Post by: tlbradford on April 26, 2009, 04:08:56 PM
So for all the horndogs out there, Mray, Bucklucky, you know who you are...enjoy.
And to you other photographers, let me know how I could have improved these shots, or what settings you might have used in these conditions.
The link so as not to offend our lovely lady members and kids
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tlbradford2009/sets/72157617269943487/ (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tlbradford2009/sets/72157617269943487/)
And a little sample.
Post by: MuleySniper on April 26, 2009, 04:30:00 PM
MS
Post by: Slider on April 26, 2009, 04:38:43 PM
Post by: mossback91 on April 26, 2009, 04:56:14 PM
Hey wait a minute. I saw those same gals at the Deja Vu!!!.................. :chuckle:
:chuckle:
Post by: bucklucky on April 26, 2009, 08:04:51 PM
Your my new favorite Moderator :chuckle: Nice pics!! Too bad the wife walked in just as I opened your link :chuckle:
Post by: dp1175 on April 26, 2009, 10:22:47 PM
Post by: bowhunterforever on April 26, 2009, 10:59:23 PM
Post by: whacker1 on April 27, 2009, 01:56:55 PM
Post by: Curly on April 27, 2009, 02:12:47 PM
Post by: whacker1 on April 27, 2009, 03:53:06 PM
Post by: tlbradford on April 27, 2009, 04:34:51 PM
Post by: TeacherMan on April 27, 2009, 04:42:08 PM
Post by: road.kill on April 27, 2009, 06:36:16 PM
but you can tell some are more clear than others and the lighting is different in some. im not a big photography guy but just noticed
Post by: TeacherMan on April 27, 2009, 06:42:00 PM
i kinda like them all :dunno:
but you can tell some are more clear than others and the lighting is different in some. im not a big photography guy but just noticed
ya I was looking at the lighting and clarity also :chuckle:
Post by: popeshawnpaul on April 28, 2009, 07:37:44 PM
Oh yeah, hot chicks!
Post by: bow-n-head on April 28, 2009, 07:43:03 PM
Post by: GoPlayOutside on April 28, 2009, 07:51:34 PM
Post by: 509er on April 28, 2009, 08:08:18 PM
Post by: tlbradford on April 28, 2009, 08:08:44 PM
I think you did a real good job with it. Some were soft and I might have tried to use the faster f1.4 more than the f2.8. Also, it's better to be grainy than fuzzy from movement. What I mean is push your ISO to get shutter speed when needed. Some of the photos are a bit soft from camera or subject movement.
Oh yeah, hot chicks!
Shawn, would you have used AI Servo? I didn't try it out, and I think it would have worked better than one shot focus.
Post by: furbearer365 on April 28, 2009, 08:24:04 PM
Post by: Country-cutie on April 29, 2009, 01:51:15 PM
Post by: whacker1 on April 29, 2009, 01:53:55 PM
Post by: mossback91 on April 29, 2009, 01:55:17 PM
Look everyone, she is waving at me. :kneel:
You mean shes not waving at me?!?!?! >:(
Post by: popeshawnpaul on April 29, 2009, 10:57:24 PM
I think you did a real good job with it. Some were soft and I might have tried to use the faster f1.4 more than the f2.8. Also, it's better to be grainy than fuzzy from movement. What I mean is push your ISO to get shutter speed when needed. Some of the photos are a bit soft from camera or subject movement.
Oh yeah, hot chicks!
Shawn, would you have used AI Servo? I didn't try it out, and I think it would have worked better than one shot focus.
You know, I go through that question a lot with Canon. It seems the Al Servo isn't terribly accurate but better than one shot on moving subjects. On non-moving subjects it seems the one shot is much more accurate. In the end I use Al Servo and live with the inconsistent results at times. Most of the object I shoot are moving though.