Hunting Washington Forum

Community => Advocacy, Agencies, Access => Topic started by: wolfbait on August 04, 2022, 07:41:06 AM


Advertise Here
Title: Oregonians to Vote on Gun Control Measure Opponent Calls ‘Strictest’ in the Nati
Post by: wolfbait on August 04, 2022, 07:41:06 AM
https://www.theepochtimes.com/oregonians-to-vote-on-nations-strictest-gun-control-measure_4633649.html?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge
Title: Re: Oregonians to Vote on Gun Control Measure Opponent Calls ‘Strictest’ in the Nati
Post by: pianoman9701 on August 04, 2022, 08:58:18 AM
We'll see how this law passes the Constitutional smell test. I doubt it could. The restrictions just to obtain a firearm will preclude many from being able to do so. Cost, accessibility, privacy under the 4th Amendment.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..."

I would find passing it unbelievable if not for the voting bloc of Multnomah County.
Title: Re: Oregonians to Vote on Gun Control Measure Opponent Calls ‘Strictest’ in the Nati
Post by: huntnphool on August 04, 2022, 09:04:39 AM
We'll see how this law passes the Constitutional smell test. I doubt it could. The restrictions just to obtain a firearm will preclude many from being able to do so. Cost, accessibility, privacy under the 4th Amendment.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..."

I would find passing it unbelievable if not for the voting bloc of Multnomah County.

 True, but even those in Multnomah are seeing the increased need for personal protection these days.
Title: Re: Oregonians to Vote on Gun Control Measure Opponent Calls ‘Strictest’ in the Nati
Post by: pianoman9701 on August 04, 2022, 09:22:11 AM
We'll see how this law passes the Constitutional smell test. I doubt it could. The restrictions just to obtain a firearm will preclude many from being able to do so. Cost, accessibility, privacy under the 4th Amendment.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated..."

I would find passing it unbelievable if not for the voting bloc of Multnomah County.

 True, but even those in Multnomah are seeing the increased need for personal protection these days.

The general population doesn't understand the Constitution or their rights. Guns are bad, government is good. Big Brother will keep us safer than someone with a damn gun.
Title: Re: Oregonians to Vote on Gun Control Measure Opponent Calls ‘Strictest’ in the Nati
Post by: Angry Perch on August 04, 2022, 01:12:10 PM
What a circle jerk.

“In order to obtain the permit, an applicant would have to show up with a firearm to demonstrate the ability to load, fire, unload, and store the firearm,” Williamson, an Oregon trial attorney specializing in firearms law, told The Epoch Times. “But you can’t get a firearm without the permit. And under Oregon’s highly restrictive gun storage laws, no one can legally loan a firearm to another. That creates an impassable barrier.”
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal