Post by: bearpaw on July 20, 2010, 08:12:09 PM
http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?topic=14016&post=90265&uid=385127436760#topic_top (http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?topic=14016&post=90265&uid=385127436760#topic_top)
Post by: Gringo31 on July 20, 2010, 09:43:51 PM
My head gets sore from all the :bash: :bash: :bash: :bash: :bash: :bash: :bash: :bash: :bash:
Post by: bearpaw on July 20, 2010, 11:59:09 PM
Post by: bearpaw on July 21, 2010, 10:49:20 AM
http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?topic=14016&post=90376&uid=385127436760#post90376 (http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?topic=14016&post=90376&uid=385127436760#post90376)
Post by: bearpaw on July 21, 2010, 11:57:48 AM
_______________________________________
Here's the real target, they want wolves thorughout the country, at a time when people are struggling to make a living they want 10's of thousands of wolves. Please read...
http://www.rr.com/news/topic/article/rr/9000/16613478/Petition_seeks_to_have_wolves_howl_across_US/full (http://www.rr.com/news/topic/article/rr/9000/16613478/Petition_seeks_to_have_wolves_howl_across_US/full)
It's obvious they do not agree with the Washington wolf plan, just read the comments in this discussion, as soon as the state tries to delist, they will sue Washington just like they sue everywhere else.
The deal was 100 wolves in each state of Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming, now look at those states with 3000 wolves and the wolf worshippers sued to relist them.
The feds had delsited Minnesota and Wisconsin but the wolf worshippers sued and wolves are listed again there too. There are 5000 wolves in the great lakes states and that is not enough for the wolf worshippers. I just returned from a family reuinion in WI/MN and not one person I talked to in 10 days there was happy about the wolves.
The best thing anyone can do is to oppose all wolves period at any point, because once wolves are established the wolf worshippers will sue to stop management and then wolves simply will multiply. I am forced to be opposed to any wolves for this reason.
Those are the facts and the responses here confirm the same story will play out in Washington. Not one wolf worshipper will put a number on how many wolves is enough.
Beware My Friends...
Post by: haus on July 21, 2010, 12:17:55 PM
Post by: grundy53 on July 21, 2010, 12:21:48 PM
Post by: haus on July 21, 2010, 01:16:07 PM
Post by: grundy53 on July 21, 2010, 02:27:52 PM
Hmm....I guess they didn't like my bunny joke... :'(
I think your right :tung: :chuckle:
Post by: Gringo31 on July 22, 2010, 10:36:57 AM
There is a poster that says "500 dead, get involved" wolf center blah, blah....
Her post-
Jami Wright- Time to get down to business. We have options, especially if your a rocky mountain resident. There is a deep rooted system at work here. We must seek to understand it, and have compassion for those who don't see things the way that we do. We can actually learn from them and create bridges. Plant seeds of compassion for all living things in your... See More communities and seek the lessons that they offer. If anyone is interested in learning more about how they can utilize their strengths within this human issue surrounding wolves, I would be happy to offer suggestions. My masters thesis in anthropology focuses on this exactly. I have a blog at jamiw.wordpress.com if your interested in some Idahoan perspectives and experiences surrounding wolves.
She also has her own wolf loving site http://jamiw.wordpress.com/ (http://jamiw.wordpress.com/)
Post by: bearpaw on July 22, 2010, 11:24:41 AM
AMAZING
Linda, the reason the wolves are dying in Yellowstone is pretty simple. The wolves over-populated, ate most of the elk and nearly all the moose, now they are starving and killing each other becuase even the wolves know there is not enough elk.
FYI - Man has the ability to manage animals so over populations do not occur. At any point biologists feel that there are to many elk, deer, or predators, man can adjust hunting seasons to establish better population levels. It has been working for the last 100 years very well.
LOL Why do you think Lewis and Clark almost starved to death crossing the west.... Because there were unmanaged predator numbers. By keeping all wildlife at sustainable levels the predators and man all fit into the modern environment.
This is precisely one of the many reasons wolves need mananged.
Unless you and everyone else on earth plan on moving to the moon, you are not even making any sense with this rant about (before man). LOL
Post by: bearpaw on July 22, 2010, 11:25:41 AM
Post by: Gringo31 on July 22, 2010, 11:31:10 AM
I still want to know if they manage wildlife on science or majority rule.
Post by: haus on July 22, 2010, 11:34:42 AM
Post by: bearpaw on July 22, 2010, 11:59:23 AM
Yeah, I saw....but they said a whole lot of nothing......Be nice, thanks for using our wolf info from our site, we will keep working on this and listening to you......blah, blah.
I still want to know if they manage wildlife on science or majority rule.
I agree, next time I get on there I will ask the same question....
Todd got results with the chicken talk...LOL
just kidding, I probably won't try that...
Post by: Gringo31 on July 22, 2010, 01:40:17 PM
Post by: bearpaw on July 22, 2010, 02:02:41 PM
Can you believe her last name is hunter?
Linda Jo Hunter
Harold. . . read carefully. . . I said the fear of animals like grizzly bears keeps people from being slobs in the woods. Personally, I don't find grizzly bears very dangerous at all and would much rather encounter one than a miss guided soul who is so scared in the woods that he/she shoots at sounds. The rest of you are really stretching for your theories. . . where animals are relatively left alone they are self regulated by the environment. Where we have over populations it can be traced back to man. Lewis and Clark had trouble with food on Lolo pass due to the depth of the snow . . no self respecting elk used to hang out where snow was chest deep so they had left. Lewis and Clark were only in the area at the wrong time. I won't change any of your minds about anything I know because you have a clear agenda. . you want to have an elk and deer farm in Washington State for ease of hunting and predators are not welcome by those who hunt. I have read the complete journals of Lewis and Clark and you need to brush up if you want to use them in your arguments.
Post by: bearpaw on July 22, 2010, 02:05:26 PM
I am the author of "Lonesome for Bears, A Woman's Journey in the Tracks of the Wilderness" and if you want a copy, you can find it easily on Amazon.com under Linda Jo Hunter. If you want a signed copy, I will sign yours when I see you!
How many do you want... :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
Post by: Curly on July 22, 2010, 02:21:50 PM
Post by: haus on July 22, 2010, 03:04:34 PM
Post by: wolfbait on July 22, 2010, 03:27:37 PM
off her facebook page....
I am the author of "Lonesome for Bears, A Woman's Journey in the Tracks of the Wilderness" and if you want a copy, you can find it easily on Amazon.com under Linda Jo Hunter. If you want a signed copy, I will sign yours when I see you!
How many do you want... :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
Where do I sign up! :yike: She is soooo smart.
Post by: haus on July 22, 2010, 03:46:09 PM
Post by: grundy53 on July 22, 2010, 03:50:16 PM
Well now I see what happens when people start struttin around makin chicken sounds. Maybe I'll wear a chicken suite to the next commissioners meeting....
:chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
Post by: 300magman on July 22, 2010, 05:12:05 PM
We have heard your BS before, same ol story...............
Your just another tree hugger that don't like the fact that pretty little animals get shot........
You could join your friend who was a bear lover, but in the end he got eaten by the same bears that he said we not dangerous at all......
as far as I am concerned you would not be missed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post by: Gringo31 on July 22, 2010, 05:30:23 PM
Save a Wolf, eat a shotgun.
Post by: high country on July 22, 2010, 06:06:36 PM
If we being "man" are causing the demise of the ecosystem....we could sell T-shirts that say..
Save a Wolf, eat a shotgun.
or save all the wolves, teach them to eat purina.
Post by: Gringo31 on July 22, 2010, 06:10:22 PM
Post by: Gringo31 on July 23, 2010, 07:06:43 AM
Mods forgive me for posting this part I got from the above here. It is legit, don't move it to the jokes thread. :chuckle: :chuckle:
"The predators they have dealt with are coyotes and rattlesnakes. Regarding coyotes, their practice is to take cattle that have died, for whatever reason, and leave them up on a hill behind their house. The coyotes eat the cattle there and leave their ranch alone. This has worked for as long as she can remember. Bev thinks that they understand and respect this notion of boundaries and territory. This makes sense if we stop to think about how coyotes, as well as wolves, exist within their own very strict boundaries.
Post by: Gringo31 on July 23, 2010, 06:37:11 PM
Post by: bearpaw on July 24, 2010, 09:04:11 AM
Post by: haus on July 26, 2010, 10:22:59 AM
Post by: Gringo31 on July 26, 2010, 06:22:59 PM
Wolf Education & Research Center (WERC) NY Times Editorial-License to Kill Wolves-Read more here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/22/opinion/22thu3.html?_r=1 (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/22/opinion/22thu3.html?_r=1)
NY Times Editorial - License to Kill Wolves
www.nytimes.com (http://www.nytimes.com)
In Idaho and Montana, in early 2009, gray wolves were removed from the endangered species list and left to the mercy of state “management plans.” Those plans have been crafted to satisfy hunters rather than protect the wolves or the ecosystem in which they play an essential role. They all but guaran...
4 hours ago · Comment · Like · Share
Barbara E Whitney likes this.
Barbara E Whitney Unbelievable!! So they decided to give them a license to kill -huh? Cretins!
4 hours ago · Like ·
Tara W Cohn We as humans really suck as a species.
3 hours ago · Like ·
Amber Walker i agree with you, tara. completely.
this is sad, and it makes me angry.
2 hours ago · Like ·
Evan O'Donnell This is ridiculous, maybe it is time to open up human season? We can start with big business and financial groups that have screwed the country and planet initially then work our way through the chain.
2 hours ago · Like ·
Amber Walker that made me laugh. and i second this motion.
2 hours ago · Like ·
Cynthia Barber We can start in DC and just continue moving west or start in the west and east and meet in the middle. It would certainly be a better world..
Wolf Education & Research Center (WERC) We have to remind ourselves that the people making these decisions are subject to 1) their own life experience (cultural and ancestral) and 2) political and financial pressure. I truly believe that there is commonality in this debate but it's like anything in the business world: identifiable interest. If we advocates alienate those in opposition to our perspective, they will unlikely embrace our positions. Being that is such a difficult endeavor, the natural reaction in our community is education of future voters, legislators, and activists.
So, being that we each know that, then WHY is it so incredibly difficult to procure funding for this work?
Hunters put their money where there mouths are---they form collaborative enterprises, special interest groups, and underwrite politicians who espouse their views. They are very effective at getting "sponsored" by recreational supply companies because of the sheer volume of financial income trading hands.
Ranchers are similar until groups like ours show them a way to do what is natural for them...protecting livestock and believe it or not, other animal species, including wolves. The rub in the ointment, however, is that there is no mutual interest with hunters who oppose wolves. Therein lies the real opponent and until we demonstrate the financial benefit of our position, it is unlikely we'll win this debate at the national level.
With that said, I have no "beef" against humans. I am one. And I marvel at the potential for good that humans have within us. But like anything, it is a choice. To say that "humans suck" betrays our real purpose as an amazing creation, regardless of what God or accident you attribute our origination to.
I take the position that using reason, stating factual evidence of our position, and being pro-actively willing to discuss this issue with everyone I meet will eventually produce a good result, especially when our efforts are multiplied by the impact of social media. --Chris
2 hours ago · Like ·
Cynthia Barber This is true. We are up against a better organized, better funded group of people. Our only hope is education. Sometimes it is very frustrating to know that we are only ultimately harming ourselves by messing with Mother Nature.
2 hours ago · Like ·
Evan O'Donnell I apologize for my comment, though the frustration is real. Why is it that we must work so hard to do good when it is so easy and easily accepted to do the wrong thing for so many? Our small victories are so small for the environment while the destruction is so great. It is so overwhelming sometimes. Again, sorry for my negative comment. I love the work that you guys are able to accomplish and look forward to more success stories in our future.
2 hours ago · Like ·
Wolf Education & Research Center (WERC) Man... Evan, I gotta tell you that your last comment is the highlight of my day. It's not often that one can take someone to task as I did and pull them back from ledge. You demonstrated the utmost humanity in your reply. Thank you; you blessed me immeasurably. I share all of your frustration but have to remain hopeful or all is certainly lost. I'm grateful for your participation here. And I know that the wolves are (in their own howling way!)
about an hour ago · Like ·
Amber Walker yeah, same. people say stupid *censored* when things bother them, and it isn't always appropriate to josh about it.
Post by: DeerThug on July 26, 2010, 09:26:45 PM
Post by: haus on July 27, 2010, 10:40:42 AM