Hunting Washington Forum
Community => Advocacy, Agencies, Access => Topic started by: Mr Mykiss on November 23, 2021, 03:50:10 PM
-
Anybody know their level of involvement?
I know they took a lot of money from the folks that worked to end predator hunting in BC.
Anybody know?
-
Not sure I’m understanding you correctly, but are you looking for a link between BHA and the loss of a spring bear permit hunting?
-
Anybody know their level of involvement?
I know they took a lot of money from the folks that worked to end predator hunting in BC.
Anybody know?
I saw one post on FB from them asking for hunters to comment. They are not known for predator management.
-
https://www.facebook.com/groups/WashingtonBackcountryHunters/
I don't have FB or I'd ask in the thread why an organization that gets privately funded by hunters isn't adhering to some of their stated goals:
-Organizing chapter members to interact with elected and agency leaders relevant to BHA's mission and our shared passion for public lands, waters and wildlife.
I was a WA BHA member for 1x year and gave it up at the complete lack of action taken, other than the occasional trash cleanup.
-
Not a BHA member but I poked around some.
They're not to blame here.
Note the Oct 27 date of this post, there's also a new post shsring the story from the statesman examiner newspaper.
I also notice they had 2 shares and 9 likes, so it didn't get a lot of traction there either.
-
1900 members in the Washington chapter, very very little input on the two threads talking about spring bear
-
They're not to blame, but they didn't help either.
Here's how much they cared after the fact
-
SCI inland northwest didn't do any better with their 495 members
-
.
-
So IMO its not the hunting .orgs to blame.
NOT BHA, not SCI not INWC none of them.
Hunters just don't give a chit until its gone.
Hunting Washington forum is the most pro-active social media site I've seen in any platform BY FAR for Washington, even so it's less than 10% of all Washington hunters, and low participation in these threads.
On a hunting site like this....loosing spring bear thread ougt to eclipse a Kyle Rittenhouse thread :'(
-
So IMO its not the hunting .orgs to blame.
NOT BHA, not SCI not INWC none of them.
Hunters just don't give a chit until its gone.
Hunting Washington forum is the most pro-active social media site I've seen in any platform BY FAR for Washington, even so it's less than 10% of all Washington hunters, and low participation in these threads.
On a hunting site like this....loosing spring bear thread ougt to eclipse a Kyle Rittenhouse thread :'(
I Agree.
I have to believe that the spring bear hunt issue will ramp up a little more after the first of the year,when there not able to buy there permit app. But who knows I may be wrong.
-
BHA sent an e-mail to all members telling them to comment on supporting the hunt along with the links on how to do it.
-
BHA sent an e-mail to all members telling them to comment on supporting the hunt along with the links on how to do it.
Thanks :tup:
-
Not looking to blame. Looking for help.
-
Are you looking to join a .org and want advice?
I read your post as finger pointing, sorry. There's been a lot of negative and heated discussion about BHA on this forum, so I was biased that you were pointing fingers at them.
I'm no fan of BHA and its origions, but they've done some good work and seem to have good people in the local chapters.
-
The hunting org’s are to blame for a lack of any sort of anything to fight this action. So are we hunters. We’re famous for it. The anti hunting orgs are good at making this stuff happen. We’ll suffer because of it.
-
Where was SCI, WWC, etc?
-
So IMO its not the hunting .orgs to blame.
NOT BHA, not SCI not INWC none of them.
Hunters just don't give a chit until its gone.
Hunting Washington forum is the most pro-active social media site I've seen in any platform BY FAR for Washington, even so it's less than 10% of all Washington hunters, and low participation in these threads.
On a hunting site like this....loosing spring bear thread ougt to eclipse a Kyle Rittenhouse thread :'(
Nailed it KF 👍
-
So IMO its not the hunting .orgs to blame.
NOT BHA, not SCI not INWC none of them.
Hunters just don't give a chit until its gone.
Hunting Washington forum is the most pro-active social media site I've seen in any platform BY FAR for Washington, even so it's less than 10% of all Washington hunters, and low participation in these threads.
On a hunting site like this....loosing spring bear thread ougt to eclipse a Kyle Rittenhouse thread :'(
I couldn’t agree more. Seems the majority of hunters would rather bitch and moan about the results than be proactive before it happens.
-
So IMO its not the hunting .orgs to blame.
NOT BHA, not SCI not INWC none of them.
Hunters just don't give a chit until its gone.
Hunting Washington forum is the most pro-active social media site I've seen in any platform BY FAR for Washington, even so it's less than 10% of all Washington hunters, and low participation in these threads.
On a hunting site like this....loosing spring bear thread ougt to eclipse a Kyle Rittenhouse thread :'(
Bingo. This site morphing into a political forum hasn't helped things.
-
So IMO its not the hunting .orgs to blame.
NOT BHA, not SCI not INWC none of them.
Hunters just don't give a chit until its gone.
Hunting Washington forum is the most pro-active social media site I've seen in any platform BY FAR for Washington, even so it's less than 10% of all Washington hunters, and low participation in these threads.
On a hunting site like this....loosing spring bear thread ougt to eclipse a Kyle Rittenhouse thread :'(
Bingo. This site morphing into a political forum hasn't helped things.
I commented on them removing permits, I believe I asked for OTC spring bear with some revisions to the regs.
Heck they where supposed to just decrease permits by 10 permits or something.
Even a lot of us that are more proactive with the department and commission didn't see this coming.
The anti's complain and they do whatever they want.
Us as hunters make suggestions ,we are told that we have to submit rule changes at three year management plan.
We as hunters have to wait three years to submit rule changes,then when submit,there's no guarantee that it turns into a proposal that the commission will even consider.
It's just BS
Just basically they make hunters jump through all the hoops to make rule changes ,the general public that don't even buy a licence have more say than we do.
You can't really blame it on hunters,the meeting was Durring prime hunting season,and we would get the shaft anyway.
-
Agree with hunter399 on this. What the hell can we do? I've sent emails, made phone calls, suggestions..... THEY JUST DON'T GIVE A CRAP!!! No matter what we say or do, they steer the ship where they want to. They don't even care if we all didn't send them another dime, they'd love to see the whole program go under. So, lets get another petition and make some more emails......
-
Agree with hunter399 on this. What the hell can we do? I've sent emails, made phone calls, suggestions..... THEY JUST DON'T GIVE A CRAP!!! No matter what we say or do, they steer the ship where they want to. They don't even care if we all didn't send them another dime, they'd love to see the whole program go under. So, lets get another petition and make some more emails......
I'm not saying we should give up.
This whole stunt is a political ,emotional,bunch of BS.
Basicly the anti's didn't submit this as a rule change,it should of never been voted on,and even if they did,we are not at the end of our three management plan. Where ending or pausing the season should even be considered.
All I'm saying or asking is why do these animal rights people don't have to jump through the same hoops as us hunters.
-
There has to be a loop hole somewhere to repeal the commission. The fact that this is not what the "proposal" was is BS.
-
I do think we all should send email to the department.
Asking that all future comments collected by the department should have to include a wild I'd # .
Basically if you don't take hunter ed,or have a wild id your
Voice is nothing.
How can we let people that don't even live in this state manage our wildlife. Don't put conservation dollars in have a bigger voice than guys like us who have paid hard earned money our whole lives to some of these programs.
Sorry for the rant posts.
I've been bitting my tongue ,watching this unfold.
Now I'm starting to get a little pissed.
Sorry.
-
I don't disagree with any of the above and that's why I said so many hunters have thrown in the towel.
We're fighting an uphill battle, but we have had some successes, so I think giving up isn't the right answer either.
Our #1 enemy to hunting is Jay Inslee, he makes these appointments and hampers WDFW in their efforts when it comes to wolf removals or predator hunting rule changes..he uses WDFW as a political tool pandering to the radical left voter, his base.
imo what hunters need to do is pressure the .orgs they belong too, remember RMEF and wolves? RMEF corporate hesitated in coming out for wolf management, its membership raised hell and quit paying dues and donations (myself included) and they changed course and threw their influence behind wolf management.
BHA, SCI, WWC, NWWC all the .orgs we join need to feel pressure, they need to be the sheep dog that steers its flock into making these calls, participating in these meetings and basically taking the lefts playbook for ourselves.
We also need more participants from HW forums to answer the call. I'm going to discuss this with HW management and see what we mods can do here to better spotlight this issue and drive up calls to action, if hunting in Washington is lost, what use is this forum?
-
What happened to the law suit we heard about last spring? Perhaps that needs revisited.
-
What happened to the law suit we heard about last spring? Perhaps that needs revisited.
It got dropped ,I think .
I might go back to the future :chuckle: :chuckle:
And go back and watch the commission meeting leading up to this. Just to see how it was proposed and all the jazz leading up to this.
And try to see why and how this "emergency" closure went down. Since we are no where close to the three year management plan ,when rule changes should take place.
-
Sadly, I don't know if enough could have been done by anyone to save spring bear, until we get a governor that appoints hunters to the commission I think WA hunters will continue to lose hunting opportunities. :dunno:
-
Sadly, I don't know if enough could have been done by anyone to save spring bear, until we get a governor that appoints hunters to the commission I think WA hunters will continue to lose hunting opportunities. :dunno:
:yeah:
-
Agree with hunter399 on this. What the hell can we do? I've sent emails, made phone calls, suggestions..... THEY JUST DON'T GIVE A CRAP!!! No matter what we say or do, they steer the ship where they want to. They don't even care if we all didn't send them another dime, they'd love to see the whole program go under. So, lets get another petition and make some more emails......
I think most of us here (this thread) have done something, but for every one of us who commented, there are a 1K who didn't do anything and likely didn't even know it was an issue. On the other hand, the well organized anti's put the word out and the commission received comments from all over the country.... I doesn't help that the commission isn't pro hunting, but if we would have out numbered the antis, the decision would have been different.
-
So IMO its not the hunting .orgs to blame.
NOT BHA, not SCI not INWC none of them.
Hunters just don't give a chit until its gone.
Hunting Washington forum is the most pro-active social media site I've seen in any platform BY FAR for Washington, even so it's less than 10% of all Washington hunters, and low participation in these threads.
On a hunting site like this....loosing spring bear thread ougt to eclipse a Kyle Rittenhouse thread :'(
Bingo. This site morphing into a political forum hasn't helped things.
LOL, amazing comment!
First, unless you opt into the political topics board you wouldn't know they are even on this forum. For the most part I think we do a good job of keeping political topics in that board. By having that board it keeps the politics away from all members who don't want to read politics!
Second, I find it hard to believe that a board hidden from public view could have any impact on losing the spring bear season in WA! :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Third, spring bear is a low priority season for the majority of hunters. This forum is a more dedicated and diverse group of hunters than most groups so these types of issues get more traction and discussion here.
Lastly, as far as how to quit losing hunting opportunities, it's truly a partisan political issue, states that are primarily democrat controlled are prone to allowing fewer hunting opportunities. If you really want to make a difference, quit voting for democrat politicians! I'm sorry to say but sadly hunting is definitely a partisan political issue. :twocents:
-
I haven't bought a license for over two years in this deteriorating state, I may never buy one again, but I did send my comments supporting spring bear to the commission even though I had a good idea this was going to happen regardless of how many comments supporting spring bear they received!
-
“More than 100 people testified on the issue during a Zoom meeting held before the commission Oct. 22. The vast majority — over 90% — asked the commission to ban outright the special-permit spring bear hunt or wait to make a decision until more science and information were provided.”
https://biologicaldiversity.org/w/news/press-releases/washington-wildlife-commission-suspends-spring-bear-hunt-2021-11-19/
There’s a big part of the reason this hunt was shut down.
-
Wdfw bio’s provided scientific research though, this was all about feelings! When I talked to Wdfw on Monday I could tell they were very disappointed in this closure. She couldn’t say it but agreed w me that it was total BS.
-
I was told that written testimony is supposed to have equal weight. I also listened after the fact online. The 23rd speaker was a well spoken hunter that gave a great 2 min reponce. Most of the antis were just burning Time.
-
Anybody know their level of involvement?
I know they took a lot of money from the folks that worked to end predator hunting in BC.
Anybody know?
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20211124/b1f3200c1c2767eca6e45004cd4d4e35.jpg)
From Instagram, pretty clear where they stood on the issue.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
So IMO its not the hunting .orgs to blame.
NOT BHA, not SCI not INWC none of them.
Hunters just don't give a chit until its gone.
Hunting Washington forum is the most pro-active social media site I've seen in any platform BY FAR for Washington, even so it's less than 10% of all Washington hunters, and low participation in these threads.
On a hunting site like this....loosing spring bear thread ougt to eclipse a Kyle Rittenhouse thread :'(
Bingo. This site morphing into a political forum hasn't helped things.
LOL, amazing comment!
First, unless you opt into the political topics board you wouldn't know they are even on this forum. For the most part I think we do a good job of keeping political topics in that board. By having that board it keeps the politics away from all members who don't want to read politics!
Second, I find it hard to believe that a board hidden from public view could have any impact on losing the spring bear season in WA! :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Third, spring bear is a low priority season for the majority of hunters. This forum is a more dedicated and diverse group of hunters than most groups so these types of issues get more traction and discussion here.
Lastly, as far as how to quit losing hunting opportunities, it's truly a partisan political issue, states that are primarily democrat controlled are prone to allowing fewer hunting opportunities. If you really want to make a difference, quit voting for democrat politicians! I'm sorry to say but sadly hunting is definitely a partisan political issue. :twocents:
Clearly, and unfortunately, politics play a role in wildlife management. The point was to highlight that on a site with 10k members the loss of a hunting season gets less ink that pretty much any political topic. It's a shame that the Rittenhouse thread has more traction on here than a thread motivating members to get active on bear seasons
-
The hunting org’s are to blame for a lack of any sort of anything to fight this action. So are we hunters. We’re famous for it. The anti hunting orgs are good at making this stuff happen. We’ll suffer because of it.
100% If hunters (yeah, you!) don't speak up and take action, don't expect others to. Hunters as a whole are good at complaining in forums buy lousy at taking action BEFORE there's something to complain about. Send you comments - respectful comments - to the Commission. Ya'll should know how to do that by now. They run the show, not WDFW. People need to quit getting on that bandwagon. This spring bear issue should make that abundantly clear. And remember, all the anti groups know of these matters and they take lots of action. Hunters need to meet and EXCEED their actions. But we never do, so we get what we got here. The truth hurts.
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
-
I can't help but feel if the 3rd Eastern WA position was filled the vote would have been 5-4 and I could keep my streak of "NOT SELECTED" going :rolleyes: All part of Uncle Jay's master plan I'd imagine, the longer that position is not filled the longer he knows he has a majority anti-hunting commission vote. Larry Carpenter can no longer be relied upon as a vote for hunters, there's no doubt in my mind there was a backdoor deal to get him vote that way. Him and the anti-hunt side knew it would come down to his vote. If he doesn't play ball he knows he's gone. Let Inslee replace him with a new anti-hunting vote, that still puts us at 4-4. We need a legitimate candidate from eastern WA, maybe someone from INWC? SCI? Bombard the Governor's office with support of said candidate and we can continue to keep our glimmer of hope our children will continue to grow up with hunting opportunities in this state. We need to find and fill this position with a level headed pro-hunting commissioner before HSUS/CBD finds one if they haven't already. https://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=77.04.030
-
Here's an update on what the Washington people have been up to
https://www.backcountryhunters.org/wa_spring_bear_next_steps
-
Those are some pretty well established, bipartisan groups. He might actually listen
-
It’s great to see several powerful organizations working together on this. The way it should be. Always.
-
Thank you for posting these links.
-
I thought most principled folks dropped FB a long time ago.
-
From that BHA post it sounds like the next thing we can do as individuals will be to participate in sending letters to the Senate Natural Resources Committee. Google didn't bring up an obvious "contact the committee" type link like there is for the Commission. If anyone is a BHA member that will receive that action alert, can they please post the contact info here?
-
I will do that but I'd also like to make another request for people:
I'd love everyone to join BHA, but realistically I think that people just getting on the emailing list would be really help. The reason I say that is because when the chapter sent out the prevote call to action it went to everyone on the Washington mailing list, not just members. It doesn't mean you have to respond to anything you get from them, but if you do it'll automatically be routed to your reps based on address. Just a thought. Of course with the natural resources committee, all contact is good but the best is if those senators are gearing it from their direct constituents :twocents:
-
https://www.backcountryhunters.org/take_action?fbclid=IwAR3cZSnCc3DdWk_Dc1tVSrIxxh_LPS0PQ9lJCrrCNNc8nm_YTiPSJ4xob5c#/249
Direct action link. Easy way to get your comments to the WDFW commission
-
https://www.backcountryhunters.org/take_action?fbclid=IwAR3cZSnCc3DdWk_Dc1tVSrIxxh_LPS0PQ9lJCrrCNNc8nm_YTiPSJ4xob5c#/249
Direct action link. Easy way to get your comments to the WDFW commission
This is awesome!
-
https://www.backcountryhunters.org/take_action?fbclid=IwAR3cZSnCc3DdWk_Dc1tVSrIxxh_LPS0PQ9lJCrrCNNc8nm_YTiPSJ4xob5c#/249
Direct action link. Easy way to get your comments to the WDFW commission
Great looking form but it wouldn't work for me, so I used the form on the WDFW site:
https://wdfw.wa.gov/about/commission/contact
-
The BHA link worked ok for me.
I sent the letter.
Appreciate everyone who is helping on this issue
-
Thank you to BHA for creating that. Super easy way to contact the commission.
-
Here is a link to the Senate Natural Resources Committee - contact for each is attached.
https://leg.wa.gov/Senate/Committees/AWNP/Pages/MembersStaff.aspx (https://leg.wa.gov/Senate/Committees/AWNP/Pages/MembersStaff.aspx)
Comments should ask that they make a recommendation to the Senate to reject Lorna Smith as an appointee to the Commission by Gov. Inslee.
Here is a link to a podcast covering the topic and next steps.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/88-washington-state-spring-bear-update/id1493899905?i=1000545730920&fbclid=IwAR34xSbGdH-CJwS1drnCFVXg4e0JBVRLNBEsQXK2Vaasi9dPsbNtiGeyh24 (https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/88-washington-state-spring-bear-update/id1493899905?i=1000545730920&fbclid=IwAR34xSbGdH-CJwS1drnCFVXg4e0JBVRLNBEsQXK2Vaasi9dPsbNtiGeyh24)
-
Here is a link to the Senate Natural Resources Committee - contact for each is attached.
https://leg.wa.gov/Senate/Committees/AWNP/Pages/MembersStaff.aspx (https://leg.wa.gov/Senate/Committees/AWNP/Pages/MembersStaff.aspx)
Comments should ask that they make a recommendation to the Senate to reject Lorna Smith as an appointee to the Commission by Gov. Inslee.
Here is a link to a podcast covering the topic and next steps.
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/88-washington-state-spring-bear-update/id1493899905?i=1000545730920&fbclid=IwAR34xSbGdH-CJwS1drnCFVXg4e0JBVRLNBEsQXK2Vaasi9dPsbNtiGeyh24 (https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/88-washington-state-spring-bear-update/id1493899905?i=1000545730920&fbclid=IwAR34xSbGdH-CJwS1drnCFVXg4e0JBVRLNBEsQXK2Vaasi9dPsbNtiGeyh24)
Lots of good information as well as some very uninformed information. Is PNW affiliated with BHA?
-
Thanks for the feedback, Tbar.
No affiliation besides supporting each other. Just trying to bring hunters together to spread some information on what steps can be taken to try and get the season back and prevent this from happening in the future.
-
Couple questions on this subject. Is it a ban or a suspension on the spring bear hunt? The commission had a 4-4 tie on the spring hunts, which is something they vote on every year right? If they do vote on it every year, what's the reasoning/history for doing so, is this standard for all species?
-
Haus it is just a suspension until they vote again.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I had lead a voter registration drive at gunshows and other events for about two years before the 2020 elections. One event that stood out was when we got permission to set up a voter registration drive table in front of the Bass Pro Shop, about 2/3 of the people gave us hostile stares because they did not want politics in their life. We told them about a recently passed gun control initiative, I-1639. Most of the people that would talk to us never heard about it. Many called us liars as they did not want to believe it.
Fact is that most outdoorsmen don't vote, they don't want to get involved. They seek escapism via sport and do not want to be informed.
-
I had lead a voter registration drive at gunshows and other events for about two years before the 2020 elections. One event that stood out was when we got permission to set up a voter registration drive table in front of the Bass Pro Shop, about 2/3 of the people gave us hostile stares because they did not want politics in their life. We told them about a recently passed gun control initiative, I-1639. Most of the people that would talk to us never heard about it. Many called us liars as they did not want to believe it.
Fact is that most outdoorsmen don't vote, they don't want to get involved. They seek escapism via sport and do not want to be informed.
Do you have anything to validate your "fact"? In my walk it's the opposite, also look at the political board here, it is quite busy, even to the point where the forum's focus seems blurred at times. :dunno:
-
This is the same BHA right?
Or am I tripped out .
-
Every single member on this site needs to follow the action items listed by BHA, contact the commission, contact the gov and contact the natural resource committee. The antis have gotten wind of vacancies and are actively working to further influence the situation. The meeting for Jan 21st is coming up quick and it’s vital we make out position heard.
It’s simple to do. Get it done.
-
Every single member on this site needs to follow the action items listed by BHA, contact the commission, contact the gov and contact the natural resource committee. The antis have gotten wind of vacancies and are actively working to further influence the situation. The meeting for Jan 21st is coming up quick and it’s vital we make out position heard.
It’s simple to do. Get it done.
Well stated. Everyone needs to jump on this and take action! Write in and voice your concerns.
-
Keep the pressure on.
Evil wins when Good is not Formidible.
This is not the time to get weak.
-
BHA was one of two national conservation orgs that co-signed on the only successful petition today for spring bear. They've also been working daily with Marie at the INWC and submitted over 1400 commissioner letters in regards to meeting today in addition to calls to action throughout the process going back months. Volunteers have been on podcasts, elevated this issue nationally through a piece on meateater and authored a letter tothe governor co-signed by local and national hunting groups including sportsmen's alliance, DU and the INWC.
It has shown leadership throughout this process and even INWC has said the same in a recent podcast. Hate all you want, call it a bunch of green decoys but it has fought the good fight the whole time and is standing up for hunting in Washington.
I don't see nearly the same scrutiny applied to orgs that either didn't weigh in or showed up real late to the action...
-
Thanks for sharing :tup:
-
https://nwsportsmanmag.com/commission-appointment-process-criticized-as-new-members-welcomed/?fbclid=IwAR3gyN3Qfn5BVTaZZpmI-izrQqZueiwpO6FHQozLBZV3nV4GsOXQJAFfajk
Washington BHA was also awarded Inland Northwest Wildlife Council's 2021 Bill Rollins Master Hunter Award "presented to a Washington state organization that shares in the principles of the INWC and support of the INWC's mission"
-
https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/comment-full-commission-needed-for-best-wildlife-management/ (https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/comment-full-commission-needed-for-best-wildlife-management/)