Post by: wolfbait on March 20, 2018, 06:47:50 AM
http://dailycaller.com/2018/03/19/epa-scott-pruitt-secret-science/?utm_medium=email
Wondered where to post this article, the history of the wolf introduction was based on USFWS corruption along with "junk science" using a corrupt judge. The same corruption continues today incorporated with corrupt state game agencies.
Where's the accountability?
Post by: WAcoyotehunter on March 20, 2018, 07:34:48 AM
It's not up to the scientific community to make sure that everyone can understand it or 'believe' it.
Post by: mfswallace on March 20, 2018, 07:49:19 AM
That's good. Any science that is used to guide regulation should be published and available.
It's not up to the scientific community to make sure that everyone can understand it or 'believe' it.
Just like the wdfw did with wolves. Keep defending the corrupt practices of others and one soon might be seen as corrupt themsellves, even for all the other good one does...
http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,125941.0.html
Post by: pianoman9701 on March 20, 2018, 08:38:56 AM
Post by: idahohuntr on March 20, 2018, 08:57:26 AM
That's good. Any science that is used to guide regulation should be published and available.:yeah:
It's not up to the scientific community to make sure that everyone can understand it or 'believe' it.
This thread reminds me of Neil Degrasse Tyson quote..."I dream of a world where truth shapes peoples politics, rather than peoples politics shaping what people think is true"
Post by: Fl0und3rz on March 20, 2018, 09:03:20 AM
That's good. Any science that is used to guide regulation should be published and available.
It's not up to the scientific community to make sure that everyone can understand it or 'believe' it.
:yeah: