Hunting Washington Forum

Community => Advocacy, Agencies, Access => Topic started by: wolfbait on May 26, 2021, 01:28:38 PM


Advertise Here
Title: ATF Nominee Offers 'Insanely Broad' Definition of 'Assault Weapon,' Which He Wan
Post by: wolfbait on May 26, 2021, 01:28:38 PM
ATF Nominee Offers 'Insanely Broad' Definition of 'Assault Weapon,' Which He Wants Banned

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2021/05/26/atf-nominee-argues-americans-should-have-to-register-their-ar15s-n2590030?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=05/26/2021&bcid=946724a696a2b55a5467f1618aba8d61&recip=26719923
Title: Re: ATF Nominee Offers 'Insanely Broad' Definition of 'Assault Weapon,' Which He Wan
Post by: timberfaller on May 26, 2021, 01:33:21 PM
Watch the RINO's cave on this one just like they did for the DOJ gal! :bash:
Title: Re: ATF Nominee Offers 'Insanely Broad' Definition of 'Assault Weapon,' Which He Wan
Post by: pawpaw1934 on May 26, 2021, 04:04:28 PM
The state of Washington votes primarily Democrat. Many of the posters on this site probably voted Blue. They are all getting what they deserve. People need to learn to vote their principles and morals and not necessarily for a person. Someone might have thought that the Orange man is bad....but damn, hard to argue his policies and results....
Title: Re: ATF Nominee Offers 'Insanely Broad' Definition of 'Assault Weapon,' Which He Wan
Post by: csaaphill on May 26, 2021, 04:45:17 PM
I don't own one, and if I get one before any more of this insanity goes through I wouldn't register it. He can choke.
Title: Re: ATF Nominee Offers 'Insanely Broad' Definition of 'Assault Weapon,' Which He Wan
Post by: Boss .300 winmag on May 26, 2021, 09:07:29 PM
R E V O L U T I O N is getting nearer.🤯
Title: Re: ATF Nominee Offers 'Insanely Broad' Definition of 'Assault Weapon,' Which He Wan
Post by: Dan-o on May 26, 2021, 09:21:15 PM
Not good.
Title: Re: ATF Nominee Offers 'Insanely Broad' Definition of 'Assault Weapon,' Which He Wan
Post by: Cougartail on May 26, 2021, 09:54:42 PM
R E V O L U T I O N is getting nearer.🤯
:sry:

Can it wait until Sleepy Joe is done napping?
Title: Re: ATF Nominee Offers 'Insanely Broad' Definition of 'Assault Weapon,' Which He Wan
Post by: csaaphill on May 28, 2021, 03:50:07 PM
R E V O L U T I O N is getting nearer.🤯
:yeah:
Title: Re: ATF Nominee Offers 'Insanely Broad' Definition of 'Assault Weapon,' Which He Wan
Post by: konradcountry on June 06, 2021, 09:30:41 AM
Chipman is such a scumbag. He is trying to argue that "well regulated" means government regulation instead of well stocked. Someone should ask him what exactly SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED means. 
Title: Re: ATF Nominee Offers 'Insanely Broad' Definition of 'Assault Weapon,' Which He Wan
Post by: SGTDuffman on June 06, 2021, 10:28:47 AM
I don't own one, and if I get one before any more of this insanity goes through I wouldn't register it. He can choke.

I'm not saying you specifically because I have no idea what you do or do not own, but this kind of thinking is dangerous for us. Washington's "assault rifle" definition is so broad that it covers many VERY common firearms, that would never be typically classified as an  "assault rifle".

If you own a Marlin Model 60, Marlin 795, Ruger 10/22, Remington 7400, Remington Model 8, Remington 750, Browning SA22, etc, you own an "assault rifle". ANY semiautomatic rifle in this state is an "assault rifle". It doesn't need a detachable magazine. It doesn't have caliber restrictions. If it's a rifle and it loads the next round for you, it's an "assault rifle" in the state of Washington.

Outside of their wacky definitions of this type of gun or that type of gun, we should all be standing together against bans or regulation of any type of gun. They aren't going to stop with one, just because you don't have it or don't care if its regulated or not. If you give them an inch they'll take a mile. It's all divide and conquer. That's why they divide people. It's easier to systematically pick off small divided groups than an enormous united group. They'll divide anyone along any lines they can, then pick them off one group at a time.
Title: Re: ATF Nominee Offers 'Insanely Broad' Definition of 'Assault Weapon,' Which He Wan
Post by: konradcountry on June 06, 2021, 12:36:17 PM
If you own a Marlin Model 60, Marlin 795, Ruger 10/22, Remington 7400, Remington Model 8, Remington 750, Browning SA22, etc, you own an "assault rifle". ANY semiautomatic rifle in this state is an "assault rifle". It doesn't need a detachable magazine. It doesn't have caliber restrictions. If it's a rifle and it loads the next round for you, it's an "assault rifle" in the state of Washington.

I was just telling someone last week that his 10/22 is now an assault rifle. He was shocked and just assumed that rimfire was exempt.

1639 was not only anti-2A but poorly written. You need a training class for a 10/22 but not a Saiga shotgun. They also didn't require that the training class meet any type of standard certification. Idiots.

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal