Hunting Washington Forum
Big Game Hunting => Elk Hunting => Topic started by: HoofsandWings on August 17, 2009, 04:09:35 PM
-
http://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/harvest/2008/index.html
This time it is by how many points the animal had.
-
id prefer to know how many hunters there are
-
id prefer to know how many hunters there are
It tells you that
-
Why does it say 2008 but when you click on a species it says 2007? :dunno:
-
I must be stupid, I don't understand the numbers they have posted?
-
yeah Im not a fan of the numbers either... Seems like they dont want us to know what the success rate was.......... :tdown:
-
I have not seen it yet, but holy crap why does it take soooooo looooong to get this out???
-
It says 107,000 elk tags sold but only 70,800 elk hunters???? Huh? :dunno:
-
I guess they are saying 37,000 folks bought tags and didn't hunt.
-
It says 107,000 elk tags sold but only 70,800 elk hunters???? Huh?
only 70,800 reported
-
Or they didnt draw there eastside bull tag and went to idaho.
-
It says 107,000 elk tags sold but only 70,800 elk hunters???? Huh?
only 70,800 reported
So 36200 did not report, sounds like alot but i guess thats possible.
-
id prefer to know how many hunters there are
It tells you that
By gmu?
-
id prefer to know how many hunters there are
It tells you that
By gmu?
If you use the 2007 hunter count, you get an idea of the number of hunters +/- 10%
In going back a few years, only when there is some big change in the regs or environment do the number of hunters change much.
Change in hunters from 2006 to 2007 for region one.
101 - SHERMAN 240 221 -8
PMU: P11
105 - KELLY HILL 237 247 4
PMU: P11
108 - DOUGLAS 182 165 -9
PMU: P11
111 - ALADDIN 415 448 8
PMU: P11
113 - SELKIRK 1150 1227 7
PMU: P11
117 - 49 DEGREES NORTH 1145 1257 10
PMU: P11
121 - HUCKLEBERRY 509 532 5
PMU: P11
124 - MOUNT SPOKANE 1051 1032 -2
PMU: P11
127 - MICA PEAK 454 425 -6
PMU: P11
130 - CHENEY 575 558 -3
PMU: P11
133 - ROOSEVELT 87 132 52
PMU: P11
136 - HARRINGTON 53 47 -11
PMU: P11
139 - STEPTOE 86 105 22
PMU: P11
142 - ALMOTA 135 128 -5
PMU: P13
145 - MAYVIEW 38 26 -32
PMU: P13
149 - PRESCOTT 142 165 16
PMU: P13
154 - BLUE CREEK 585 556 -5
PMU: P13
162 - DAYTON 912 1054 16
PMU: P13
163 - MARENGO 186 105 -44
PMU: P13
166 - TUCANNON 270 314 16
PMU: P13
169 - WENAHA 280 359 28
PMU: P13
172 - MOUNTAIN VIEW 361 421 17
PMU: P13
175 - LICK CREEK 520 710 37
PMU: P13
178 - PEOLA 233 242 4
PMU: P13
181 - COUSE 120 136 13
PMU: P13
186 - GRANDE RONDE 16 38 138
PMU: P13
-
Here is the link for number of hunters for 2007 by gmu.
Add about 10% for 2008.
http://wdfw.wa.gov/wlm/game/harvest/2007/db/elk_all.php
-
Or they didnt draw there eastside bull tag and went to idaho.
Or like me, Montana. ;)
It was only a guess on my part buckmark, I really don't know.
Armadillo, it only shows by GMU in special permits, some people in general hunt more than one GMU in a season.
-
Gonna have to print it out and spread it out to figure it out :dunno: :chuckle:
-
Oh ok thanks
-
Thanks for the post, was wondering if was going to get out this year.
-
Here is the link for number of hunters for 2007 by gmu.
Add about 10% for 2008.
http://wdfw.wa.gov/wlm/game/harvest/2007/db/elk_all.php
Well that sucks if we're never going to have that information again and all we can do is look at the 2007 data. So in 2020 how close will the hunter numbers be? Still just have to add 10%?
So is there no way to get success rates for any of the general seasons? I do like having the data for number of antler points but not having hunter numbers or success rates blows! :bash:
-
im surprised on how many big elk, or elk in general were shot in puyallup and issaquah, iv lived in those areas my whole life and honestly i dont think iv ever seen an elk...all private land near hobart im thinking??????
-
Here is how messed up that is. There are only 14 permits for elk multiple weapons. 14 animals were taken, that's 100%. But it says that there were 48 hunters and the success rate was only 29%. How can there only be 14 permits but 48 hunters?????????????? :dunno:
-
The multiple-season elk permits had 1500 permits, or something like that. A heck of a lot more than 14 anyway. Or are you talking about multiple-season permit holders that hunted a specific unit ???
-
The multiple-season elk permits had 1500 permits, or something like that. A heck of a lot more than 14 anyway. Or are you talking about multiple-season permit holders that hunted a specific unit ???
I am talking Multiple Weapon as it states in the report. I don't think that there was 1500 multi-season permits issued was there? Actually I just went back and looked in another area and it stated 48 permits. So I'll cut em some slack.
-
I think the numers ar skewed by hunters thart say they bought a tag and didnt hunt because its easier I know alot of people that hunt and kill animals and report that they didnt hunt at all
-
The multiple-season elk permits had 1500 permits, or something like that. A heck of a lot more than 14 anyway. Or are you talking about multiple-season permit holders that hunted a specific unit ???
I am talking Multiple Weapon as it states in the report. I don't think that there was 1500 multi-season permits issued was there? Actually I just went back and looked in another area and it stated 48 permits. So I'll cut em some slack.
You're right, it wasn't 1500. I just looked it up... there were 500 multiple-season elk permits. But that's still a lot more than 14, or 48.