Hunting Washington Forum
Big Game Hunting => Elk Hunting => Topic started by: jason stevens on June 16, 2022, 04:13:14 PM
-
Not trying to start something but want honest feed back. I've got both calibers an want to know. Do you guys feel that these calibers will put down an elk up to 300yrds. Thanks for the opinions in advance.i drew a cow tag for riffle after 10 years an im excited.
-
My personal preference on an elk would be a 150 gr partition or accubond out of the 308. But other bullets can work great too. And the 6.5 is dropping elk as well. But I like the .308.
-
My personal preference on an elk would be a 150 gr partition or accubond out of the 308. But other bullets can work great too. And the 6.5 is dropping elk as well. But I like the .308.
Congrats on the tag. I had a cow tag last year. Used a .270 with 150 grain partition. Took a very hard quartered away shot and it entered at the back of the ribs. Traveled right between both shoulders and out the front of the neck. That elk went down very fast. Absolutely hammered it. Took a few steps over the edge of the hill and tumbled until it came to a stop down the hill about 25 yards. I was extremely happy with the terminal performance and penetration. . 308 would be very similar results with a similar load.
-
6.5 what ..
Assuming creed.
And the answer is yes.
-
6.5 what ..
Assuming creed.
And the answer is yes.
Yes creedmoor I'm sorry I wasn't clear.
-
I have 140 grain edlx for the 6.5 creedmoor
-
You put a bullet where it needs to go on an elk and both will do the job easily inside 300 yards.
-
Compare your loads/ammo ENERGY @ 300 yards and go with whats highest for elk since you have the choice. Me?, Id go with the most energy.
-
Compare your loads/ammo ENERGY @ 300 yards and go with whats highest for elk since you have the choice. Me?, Id go with the most energy.
This is true. And a very good point. One good thing about the 6.5 is it holds a high ballistic coefficient. Although to 300yards I am not sure how much of a change that will effect. Both will get the job done. Done well with shot placement. I've seen a lot of deer and bear fall as well as 1 elk with the eldx bullets and have seen good results.
-
Either cartridge will work but I'd prefer the 308, and no ELD-X bullet no matter which one you use. That's not an elk bullet, in my experience.
-
Either cartridge will work but I'd prefer the 308, and no ELD-X bullet no matter which one you use. That's not an elk bullet, in my experience.
I second that, use a bullet that's either bonded, partitioned, or monolithic. Eldx, match, and sst ain't on that list.
-
The advice so far is awesome thank you guys alot
-
Make the choice on rifles, not caliber. Whichever one you more confidence in is what I would choose.
-
Either cartridge will work but I'd prefer the 308, and no ELD-X bullet no matter which one you use. That's not an elk bullet, in my experience.
Bobcat once again a speaks the truth.
My unpopular opinion, 6.5creed is not an elk gun. Me personally, wouldn’t even use it for mule deer. Shooting targets and/or maybe a whitetail under 200 yards.
-
7.62 MM, or .308 if you wish. All those Army snipers can’t be wrong.
-
Both of these guns can kill elk. A 243 can kill elk. But I don’t go on an elk hunt without my 300 Win Mag. Get a 7mm or a 300 Win. Best elk guns. You can feel good about energy at 400 yards to put an animal down at that size. Feel confident and your not on the edge. Just my opinion. Lots of people talk about shot placement and bullet design/makeup and this does make a huge difference. But the same shot placement and bullet design out of a 300 Win mag at 300-400 yards will get the job done better than the calibers you are talking about with the same shot placement and bullet design. No need to mess around and you owe it to the animal for a quick kill. Just my opinion.
-
Either cartridge will work but I'd prefer the 308, and no ELD-X bullet no matter which one you use. That's not an elk bullet, in my experience.
Bobcat once again a speaks the truth.
My unpopular opinion, 6.5creed is not an elk gun. Me personally, wouldn’t even use it for mule deer. Shooting targets and/or maybe a whitetail under 200 yards.
I know of a big desert buck shot a couple years ago through both shoulders with a 6.5 creedmoore and eldx bullet. 250 yard shot and it was a clean pass through and deer fell very quickly. No hesitation on a 6.5 creedmore on a mule deer or any deer. That shooter has been dropping bears and deer all very quickly with eldx bullets on the 6.5 creedmoore the last few years. That is not to say I think it is a great elk round. But deer that caliber is way more than adaquate. Especially for those that think a better constructed bullet could be used than eldx for hunting. But again those deer and bears are getting a hurtin put on them with that combo. Just my personal experience with what I have seen with the 6.5 creedmoore
But in general a 6.5 creedmoore can be an elk killer if the shooter does his job and puts shot placement.
But again a 308 win will be a perfectly fine elk caliber to 300 yards.
-
Both of these guns can kill elk. A 243 can kill elk. But I don’t go on an elk hunt without my 300 Win Mag. Get a 7mm or a 300 Win. Best elk guns. You can feel good about energy at 400 yards to put an animal down at that size. Feel confident and your not on the edge. Just my opinion. Lots of people talk about shot placement and bullet design/makeup and this does make a huge difference. But the same shot placement and bullet design out of a 300 Win mag at 300-400 yards will get the job done better than the calibers you are talking about with the same shot placement and bullet design. No need to mess around and you owe it to the animal for a quick kill. Just my opinion.
I agree with this - it is spot on!
-
Guy went from talking about 6.5 vs 308 and now we have people suggesting magnums. You could recommend a 30-06, 280, 270 etc class cartridge first to gain another 100 yards of range. Anyway to the OP, if you handload you may want to consider a 7-08. 150gr partition will kill elk fine to at least 300 yards. You want to stay above 1500 ft/lbs of energy at impact with a premium bullet for an ek round.
-
Poor man partitions that's what I call them.
https://www.speer.com/bullets/rifle_bullets/grand_slam_rifle_bullet/19-1444.html
https://www.midwayusa.com/product/1010538145?pid=349407
I agree both these calibers will perform well as long as you
Can punch a hole in the right spot.
Posted a couple links to what I call the.
Poor man's partitions.
They work at a fraction of the price ,made in America,
Kinda like the old remington cor lok ,not some foo foo high BC bullet but at 300 yards you just need expanding tough bullets.
-
Guy went from talking about 6.5 vs 308 and now we have people suggesting magnums. You could recommend a 30-06, 280, 270 etc class cartridge first to gain another 100 yards of range. Anyway to the OP, if you handload you may want to consider a 7-08. 150gr partition will kill elk fine to at least 300 yards. You want to stay above 1500 ft/lbs of energy at impact with a premium bullet for an ek round.
The gentleman who initiated the thread inquired about a proficient "elk" caliber. It is not out of line for anyone to suggest a magnum. I think too many of us read these forums and guys gloat about killing elk with a 6.5 at 800 yards, blah blah. Sure, you poked a hole in the elk and he bled out for two hours... that is not killing elk to me. I agree with you completely at 1500-1600ft./lbs. of energy at impact. If I were an elk and you were hunting me, I would hope you shoot me with a large caliber rifle.
-
Make the choice on rifles, not caliber. Whichever one you more confidence in is what I would choose.
:yeah:Sound advice. Both will do the job. Bring the rifle you shoot best. :tup:
-
Both are great, go with what you shoot best.
https://www.themeateater.com/hunt/firearm-hunting/caliber-battle-308-win-vs-6-5-creedmoor
-
6.5 dbl lung all day with that bullet. 308 depending on bullet, imo send it. Both are proven but as mentioned, you gotta do your part and put it on the X.
-
Guy went from talking about 6.5 vs 308 and now we have people suggesting magnums. You could recommend a 30-06, 280, 270 etc class cartridge first to gain another 100 yards of range. Anyway to the OP, if you handload you may want to consider a 7-08. 150gr partition will kill elk fine to at least 300 yards. You want to stay above 1500 ft/lbs of energy at impact with a premium bullet for an ek round.
The gentleman who initiated the thread inquired about a proficient "elk" caliber. It is not out of line for anyone to suggest a magnum. I think too many of us read these forums and guys gloat about killing elk with a 6.5 at 800 yards, blah blah. Sure, you poked a hole in the elk and he bled out for two hours... that is not killing elk to me. I agree with you completely at 1500-1600ft./lbs. of energy at impact. If I were an elk and you were hunting me, I would hope you shoot me with a large caliber rifle.
Well technically, he asked about advice between two specific calibers....
-
In so many of these discussions about one caliber vs. another caliber I read "If you do your part", and "shot placement is key".
Both are important but in many, if not most, hunting situations you don't have the luxury of making the perfect shot, or lots of time. So, using a marginal caliber for the situation is just not being responsible. Just my 2˘.
-
Guy went from talking about 6.5 vs 308 and now we have people suggesting magnums. You could recommend a 30-06, 280, 270 etc class cartridge first to gain another 100 yards of range. Anyway to the OP, if you handload you may want to consider a 7-08. 150gr partition will kill elk fine to at least 300 yards. You want to stay above 1500 ft/lbs of energy at impact with a premium bullet for an ek round.
The gentleman who initiated the thread inquired about a proficient "elk" caliber. It is not out of line for anyone to suggest a magnum. I think too many of us read these forums and guys gloat about killing elk with a 6.5 at 800 yards, blah blah. Sure, you poked a hole in the elk and he bled out for two hours... that is not killing elk to me. I agree with you completely at 1500-1600ft./lbs. of energy at impact. If I were an elk and you were hunting me, I would hope you shoot me with a large caliber rifle.
Well technically, he asked about advice between two specific calibers....
Please see original post " Do you guys feel that these calibers will put down an elk up to 300yrds."
feel free to contribute your thoughts pickardjw
-
In so many of these discussions about one caliber vs. another caliber I read "If you do your part", and "shot placement is key".
Both are important but in many, if not most, hunting situations you don't have the luxury of making the perfect shot, or lots of time. So, using a marginal caliber for the situation is just not being responsible. Just my 2˘.
Not to be to argumentative :chuckle:..but,
along those lines don't take the shot if you don't have it...
So many guys want a magnum caliber in case they have to "punch" through bone...or miss by a little, or can't shoot sub moa and don't want to practice...
The argument can be made for all flavors of hunting methods. Muzzy, archery etc...we owe it just as much to animals to take the good shot and not force it because we brought the big gun with us...
In the ops case we have two options and a distance range..
Both options will work just fine. That's real world experience. Not paper math or what someone says on a hunting show....
Anyway...in typical hunt wa fashion we've turned this into a best elk caliber thread :chuckle:
-
Guy went from talking about 6.5 vs 308 and now we have people suggesting magnums. You could recommend a 30-06, 280, 270 etc class cartridge first to gain another 100 yards of range. Anyway to the OP, if you handload you may want to consider a 7-08. 150gr partition will kill elk fine to at least 300 yards. You want to stay above 1500 ft/lbs of energy at impact with a premium bullet for an ek round.
The gentleman who initiated the thread inquired about a proficient "elk" caliber. It is not out of line for anyone to suggest a magnum. I think too many of us read these forums and guys gloat about killing elk with a 6.5 at 800 yards, blah blah. Sure, you poked a hole in the elk and he bled out for two hours... that is not killing elk to me. I agree with you completely at 1500-1600ft./lbs. of energy at impact. If I were an elk and you were hunting me, I would hope you shoot me with a large caliber rifle.
Well technically, he asked about advice between two specific calibers....
Please see original post " Do you guys feel that these calibers will put down an elk up to 300yrds."
feel free to contribute your thoughts pickardjw
Still putting my 6.5 together, waiting on rings. But from my research a 143 ELD-X pushing should hit with 1600+ ft/# of energy at 300 yds. I plan on using it for elk at that range. If my gun shoots 147 ELD-M's well maybe even out to 400 with that bullet, it should hit with 1500+ ft/# at that range.
-
I will say I am not the biggest 30 cal. fan but at those distances and on elk I would probably opt for the 308 over the 6.5 Creed. I like the 165/168 gr bullets for the 30 cal. non magnums so I would probably go that route. If those were my guns and only 2 choices I would be loading 308 with 168 gr Barnes TTSX. Again only my opinion based off the 2 options given.
-
I will say I am not the biggest 30 cal. fan but at those distances and on elk I would probably opt for the 308 over the 6.5 Creed. I like the 165/168 gr bullets for the 30 cal. non magnums so I would probably go that route. If those were my guns and only 2 choices I would be loading 308 with 168 gr Barnes TTSX. Again only my opinion based off the 2 options given.
:yeah: RTFOP
-
Awesome opinions everyone. Thank you very much for all the input.
-
Either cartridge will work but I'd prefer the 308, and no ELD-X bullet no matter which one you use. That's not an elk bullet, in my experience.
Bobcat once again a speaks the truth.
My unpopular opinion, 6.5creed is not an elk gun. Me personally, wouldn’t even use it for mule deer. Shooting targets and/or maybe a whitetail under 200 yards.
The 6.5 cm has stacked quite a body count of deer, elk, bears, etc since it came put. Its almost on par with the 6.5-284 and people have one and done on elk out to 700-800 yards with that round. Im not saying the average shooter/hunter should try that… but the 6.5 cm with the right bullet and you doing your job right, will drop an elk. Personally i prefer my 300 win mag or 300 wby mag… but if i had to choose between a 6.5 cm and a .308 win, id probably choose the 6.5 cm as an overall round. You can kill game animals with it or load up some match/lr bullets and pop targets at 1,000 yards and a mile relatively easily.
-
I'm certainly no expert on gun ballistics but I think you're be fine with either one you have.
-
Elk are only armor plated on the internet. Either one of the cartridges asked about will kill any elk that walks the earth. My personal preference would be the .308 Winchester shooting 165gr bullets. The Creed just doesn’t excite me.
-
The 6.5 cm has stacked quite a body count of deer, elk, bears, etc since it came put. Its almost on par with the 6.5-284 and people have one and done on elk out to 700-800 yards with that round. Im not saying the average shooter/hunter should try that… but the 6.5 cm with the right bullet and you doing your job right, will drop an elk. Personally i prefer my 300 win mag or 300 wby mag… but if i had to choose between a 6.5 cm and a .308 win, id probably choose the 6.5 cm as an overall round. You can kill game animals with it or load up some match/lr bullets and pop targets at 1,000 yards and a mile relatively easily.
Not trying to be a PITA, but everybody, except a very few, are an "average shooter/hunter".
There is a world of difference, ballistically, between a 6.5 cm and a .300 WM, or a .300 Wby Mag.
-
The great grandpappy to the 6.5 CM, the 6.5x55 has killed close to a million moose over the last century. Food for thought.
-
This was a question of caliber not shooter. I can shoot very accurate. An can haven't elk with a bow. My question was caliber difference not accuracy otherwise I would have said that.
The 6.5 cm has stacked quite a body count of deer, elk, bears, etc since it came put. Its almost on par with the 6.5-284 and people have one and done on elk out to 700-800 yards with that round. Im not saying the average shooter/hunter should try that… but the 6.5 cm with the right bullet and you doing your job right, will drop an elk. Personally i prefer my 300 win mag or 300 wby mag… but if i had to choose between a 6.5 cm and a .308 win, id probably choose the 6.5 cm as an overall round. You can kill game animals with it or load up some match/lr bullets and pop targets at 1,000 yards and a mile relatively easily.
Not trying to be a PITA, but everybody, except a very few, are an "average shooter/hunter".
There is a world of difference, ballistically, between a 6.5 cm and a .300 WM, or a .300 Wby Mag.
-
I messed up the last quote. So my original theory was on caliber between the 2 not accuracy. I can shoot better then most an I know a bow hunter can harvest an elk with a stick an blade. So let's keep it to that. Big calibers can do the trick for people you can't shoot they need that knock down power. But I believe in 1 shot 1 harvest. 300 yards was pushing it for me for clean kill. Don't want the animal to suffer. Just wanted opinions
-
I messed up the last quote. So my original theory was on caliber between the 2 not accuracy. I can shoot better then most an I know a bow hunter can harvest an elk with a stick an blade. So let's keep it to that. Big calibers can do the trick for people you can't shoot they need that knock down power. But I believe in 1 shot 1 harvest. 300 yards was pushing it for me for clean kill. Don't want the animal to suffer. Just wanted opinions
I've killed multiple deer (mules and whitetail) and a very large black bear all with one shot with a 6.5 shooting the 143 ELDX and varied ranges from 100 put to 350 yards and none have gone more than 30 yards. A friend has also killed a Roosevelt cow at 250 and the round put a tennis ball sized hole in the ribs. I've recovered perfectly mushroomed bullets like the picture shows on the box. My limit is 400 yards and I won't hesitate to shoot any Washington animal with a 6.5. I also shoot a lot and am very proficient with my rifle.
-
I messed up the last quote. So my original theory was on caliber between the 2 not accuracy. I can shoot better then most an I know a bow hunter can harvest an elk with a stick an blade. So let's keep it to that. Big calibers can do the trick for people you can't shoot they need that knock down power. But I believe in 1 shot 1 harvest. 300 yards was pushing it for me for clean kill. Don't want the animal to suffer. Just wanted opinions
I've killed multiple deer (mules and whitetail) and a very large black bear all with one shot with a 6.5 shooting the 143 ELDX and varied ranges from 100 put to 350 yards and none have gone more than 30 yards. A friend has also killed a Roosevelt cow at 250 and the round put a tennis ball sized hole in the ribs. I've recovered perfectly mushroomed bullets like the picture shows on the box. My limit is 400 yards and I won't hesitate to shoot any Washington animal with a 6.5. I also shoot a lot and am very proficient with my rifle.
Thank you for that. This was not a pissing match just a general question for others opinions.. an there has been alot of real opinions that I appreciate.
-
I really appreciate everyone's opinion on this post it has helped me alot. So thank you good or bad it helps
-
You will be good with either rifle/round. I personally have killed 5 elk and numerous whitetail with the 6.5 Creedmoor. I am not a proponent of the blow up/shrapnel bullets just for the fact that I don't want to consume the lead and don't want the lead particles in the scraps that I feed the local eagles and other birds. I have found that monometal bullets do not create the bloodshot that cup and core bullets do. I load the 120TTSX or 127LRX in my Creedmoor. My biggest bull fell with one shot at 140 yards with the Hornady 120GMX.
Congrats on the tag and go kill an elk with which ever rifle you like.
-
Call me a prude, would prefer 6.5 prc for elk over the cm or .308. Over 300 yd prefer .338 wm. Over 600 prefer Lapua / 338-378. But this is just from actual experience which may skew my judgement.
-
Ya or just buy a 7mm rem mag
And harvest EVERYTHING in North America
Never pickup another rifle and never look back.
:chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
Spreading some love now.
Tell me I'm wrong.
:chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
-
Your not wrong!
-
Ya or just buy a 7mm rem mag
And harvest EVERYTHING in North America
Never pickup another rifle and never look back.
:chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
Spreading some love now.
Tell me I'm wrong.
:chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
Or build a custom 7-300 win mag and have even more push behind the 180-195 gr .284 cal bullets.
-
Some important tips. Calibers needed shrink the farther you live from cities. :chuckle: Also, people who actually leave camp or the truck own stainless steel rifles as elk hunting often happens in rain and snow. I'd use the rifle I cared the least about if they aren't stainless. Rust happens!
The 6.5x55 Swede has been killing Moose for over 100 years. They are very similar to the Creedmoor.
Good luck!
-
Either would do fine at 3-400. I would choose the 6.5 because I really put an importance on seeing impacts on animals. In my rifle arsenal, bigger the caliber and cartridge, heavier the rifle and bigger the brake. I want to be able to see impacts at the distance I plan on shooting the rifle at. Breaking a shot, to then be frantically trying to get back on the animal to see where it went, where you hit, is not a great feeling.
-
Within 500 yards the .308 is superior after that the 6.5 starts to make more sense or something like that. But either will work.