos my trail camera recorded
https://www.facebook.com/theheir3304/videos/1121536941249654/?autoplay_reason=gatekeeper&video_container_type=1&video_creator_product_type=0&app_id=2392950137&live_video_guests=0
-
OK, this is just awesome.
I've had three stolen over the years, and I just love that you caught them.
-
I'm glad we caught them too. I just wish people didnt mess with other people's stuff. They went on to lie to the warden and told them we were baiting bears. After the wardens went to the "site", all three decided I was in fact not baiting.
Cody and Nathan even went back after they were caught and posted a video of trash all around the site. They threw all sorts of trash and beer cans out there. When the warden told me that I laughed and told him I'm a complete beer snob. If it wasn't some micro-brew IPA, it definitely wasn't me.
-
Just amazing. I placed two cams at the same location in ID in July (one on snap, one on VID). When I returned to hunt in SEP, somebody had taken both cards out of them. Glad you got these thieves on VID and hopefully, they'll get the MAX punishment for theft of private property. Nothing worse than a thief or a liar in my book.
-
Hopefully everything is done by February.
Just amazing. I placed two cams at the same location in ID in July (one on snap, one on VID). When I returned to hunt in SEP, somebody had taken both cards out of them. Glad you got these thieves on VID and hopefully, they'll get the MAX punishment for theft of private property. Nothing worse than a thief or a liar in my book.
-
So if you bear bait and leave beer cans all over the place, I can rip off your camera without consequences? What kind of defense is that? I'm so glad you caught them.
-
I'm not too sure what they were thinking when they fabricated that lie.
So if you bear bait and leave beer cans all over the place, I can rip off your camera without consequences? What kind of defense is that? I'm so glad you caught them.
-
I remember this incident. Thanks for following with an update. I hope they get the book thrown at them.
-
tagging
-
Good deal that they are facing a judge. What kind of penalty are they potentially looking at?
-
:chuckle:
-
Good deal that they are facing a judge. What kind of penalty are they potentially looking at?
Not enough probably. :bash:
-
Good deal!
-
Glad to hear.
-
I sure am getting tired of people like this :bash: :bash:
-
Unfortunately they're only facing vandalism. When I speak to the judge I will tell them their intent was to steal the camera, not just break it.
-
Some good kids here. We ran across them last year with a bull in there truck they shot at night. Rangers must have pushed them out of Eatonville. Saw them yesterday in packwood.
-
Hate people like that - THIEVES! Go work, earn money, and buy your own stuff
-
REALLY?! Hopefully you turned them in. They're known poachers.
Some good kids here. We ran across them last year with a bull in there truck they shot at night. Rangers must have pushed them out of Eatonville. Saw them yesterday in packwood.
-
Funny, in that picture, Cody's zipper is down LOL
:chuckle:
-
they will never stop until they throw the book at them :bash: they have been poaching for years and years.
-
REALLY?! Hopefully you turned them in. They're known poachers.
Some good kids here. We ran across them last year with a bull in there truck they shot at night. Rangers must have pushed them out of Eatonville. Saw them yesterday in packwood.
Called and made a report.
-
Unfortunately they're only facing vandalism. When I speak to the judge I will tell them their intent was to steal the camera, not just break it.
I really enjoyed the video especially your forceful "give me your effing ID"! It was priceless and they were absolutely terrified. Yea, that vandalism will be charged as malicious mischief 3rd degree. 364 day maximum but they won't see any serious jail time unless they have serious criminal records. Make sure you talk to the prosecutor and tell him as the victim you would not approve any deals being given that do not involve a plea to the crime as charged. A lot of people get deals that end up getting the case dismissed but that shouldn't be given here.
-
From what Ive read, one was charged with attempted theft back in Dec 2015, and from what Ive been told is one has a record.
Unfortunately they're only facing vandalism. When I speak to the judge I will tell them their intent was to steal the camera, not just break it.
I really enjoyed the video especially your forceful "give me your effing ID"! It was priceless and they were absolutely terrified. Yea, that vandalism will be charged as malicious mischief 3rd degree. 364 day maximum but they won't see any serious jail time unless they have serious criminal records. Make sure you talk to the prosecutor and tell him as the victim you would not approve any deals being given that do not involve a plea to the crime as charged. A lot of people get deals that end up getting the case dismissed but that shouldn't be given here.
-
REALLY?! Hopefully you turned them in. They're known poachers.
Some good kids here. We ran across them last year with a bull in there truck they shot at night. Rangers must have pushed them out of Eatonville. Saw them yesterday in packwood.
Called and made a report.
REALLY?! Hopefully you turned them in. They're known poachers.
Some good kids here. We ran across them last year with a bull in there truck they shot at night. Rangers must have pushed them out of Eatonville. Saw them yesterday in packwood.
Called and made a report.
How do you know they shot a elk at night? Just curious
-
Waste of taxpayers money for vandalizing a trail camera. You don't like that, but that's how I feel. You shudda got the money from them and then gave 'em an ass whoopin'.
-
Waste of taxpayers money for vandalizing a trail camera. You don't like that, but that's how I feel. You shudda got the money from them and then gave 'em an ass whoopin'.
Bad advice.
This is 2016, not the wild west of the 1800's.
You don't have to like it, but if you go around handing out ass whoopins you will be sued out of house and home.
This guy is doing it ALL the right way.
-
Waste of taxpayers money for vandalizing a trail camera. You don't like that, but that's how I feel. You shudda got the money from them and then gave 'em an ass whoopin'.
Bad advice.
This is 2016, not the wild west of the 1800's.
You don't have to like it, but if you go around handing out ass whoopins you will be sued out of house and home.
This guy is doing it ALL the right way.
He is, but I don't think like that. Some people need to have their butts kicked. That's what's partially wrong with this country.
-
Why would I want to risk my military career over some clowns trying to steal something I worked hard to get? Getting the money and beating them up doesn't teach them anything. When they have to tell their employers the reasons they are missing work, and when they are looked over on certain jobs because it goes on their records, THAT teaches them a lesson.
Waste of taxpayers money for vandalizing a trail camera. You don't like that, but that's how I feel. You shudda got the money from them and then gave 'em an ass whoopin'.
-
Why would I want to risk my military career over some clowns trying to steal something I worked hard to get? Getting the money and beating them up doesn't teach them anything. When they have to tell their employers the reasons they are missing work, and when they are looked over on certain jobs because it goes on their records, THAT teaches them a lesson.
Waste of taxpayers money for vandalizing a trail camera. You don't like that, but that's how I feel. You shudda got the money from them and then gave 'em an ass whoopin'.
You never mentioned you are in the military. Tell the whole story, so people will understand where YOU are coming from. I really don't think any employer would give a rats butt about a vandalism misdemeanor. You don't have to tell your employer why you missed work either. They'll lie about that I bet. Good luck on your prosecution on them.. :tup:
-
"sgtss" is either one of the two, or a family member or friend. Been here since 2014 but only has four posts. All four posts are on this thread or the other thread in regards to the trail camera being stolen. Doesnt take a brain surgeon to figure that out.
He also accused me of baiting bear, like Nathan and Cody did
REALLY?! Hopefully you turned them in. They're known poachers.
Some good kids here. We ran across them last year with a bull in there truck they shot at night. Rangers must have pushed them out of Eatonville. Saw them yesterday in packwood.
Called and made a report.
REALLY?! Hopefully you turned them in. They're known poachers.
Some good kids here. We ran across them last year with a bull in there truck they shot at night. Rangers must have pushed them out of Eatonville. Saw them yesterday in packwood.
Called and made a report.
How do you know they shot a elk at night? Just curious
-
Do I really need to explain why I chose not to break the law because other people decided to break the law? They route I chose was the absolute best route, regardless of me being in the military. I think anyone with any type of sense would realize that
Why would I want to risk my military career over some clowns trying to steal something I worked hard to get? Getting the money and beating them up doesn't teach them anything. When they have to tell their employers the reasons they are missing work, and when they are looked over on certain jobs because it goes on their records, THAT teaches them a lesson.
Waste of taxpayers money for vandalizing a trail camera. You don't like that, but that's how I feel. You shudda got the money from them and then gave 'em an ass whoopin'.
You never mentioned you are in the military. Tell the whole story, so people will understand where YOU are coming from. I really don't think any employer would give a rats butt about a vandalism misdemeanor. You don't have to tell your employer why you missed work either. They'll lie about that I bet. Good luck on your prosecution on them.. :tup:
-
Whatever, I don't think like others on here. I'm old school and believe in a good knock on the head.
-
Whatever, I don't think like others on here. I'm old school and believe in a good knock on the head.
:yeah:
-
Bite the curb you thieving poaching POS.
-
Super smart to throw down with two guys who have bad judgement and a weapon.
-
Super smart to throw down with two guys who have bad judgement and a weapon.
I ALWAYS have a weapon on me too....
-
Super smart to throw down with two guys who have bad judgement and a weapon.
[/quote
Yeah, you should just let people steal your property.]
-
Don't get me wrong, I think they are in need of a good a$$ whoopin, but you'd get in a gun fight against two guys over a trail cam? :o
-
Don't get me wrong, I think they are in need of a good a$$ whoopin, but you'd get in a gun fight against two guys over a trail cam? :o
Not a gun fight for $50 stinking bucks.....people should almost expect that their precious trail camera WILL be stolen. Crap happens.
-
I think we can all agree that in a perfect world those two would be beaten to a pulp.
-
I think we can all agree that in a perfect world those two would be beaten to a pulp.
:yeah:.
-
I chose the high road. You can say you're old school, and you wouldve done this or that, but at the end of the day, I made my choice and I'm happy with it. We go to court on December 9th and I cant wait to talk to the judge and give him MORE evidence of the situation.
-
I chose the high road. You can say you're old school, and you wouldve done this or that, but at the end of the day, I made my choice and I'm happy with it. We go to court on December 9th and I cant wait to talk to the judge and give him MORE evidence of the situation.
Thanks for taking the time and effort to go to court. I'm sure your personal time is better spent doing something else but holding POS's like these accountable is an important principle that needs to be followed through with.
I'm imagining what I might have done had I caught the POS who stole one of my cams last year. I'd love to find out who it was and get even. And by get even, I mean get ahead. Way ahead. In a way that would make them regret ever having stolen something that doesn't belong to them. I hate POS thieves and would be hard pressed to hold a property owner accountable for beating the living crap out of a thief (or worse) if I were on a jury in such a case. The next guy who thinks about stealing one of my cams had best be looking over his shoulder.
-
All this tough talk about busting someone up is priceless. I suppose you all would also shoot at a guy driving away in your car after he stole it. Yeah, shoot at the thief driving away in your car, your own brand of justice, and the "right" thing to do these days, when things are so wrong. Just remember not to shoot the sleeping neighbor down the street. After all, you tough guys with your own brand of justice are RIGHT, so there would never be any consequences.
OP, you are doing the right thing. You don't owe anyone anything on here about why you chose this path, and you certainly don't owe anyone any info about what you do for a living. Keep doing the right thing.
-
Ya tough guys on the computer. My question is how do u prove its ur cam to the police ir in court? Engrave you name in it? Im just curious as to im heading out in a little but to hang one. I get it if its on private property.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
-
There's certainly a time and place to knuckle chuck, don't get me wrong.
-
Electronic,Motion activated, cameras for hunting should be outlawed right next to the battery powered waterfowl decoys.
-
I have all mine registered with the company I bought it from. So all SN would match. Doesnt hurt that I have the key to the lock and they python cable.
Ya tough guys on the computer. My question is how do u prove its ur cam to the police ir in court? Engrave you name in it? Im just curious as to im heading out in a little but to hang one. I get it if its on private property.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
-
why's that?
Electronic,Motion activated, cameras for hunting should be outlawed right next to the battery powered waterfowl decoys.
-
All this tough talk about busting someone up is priceless.
Nothing wrong with blowing off a little steam and making thieves think twice before stealing what doesn't belong to them. :twocents:
-
Yeah, you're protecting other from crime. Just like this tough guy wielding his own brand of justice was protecting his neighbor.
http://www.king5.com/news/crime/stray-bullet-leaves-woman-in-critical-condition-after-bonney-lake-shooting/348178860 (http://www.king5.com/news/crime/stray-bullet-leaves-woman-in-critical-condition-after-bonney-lake-shooting/348178860)
-
Breaking the law because you caught someone else breaking the law isn't old school. It's dumb. Even if I wasn't in the military, I wouldn't risk my career on some fools. Why risk an assault charge over these idiots? Let's say I did decide to go the other route and they do press charges on me. What am I suppose to tell the judge? "Sorry your honor, I'm old school"
Ignorance at its finest.
-
Wow, I can see hunt wa has gone places since I've been inactive. They got caught, Stealing is stealing. Simple as that.
They should be punished, just as I have been and everyone should be. Bad juju right there.
Glad to say I don't know these guys but If I remember correctly this took place within a few miles of our place.
-
smart phone video it and turn it in to the cops
not worth it
-
:cue:
-
*UPDATE*
Cody changed his plea to GUILTY. He now has to choose between 10 days jail, or 10 days electronic home monitoring.
-
*UPDATE*
Cody changed his plea to GUILTY. He now has to choose between 10 days jail, or 10 days electronic home monitoring.
I'm impressed. Thanks for the update.
-
*UPDATE*
Cody changed his plea to GUILTY. He now has to choose between 10 days jail, or 10 days electronic home monitoring.
Sad that he has a choice, but at least there is some punishment and mark on his record.
-
:tup:
any monetary fines?
Do you get reimbursed for the damage or would that require civil court?
-
Too bad the judge can't make those POS go stand in front of Cabelas on a Saturday with a big sign saying...I'm a thief that got caught trying to steal a game camera out in the field and this is part of my punishment.
-
Too bad the judge can't make those POS go stand in front of Cabelas on a Saturday with a big sign saying...I'm a thief that got caught trying to steal a game camera out in the field and this is part of my punishment.
:yeah: Shoot, I'd make the drive down there to give them a piece of my mind.
8)
-
Gosh dang that is good to hear. Either way, if he has a job he will be forced to pay the costs of his incarceration, a criminal conviction fee, and any other fine associated with the crime. If he does the home monitoring that'll hit him fairly hard because that option costs up to $25 per day plus the cost of installing a phone line (if his place doesn't have one). Mind you the judge does not have to accept an agreed recommendation. He can go beyond (or below) what the parties present in the plea agreement. You could go to his sentencing and ask to be heard during the hearing.
-
not, not, not trying to start an argument.... but just curious if this was on private or public ground? If public am just, simply curious what the law says about removal of something like this? I'd have figure the law would not protect personal property left on public ground?
All that said, stealing cams is a totally BS move!
-
not, not, not trying to start an argument.... but just curious if this was on private or public ground? If public am just, simply curious what the law says about removal of something like this? I'd have figure the law would not protect personal property left on public ground?
All that said, stealing cams is a totally BS move!
If it is not yours dont touch it :bash:
If i am up in Nat forest or other lands open to the public and not private hunting/camping and have my tent, trailer, etc etc set up and i head out to hunt it is not yours to take :bash:
if i put my trail camera out it is not yours, my tree stand etc etc :bash:+
Theft is theft, if someone steals your car that you parked at a public parking lot (like a park) you are covered under the law....
:mor:
-
not, not, not trying to start an argument.... but just curious if this was on private or public ground? If public am just, simply curious what the law says about removal of something like this? I'd have figure the law would not protect personal property left on public ground?
All that said, stealing cams is a totally BS move!
Just think about what your saying about public ground! Everybody leaves things on public ground all the time, your cars, bikes, motorcycles. :chuckle:
-
:bash:
not, not, not trying to start an argument.... but just curious if this was on private or public ground? If public am just, simply curious what the law says about removal of something like this? I'd have figure the law would not protect personal property left on public ground?
All that said, stealing cams is a totally BS move!
:bash:
-
Wow, he flat out said he didn't want to cause an argument. :dunno: I think he's wondering like I am if those charges he got were from taking a cam on public land. I surely hope so. That'd be nice to see a judge issue a punishment from stealing a cam on public, like he would on private.
-
Wow, he flat out said he didn't want to cause an argument. :dunno: I think he's wondering like I am if those charges he got were from taking a cam on public land. I surely hope so. That'd be nice to see a judge issue a punishment from stealing a cam on public, like he would on private.
The cameras I've had stolen or messed with were on private land. Guess I don't understand why that would be worse than taking one on public land.
FWIW, I have an expectation that trespassers will tamper/steal cameras on private property. Those Dbags are already up to no good!
It's Joe BlowStickyFinger on public ground that's surprising. A normal everyday guy that wouldn't think to pilfer or shoplift in Walmart but can't pass up another guys gear.
-
Again, not trying to start an argument.... so if you feel the need to freak out and bang your head on the wall do it elsewhere. Public ground cars etc is good example, but cars on public streets need to be moved in given period or they are impounded, camps on national forest are time limited. There is a nice camera box, w/o camera ever, bolted to a tree for last 5 years. Should it be considered abandoned, can I use it, does someone own that tree now.... I know any number of guys who leave/neglect cams in the woods over the winter. Really just curious if the law at some point looks at things like the as abandoned at some point?
-
I think you are confused. There are animals in the outdoors year round.
-
I've never had one stolen but people messed with mine this year. My blind was stolen this year and another last year. I've since pulled all my gear from that property.
The cams were turned upside down prior to a hard rain and both cards stolen. I don't know why they didn't take the cams but i guess i should be thankful???
-
:bash:
Again, not trying to start an argument.... so if you feel the need to freak out and bang your head on the wall do it elsewhere. Public ground cars etc is good example, but cars on public streets need to be moved in given period or they are impounded, camps on national forest are time limited. There is a nice camera box, w/o camera ever, bolted to a tree for last 5 years. Should it be considered abandoned, can I use it, does someone own that tree now.... I know any number of guys who leave/neglect cams in the woods over the winter. Really just curious if the law at some point looks at things like the as abandoned at some point?
:dunno: So I'm at a Christmas party last week and we're doing introductions. Afterword a guy at the table asked an East Indian what his name meant in English :yike:
He didn't get what was wrong with that either.
-
:bash: Again, not trying to start an argument.... so if you feel the need to freak out and bang your head on the wall do it elsewhere. Public ground cars etc is good example, but cars on public streets need to be moved in given period or they are impounded, camps on national forest are time limited. There is a nice camera box, w/o camera ever, bolted to a tree for last 5 years. Should it be considered abandoned, can I use it, does someone own that tree now.... I know any number of guys who leave/neglect cams in the woods over the winter. Really just curious if the law at some point looks at things like the as abandoned at some point?
:dunno: So I'm at a Christmas party last week and we're doing introductions. Afterword a guy at the table asked an East Indian what his name meant in English :yike:
He didn't get what was wrong with that either.
It was a pretty simple, honest, question out of curiosity. If I could figure out away to ask it using crayons and pictures so you could understand it I would.
Troll
-
:bash: Again, not trying to start an argument.... so if you feel the need to freak out and bang your head on the wall do it elsewhere. Public ground cars etc is good example, but cars on public streets need to be moved in given period or they are impounded, camps on national forest are time limited. There is a nice camera box, w/o camera ever, bolted to a tree for last 5 years. Should it be considered abandoned, can I use it, does someone own that tree now.... I know any number of guys who leave/neglect cams in the woods over the winter. Really just curious if the law at some point looks at things like the as abandoned at some point?
:dunno: So I'm at a Christmas party last week and we're doing introductions. Afterword a guy at the table asked an East Indian what his name meant in English :yike:
He didn't get what was wrong with that either.
You fail reading comprehension. His question was how does the law look at this on public land vs private land
-
I often leave my lock boxes locked with the camera removed over the winter to prevent water damage. Some of my cameras are 6-7 miles in, never had others on cam so I see no need to pack it in and out yearly.
-
:bash: Again, not trying to start an argument.... so if you feel the need to freak out and bang your head on the wall do it elsewhere. Public ground cars etc is good example, but cars on public streets need to be moved in given period or they are impounded, camps on national forest are time limited. There is a nice camera box, w/o camera ever, bolted to a tree for last 5 years. Should it be considered abandoned, can I use it, does someone own that tree now.... I know any number of guys who leave/neglect cams in the woods over the winter. Really just curious if the law at some point looks at things like the as abandoned at some point?
:dunno: So I'm at a Christmas party last week and we're doing introductions. Afterword a guy at the table asked an East Indian what his name meant in English :yike:
He didn't get what was wrong with that either.
It was a pretty simple, honest, question out of curiosity. If I could figure out away to ask it using crayons and pictures so you could understand it I would.
Troll
So laffin'
How dare you ask a question while trying not to start an argument? :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
-
LOL :chuckle: When is it OK to take other peoples stuff?
If it's not on your privately owned property, leave other peoples crap alone.
-
I'd have figure the law would not protect personal property left on public ground?
You fail reading comprehension. His question was how does the law look at this on public land vs private land
Comprehension? His quote says that if it's on public property he figures it's not protected (theft).
-
The law doesnt care if it's on private or public lands. The law cares that they both vandalized, broke and shot my equipment. Many people have said anything left in the woods is abandoned property. I did some research on that and I wouldnt find ANY law that stated anything like that.
-
LOL :chuckle: When is it OK to take other peoples stuff?
If it's not on your privately owned property, leave other peoples crap alone.
who is saying that people should do otherwise?
-
The law doesnt care if it's on private or public lands. The law cares that they both vandalized, broke and shot my equipment. Many people have said anything left in the woods is abandoned property. I did some research on that and I wouldnt find ANY law that stated anything like that.
I am thinking that rule is specific to wilderness areas. Obviously not private property or necessarily all public land. I can't find it in RCWs.
I think you guys might be figuring that 5x5's question is pointed at your situation. In truth, I think he is genuinely curious about how that law would have applied in a different but similar situation.
Again, glad that justice was served. You did the right thing.
-
If it isn't yours, don't take it. Simple. If you see a trail cam up on a tree, it belongs to someone. If you drive past a parked car, it belongs to someone. If you come across a hunting camp, all that gear belongs to someone. Just leave it alone, it isn't yours. If you think something has been abandoned, call the FS and let them handle it. If you disagree with any of this, please pack your truck with your best hunting gear and valuables, park it on public land, then walk away - but don't complain when I.... I mean someone, takes it. And a heads up of when/where/and an itemized inventory would be appreciated. TIA :tup:
-
I remember finding really nice hunting cabins in the middle of no where. We would stay in them and while there, act like temporary care takers. We would leave them just like we found them. For the first five or so years it was nice to stay at them, there was three spread out over 20+ miles. Finally, one after another was vandalized. None exist today.
Really sad to see what has become of the places we took for granted as a great escape, thinking others felt the same. Now knowing differently.
-
The law doesnt care if it's on private or public lands. The law cares that they both vandalized, broke and shot my equipment. Many people have said anything left in the woods is abandoned property. I did some research on that and I wouldnt find ANY law that stated anything like that.
I am thinking that rule is specific to wilderness areas. Obviously not private property or necessarily all public land. I can't find it in RCWs.
It's a federal public land regulation and isn't found in the RCWs but rather the CFRs to the appropriate federal land management agency.
On one federal agency's land any property that hasn't been moved/touched in 72 hours is considered abandoned. The regulation authorizes the agency to seize the property and cite the offender.
-
I didn't say the cabins were legal, I was impressed by how respectful people were initially. It wasn't Fed land if that makes a difference.
-
I remember finding really nice hunting cabins in the middle of no where. We would stay in them and while there, act like temporary care takers. We would leave them just like we found them. For the first five or so years it was nice to stay at them, there was three spread out over 20+ miles. Finally, one after another was vandalized. None exist today.
Really sad to see what has become of the places we took for granted as a great escape, thinking others felt the same. Now knowing differently.
Good memories and good people are where you find them. Here's to caretakers :tup:
-
Middle of No Where. @Lefthook
:)
-
That is a great pic huntingfool7! That is paradise right there! That was a serious straight forward set up, really appreciated it.
I killed a bull in a new clear cut that had an eery familiarity to it. It wasn't until after that I realized the new clearcut was once that stand of timber the cabin was built in.
-
I was also curious how the law would view cameras on public ground because I've heard different things about how agencies define abandoned property. Nobody is saying it's ok to steal anyone else's property.
I put cameras out too and haven't researched what the rules are for the agency in charge of the land.
-
*UPDATE*
Nathan was suppose to have his pre-trial conference last week but was unable to make it. The prosecutor called me and said that it has been rescheduled for 23 February and he plans on changing his plea from "Not guilty" to "guilty".
-
@jtrammell Nicely done. Way to stick with it!
-
What about a tree stand a 1/2 mile back from the road on Fed Land?
Let's say it's 5-8 years old and still sound/safe.
Can I use it and if so am I obligated to vacate siad stand upon request/demand?
I have built a few and never had a problem, but I could.
-
I believe the regs say that stands and blinds on public property are free game for ANYONE and EVERYONE.
What about a tree stand a 1/2 mile back from the road on Fed Land?
Let's say it's 5-8 years old and still sound/safe.
Can I use it and if so am I obligated to vacate siad stand upon request/demand?
I have built a few and never had a problem, but I could.
-
What about a tree stand a 1/2 mile back from the road on Fed Land?
Let's say it's 5-8 years old and still sound/safe.
Can I use it and if so am I obligated to vacate siad stand upon request/demand?
I have built a few and never had a problem, but I could.
As I recall from school, whether property is abandoned is basically a totality of the circumstances test--meaning if given all the circumstances a reasonable person would conclude it's abandoned--then it is technically abandoned and if one takes it they have a defense to theft. With your tree stand idea lets say you saw it there a few years in a row and it started to form moss on the rungs that was never disturbed from a climber. If you took it or used it I don't think there would be any violation of the law. Just my opinion and I have seen a few theft prosecutions fold because of interesting facts like that.
-
If it's a stand or trail cam leave it alone, eventually the owner will come back for it. As for the other crap that's left to seem like a long term camping trip or living in the woods, just report it. Don't be apart of the blue falcon crew and take what's not yours. Keep it up whomever you steal from will probably take your stuff out of your truck/put something on their devices that will harm you.
-
The pre-trial conference for Nathan Allison is SUPPOSE to be on Thursday. Unfortunately I will not be able to make it but I have been told that he will be changing his plea from "NOT GUILTY" to "GUILTY" I will be calling the prosecutor's office on Friday and I will get an update on what happened and what his punishment, if given one, was.
-
That's great. Hope they stick it to him.
-
I just got off the phone with the prosecutor's office. Nathan Allison changed his plea from "NOT GUILTY" to "GUILTY". I was told that these were his punishments: 20 days of at home electronic monitoring. He cannot leave his house for 20 days and has to pay for the electronic device tracking him. He is placed on probation until 2021. He must get an Interlock Ignition Device(a breathalyzer for your car) installed, he must pay fines, and restitution to be determined at a later date.
-
:tup:
-
Why would he have to get a interlock on his car? This makes no sense!
-
I'm not too sure. The only thing I can think of, is that he had a prior alcohol conviction. He's a repeat offender, so i wouldnt be shocked
-
So I got clarification on the interlock ignition device, the breathalyzer for the vehicle.
He also got a DUI.
-
These guys sound like real winners