Post by: Hillbilly270 on January 05, 2010, 12:04:57 PM
thanks,
Post by: washelkhntr on January 05, 2010, 12:08:21 PM
Post by: jackelope on January 05, 2010, 12:11:38 PM
Post by: olsy on January 05, 2010, 12:14:02 PM
Post by: addicted on January 05, 2010, 12:20:49 PM
DNZ very uniqure for the market and a lot of common sence. look good as well.
EAW SCHWANK MONTAGE(swing mount) or EINHAWKMONTAGE(claw mount) the best return to zero removables on the market.
Post by: wildmanoutdoors on January 05, 2010, 12:37:14 PM
Post by: Mookie on January 05, 2010, 12:45:14 PM
I have used Leupold, Warne, DNZ, and they all work great. Any of the all steel good names brands will hold very well.
Post by: bobcat on January 05, 2010, 12:48:40 PM
Post by: thinkingman on January 05, 2010, 01:16:15 PM
Post by: Big10gauge on January 05, 2010, 01:19:24 PM
Post by: Straight Shooter on January 05, 2010, 03:38:19 PM
Talley, Warne or Deadnutz.
:yeah:
I own 3 sets of Warne (great heavy-duty rings), but my next set will be Talley or Deadnutz (so, I can avoid standard scope bases).
Post by: Jamieb on January 05, 2010, 03:39:27 PM
Post by: carpsniperg2 on January 05, 2010, 03:40:35 PM
Post by: MtnMuley on January 05, 2010, 04:26:38 PM
Post by: grousetracker on January 05, 2010, 04:32:31 PM
Post by: high country on January 05, 2010, 04:34:57 PM
Post by: yorketransport on January 05, 2010, 05:16:31 PM
If not the Burris rings, I always go with Warne QR.
Andrew
Post by: addicted on January 06, 2010, 02:44:30 AM
How about the Burris Signature rings? No more ring marks, without needing to lap the rings. Plus you can change the inserts to help zero the scope or give a little extra range. I've never seen a scope slip in a set of Signature rings.
If not the Burris rings, I always go with Warne QR.
Andrew
i like the burris zee steel 30mm high's i put on my savage. the price was right. at the time thats what mattered.
Post by: 257 Wby Mag on January 06, 2010, 10:28:22 AM
Post by: GEARHEAD on January 06, 2010, 11:26:29 AM
Post by: JackOfAllTrades on January 06, 2010, 11:57:54 AM
That said... For the budget minded, I've had Nikon Buckmaster rings holding my boys rifle/scopes (Nikon) to their respective receivers and they've taken a beating without issue. (no one beats a rifle in the woods more than a kid trying to earn his sea legs)
I don't know that there is a 'Best'. There might be best for a given installation, but I don't think there's a one brand/style/size that fits all.
-Steve
Post by: actionshooter on January 06, 2010, 01:22:30 PM
Post by: CWCruiser on January 06, 2010, 01:46:19 PM
NF
Seekins
TPS
Post by: phishisgroovin on January 07, 2010, 10:35:24 PM
Leupold :twocents:cost effective and their customer service & Support rocks!
You dont have to pay $200,000 to get a straight shot, its your sope that matters and a clean rifle. not the rings.
Post by: Mookie on January 09, 2010, 04:25:51 AM
I will agree that $200 is to much for anyone other than ultra serious, or people with a good income, but I know quite a few people who could not get it through their thick skulls that maybe, just maybe, their $400 scope was not bad, but those $15 rings were not good. I have seen rimfires bust apart cheap rings.Leupold :twocents:cost effective and their customer service & Support rocks!
You dont have to pay $200,000 to get a straight shot, its your sope that matters and a clean rifle. not the rings.
The most I have ever paid is $50 or so, but it is on my hunting rifle and I don't ever want to worry about it. The rings I really like, for lower powered rifles, and are a good cost are the Leupold Rifleman.
Post by: high country on January 09, 2010, 08:11:30 AM
there comes a point where you need to have some MOA built into your base. you are not going to get good results with $50 ring and base setup expecting perfect long range results. my rifle wearing seekins stuff has the base bedded to the rifle and the rings are matched to the base by glen to exact tolerances. not too big of a deal untill you get way out there and run out of correction in your scope.Leupold :twocents:cost effective and their customer service & Support rocks!
You dont have to pay $200,000 to get a straight shot, its your sope that matters and a clean rifle. not the rings.
the talley LW's have everything going for them from a hunting standpoint.....they can't really gt much lighter, you could break half of the fasteners and still be as secure as a leuy or burris setup, there is NO chance of ring to base failure (I have broke a few windage adjustable setups on my lightweight magnums) tolerances are up to dave talley standards. and all that for less then the cost of a dual dovtail setup and way less weight.....a far cry from 200 un less it came with a burris fullfield 3x9
Post by: Wacenturion on January 09, 2010, 08:01:52 PM
Another vote for Dednutz.\
:yeah:
Post by: poulsbo on January 09, 2010, 09:54:21 PM
Post by: bullchaser on January 09, 2010, 10:05:27 PM
Post by: DOUBLELUNG on January 10, 2010, 12:09:55 AM
Post by: NORRISKI2 on January 10, 2010, 11:02:56 AM
Post by: Sporting_Man on January 13, 2010, 11:00:17 AM
Those inserts make a lot of sense to me. They hold well. I have a rifle of 2 years with them and no problems so far...
Post by: Hillbilly270 on January 13, 2010, 11:44:52 AM
Post by: Buckblaster on January 13, 2010, 12:10:12 PM
Post by: woodswalker on January 13, 2010, 12:37:38 PM
Post by: littlebuf on January 13, 2010, 05:34:52 PM
Post by: Big10gauge on January 13, 2010, 05:38:36 PM
I like the Burris signature rings. I find them to be very classy in appearance.I've got a pair of them on a contender pistol. They are holding up good. Usually I lap my rings but the insert takes care of that.
Those inserts make a lot of sense to me. They hold well. I have a rifle of 2 years with them and no problems so far...
Post by: elkaholic123 on January 13, 2010, 05:52:26 PM