Hunting Washington Forum
Other Activities => Trapping => Topic started by: Goshawk on December 19, 2024, 01:42:31 PM
-
I've always been impressed with the hammer effect the 330 delivers on beaver and otter. Having said that, it's a big footprint to fit in tight places. Does anyone know if a single spring 330 would be effective enough to still be an efficient means of taking beaver and otter? Thanks for reading.
-
I swear thats the spookiest trap to deal with in the cold. No experience with the single. sorry.
-
I've never heard of a single spring 330 but I think it would be a mistake. I know when my 280s and 330s got older I noticed a significant increase in hip caught otter. That alone would keep me from using a weaker coni of any size. I know they did make 210s which were a single spring 220 but were made for muskrat I understand.
If I had a smaller opening, I would use a 280.
-
Can you still use conibears on anything?
-
Can you still use conibears on anything?
WCO. Nuicance control with permit
-
I wouldn’t use single spring. You can rotate the springs 90 degrees of course
To tighten space. I just put sticks vertically inside the springs like a lil wall on both sides of the run.
-
I think you would be better off with a traditional double spring in 280 since the spring is what closes the conibear and the pressure is what keeps the jaws closed
-
Yep use 280's they are quicker and a touch smaller. A single spring 330 is going to be slow.
-
Can you still use conibears on anything?
We have folks here from Idaho, Alaska, Montana.....
-
I would use a #280 they smaller and I think sometimes better depending on what you're after and where you are setting them.
If I could only have one size bodygrip for beaver and otter, I would have @80's hands down.
JC
-
Thanks for the advice. Have a smooth 2025!
-
Nice catch
-
Nice catch
Thanks. The wet weather has been productive.