Hunting Washington Forum

Community => Advocacy, Agencies, Access => Topic started by: time2hunt on June 30, 2023, 12:44:48 PM


Advertise Here
Title: Lorna smith
Post by: time2hunt on June 30, 2023, 12:44:48 PM
I hear she may be going out the door


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: Special T on June 30, 2023, 12:52:51 PM
I hear she may be going out the door


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Care to elaborate?
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: time2hunt on June 30, 2023, 12:55:51 PM
Judge ruled in our favor and Lorna Smith was breaking the law by holding both positions. She didn’t rule on what to do. Lawyers meeting next week to discuss options. She’ll likely just quit the other board.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: time2hunt on June 30, 2023, 12:57:29 PM
That’s all I’ve received so far


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: sage rat on June 30, 2023, 12:58:51 PM
thanks for the update
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: Special T on June 30, 2023, 01:01:31 PM
Judge ruled in our favor and Lorna Smith was breaking the law by holding both positions. She didn’t rule on what to do. Lawyers meeting next week to discuss options. She’ll likely just quit the other board.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 :tup:

Unfortunately that is how I figured it would work out.
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: Timberstalker on June 30, 2023, 01:16:24 PM
Quit the other board or quit WDFW commission?
@time2hunt
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: Mtnwalker on June 30, 2023, 01:18:56 PM
Should be removed from both if she was knowingly violating the law
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: time2hunt on June 30, 2023, 01:20:06 PM
I have no other details sorry


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: lewy on June 30, 2023, 01:20:13 PM
I hate that women
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: Farmer72 on June 30, 2023, 01:28:30 PM
All of her votes during the time she held both should be null and void since it was an illegally held position.
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: MtnMuley on June 30, 2023, 01:32:20 PM
I was hoping this thread was going to be about her going sky diving without a parachute :chuckle:
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: Platensek-po on June 30, 2023, 01:33:52 PM
 :yeah:
All of her votes during the time she held both should be null and void since it was an illegally held position.
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: fishngamereaper on June 30, 2023, 01:47:32 PM
So wouldn't this make the guy that appointed her also in violation...
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: dreadi on June 30, 2023, 01:48:48 PM
This is great news.


BLACK HAMMER ARMS
07/02 NFA Dealer

http://www.blackhammerarms.com
http://www.facebook.com/blackhammerarms
https://www.instagram.com/blackhammerarms
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: Gringo31 on June 30, 2023, 01:49:22 PM
https://nwsportsmanmag.com/org-judge-rules-smith-wa-fwc-appointment-violates-state-law/ (https://nwsportsmanmag.com/org-judge-rules-smith-wa-fwc-appointment-violates-state-law/)
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: pickardjw on June 30, 2023, 03:27:57 PM
“We’re very pleased with today’s decision that affirms Ms. Smith has been violating state law for more than two years while crafting policy that undermines scientific wildlife management and damages the state’s traditions of hunting and fishing,” said Todd Adkins, the organization’s vice president of government affairs. “It’s reassuring to see that law still matters in Washington state, something the Fish and Wildlife Commission would do well to remember in the future.”

Fantastic statement
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: Rainier10 on June 30, 2023, 03:32:56 PM
I loved this comment from Andy the author

“Smith did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but when she does, I’ll fold it in.”

Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: blackdog on June 30, 2023, 03:56:47 PM
Understand the Commission may lose Molly Linville and Lorna Smith may cure her violation as a result of this decision.
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: saylean on June 30, 2023, 04:26:12 PM
Made my day.
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: Whitpirate on June 30, 2023, 04:34:36 PM
Well, we should be following the anti-playbook now and sue the Governor's office, and Lorna for willful violation and to censure all decisions and votes of her tenure.  Reversal of spring bear would be good start as her illegal held position as proven to damage sportsman opportunity and access in direct violation of state Constitution.
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: ASHQUACK on June 30, 2023, 04:35:30 PM
Hopefully they can sue her and her husband for every single penny they have.
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: hughjorgan on June 30, 2023, 04:58:07 PM
Understand the Commission may lose Molly Linville and Lorna Smith may cure her violation as a result of this decision.

How so? Linville serves on a school board which is not county, state or municipal, therefore it doesn’t effect her.
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: Twispriver on June 30, 2023, 05:11:47 PM


RCW 28A.315.005
Governance structure.
(1) Under the constitutional framework and the laws of the state of Washington, the governance structure for the state's public common school system is comprised of the following bodies: The legislature, the governor, the superintendent of public instruction, the state board of education, the educational service district boards of directors, and local school district boards of directors. The respective policy and administrative roles of each body are determined by the state Constitution and statutes.
(2) Local school districts are political subdivisions of the state and the organization of such districts, including the powers, duties, and boundaries thereof, may be altered or abolished by laws of the state of Washington.
[ 2016 c 241 § 132. Prior: 2013 c 2 § 302 (Initiative Measure No. 1240, approved November 6, 2012); 1999 c 315 § 1.]
NOTES:
Effective date—2016 c 241: See RCW 28A.710.901.
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: huntnphool on June 30, 2023, 05:13:39 PM


RCW 28A.315.005
Governance structure.
(1) Under the constitutional framework and the laws of the state of Washington, the governance structure for the state's public common school system is comprised of the following bodies: The legislature, the governor, the superintendent of public instruction, the state board of education, the educational service district boards of directors, and local school district boards of directors. The respective policy and administrative roles of each body are determined by the state Constitution and statutes.
(2) Local school districts are political subdivisions of the state and the organization of such districts, including the powers, duties, and boundaries thereof, may be altered or abolished by laws of the state of Washington.
[ 2016 c 241 § 132. Prior: 2013 c 2 § 302 (Initiative Measure No. 1240, approved November 6, 2012); 1999 c 315 § 1.]
NOTES:
Effective date—2016 c 241: See RCW 28A.710.901.

 Thanks TR :tup:
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: bigtex on June 30, 2023, 05:15:33 PM
Well, we should be following the anti-playbook now and sue the Governor's office, and Lorna for willful violation and to censure all decisions and votes of her tenure.  Reversal of spring bear would be good start as her illegal held position as proven to damage sportsman opportunity and access in direct violation of state Constitution.
All the commission would do is a re-vote with the same outcome.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: Whitpirate on June 30, 2023, 05:17:18 PM
Well, we should be following the anti-playbook now and sue the Governor's office, and Lorna for willful violation and to censure all decisions and votes of her tenure.  Reversal of spring bear would be good start as her illegal held position as proven to damage sportsman opportunity and access in direct violation of state Constitution.
All the commission would do is a re-vote with the same outcome.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Brick by brick.  Money starts to hurt opportunities for their unfettered advancement or are you just the "we should all quit" BigTex?
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: bigtex on June 30, 2023, 05:24:26 PM


Well, we should be following the anti-playbook now and sue the Governor's office, and Lorna for willful violation and to censure all decisions and votes of her tenure.  Reversal of spring bear would be good start as her illegal held position as proven to damage sportsman opportunity and access in direct violation of state Constitution.
All the commission would do is a re-vote with the same outcome.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Brick by brick.  Money starts to hurt opportunities for their unfettered advancement or are you just the "we should all quit" BigTex?

I just live in reality. Even if Smith is booted, all Inslee will do is reappoint someone exactly like her. If she stays on, nothing changes. If she stays on and her previous votes are void, the commission can re-vote and we'll likely have a similar outcome.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: Special T on June 30, 2023, 05:33:40 PM
Understand the Commission may lose Molly Linville and Lorna Smith may cure her violation as a result of this decision.

This is the likely unintended consequence of this lawsuit.
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: HillHound on June 30, 2023, 05:42:20 PM
I was hoping this thread was going to be about her going sky diving without a parachute :chuckle:
:yeah:
And may be a couple of her friends to
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: blackdog on June 30, 2023, 07:46:03 PM
Understand the Commission may lose Molly Linville and Lorna Smith may cure her violation as a result of this decision.

How so? Linville serves on a school board which is not county, state or municipal, therefore it doesn’t effect her.

I hope you are correct, Linville would be a huge loss.
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: ducks4days on July 01, 2023, 06:06:38 AM


Well, we should be following the anti-playbook now and sue the Governor's office, and Lorna for willful violation and to censure all decisions and votes of her tenure.  Reversal of spring bear would be good start as her illegal held position as proven to damage sportsman opportunity and access in direct violation of state Constitution.
All the commission would do is a re-vote with the same outcome.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Brick by brick.  Money starts to hurt opportunities for their unfettered advancement or are you just the "we should all quit" BigTex?

I just live in reality. Even if Smith is booted, all Inslee will do is reappoint someone exactly like her. If she stays on, nothing changes. If she stays on and her previous votes are void, the commission can re-vote and we'll likely have a similar outcome.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

The antis were fighting the same battle of a commission that wouldn’t listen to them, until they suddenly weren’t. EVERY win is a win. They snuck in the cancellation of spring bear on a technicality when it wasn’t supposed to be up for a vote, and rode the inertia to keep it cancelled. IF they need to do it all over again there is a better chance it won’t work than if we wait decades to get a balanced commission that votes with the recommendation of biologists.
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: bigtex on July 01, 2023, 07:22:35 AM




Well, we should be following the anti-playbook now and sue the Governor's office, and Lorna for willful violation and to censure all decisions and votes of her tenure.  Reversal of spring bear would be good start as her illegal held position as proven to damage sportsman opportunity and access in direct violation of state Constitution.
All the commission would do is a re-vote with the same outcome.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Brick by brick.  Money starts to hurt opportunities for their unfettered advancement or are you just the "we should all quit" BigTex?

I just live in reality. Even if Smith is booted, all Inslee will do is reappoint someone exactly like her. If she stays on, nothing changes. If she stays on and her previous votes are void, the commission can re-vote and we'll likely have a similar outcome.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

The antis were fighting the same battle of a commission that wouldn’t listen to them, until they suddenly weren’t. EVERY win is a win. They snuck in the cancellation of spring bear on a technicality when it wasn’t supposed to be up for a vote, and rode the inertia to keep it cancelled. IF they need to do it all over again there is a better chance it won’t work than if we wait decades to get a balanced commission that votes with the recommendation of biologists.

Sorry but they didn't "sneak in the cancelation of spring bear on a technicality". They had to vote to approve the season (like they do with all seasons) and the vote failed, thus no season.

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: Skyvalhunter on July 01, 2023, 08:17:37 AM
On a technicality? Try more like Smith and Rowlands personal agenda
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: Special T on July 01, 2023, 10:03:50 AM
This "win" doesn't seem like the big gain it should be. Smith stays on the comission and Linville leaves what does that gain us? I wonder why Sportsmen Alliance didn't join the WWC suit?
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: fishngamereaper on July 01, 2023, 10:17:22 AM
She shouldn't get to "decide" to stay.
Her appointment was illegal and she should be immediately removed. Any actions the commission took during her illegal participation should be null and void... force them to re do everything regardless of outcome...
And...
Force Jay to decide if he wants to re appoint her with the pending suit's for his other willful violations. And risk loosing her again....
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: Karl Blanchard on July 01, 2023, 10:21:44 AM
She shouldn't get to "decide" to stay.
Her appointment was illegal and she should be immediately removed. Any actions the commission took during her illegal participation should be null and void... force them to re do everything regardless of outcome...
And...
Force Jay to decide if he wants to re appoint her with the pending suit's for his other willful violations. And risk loosing her again....
this....
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: bigtex on July 01, 2023, 10:27:59 AM


Any actions the commission took during her illegal participation should be null and void... force them to re do everything regardless of outcome...

By voiding all votes during her time it would essentially close all hunting and fishing seasons until they re-approve them...

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: Skyvalhunter on July 01, 2023, 10:34:26 AM
I believe thats a stretch to say close all seasons. If that happened they would have a special commission meeting to reapprove
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: fishngamereaper on July 01, 2023, 10:35:34 AM


Any actions the commission took during her illegal participation should be null and void... force them to re do everything regardless of outcome...

By voiding all votes during her time it would essentially close all hunting and fishing seasons until they re-approve them...

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Fine by me...small sacrifice.
It's about time Jays crooked politics get a little more exposure...he knew what he was doing was illegal and did it anyway...like always.
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: KFhunter on July 01, 2023, 10:36:39 AM
I think a lot of people might hunt without a tag for the first time in their lives
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: pianoman9701 on July 01, 2023, 11:35:53 AM
So wouldn't this make the guy that appointed her also in violation...
W4WC.org specifically named him in the suit that's been filed, as well as the 5 activists on the board for violating our RCWs.
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: GASoline71 on July 10, 2023, 03:48:57 PM
So wouldn't this make the guy that appointed her also in violation...
W4WC.org specifically named him in the suit that's been filed, as well as the 5 activists on the board for violating our RCWs.

Any updates on what is happening with that lawsuit John?

Gary
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: pianoman9701 on July 10, 2023, 04:00:44 PM
I haven't heard anything, but it's only been a few weeks since the suit dropped. I'm quite sure they're in the process of filing dozens of motions, requests for summary judgements, etc. That can take months. That's why this is such an expensive proposition. It's not the actual court time. @Special T
Title: Re: Lorna smith
Post by: Special T on July 10, 2023, 04:21:32 PM
The posts state that the first court hearing is October 13th. I would imagine they are in the process of discovery. Meaning they have/are subpeonaing records communications and such. In addition to doing research.

This process is painfully slow for us all,  also as much as we might like to know all the juicy details it would be really bad tactics to show your hand before court.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal