Hunting Washington Forum

Equipment & Gear => Guns and Ammo => Topic started by: jackelope on February 26, 2010, 11:40:22 AM


Advertise Here
Title: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: jackelope on February 26, 2010, 11:40:22 AM
Whats the advantages and/or downsides to a .223 compared to a .22-250 when it comes to coyotes and other random varmints and critters?
I have a 22-250 but have never even shot the thing. My co-worker wants an AR but he's been convinced that a 22-250 is the caliber he should have...
So we are also trying to figure out if there is such an animal as an AR type black rifle in 22-250. I am not a black gun guy so don't know anything about them, nor am I too familiar with the .22 caliber stuff.
I figure this thread should make for some good ford versus chevy versus dodge type conversation too...  :peep:
Thanks in advance.

Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: WDFW-SUX on February 26, 2010, 11:48:44 AM
The difference is between the 400-600 yard mark.  the 223 is cheaper so it gets my vote.

.223 Remington Impact Energy
100 yds. = 998
200 yds. = 767
300 yds. = 581
400 yds. = 437

.22-250 Remington Impact Energy
100 yds. = 1302
200 yds. = 1010
300 yds. = 772
400 yds. = 582
500 yds. = 433



.223 Remington Impact Velocity
100 yds. = 2859
200 yds. = 2507
300 yds. = 2181
400 yds. = 1891

.22-250 Remington Impact Velocity
100 yds. = 3265
200 yds. = 2876
300 yds. = 2517
400 yds. = 2183
500 yds. = 1887
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: MtnMuley on February 26, 2010, 12:23:48 PM
Looks like there's a pretty big difference in the 100yd to 400yd mark also compared to that chart?  The 223 and 22-250 are a toss up inside 300 yards.  I prefer to shoot out to 500yds+, so the 22-250 far outweighs the 223 to me. :twocents:  
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: jackelope on February 26, 2010, 12:26:53 PM
ok so bear with me here, this may be a dumd question but I'm not a reloader and like I said I'm also not familiar with this little stuff...are they the same bullet?

Also is there such a thing as an AR platformed rifle in 22-250?
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: WDFW-SUX on February 26, 2010, 12:27:36 PM
yes

and

yes
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: jackelope on February 26, 2010, 12:29:06 PM
thanks guys...I guess it seems pretty cut and dry that the 22-250 hits harder everywhere.
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: MtnMuley on February 26, 2010, 12:31:28 PM
 
I kinda relate the 223 to the trusty ole 308--- worked for years and gets the job done.  Where as I relate  the 22-250 to the 7mag--- technology has created an upgrade with more energy and velocity, which should lead to better preformance.
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: coop2424 on February 26, 2010, 12:32:35 PM
I have never heard of an AR15 in 22-250.  Here are the calibers I have heard of on the AR15 & AR10 Platforms.  Looks like you can get it in AR10 platform from the link below..
223WSSM, 243WSSM, 25WSSM, and I believe a few other bigger bores, like 300 whisper, and a .45 calibre. (To add to Coop2424's list)
AR15
204
223
223 wssm
243 wssm
25 wssm
300 whisper
.45
5.56
6.5 Grendel
6.8 SPC
7.62x39
5.45x39
.22LR
5.7
.50 Beowulf
.410 shotgun
.450 bushmaster

AR10

22-250
.260 Remington
.243 Winchester
.308 Winchester
7.62x51mm
.338 Federal
6.5 Creedmoor

There is also a lot of pistol calibers that can be put in the AR15..
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: dontgetcrabs on February 26, 2010, 12:32:53 PM
I havn't heard of an AR-15 chambered in 22-250? But they are chambered in 223 wssm which would be close maybe even faster than a 250?
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: WDFW-SUX on February 26, 2010, 12:34:20 PM
http://www.ar15barrels.com/ar10.shtml (http://www.ar15barrels.com/ar10.shtml)
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: sako223 on February 26, 2010, 12:37:20 PM
The .223 & .22-250 use the same diameter bullet.
To get a .22-250 in an AR you have to go with a custom aR10 which is heavier. There have been factory runs of a few AR10 in .22-250 by Armalite but are hard to find. They can have feeding problems is the first reason you don't see that caliber in semi auto.
The .22-250 shoots flatter and generally has a 100 yard advantage over the .223 at all ranges. Practical experience shows the .22-250 to clearly have more authority on coyotes with less runners. The .223 is fine to 300 yds with placement of a good bullet.
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: Jamieb on February 26, 2010, 12:40:59 PM
I shoot both in bolt rifles and like both.
If your going to get a AR then stick with .223, its been perfected.
I hunt yotes more with the 22-250 and just for fun shooting the 22-250 gets more use.
I load 50gr V-max's in both, they get to the target alot faster out of the 22-250 and with less drop/wind drift.
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: WDFW-SUX on February 26, 2010, 12:43:15 PM
Can I change the barrel on my Colt AR15 and shoot somthing other than .223?  Im thinking 308 or 7mm-08?

If no what calibers are available for the 15 platform?

6.5 AR?
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: coop2424 on February 26, 2010, 12:47:40 PM
Can I change the barrel on my Colt AR15 and shoot somthing other than .223?  Im thinking 308 or 7mm-08?

If no what calibers are available for the 15 platform?

6.5 AR?

Look at the list above..  Those are most of the calibers you could switch to.  308 and 7mm-08 would have to be AR10 platform..
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: jackelope on February 26, 2010, 12:50:17 PM
I saw an AR in .450 Bushmaster the other week
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: WDFW-SUX on February 26, 2010, 12:51:54 PM
6.5 Grendel looks like what Im looking for.
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: dontgetcrabs on February 26, 2010, 12:53:07 PM
AR-15s are also chambered in 223WSSM, 243WSSM, 25WSSM, and I believe a few other bigger bores, like 300 whisper, and a .45 calibre. (To add to Coop2424's list)
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: coop2424 on February 26, 2010, 12:57:25 PM
AR-15s are also chambered in 223WSSM, 243WSSM, 25WSSM, and I believe a few other bigger bores, like 300 whisper, and a .45 calibre. (To add to Coop2424's list)

Added those to the list..  ;)
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: whacker1 on February 26, 2010, 02:08:45 PM
.223 for the AR - because you won't want to foot the ammunition bill with a .22-250 in an auto loader with 10 + round magazines.

I bought a bolt in 22.250. If I ever buy a AR platform, it will be in 223, because it is cheap.
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: jackelope on February 26, 2010, 02:33:20 PM
AR-15s are also chambered in 223WSSM, 243WSSM, 25WSSM, and I believe a few other bigger bores, like 300 whisper, and a .45 calibre. (To add to Coop2424's list)

Added those to the list..  ;)

.450 Bushmaster

my 22-250 is in the form of a barrel for my T/C Encore

Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: Special T on February 26, 2010, 04:09:32 PM
Only the AR for 223 if the decision is between the 2 rounds for a bolt gun then its not a choose 22-250. I would want a 223 AR because i always seem to miss judge the distance on my first shot...  I think though you have to add about $400 to you budget to get one tho.  :twocents:
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: WDFW-SUX on February 26, 2010, 04:20:03 PM
I like the idea of the 243 wssm for my ar 15....
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: jackelope on February 26, 2010, 05:12:03 PM
Only the AR for 223 if the decision is between the 2 rounds for a bolt gun then its not a choose 22-250. I would want a 223 AR because i always seem to miss judge the distance on my first shot...  I think though you have to add about $400 to you budget to get one tho.  :twocents:

Budget is not an issue right now.
I agree with your choices.
I like the idea of the 243 wssm for my ar 15....
Rainshadow1 shoots a 243wssm on his R15 rifle I believe.
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: demontang on February 26, 2010, 05:28:20 PM
As stated you wont find a 22-250 ar15 the coal is to long for the mag. There a lots and lots of other cals out there for the ar15. The WSSM are a good one and the .223wssm is faster then the 22-250 or 220 swift from all the load data Ive seen. Theres a 6mm turbo thats seems to have good ballistics too. Id say look around online and decide what cal fits your needs. The wssm and ossm are to fastest for cal size in the AR15 and feed with out a problem.
 
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: Big10gauge on February 26, 2010, 05:54:01 PM
Well I told myself that I wasn't going to chime in here but my fingers seem to have a mind of their own!!! Basically it boils down to what type of terrain you will be using you gun for. First off let me say that the areas I hunt can give me shot opportunities further than I am capable of shooting. My experience using a .223 has not been very satisfactory for me on anything over 200 to 250 yds. My .204 seems to be on step up from a .223 under my hunting conditions using a 32 gr Vmax. Now my  :twocents: on a 22-250, it will do just about anything you need to do except now you are into a bolt gun. My current favorite coyote gun is a .243 bolt just because it knocks the dogs down and they stay down. I am currently building a .20 tac AR that is made to shoot 40 gr bullets which is very close to a 22-250 in terms of velocity and energy. My next build will be a .243 WSSM with Mike from DTech. While you don't have the magazine capacity of the .223 and .204 you probably don't need more than 5 or 6 rounds in a magazine at any given time anyway. The .243 WSSM will be more expensive to shoot given the cost of the brass and expensive magazines unless you know how to modify the magazines to accommodate the fat cartridges. You will definitely need a brass deflector so you won't lose any of the brass. Also some of the heavier 6mm bullets are too long to fit in the magazine. These are some of the issues of shooting the WSSM cartridges but may be of no importance to you. I would definitely look into a .243 WSSM as it has more versatility. The 6 x 45 is a very stable accurate cartridge also (.223 necked up to 6mm) but somewhat lacking in velocity but is very popular also.  
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: carpsniperg2 on February 26, 2010, 08:07:48 PM
As stated you wont find a 22-250 ar15 the coal is to long for the mag. There a lots and lots of other cals out there for the ar15. The WSSM are a good one and the .223wssm is faster then the 22-250 or 220 swift from all the load data Ive seen. Theres a 6mm turbo thats seems to have good ballistics too. Id say look around online and decide what cal fits your needs. The wssm and ossm are to fastest for cal size in the AR15 and feed with out a problem.
 

very true they make a 243 r-25 i would look at if you are wanting a ar-15 style rifle.  i have the 7mm-08 and love it and my cousin has the 308.
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: Bofire on February 27, 2010, 08:41:34 AM
comparing cartridge to cartridge, 223 to 22-250. I dont care for AR's anyway so will not address that.
Since both are meant for varmits and coyotes I do not consider energy or velocity at impact a factor. If you are having trouble killing with either, consider shot placement.
The bottom line is at long range you must hit the target the most important factor for that is consistancy, consistancy!!! look at the slow 308 with heavy bullets, one of the most effective long range cartridges in existance.
For long range use I give a fast twist 223(7-9 inch) the edge over the normal (12-14 inch) 22-250, due to the availability of heavy bullet use. the heavy 223 has a higher ballistic coefficent. :)
my 2
Carl
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: 700xcr on February 27, 2010, 11:19:29 AM
comparing cartridge to cartridge, 223 to 22-250. I dont care for AR's anyway so will not address that.
Since both are meant for varmits and coyotes I do not consider energy or velocity at impact a factor. If you are having trouble killing with either, consider shot placement.
The bottom line is at long range you must hit the target the most important factor for that is consistancy, consistancy!!! look at the slow 308 with heavy bullets, one of the most effective long range cartridges in existance.
For long range use I give a fast twist 223(7-9 inch) the edge over the normal (12-14 inch) 22-250, due to the availability of heavy bullet use. the heavy 223 has a higher ballistic coefficent. :)
my 2
Carl
I agree with you 100%. That is why when it comes down to rebarreling my Remington 700 SPS 26" Varmint 1 an12" 223rem. I will rebarrel it with a 26" Benchmark 223 Akley fluted stainless with a 1 an 9" twist. That way I can run with 70gr. Berger VLD's
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: sako223 on February 27, 2010, 11:30:15 AM
.223 AI closes the gap a bit with the .22-250. But then the .22-250 AI widens the gap even more, this is a real performing round up to 5200 fps.
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: WDFW-SUX on February 27, 2010, 11:52:56 AM
243 wssm will be the perfect wolf AR..


http://www.olyarms.com/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage=shop.flypage&product_id=105&category_id=12&manufacturer_id=0&option=com_virtuemart&Itemid=37 (http://www.olyarms.com/index.php?page=shop.product_details&flypage=shop.flypage&product_id=105&category_id=12&manufacturer_id=0&option=com_virtuemart&Itemid=37)

 :drool:
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: Wanttohuntmore on February 27, 2010, 09:48:14 PM
I hope 5200 fps was a typo  :dunno:, my 22-250 ackley comes nowhere near that speed.  I shoot both, 22-250, 223 in an AR, a 243, and a 2506.  Today, where I knew the distance was out there, I packed the 2506.  But to tell the truth, I wouldn't have felt that handicapped with my AR in 223 as well.  Between the 2 cartridges you mentioned, I would stick with the 223 if coyote hunting was less than 50% of it's main purpose.  If it's a yote gun, and fur isn't a concern, get a 243 or 2506, or what I'm eyeing now, a 22/250 ackley, with 1/7" twist......  Or a 6.5x284win....
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: shaneman153D on February 27, 2010, 11:45:22 PM
Well I told myself that I wasn't going to chime in here but my fingers seem to have a mind of their own!!! Basically it boils down to what type of terrain you will be using you gun for. First off let me say that the areas I hunt can give me shot opportunities further than I am capable of shooting. My experience using a .223 has not been very satisfactory for me on anything over 200 to 250 yds. My .204 seems to be on step up from a .223 under my hunting conditions using a 32 gr Vmax. Now my  :twocents: on a 22-250, it will do just about anything you need to do except now you are into a bolt gun. My current favorite coyote gun is a .243 bolt just because it knocks the dogs down and they stay down. I am currently building a .20 tac AR that is made to shoot 40 gr bullets which is very close to a 22-250 in terms of velocity and energy. My next build will be a .243 WSSM with Mike from DTech. While you don't have the magazine capacity of the .223 and .204 you probably don't need more than 5 or 6 rounds in a magazine at any given time anyway. The .243 WSSM will be more expensive to shoot given the cost of the brass and expensive magazines unless you know how to modify the magazines to accommodate the fat cartridges. You will definitely need a brass deflector so you won't lose any of the brass. Also some of the heavier 6mm bullets are too long to fit in the magazine. These are some of the issues of shooting the WSSM cartridges but may be of no importance to you. I would definitely look into a .243 WSSM as it has more versatility. The 6 x 45 is a very stable accurate cartridge also (.223 necked up to 6mm) but somewhat lacking in velocity but is very popular also.  

I know max OAL can be a problem for commercially loaded heavy bullets, and a problem for heavy bullets in the 25WSSM but I think you're good on the .243.

And big10, P-mags can be pretty easily modded, and are way cheaper and better than the Oly mags.  Mike mods his with Pmag followers IIRC.  The 20 rounder will hold 7 and the 30 will hod 11.  There's a guy on predatormasters that will do it for you, can't remember his name though.

Did you already order it?  I told myself when I shoot this one out I'm going to send it to him for a shilen barrel and the D-Tech touch.

I'm well on my way just in load development.   :chuckle:
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: Intruder on March 01, 2010, 08:00:13 AM
No question, 22-250 is ballisticly superior.... to the tune of about 400 fps on average.  It shoots about 40% more powder and as such can flat scoot a bullet down range... and accurately.  On coyote sized game the 223 tends to start maxing out around 250ish IMO.  All things equal 22-250 is vastly superior. 

The real difference is cost of shooting them.  Currently I'm able to buy 223 ammo for about 45-50 cents a shot.  If you're not reloading the 22-250 is gonna cost ya bout a buck and a quarter a shot. 

One of the main reason I got a 223 was for all around versatility.  I plink with it, shot squirrels, and yotes.  It is really my main "practice" gun for developing shooting skills.  As such I end up shooting hundreds of shots a year.  A lot harder to justify that when your shots cost 70+ cents more a piece  :twocents: 
Title: Re: .223 compared to .22-250
Post by: sako223 on March 01, 2010, 08:32:22 AM
Quote
I hope 5200 fps was a typo  , my 22-250 ackley comes nowhere near that speed.

Well over 5100
http://www.accuratereloading.com/22250ai.html (http://www.accuratereloading.com/22250ai.html)

Here is the 223 AI
http://www.accuratereloading.com/223ackley.html (http://www.accuratereloading.com/223ackley.html)
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal