Hunting Washington Forum

Equipment & Gear => Guns and Ammo => Topic started by: Crunchy on October 17, 2018, 03:38:30 PM


Advertise Here
Title: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Crunchy on October 17, 2018, 03:38:30 PM
Looking for a little input.  Going to send my Rem 700 in 7mag to Benchmark.  Looks like they will blueprint the action, and barrel install for about $850.  I will have them also install a brake.  Any other work I should have them do?  Probably have the barrel fluted, not sure if they offer cerakote, but guessing they do not.  Looking for input on length and contour.  Its a hunting rifle so barrel so Im thinking 24-27 inch.  Most of my hunting is either mountain bike, or driving and glassing ridge to ridge.  Contour I know little about but they offer several different options so input there is appreciated if you know a little about their work. Which should I chose three or five groove, and a 1-9 twist?

Lastly,

Cerakote locations with decent turnaround
Decent stock to throw it into in the $500-$800 range

Thanks in advance.  This will give me something to do in the off season.

Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Wetwoodshunter on October 17, 2018, 03:46:28 PM
http://madcustomcoating.com

I recently talked to my old gunsmith that went under with the new regulations but he sent stuff to these guys. They are in Bremmerton, WA and come highly recommended from him.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Bob33 on October 17, 2018, 04:10:11 PM
If it doesn't already have one, get a good trigger like a Timney put on it.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: BULLBLASTER on October 17, 2018, 04:23:49 PM

As for stocks in the 500-800 range manners, McMillan, or agcompmposites
My 300 win has a 9 twist #5 spiral flutedinished at 28.5 inches.
For a 7 mag I would say 26+ on barrel length.
I’ll second the trigger also.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Bill W on October 17, 2018, 04:24:35 PM
I would be concerned with what chamber dimensions and the length of the throat.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: BULLBLASTER on October 17, 2018, 04:30:57 PM
Let them know what bullets you are thinking of wanting to use and ask their input on chamber specs, they know what works well.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Timberdog on October 17, 2018, 05:06:05 PM
Benchmark rebarreled a rifle for a friend and they cerakote
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Crunchy on October 17, 2018, 05:47:57 PM
Good advice on the trigger.  I should be able to pick up a Timney without too much trouble.

 

As for stocks in the 500-800 range manners, McMillan, or agcompmposites
My 300 win has a 9 twist #5 spiral flutedinished at 28.5 inches.
For a 7 mag I would say 26+ on barrel length.
I’ll second the trigger also.


28.5 finished including the brake?

Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: BULLBLASTER on October 17, 2018, 05:57:01 PM
Good advice on the trigger.  I should be able to pick up a Timney without too much trouble.

 

As for stocks in the 500-800 range manners, McMillan, or agcompmposites
My 300 win has a 9 twist #5 spiral flutedinished at 28.5 inches.
For a 7 mag I would say 26+ on barrel length.
I’ll second the trigger also.


28.5 finished including the brake?
mine is 28.5 before the brake. 30 ish including the brake
You definitely don’t need that much but I wouldn’t personally go shorter than 26 before the brake.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Reidus on October 17, 2018, 06:42:06 PM
I think a fluted #4 at 26" is ideal for a pack around hunting rifle. I wouldn't want to go any heavier or longer.

I hear a lot of good things about benchmark.

Manners elite hunter or mcmillan edge in whatever configuration you prefer. (order asap)

Just the standard trigger tech is pretty tough trigger to beat for a hunting rifle.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: CAMPMEAT on October 17, 2018, 06:59:29 PM
Put it in a Killer Innovations Orias Chassis.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Encore 280 on October 17, 2018, 07:35:25 PM
X2 on Mad Custom Coatings in Bremerton. They do excellent work. :tup: Had them do my 300 Weatherby and it turned out great.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: elkaholic123 on October 17, 2018, 07:55:13 PM
Trigger tech triggers are very nice. 👍
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: bullfisher on October 17, 2018, 08:26:10 PM
As mentioned above, talk to benchmark about chamber specs and your bullet preference.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Crunchy on October 17, 2018, 08:27:10 PM
I was looking at the old reliable Timney 510 which is only about 150 bones.  I will do a little look at trigger tech.

X2 on Mad Custom Coatings in Bremerton. They do excellent work. :tup: Had them do my 300 Weatherby and it turned out great.

What was the turn around time?  A friend used them and seemed that it was longer than they quoted by a few weeks.  Not a huge deal.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Encore 280 on October 17, 2018, 08:45:56 PM
Can't remember for sure but it wasn't more than a couple weeks. I wasn't in a big hurry so it didn't matter. Turn around time would depend on how busy they are too. If you're looking fo quality work I would highly recommend them.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Crunchy on October 17, 2018, 09:00:58 PM
I have an email to benchmark to see if they can start the barrel now, and after late rifle deer I send them the action to cut down on wait time.  Will order the stock soon since that will likely take a little wait time also. 
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: yorketransport on October 17, 2018, 09:10:58 PM
Put it in a Killer Innovations Orias Chassis.

You might be one of the only guys out there who’s familiar with or would recommend an Orias chassis. Everybody else forgot about those.  :chuckle:
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: CAMPMEAT on October 17, 2018, 09:13:34 PM
Put it in a Killer Innovations Orias Chassis.

You might be one of the only guys out there who’s familiar with or would recommend an Orias chassis. Everybody else forgot about those.  :chuckle:



You know Rick the owner ? I have one myself. Remington 700 in 308 sitting in it.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Karl Blanchard on October 17, 2018, 10:08:48 PM
Another vote for trigger tech.  I'd go 26 on the barrel.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: yorketransport on October 17, 2018, 10:38:49 PM
Put it in a Killer Innovations Orias Chassis.

You might be one of the only guys out there who’s familiar with or would recommend an Orias chassis. Everybody else forgot about those.  :chuckle:



You know Rick the owner ? I have one myself. Remington 700 in 308 sitting in it.


I met him a couple years back briefly while at their shop. I got a chance to see an early version of the chassis courtesy of Jay.sharkbait when he was working there. It’s a great design but I just haven’t found a good build to use one on.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: CaNINE on October 18, 2018, 06:57:37 AM
I’ve had benchmark do two builds for me.  Both rifles are quarter minute or better with custom loads very little copper pick up. Start with the bullet you want to shoot. They will work with you on the specs to achieve best results. If sticking with the 7RM I’d suggest throating and twisting for a 180 grain class bullet.  26” heavy sporter. Skip the flutes in my opinion.  Miller brake. Trigger tech. For a hunting rifle I like the McMillan m40a1 stock with adjustable riser. Personal preference. Bottom metal and mag well appropriately sized for the finished cartridge.  Upgrade the lug and do a ptg bolt with m16 extractor. Yes they cerecote.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Crunchy on October 18, 2018, 05:47:48 PM
Which contour.  Trying to decide between these two sporter contours.

Benchmark 5   1.250"   3.00"   .700"   26"   27"   6.0"   .875"   4.00 lbs
Benchmark 6   1.250"   3.25"   .750"   26"   27"   6.5"   .925"   4.46 lbs

Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Magnum_Willys on October 18, 2018, 06:53:03 PM
Hunting go lighter, bench go heavier
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: jasnt on October 18, 2018, 07:07:55 PM
I like straight tapper for every thing... but I’m a glutton for punishment
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Snakeriver on October 18, 2018, 07:17:41 PM
I've got 3 benchmark barrels. All finished at .750 at the muzzle. A 6.5 creedmore with a 24, a 7mm rem mag with a 26, and a 338 edge with a 27. All three rifles have brakes, and are a sendero taper. I wouldn't change a thing.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: yorketransport on October 18, 2018, 07:34:59 PM
I’d go with the #5. It’s a pretty good balance for a medium weight magnum. I’m not a big fan of muzzle brakes on hunting guns and a 7mm Mag with a #5 contour barrrel will be very manageable without a break. 
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: CaNINE on October 18, 2018, 08:10:19 PM
I’d go with a #5 without flutes.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Bob33 on October 18, 2018, 08:47:19 PM
Which contour.  Trying to decide between these two sporter contours.

Benchmark 5   1.250"   3.00"   .700"   26"   27"   6.0"   .875"   4.00 lbs
Benchmark 6   1.250"   3.25"   .750"   26"   27"   6.5"   .925"   4.46 lbs
How much more accurate will a heavier barrel make the first shot from a cold barrel be?
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: carpsniperg2 on October 18, 2018, 08:51:39 PM
I have 2 #4 and 2 #5 contours. All shoot well but I would go 5. They are money.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: opdinkslayer on October 19, 2018, 07:54:14 AM
Could a guy have a 26” #5 contour barrel on a remmy 700 action with a Bell & Carlson or HS precision stock & keep the bare rifle weight to around 8lbs?

I want to upgrade my 700DM 300wm with a barrel & stock but keep cost to a minimum. Any suggestions are welcome.👍🏻
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: BULLBLASTER on October 19, 2018, 08:04:40 AM
Could a guy have a 26” #5 contour barrel on a remmy 700 action with a Bell & Carlson or HS precision stock & keep the bare rifle weight to around 8lbs?

I want to upgrade my 700DM 300wm with a barrel & stock but keep cost to a minimum. Any suggestions are welcome.👍🏻
I don’t think that would get you there. I have a lone peak razor action with a 26 inch #5 and a manners stock and am over 8 lb. if you spiral fluted the barrel yu would be closer but I think the hs stock is still a bit too heavy to get you there.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Magnum_Willys on October 19, 2018, 08:31:26 AM
Im at 9# with manners elite stock, 28” carbon barrel sendero.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: opdinkslayer on October 19, 2018, 09:13:27 AM
I want it to be a well balanced hunting rifle with 800 yd accuracy but not be over 9lbs. I have a tikka superlight in 7RM. While it is super accurate, I find it a bit difficult to shoot accurately out to distance being so light. Thinking something 8-9 would be the ticket but not have to lug a 12-13 lb Lr rifle into the high country. Am I dreaming having a tight budget?
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Crunchy on October 19, 2018, 09:19:20 AM
Im at 9# with manners elite stock, 28” carbon barrel sendero.

Getting an Elite stock aint easy.  Been digging through their website, and unless you wait 4-6 months likely not going to find one laying around.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: BULLBLASTER on October 19, 2018, 09:28:03 AM
I want it to be a well balanced hunting rifle with 800 yd accuracy but not be over 9lbs. I have a tikka superlight in 7RM. While it is super accurate, I find it a bit difficult to shoot accurately out to distance being so light. Thinking something 8-9 would be the ticket but not have to lug a 12-13 lb Lr rifle into the high country. Am I dreaming having a tight budget?
Hang a spiral fluted #5 off that tikka and get a lightweight stock and you’ll be pretty good
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: BULLBLASTER on October 19, 2018, 09:29:06 AM
Im at 9# with manners elite stock, 28” carbon barrel sendero.

Getting an Elite stock aint easy.  Been digging through their website, and unless you wait 4-6 months likely not going to find one laying around.
Get it ordered ASAP.manners and McMillan are both long lead.  Another option is AGcomposite. Quicker turn around time on them
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Karl Blanchard on October 19, 2018, 09:43:34 AM
Im at 9# with manners elite stock, 28” carbon barrel sendero.

Getting an Elite stock aint easy.  Been digging through their website, and unless you wait 4-6 months likely not going to find one laying around.
Get it ordered ASAP.manners and McMillan are both long lead.  Another option is AGcomposite. Quicker turn around time on them
  killer stocks as well!  Wish I had gotten hands on one before I ordered my last McMillan.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: opdinkslayer on October 19, 2018, 10:08:55 AM
I want it to be a well balanced hunting rifle with 800 yd accuracy but not be over 9lbs. I have a tikka superlight in 7RM. While it is super accurate, I find it a bit difficult to shoot accurately out to distance being so light. Thinking something 8-9 would be the ticket but not have to lug a 12-13 lb Lr rifle into the high country. Am I dreaming having a tight budget?
Hang a spiral fluted #5 off that tikka and get a lightweight stock and you’ll be pretty good

That’s an idea but I kind of want to shoot a 200+ grainer out of the 300 wm & it’s accuracy is less than desirable. Wondering if factory magazine length with heavy for caliber bullets would be an issue in either the 700DM 300 wm or tikka 7 mag?
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: BULLBLASTER on October 19, 2018, 10:14:19 AM
I want it to be a well balanced hunting rifle with 800 yd accuracy but not be over 9lbs. I have a tikka superlight in 7RM. While it is super accurate, I find it a bit difficult to shoot accurately out to distance being so light. Thinking something 8-9 would be the ticket but not have to lug a 12-13 lb Lr rifle into the high country. Am I dreaming having a tight budget?
Hang a spiral fluted #5 off that tikka and get a lightweight stock and you’ll be pretty good

That’s an idea but I kind of want to shoot a 200+ grainer out of the 300 wm & it’s accuracy is less than desirable. Wondering if factory magazine length with heavy for caliber bullets would be an issue in either the 700DM 300 wm or tikka 7 mag?
sorry to threadjack the op. But you would wouldn’t get everything you need in length from the tikka for the 300. I am loading 215 to a oal of 3.74 in my 300 win. A long throated 300 wsm could be pretty good on a tikka. Except it would still be a tikka.  :chuckle: had to get my jab in! 
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Reidus on October 19, 2018, 10:14:22 AM
Im at 9# with manners elite stock, 28” carbon barrel sendero.

Getting an Elite stock aint easy.  Been digging through their website, and unless you wait 4-6 months likely not going to find one laying around.
Get it ordered ASAP.manners and McMillan are both long lead.  Another option is AGcomposite. Quicker turn around time on them
  killer stocks as well!  Wish I had gotten hands on one before I ordered my last McMillan.

I wouldn't recommend their tikka option. 
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Reidus on October 19, 2018, 10:18:30 AM
Tikka action is not that great for LA cartridges with long heavy bullets. It's great for SA cartridges with heavies. I have a 7wsm that's throated out and get about 3000fps with 180s which is similar to 7 mag performance.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: carpsniperg2 on October 19, 2018, 11:02:46 AM
Could a guy have a 26” #5 contour barrel on a remmy 700 action with a Bell & Carlson or HS precision stock & keep the bare rifle weight to around 8lbs?

I want to upgrade my 700DM 300wm with a barrel & stock but keep cost to a minimum. Any suggestions are welcome.👍🏻

My 5’s are both 26 before the brake. And in a similar stock and they come in 8.5-9lbs bare. One has a oversized bolt knob and Wyatt’s bottom the other is just hinged floor plate so it’s about 1/2  pound or so lighter.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Magnum_Willys on October 19, 2018, 11:13:51 AM
Im at 9# with manners elite stock, 28” carbon barrel sendero.

Getting an Elite stock aint easy.  Been digging through their website, and unless you wait 4-6 months likely not going to find one laying around.
Yep, 9 month build time on mine - 6 mo for stock, 7 for barrel, 5 for action. Then add 6 weeks for hydrodip After rifle in their hand. 
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: opdinkslayer on October 19, 2018, 11:27:00 AM
Sorry for the thread jack but I appreciate all the input from the resident gun guys. Would like to hear more on the performance of the 7wsm/180’s from a built tikka?🤔
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Karl Blanchard on October 19, 2018, 11:54:34 AM
Sorry for the thread jack but I appreciate all the input from the resident gun guys. Would like to hear more on the performance of the 7wsm/180’s from a built tikka?🤔
throat it long on a 26"+ barrel and shouldn't be too hard to achieve.  I run the 185's out of my 300wsm at 3110.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: b23 on October 19, 2018, 03:00:51 PM
Sorry for the thread jack but I appreciate all the input from the resident gun guys. Would like to hear more on the performance of the 7wsm/180’s from a built tikka?🤔

I'm running the 180gr Berger's 3088-3100 from my 7mm Blaser Mag built on a Rem LA 700 with a 26in Hart #4, if you're looking for 7mm ideas.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Crunchy on October 19, 2018, 07:10:46 PM
What input do you have on bottom metal.  I am looking at HS Precision detachable magazine bottom metal, mainly for longer cartridges.  Bit pricey, but if there are no other reasonable options I dont mind paying. 
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: BULLBLASTER on October 19, 2018, 07:15:17 PM
I like my Hawkins bdl bottom metal and Wyatt’s box. If I was going detachable it would be one of the ai pattern options

This is the first I googled up. 

http://pacifictoolandgauge.com/remington-700-detachable-mag-bottom-metal-dbm/7907-remington-long-action-la-stealth-338-lapua-cip-3850-length-detachable-mag-bottom-metal.html
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Reidus on October 19, 2018, 07:37:07 PM
I wouldn't mind ai if they had a mag that was flush. Curtis custom might make something like that.

The seekins rifles have a decent looking mag system on them. I been meaning to look into it more.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Crunchy on October 19, 2018, 07:39:38 PM
Yeah, nothing easy.  Need to figure out bottom metal before I can order the stock.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: BULLBLASTER on October 19, 2018, 07:46:23 PM
If you want flush then bdl floor plate is the best option imo
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Crunchy on October 19, 2018, 07:55:51 PM
I want to go with detachable mags.  All else fails I will go hinged floor plate.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: carpsniperg2 on October 19, 2018, 08:09:47 PM
Wyatts all the way for me if I go detachable.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: b23 on October 19, 2018, 09:05:26 PM
What input do you have on bottom metal.  I am looking at HS Precision detachable magazine bottom metal, mainly for longer cartridges.  Bit pricey, but if there are no other reasonable options I dont mind paying.

I have a few rifles with HS Det. mags and they've been great, they feed well and are nealy flush across the bottom of the stock but in the long actions they are more limited for long OAL's.  I don't remember off the top off my head but my LA one only allows for an OAL of a little over 3.600.  I have a Seekins det. mag setup on my 300AX and it'll go all the way out to 3.900 but I'm not sure Seekins still makes those and it sticks down much further than my HS setup does.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Crunchy on October 19, 2018, 09:40:46 PM
Ya HS Gen 2 in long action is- 3.70.  That can work but really isnt any longer that my stock mags.  I was hoping for a little more wiggle room.  Current cartridge COAL is 3.5 and I would like to push that out a bit, but had some feeding issues.  I looked at Wyatt's and theirs are 3.7 also.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Reidus on October 19, 2018, 10:54:10 PM
this is what i was thinking of. AI style mag that sticks down 1/2".

http://www.curtiscustom.com/product/magazines/

looks like they're working on an extended one.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Karl Blanchard on October 20, 2018, 08:35:44 AM
PTG box will get you 4.0
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Reidus on October 20, 2018, 09:50:51 AM
PTG box will get you 4.0

Doesn't that require some milling on the action?
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Karl Blanchard on October 20, 2018, 10:39:40 AM
PTG box will get you 4.0

Doesn't that require some milling on the action?
so does a wyatt's.  If you are having a rifle BUILT, then a bit of action milling isn't even something to blink at
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Crunchy on October 20, 2018, 10:54:29 AM
Was hoping that the stock builder will inlet for whichever bottom metal I pick.  I know Manners and McMillan will do it, not sure about others.  Just have to pick well known bottom metal design.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: b23 on October 20, 2018, 12:56:33 PM
I don't know about all of the different det. mag setups but my HS Prec det. mags and my Seekins det. mag setups were all used on stocks that originally had standard Remington BDL bottom metal.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: yorketransport on October 20, 2018, 08:12:08 PM
Was hoping that the stock builder will inlet for whichever bottom metal I pick.  I know Manners and McMillan will do it, not sure about others.  Just have to pick well known bottom metal design.

It seems like most bottom metal is designated either M4 or M5 inlet. The M4 style will drop into most BDL inlets in a stock but the M5 style requires a special inlet. I have the Wyatt's bottom metal and 5 round magazine setup on a stock right now and it's not bad. The mag locks in securely but it rattles terribly. I do like the mag release though.

I bought this stock and Wyatt's bottom metal package as a secondary stock for my Nucleus action and it's a decent deal for $430.
https://www.stockysstocks.com/stocks-by-brand/stocky-s/stocky-s-accublocks/accublockr-long-range-composite-stocks/package-deal-stocky-sr-long-range-composite-premium-finished-stock-with-wyatt-s-m4-det-mag.html

this is what i was thinking of. AI style mag that sticks down 1/2".

http://www.curtiscustom.com/product/magazines/

looks like they're working on an extended one.

The only problems with the Curtis Custom mags are the price, availability and the max OAL. They're $130, never in stock, and have a max OAL of 3.625". Accurate-Mag does make a 3rd mag that allows a 3.750" OAL and is about 1" shorter than the 5rd version. My 5rd Wyatt's mag hangs down almost exactly 2" so I'd expect the 3rd version to hang about 1" bellow the stock.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Crunchy on November 08, 2018, 03:41:32 PM
Got my bottom metal (HS-Precision), trigger (Trigger tech), and barrel ordered from Benchmark, went with 27 inch 5 contour with the Miller brake 1-9 twist 5 grove.  On the hunt now for a good stock.  Checking Manners daily to try and find a EH-1 flat top, just curious if anyone has an intel on these.  Looks like I can get my hands on one in just a couple of weeks rather than 4-5 months for a Manners.  McMillan isnt much better.

http://agcomposites.com/rifle-alpine-hunter/
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Karl Blanchard on November 08, 2018, 03:45:37 PM
Agc are great!
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: huntnphool on November 08, 2018, 04:23:57 PM
When are we going to see another huntwa group purchase deal? :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Reidus on November 08, 2018, 04:30:50 PM
Agc are great!

I was less than thrilled with the AGC for the tikka. Main problem was how it was inletted. With the Rem 700 one you're probably fine. The Tikka one is a poor retrofit of the 700 stock to fit a tikka.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Crunchy on November 08, 2018, 05:16:53 PM
When are we going to see another huntwa group purchase deal? :rolleyes:

I must have missed out on the first one.  How many years ago was that?
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Karl Blanchard on November 08, 2018, 05:53:23 PM
Agc are great!

I was less than thrilled with the AGC for the tikka. Main problem was how it was inletted. With the Rem 700 one you're probably fine. The Tikka one is a poor retrofit of the 700 stock to fit a tikka.
good thing he has a 700 then :tup:
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: CAMPMEAT on November 09, 2018, 08:44:31 AM
How come nobody buys a chassis for their build ?
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: BULLBLASTER on November 09, 2018, 09:54:12 AM
How come nobody buys a chassis for their build ?
Speaking for myself here, but they are heavier and I don’t need the accessory options on a hunting rifle. As long as I can mount a bipod I’m fine. Plus I like the looks of a composite stock much better.
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Karl Blanchard on November 09, 2018, 10:03:49 AM
How come nobody buys a chassis for their build ?
Speaking for myself here, but they are heavier and I don’t need the accessory options on a hunting rifle. As long as I can mount a bipod I’m fine. Plus I like the looks of a composite stock much better.
  exact same reasons for me as well.  I just cant see a single benefit to going chassis over composite
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: kentrek on November 09, 2018, 10:25:59 AM
Chasis would be awesome for those that hunt off a tripod but they're too heavey and would be cruddy on the hands for packing, esp in cold weather.

It might be an option for a dedicated long range gun that needs the weight and will ride in your pack until you get to your crows nest..esp a folder

Everything is a compromise
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: b23 on November 09, 2018, 11:19:52 AM
Here a few months ago I had the opportunity to buy a near new XLR Carbon chassis for $400.  I probably should have pulled the trigger on it, since it was such a good deal, but I passed.  Just about everything I have is in the 11-11++ lbs range and the thought of adding even more weight, didn't really excite me to much.  But, I still kinda kick myself for not picking it up, if nothing else, just to see if I would have liked it long term or not, that, and I hate passing up a good deal.  :bash:
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: jasnt on November 09, 2018, 12:29:36 PM
My chassis rig is my fav hunting rifle
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: yorketransport on November 09, 2018, 02:44:30 PM
How come nobody buys a chassis for their build ?

They’re alright for some applications but I don’t like them for my style of hunting. They’re heavier, have more edges to snag on brush, ring like a bell when a branch hits them and they’re COLD!!! :chuckle:

I’ve had XLR, Killer Innovations, PDC, MDT, KRG, J Allen and Mcree chassis and the only one left is the McRee on the 338 SnipeTac. I even worked with Jay.sharkbait to design a chassis for the CZ 527 and Savage actions.

One of my biggest complaints though is the cost. I know exactly how much it costs to manufacture one and the prices they sell for are obscene sometimes. Profit’s not a bad word, but some of these companies just over charge to gouge shooters who don’t know better.  :twocents:
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: Crunchy on November 09, 2018, 03:00:49 PM
So when I ordered my barrel from Benchmark I have them the twist, grooves, contour and length.  I later wondered if they needed to know my bullet preference.  So I shot them an email, and the nice lady who handles the office stuff said that they didnt need it.  Maybe I have been reading too much online stuff.  Do I need to make sure the smith has this info, or is it not a big deal?
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: wooltie on November 09, 2018, 10:09:35 PM
I have a 24", #5 fluted for my 30-06. Go #5 or go home! Love me a stout barrel that's not that heavy.

Bench made the barrel is like 6 weeks, pretty fast turn. I was choosing between a bench or a lilja. Both barrels have identical specs, but bench is local, faster mfg time and saved money on shipping.

I had Freud install the barrel.  Fwiw Freud told me that bench barrels are really freaking straight, which doesn't affect accuracy, he just has observed that their barrels don't wobble on the lathe so to speak. 

Man once you put aftermarket steel on one gun it is so tempting to replace all you barrels.

I
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: hogslayer on November 09, 2018, 10:25:51 PM
So when I ordered my barrel from Benchmark I have them the twist, grooves, contour and length.  I later wondered if they needed to know my bullet preference.  So I shot them an email, and the nice lady who handles the office stuff said that they didnt need it.  Maybe I have been reading too much online stuff.  Do I need to make sure the smith has this info, or is it not a big deal?

You just need to have a fast enough twist for the bullet you will be shooting.  Each bullet manufacture has a recommended twist.  Berger just changed there’s to a little slower.  Going with a fatter twist is better than slower.  The gun smith will chamber the round you wish with the amount of freebore you should need to get the bullet to the neck should junction.  If you going to shoot a 300 win mag and a 210 vld, you would be ok with a 212 eldx or 215 Berger etc
Title: Re: Benchmark barrels
Post by: CAMPMEAT on November 10, 2018, 07:11:32 AM
How come nobody buys a chassis for their build ?

They’re alright for some applications but I don’t like them for my style of hunting. They’re heavier, have more edges to snag on brush, ring like a bell when a branch hits them and they’re COLD!!! :chuckle:

I’ve had XLR, Killer Innovations, PDC, MDT, KRG, J Allen and Mcree chassis and the only one left is the McRee on the 338 SnipeTac. I even worked with Jay.sharkbait to design a chassis for the CZ 527 and Savage actions.

One of my biggest complaints though is the cost. I know exactly how much it costs to manufacture one and the prices they sell for are obscene sometimes. Profit’s not a bad word, but some of these companies just over charge to gouge shooters who don’t know better.  :twocents:





I've got a Killer Innovations and 2 MDT LSS Chassis. They're great for me, but a little expensive. I can't hunt anymore, except out of the truck because of my knees. So the long range is only what I use them for..
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal