Post by: PA BEN on February 04, 2018, 06:25:35 AM
Post by: bearpaw on February 04, 2018, 06:37:46 AM
He is the reason we don't have responsible cougar management in WA!
Post by: PA BEN on February 04, 2018, 07:28:31 AM
“I just want a severance package, and I want to be free from their tyranny,” Wielgus said of WSU. Is all he wants. He wants the tax payers to give him money for being a known liar and discredited by his own work and statements. Hell no to this!
Post by: dscubame on February 04, 2018, 07:40:01 AM
Post by: chukarchaser on February 04, 2018, 08:00:56 PM
Post by: Humptulips on February 04, 2018, 08:49:40 PM
Post by: Dan-o on February 04, 2018, 09:20:52 PM
Worst part is WSU and by that I mean the taxpayers will give him a big payout to get rid of him.
Sadly, you are probably right.
Post by: bearpaw on February 05, 2018, 07:21:09 AM
Worst part is WSU and by that I mean the taxpayers will give him a big payout to get rid of him.
Sadly, you are probably right.
:yeah: He's just being a big mouthpiece trying to make that happen!
Post by: Sandberm on February 05, 2018, 07:34:22 AM
Fairly empty article. Did not get anything out of it other than the guy is disgruntled and for what is not very clear.
I felt the same till I got to this part near the end.
"...Wielgus said his relationship with WSU, the situation with his lab and the backing of his research made a 180-degree turn when current President Kirk Schulz took over.
By 2016, Wielgus had submitted his now infamous claim that a Washington cattle rancher purposefully lured his livestock directly on top of a wolves’ den site. WSU and the College of Agricultural, Human and Natural Resources Sciences promptly disavowed Wielgus’s claim and apologized to the public in a press release issued Aug. 31, 2016.
The Daily News reported in May last year that Wielgus appeared to have been cleared of an accusation by the university that he misused state resources by using his WSU email for lobbying activities, though there was apparently evidence found that his use of email may have been a misuse of state resources in “regard to the content of the messaging and repeated recommendations from management to use private resources related to the activity in questions.”