Hunting Washington Forum
Equipment & Gear => Scopes and Optics => Topic started by: yakimanoob on August 28, 2017, 07:22:13 PM
-
Hey folks. Curious what your experiences have been when Vortex vs Leupold vs Nikon rangefinders.
I've been looking at things like the Aculon by Nikon and the RX-650 Leupold, but after looking over warranties I realized that not even Leupold offers their usual lifetime warranty on their rangefinders.
So my choice now is to spend ~$150 on a Nikon or Leupold and live with the fact that I might have to replace it, or blow a little more $$ and get the ~$300 Vortex Ranger 1000, knowing Vortex will fix or replace it for any reason ever.
What do you think? This will be my first rangefinder. I'm a rifle hunter for deer/elk/bear and currently use a 7mm-08 so I don't mind the 500-650 yard range limits on the cheaper units--I won't be shooting that far anyway.
-
You won't get 500 to 600 on the cheap units even though they claim it.
Leupold for archery and Leica for rifle.
Then the Sig Kilo came out and I would have gone that route in place of the Leica.
-
You won't get 500 to 600 on the cheap units even though they claim it.
Leupold for archery and Leica for rifle.
Then the Sig Kilo came out and I would have gone that route in place of the Leica.
Why not the Vortex? Is there something about it I should know?
-
My Leica has been reliable for years.
-
The reviews I recall on here and the impression I get is you will not get consistent read outs at the range you mentioned with the vortex.
-
My Leica has been reliable for years.
Agree. Don't regret the Leica at all.
-
Research the threads on here and I bet you set your sights on the Kilo.
-
Agree that you don't get near the claimed range with hunting conditions.
In my experience you get about 50-65 percent of the optimal range claim.
I went cheap the first time. Wish I'd saved the money.
I do like the longer range Vortek.... but I'm a Vortek fan.
If you'rer interested in Vortek, hit up elknut1 on here. He sells it, and I have found him to be very knoledgeable and totally trustworthy.
-
I have a Leupold Rx 600 that has served me well. I upgraded last year to the Sig Kilo 2000 and it's great.
-
Just spend the extra few dollars and get a leica best rangefinder you can get
-
I went and looked at most of those you are looking at. A lighted cross hair is the best way to go, I bought the vortex ranger 1000. Haven't recieved it yet but it was very impressive in the store.
-
I have a Leica 1600 and a Sig Kilo 2000. The Sig gets more use.
-
Sig Kilo. $209 on Camofire right now.
-
Sig Kilo. $209 on Camofire right now.
FYI, I don't believe that one has lite up redicles.
-
Vortex 1500
-
I have Leupold rx 1000i tbr and has been great. Would have gotten the Leica if I had the money .
-
Leupold or Leica. Had great luck with Leupold. Wouldn't touch anything Vortex.
-
Kilo 2000, the new model.
-
I purchased the Vortex Ranger 1000 2 years ago. It is great when you have 100% clear line of sight. However, it picks up the tiniest intervening object if there is one - raindrop, blade of grass tiny twig. I tried to get it to range a mule deer in very light brush last archery season - even when the crosshair was on the deer and in the clear, it was under-ranging, 28, 35 when I KNEW it was farther. I finally gave up, gave it my best old-school range estimate of 40 yards - and shot right under the brisket. More like 46 I guess, that's hunting :)
-
Leupold or Leica. Had great luck with Leupold. Wouldn't touch anything Vortex.
Why the ban on Vortex?
-
For $209 on Camofire you can't go wrong.
-
Leica all the way... Was out Antelope hunting last year with a member on here as we were leaving truck he mentioned he forgot his rangefinder. I told him not to worry I had mine ( a Vortex) we got into a nice herd of goats between 200 and 300 yards out my Vortex just flat would not pick them up. Hunted later in the season and friend had a Leica simply put is was just amazing on everything we ranged. I talked with other big game guides all were using Leica. I am now using a Leica and absolutely love it. A lot of prairie dogs and gophers in the past 3 weeks wished I never had it.
-
Leupold or Leica. Had great luck with Leupold. Wouldn't touch anything Vortex.
Why the ban on Vortex?
Every single person that I personally know has had issues with their Vortex stuff wether it is a scope, binocs or range finder. It is a good thing that their warranty is so great because you will more than likely need it. There is a reason that you see a lot of Vortex stuff for sale on this site and many others.
-
My Leica has been reliable for years.
:yeah:
-
Thanks for the advice folks! I found a deal on a Sig Kilo 1250 for $179.99 so I jumped on it. I'll let you know my thoughts once I've had a chance to use it!
-
My Leica has been reliable for years.
:yeah:
:yeah:x2
-
I have a Leica 1600 and a Sig Kilo 2000. The Sig gets more use.
Sig is pretty amazing for the money. Leupolds work well in good conditions, a little fog or haze they don't so much. Vortex are by far the worst of the bunch, so painfully slow.
-
My Leica has been reliable for years.
:yeah:
:yeah:x2
X3
Love it.
-
Another nod to the Sig Kilo 2000. :tup:
-
I bought a new G7,got in to a long range.Before that had Leupold TBR_1000
-
Here's my Leupold range finder from this past weeks elk hunt. I got sick of it not working so decided to use it for a practical purpose.
-
I have the Sig 1200 and it won't read black objects or if it does it reads them about 7 yards longer than they really are.
-
Here's my Leupold range finder from this past weeks elk hunt. I got sick of it not working so decided to use it for a practical purpose.
They still make aluminum arrows?!
-
When I did my research a year ago, I found this to be the standard:
Sig 2000
Leica 1600
Everything else
I bought a Sig 850 and I love it, but I don't like the black display. Wish it was red.
-
I use the Leica 1600 and have not had any issues other than if you run into fog. It throws off the reading. Other than that, it has been a great unit.
-
Here's my Leupold range finder from this past weeks elk hunt. I got sick of it not working so decided to use it for a practical purpose.
They still make aluminum arrows?!
Yep. I'm thinking of switching to carbon to get a flatter trajectory at closer ranges, though
-
I have a Vortex 1000 and have no complaints. I push the button, it tells me either the actual range or the ballistic range and if it breaks they will send me a new one no questions asked.
-
Just picked up the Sig 2000, cabelas had a good sale, got it for 275 shipped, it is fast! was able to pick up plenty of targets in the 1700-2000 yard range without much trouble.
-
Sig Kilo 2400ABS
-
I live on the coast and we deal with fog my leica would not give readings with any fog the Bushnell did better. I have a swaroski and it works.
-
Sig Kilo 2400ABS
I have read good things about the 2400. Have you had it out in the fog?
-
It has always worked well.
I guess I cannot say in the fog.
-
Leica 1600. The gold standard by which all others are measured.
Compact. Lightweight. Works.
-
upgraded from a redfield earlier this year to a sig kilo 2000, i love it.
-
Leica 1200 is what I have now. I sure like the new G7 BR2500 Ballistic Rangefinder 7x reviews that came out.
-
Sig 2400 is superfast - much more responsive and longer range than the Leica 1600B - and it should be at twice the cost.
Ranges up to 2200 yards consistently.
-
Just bought a Sig 2200 Kilo. I had narrowed it down to Sig 2000 Kilo or Vortex Ranger 1500, went to Cabela's check them out in person. The Sig was better menu wise and the aiming reticle was smaller and it had the better range. While I was standing there, noticed they had a sale on the 2200 for $428 so I bought it. So far I have been able to range wet grass out to 1100 in bright sunlight consistently. Waiting for an overcast day to really see what it can do.
-
I have an older Leica 800 and a g7 br2
-
For the money nothing ranges further than the Sig Kilos.
-
I picked up two of the Sig Silo 2200, very disappointed for sure! I read so much hype about them being hands down better than the Vortex 1500 -- Simply not true! I talked to the Sig rep & he mentioned it could be the batteries that were used so he sent me two upgraded ones that are used in the 2400 models. (Duracell's) No difference in them. Our 2200's are best used in 0-900 yards at best, in most cases 800 yards is the best it will do & that's after you click the button a 1/2 dozen times! Once we did get a skosh over 1000 yards. The 1500 is brighter & will laser ranges side by side if not better than the Sig. I sold one of the Sigs & will be selling the other shortly. I have no idea how some here claim 2000 yards+ with this model. It simply is not true for us, as I mentioned I was very disappointed with them. Too, they have no way to attach them to your pack? The Vortex have a metal belt clip & slides perfectly on my packs horizontal chest strap.
It doesn't matter to me who owns what but those considering the 2200 may want to check out other units first!
ElkNut/Paul
-
I picked up two of the Sig Silo 2200, very disappointed for sure! I read so much hype about them being hands down better than the Vortex 1500 -- Simply not true! I talked to the Sig rep & he mentioned it could be the batteries that were used so he sent me two upgraded ones that are used in the 2400 models. (Duracell's) No difference in them. Our 2200's are best used in 0-900 yards at best, in most cases 800 yards is the best it will do & that's after you click the button a 1/2 dozen times! Once we did get a skosh over 1000 yards. The 1500 is brighter & will laser ranges side by side if not better than the Sig. I sold one of the Sigs & will be selling the other shortly. I have no idea how some here claim 2000 yards+ with this model. It simply is not true for us, as I mentioned I was very disappointed with them. Too, they have no way to attach them to your pack? The Vortex have a metal belt clip & slides perfectly on my packs horizontal chest strap.
It doesn't matter to me who owns what but those considering the 2200 may want to check out other units first!
ElkNut/Paul
Your experience is definitely different than the majority of the experiences shared around here.
-
Leica 1200 is what I have now. I sure like the new G7 BR2500 Ballistic Rangefinder 7x reviews that came out.
Like the “shoot to” correction it does to correct yardage to your turret conditions. Was surprised sig didnt have this - I wrote them twice suggesting simple table lookup feature. Going to be a shootout with sig 2400 and G7 with both $1499 street price for king of the rangefinders.
-
dscubame, no doubt about it, this is why I picked them up. I read many good reviews here on them. I believe guys are exaggerating the heck out of them. The two I had (still have one) aren't getting 1/2 the distances some here are claiming? What gives? I talked with the Sig Sauer Rep & he said I should easily get 1500-1800 yards. These haven't came close to it. They are at best an 800-900 yard unit. I f I were to purchase a new unit that needed to range 1500 yards consistently in would be the Leupold 1600 B -- Just sharing my honest findings!
Do you own a 2200? If so what ranges are you consistently receiving?
ElkNut/Paul
-
Are we talking live settings or reflective targets?
-
I have a Leica 1600 and a Sig Kilo 2000. The Sig gets more use.
+1
The Leica 1600 was a wedding gift from my wife and has a bit of sentimental value attached to it. If that wasn't the case I would have two Sigs.
-
dscubame, no doubt about it, this is why I picked them up. I read many good reviews here on them. I believe guys are exaggerating the heck out of them. The two I had (still have one) aren't getting 1/2 the distances some here are claiming? What gives? I talked with the Sig Sauer Rep & he said I should easily get 1500-1800 yards. These haven't came close to it. They are at best an 800-900 yard unit. I f I were to purchase a new unit that needed to range 1500 yards consistently in would be the Leupold 1600 B -- Just sharing my honest findings!
Do you own a 2200? If so what ranges are you consistently receiving?
ElkNut/Paul
I have the Leica and was skeptical of the Sig due to price as I have found the less expensive ones not work as advertised, not even close.
I would expect what you experienced but with so many folks raving about them, over time I came to think maybe there is something there.
I most definitely trust what your saying just goes to remind a guy that once again you get what you pay for and do good research for yourself. With your experience and background I consider a product review from you part of good research unless you have a business relationship or some other reason to be hyping Vortex.
A little off topic and not to be accusatory here but so many relatively higher profile folks in the hunting industry giving good reviews to not so good products or not so good reviews to good products to help encourage the companies to continue flooding them with free gear and other perks, it's too bad. Can't blame a guy for being skeptical with reviews and not just in this industry but most if not all others as well.
-
Sorry, I meant Leica 1600 B. As far as research goes no I didn't go to any extreme looking for the perfect unit, I went by what I read here & on Rokslide. Many raved about it getting well over 2000 yards consistently, there were some that had the same issues I'm having but I decided what the heck I'll pick them up & see for myself. I even sent one back to Sig to check out, they sent it back saying it was perfectly fine along with the new duracell battery.
I wish it would perform like some say it does! I've tried it on mountain sides, trees, rocks, buildings, roof tops, you name it, it's like pulling teeth to get it to range 900 yards. No way will it do it on 3-4 clicks or holding down on scan mode.
Who here is reputable/trustworthy? I will send him this unit to check out for a week, I'll even send a pre-paid shipping label to send it back. I would like someone else here to see what this unit does for them!
ElkNut/Paul
-
Elknut. I added a little more to my previous reply and my intentions are respectful and hope to be taken that way. With that said I do enjoy and appreciate what you do in the industry. A thank you from me.
-
I picked up two of the Sig Silo 2200, very disappointed for sure! I read so much hype about them being hands down better than the Vortex 1500 -- Simply not true! I talked to the Sig rep & he mentioned it could be the batteries that were used so he sent me two upgraded ones that are used in the 2400 models. (Duracell's) No difference in them. Our 2200's are best used in 0-900 yards at best, in most cases 800 yards is the best it will do & that's after you click the button a 1/2 dozen times! Once we did get a skosh over 1000 yards. The 1500 is brighter & will laser ranges side by side if not better than the Sig. I sold one of the Sigs & will be selling the other shortly. I have no idea how some here claim 2000 yards+ with this model. It simply is not true for us, as I mentioned I was very disappointed with them. Too, they have no way to attach them to your pack? The Vortex have a metal belt clip & slides perfectly on my packs horizontal chest strap.
It doesn't matter to me who owns what but those considering the 2200 may want to check out other units first!
ElkNut/Paul
Your experience is definitely different than the majority of the experiences shared around here.
I have heard others say the Sig Quality Assurance is not up to snuff. He is not alone.
-
How a range finder is used effects the results.
-Shaky hands and no tripod = reduced range (I am convinced this is my problem)
-Target composition: the larger, harder, flatter, and more perpendicular it is too you the better (grass, deer fur, anything dew covered, and evergreens seem to be the best at diffusing the beam).
-Sunlight, Fog and Rain = reduced range (If sunny try shooting something in the shade from a shaded position or wait for a cloud to cross over the sun. It will help, but your range will still be reduced.)
-Dirt or Scratched lens = reduced range
-Beam divergence (KILO2200 is 1.3MILRAD so its 4.68" at 1000 yards, most range finders are even bigger which can make ranging a distance target difficult to impossible if not enough laser is hitting the target or its hitting something else.)
-Not 100% sure on this, but I bet humidity has an impact too.
I did not get to try the Vortex outside the store, so my choice was based solely on the reticle difference and the menu layout. Previous to that I was going to get one or the other due to price, claimed performance, and what reviews had said about them.
-
dscubame, I understand your question & it's a legitimate one! I am a Vortex Dealer & have been for 9 years, I also bought a Swaro 80 HD Spotter & I own 10x42 Swarovision binos. I compare them & use them at times. Of course those are another subject! Just saying I'm not Vortex or nothing!
I sadly agree that with so much Pro Staff B/S out there these days it's tough to know who & what is legit & what's not! This is a big reason I buy these certain items so I can make my own comparisons. At 62 I'm not interested in lying to folks, I like to see products stand on their own merits. This is what I did with the Sig unit, it does not stand up to what the actual hype is, at least not in the two units I had! How many more will it take to find that one that does? It shouldn't be that way.
I'm serious about sending a trustworthy guy this one I still have, it's 2 months old, he will see what I see! Thanks!
ElkNut/Paul
-
Huntnphool is trustworthy
-
Thanks Paul and I meant it when I said I trust you. Thanks for not taking our conversation as negative and I believe we are on the same page.
Dialogue on forums can be difficult at best sometimes and was a pleasure with you.
-
LEICA GEOVIDS 10 X 40, best thing since sliced bread
-
Being a died in the wool Leopold scope guy, I went with their RX-600 range finder. Bad idea. After just 2 full seasons, the battery case cover just disintegrated on me. Leica will be my next purchase.
-
Own a Leica Rangefinder. Love it.
-
I've had a couple leupolds...never get close to their advertised range even in ideal conditions. I have their RX TBR 1200 model and if I can pick up a 6-700 yard reading its extremely rare. In hunting conditions it seems sometimes difficult to get 400 or 500 yard readings. I was so disgusted it with it after my last elk hunt when I got home I found a guy selling an old leica 1200...that thing is awesome! While it doesn't have the angle corrections, it actually works at long distances (1000+) in less than perfect conditions!
-
Leupold or Leica. Had great luck with Leupold. Wouldn't touch anything Vortex.
Why the ban on Vortex?
Every single person that I personally know has had issues with their Vortex stuff wether it is a scope, binocs or range finder. It is a good thing that their warranty is so great because you will more than likely need it. There is a reason that you see a lot of Vortex stuff for sale on this site and many others.
as usual I agree
-
sig kilo 2000. been very happy with it until my last trip in extreme cold it had trouble ranging. could have been the snow, couldn't verify.
had leupold rx1000?i before that, was very serviceable as an archery unit, lacked much for rifle.
-
Leupold or Leica. Had great luck with Leupold. Wouldn't touch anything Vortex.
Why the ban on Vortex?
Every single person that I personally know has had issues with their Vortex stuff wether it is a scope, binocs or range finder. It is a good thing that their warranty is so great because you will more than likely need it. There is a reason that you see a lot of Vortex stuff for sale on this site and many others.
as usual I agree
Agree x2.
As soon as I can afford it, I am switching over to another brand of binoculars. Had to send a pair of binos in 5 times in 3 years before they replaced them. My other pair fell apart after 3 years of use everyday and a going to send them in for a new pair. Don't own any vortex rifle scopes or range finders and never will. A buddy is selling a pair of Leica binos and is going to give me a hell of a deal on them. Binoculars first then a step up in range finders will follow. I bought a Leupold rx 850i TBR off of a member and love it.
-
Any reviews on the Vortex Ranger 1500?
-
One more day left on the Cabelas sale for the Sig Kilo 2200 $349 (regular is $499). My furthest so far with the Sig 2200 has been 1849 yards.
-
I use the Leupold 1200i, not happy at all though. It does not consistently give range reading and next to never ranges anything after 600 yards.
-
Leupold RX3 is what I have used for the past 11 years. I didn't need anything crazy and it was my first rangefinder, so I purchased second hand because they were there in front of me. I use it for bowhunting and turkey hunting, mostly, so for that it works just fine. When I am calling bears I will range some distances at the start of the stand to different landmarks. On a good surface it can range out to 800 in clear weather. Good surface and rain 400 yards. Poor surface - 400-500 yards with some coaxing (multiple punches on the button), Poor surface and rain 200-400 yards, or I am looking for a better surface. This is all hand held.
I do like the compact size, clear optics, reticle, ballistic comp, and battery life. It has also been very durable and immune to horrible weather.
I am pretty old school though with my hunting. I know the ballistics of my rifle, and don't dial in ranges. I don't shoot anything further than 400 yards with a rifle (unless I am lobbing bullets at a running coyote), and I bowhunt with a longbow so I can eyeball up to 40 yards pretty easily. I do stretch my barrel turkey hunting so it's nice to know how far out my field of fire is. My brother in law had Leica Geovids and those seemed to work on everything you pointed them at. So take this review for the :twocents: it's worth.
-
One more day left on the Cabelas sale for the Sig Kilo 2200 $349 (regular is $499). My furthest so far with the Sig 2200 has been 1849 yards.
:yeah:
tough to beat at that price !!!
-
I have a Leuopold RX600 and a 750. I wouldn't recommend either. I've been pretty disappointed.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
-
My RX600 was made in China. Explains things a bit.
-
I’m not surprised by the dramatic variances in experiences with the Sig. That mirrors my experience with Vortex optics for the most part; I’d have one that was disappointing and then a buddy would have one that was great. It seems like a QC issue to me.
I’ve settled on a two rangefinder set. I have the Terrapin for extreme ranging when I’m just out messing around and a used Leica 1600 that I picked up for a good price that comes hunting with me. Since very few people have a real, consistent use for a rangefinder capable of giving a range beyond 1200 yards I don’t think there’s much reason for the average shooter to worry about the ability to range a rock at 3000 yards. Even though I smile every time a get a reading on my stump at 4489 yards, I don’t have any practical use for that information. I do however have a use for a small and portable rangefinder that will give good readings to 1000-1200 yards max. Heck, I’m happy with 400 yards for my hunting rangefinder. I’ve never shot a big game animal beyond 360 yards!
-
I used to have a Leica (think it was a LRF 900) and it was a great rangefinder when it came out. Purchased roughly 10 years ago. Two years ago stepped up to the Vortex because it was much smaller and lighter. Honestly was expecting it to work better then my really old Leica but if anything I think it is worse then my old Leica. I find it hard to get ranges much past 500yrds with my Vortex 1000. The max range I ever got with my Leica was just shy of 1000yrds and so far the farthest I've been able to get with Vortex 1000 is a little under 700yrds.
-
Leica 1600B won't range quite as far as the Sig 2400 but is significantly easier and more consistent on target - just point and shoot while the Sig 2400 has a very narrow beam but less magnification that makes picking the target more difficult. If just ranging a hillside it doesn't matter but if trying to pick out an animal or stump the Leica can do it almost everytime handheld while the sig you almost need a tripod or steady rest. Ranging a 500 yard stump in a clearcut the Leica will give me a consistent reading while the Sig is all over the place unless I get a solid rest and hold the beam steady on it.
I do use the 2400 for its longer range and ballistics but for general use I think the Leica even at less than half the price is an easier unit to use for 800 yards and under.
-
I have a leupold RX600 that I have used for archery deer hunting with 0 issues and also for ranging 100-300 yard targets with 0 issues. Got the Leica Rangemaster 1600 for Christmas last year and those are really nice! We ranged a 15" steel gong at 1765 yards this last summer while out having some fun.
-
I think I have a pair of Nikon Laserforce rangefinding binoculars on Santa's sleigh.... :IBCOOL:
-
G7
-
Swarovski EL Range. Packed them for a few years and been happy with them; they haven't let me down yet.
-
Leica usually