Hunting Washington Forum

Community => Advocacy, Agencies, Access => Topic started by: InsideWDFW on October 19, 2010, 10:20:56 PM


Advertise Here
Title: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: InsideWDFW on October 19, 2010, 10:20:56 PM
Hello all,

Some of you may remember me from a few years ago.  I answered a few questions on the inner workings of WDFW, especially regarding the drawing system.  After some pressure from higher-ups I stopped posting for fear of losing my job.  Now that I'm no longer working for WDFW, I don't have to worry anymore.  I forgot about this place until I found a post through Google.  I figure while I'm unemployed, I'd kill time by hanging around here answering any questions I can.  While I'm not a big fan of the people I worked with, I did love my job.  Though I will only answer questions that could be answered if you asked WDFW directly or filled a public disclosure request.  I'm sure I'm not going to make any friends in the Agency, and don't want to hang-out in court.

I started with the Agency in July 2007 working in the WDFW Licensing unit stuffing internet sold licenses and mailing them.  I worked my up to tech support for dealers and working with the technical group that handles the WILD system and the actual draw system.  I then moved to the Wildlife Program and worked as one of two Customer Service Specialists.

While a CSS doesn't sound like an important job, I had to know the answers to questions I got while answering (360) 902-2515, if you e-mailed the Wildlife Program (wildthing@dfw.wa.gov) you received a response from me.  What you guys will probably be most interested in was that I was the coordinator for the permits/processing of Game Farms, Migratory Bird permits, Wildlife publications, and Special Hunt drawings.

For Special hunt drawings I was in charge of pulling the raw drawing data from the WILD system, parsing the data (it came in a text file with each entry looking like "604605406546540smith bob a 8464 1 0 0 0"), working with IT to query the WILD system for addresses and what not, then getting the data to the web team for posting (http://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/permits/results/ (http://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/permits/results/) and https://fishhunt.dfw.wa.gov/wa/specialhuntlookup (https://fishhunt.dfw.wa.gov/wa/specialhuntlookup)) and the Licensing unit for permit printing.  (And the mis-printed permits from 2009 was not my fault, Dept. Of Printing dropped the ball on that one).  I also created the spreadsheets that were uploaded to the WILD system to populate hunt choices when you go to enter your application.

So yea, I'll be hanging around answering any questions I can.  I was put on admin leave in Decemember 2009 and finally fired in May 2010, so some things may have changed.

Mike
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: bobcat on October 19, 2010, 10:30:23 PM
Great! Well, I'm sorry you were fired. I don't suppose you'd want to say why? I remember you well and was very sorry when they told you not to post anymore. Especially thought that was ridiculous since it was on your own time! I'll be thinking of some questions for sure. But it's too late right now. I'll have to sleep on it.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: bow4elk on October 19, 2010, 10:38:47 PM
Mike, are you the guy mentioned on the news last night?  Just curious. 
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: bobcat on October 19, 2010, 10:42:58 PM
I don't think that guy was from Olympia, and he was a biologist.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: sisu on October 19, 2010, 10:45:56 PM
Fired! Hell, the governor, her staff and all the top admin. at WDFW should be canned not the troops running the show.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: bobcat on October 19, 2010, 10:46:57 PM
Fired! Hell, the governor, her staff and all the top admin. at WDFW should be canned not the troops running the show.

:yeah:
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: InsideWDFW on October 19, 2010, 10:47:43 PM
Mike, are you the guy mentioned on the news last night?  Just curious.  

I'm assuming you are talking about this http://www.theolympian.com/2010/10/19/1408857/former-washington-department-of.html (http://www.theolympian.com/2010/10/19/1408857/former-washington-department-of.html)?  Nope.

Basically I made the mistake a messing around with my boss.  She eventually got mad and had friends up on high.  So I got the crap audited out of me, and they found that I was using Firefox, had used the WILD system to look up an address of the a coworker for Christmas cards, and had looked a sub-shop's webpage to see what I was going to have for dinner.  Life lesson # 3454: Do not date co-workers, especially if she signs your evaluation.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Curly on October 20, 2010, 07:20:23 AM
So yea, I'll be hanging around answering any questions I can.

So, is Dave Ware really as big of a *censored* as he appears to be?

Did WDFW really think the new permit draw system was a good idea?  Or did they only come up with all the new category system for the sole purpose of generating more revenue?

When did WDFW start working on the new category system, and did they try to keep it a secret from the public until it was basically too late to stop the system from being implemented?


There.  Those are a few of the questions that have been on my mind for almost a year now.  You may not be able to answer any of those questions, but if you can.......I'm all ears.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: robodad on October 20, 2010, 07:28:14 AM
It's really good to see you back here but wish it could have been under better circumstances, Welcome back !!  :hello:
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: runamuk on October 20, 2010, 07:28:32 AM
Mike, are you the guy mentioned on the news last night?  Just curious.  

I'm assuming you are talking about this http://www.theolympian.com/2010/10/19/1408857/former-washington-department-of.html (http://www.theolympian.com/2010/10/19/1408857/former-washington-department-of.html)?  Nope.

Basically I made the mistake a messing around with my boss.  She eventually got mad and had friends up on high.  So I got the crap audited out of me, and they found that I was using Firefox, had used the WILD system to look up an address of the a coworker for Christmas cards, and had looked a sub-shop's webpage to see what I was going to have for dinner.  Life lesson # 3454: Do not date co-workers, especially if she signs your evaluation.

this makes me laugh but very good advice  :chuckle:

I am glad you are back I rather liked having someone who actually was in wdfw answering questions.  I am sorry you lost your job....but nice to have you back here.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Curly on October 20, 2010, 07:45:25 AM
I thought of a couple more.

What percentage of WDFW employees would you estimate are anti-hunters? 

I can't make any sense out of WDFW protecting cougars like they seem to be doing.  Is there some sort of cougar lover working there that lobbies for the crazy rules that have been set lately regarding cougars?
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: InsideWDFW on October 20, 2010, 11:33:56 AM

So, is Dave Ware really as big of a *censored* as he appears to be?

Did WDFW really think the new permit draw system was a good idea?  Or did they only come up with all the new category system for the sole purpose of generating more revenue?

When did WDFW start working on the new category system, and did they try to keep it a secret from the public until it was basically too late to stop the system from being implemented?

On a personal level, Dave's a pretty good guy.  At his level professionally he has to be a politician, so he get wishy-washy sometimes.

The new permit system was just getting put together when I was put on admin leave so I don't know too much about it.  I do know the rumblings of something like it began in the last season setting process.  I know they were aware that the first couple of years were going to be weird due the points that had been built up, but were confident that it would calm down eventually.  While increased revenue was discussed (the agency is scrambling for more money), the majority of the talk that I heard focused around hunter's comments/concerns with the way the system was.

Quote
What percentage of WDFW employees would you estimate are anti-hunters?  

I can't make any sense out of WDFW protecting cougars like they seem to be doing.  Is there some sort of cougar lover working there that lobbies for the crazy rules that have been set lately regarding cougars?

Believe it or not I was the odd duck out and was one of the few who didn't hunt (not anti-hunting, just never had the chance).  The guys who are directly involved with land use and game management (people like Dave Ware, Jerry Nelson, ect.) are just about as hardcore about hunting as you are.  WDFW is one of those places where it's fairly easy to take a vacation during the summer, but almost impossible to get time off in the fall because everyone is out in the field.

I'm not sure what you are talking about as far as cougars (I've been out of the loop for nearly a year).  I will say (in my personal opinion) that the cougar manager is an ok biologist, but a lousy manager - a sentiment that is shared by a lot of people in the agency.  On the flip side, the unofficial mission statement of the agency was basically "Managing Washington's Wildlife so your great, great, great, grandson has something to tag/hook."
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Skyvalhunter on October 20, 2010, 12:18:36 PM
How long is the contract for with the company that does the drawings? I heard they get a certain percentage of each License, tag, punch card, etc sold. Is there any truth to this?
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Humptulips on October 20, 2010, 12:24:34 PM
There are certain people in the department that never return calls or answer e-mails. I won't name names. Is there any system within the department for tracking who is actually doing their job regarding customer relations and is there any repercussions if they are not?
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: InsideWDFW on October 20, 2010, 01:55:49 PM
How long is the contract for with the company that does the drawings? I heard they get a certain percentage of each License, tag, punch card, etc sold. Is there any truth to this?

I'm not 100% sure when the contract is up, but I believe in the next year or two.  The thing is there really are no other companies that could do it, so I wouldn't be surprised if they stick with Outdoors Central/Active Outdoors.  Especially now that the system has stabilized.  There is a fee on every license that goes into an account that then is paid to OC/AO.  The fun part about it is that if they don't do what they are supposed to do, then the agency doesn't pay them the fees.  This happened a lot in the beginning. 

Quote
There are certain people in the department that never return calls or answer e-mails. I won't name names. Is there any system within the department for tracking who is actually doing their job regarding customer relations and is there any repercussions if they are not?

I'll name names, Dave Ware and Donny Martorello.  I'll start with the answer you'll like.

Like I said earlier, Donny is a biologist, not a manager.  He's in the office maybe 2 days out five.  You're not alone if you are frustrated with not being able to get a hold of Donny, so is the staff.  The 2009 spring bear drawing/packets almost didn't happen on time because he went awhol.  I had my brother on standby to be the citizen witness for the drawing because Donny didn't get one.  I finally sent out the permit packets without his approval because he didn't answer a bunch of e-mails, phone calls, or headups from his boss (Dave Ware) and mine.  Don't even get me started on Trapper reports.

Dave Ware like I said is basically a politician.  Three quarters of his day is spent in meetings.  Right about now I bet he's getting 20 to 30 calls a day and 30-40 e-mails from hunters.  He just doesn't have time to answer them all.  And 99% of the calls/e-mails he gets were answered farther down the food chain.  There were quite a few times I'd give an answer to a caller, they wouldn't like it and ask to speak to Dave.  Dave would get the message come back to me, and have me respond to the caller and give the exact same answer I gave the caller in the first place.

Dave is really good about sitting down with the front-line staff (360-902-2515 and Wildthing@dfw.wa.gov) and going over questions we got.  A majority of the calls/e-mails I received I had already had an answer from Dave on.  A good example is point refunds. There's a pretty cut and dry policy on when I could refund points.  If I said I'm sorry, going over my head wouldn't change it.  If it was something questionable, I'd tell the caller I call them back, walk over to Dave's office and ask him face to face.  I'm sure that his communication with the front desk staff has improved since then seeing how the person who basically replaced me on the phones/e-mails is his wife.

When you get go above the front-line staff, there really is no tracking and what not.  Nine times out of ten the answer you got by calling 360-902-2515 is the answer you'd get if you went up the food chain.
 
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: 6x6in6 on October 20, 2010, 02:16:59 PM
Welcome Back!!!   :)

Good stuff, thanks.

And FWIW, sounds more like Ware's old lady needed a job and you got ran up the meat pole for a little internet surfing on State time.  Lame!!!
And there's nothing wrong with dipping the pen in company ink.  It's worked for me in the past.  :chuckle:
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Kain on October 20, 2010, 06:00:53 PM
You could try to clear up night and hound hunting rules.   :dunno: 

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,58219.0.html (http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,58219.0.html)

These rules are so bad that nearly everyone has a different idea on what is legal and when.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Fireant11 on October 22, 2010, 09:59:33 PM
Mike, I left you a PM, but maybe someone else on this forum can roll in with an answer.

I have an issue where I was going to hunt Western rifle for elk.  The person I was going with got hurt in an accident and can't hunt.  The WDFW said I could swap tags provided the season I had a tag for hadn't already started (which Western rifle elk hasn't). 

Now, when I go to Dick's Sporting Goods today and the clerk calls WDFW to exchange my tag, they say I can't because I put in for a special permit under my Western tag.  I was not selected for a special permit, but somehow this locks me in to my current tag.

Why should this prevent me from exchanging tags?!!!  I'm not hunting two seasons or owning two tags, and I'm not taking away a special permit from someone since I wasn't drawn?  This makes not sense!!

While I'm at it, I'd like to see the state do away with purchasing a tag prior to putting in for special permits!  Let people try for what they want, and if they don't get drawn, then let them buy a tag they will use.  There's no harm with this, as no matter what a person puts in for, the state has limited numbers for each draw.  Even if everyone put in for the same special permit, so what?!!  Only a certain number of tags will be issued.  All that will happen is it would increase the odds of getting drawn. 
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: stumprat on October 23, 2010, 06:53:21 AM
I'll name names, Dave Ware and Donny Martorello.  I'll start with the answer you'll like.

Like I said earlier, Donny is a biologist, not a manager.  He's in the office maybe 2 days out five.  You're not alone if you are frustrated with not being able to get a hold of Donny, so is the staff.  The 2009 spring bear drawing/packets almost didn't happen on time because he went awhol.  I had my brother on standby to be the citizen witness for the drawing because Donny didn't get one.  I finally sent out the permit packets without his approval because he didn't answer a bunch of e-mails, phone calls, or headups from his boss (Dave Ware) and mine.  Don't even get me started on Trapper reports.

Dave Ware like I said is basically a politician.  Three quarters of his day is spent in meetings.  Right about now I bet he's getting 20 to 30 calls a day and 30-40 e-mails from hunters.  He just doesn't have time to answer them all.  And 99% of the calls/e-mails he gets were answered farther down the food chain.  There were quite a few times I'd give an answer to a caller, they wouldn't like it and ask to speak to Dave.  Dave would get the message come back to me, and have me respond to the caller and give the exact same answer I gave the caller in the first place.

Dave is really good about sitting down with the front-line staff (360-902-2515 and Wildthing@dfw.wa.gov) and going over questions we got.  A majority of the calls/e-mails I received I had already had an answer from Dave on.  A good example is point refunds. There's a pretty cut and dry policy on when I could refund points.  If I said I'm sorry, going over my head wouldn't change it.  If it was something questionable, I'd tell the caller I call them back, walk over to Dave's office and ask him face to face.  I'm sure that his communication with the front desk staff has improved since then seeing how the person who basically replaced me on the phones/e-mails is his wife.

When you get go above the front-line staff, there really is no tracking and what not.  Nine times out of ten the answer you got by calling 360-902-2515 is the answer you'd get if you went up the food chain.
 


When I have contacted the dept. Dave has always seemed to be as forthright as possible. Donny on the other hand makes no sense and gives alot of double talk. IF YOU CAN EVER REACH HIM AS YOU STATED. Does he ever go through a personal audit??


Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Curly on October 23, 2010, 07:56:45 AM
Mike, I left you a PM, but maybe someone else on this forum can roll in with an answer.

I have an issue where I was going to hunt Western rifle for elk.  The person I was going with got hurt in an accident and can't hunt.  The WDFW said I could swap tags provided the season I had a tag for hadn't already started (which Western rifle elk hasn't). 

Now, when I go to Dick's Sporting Goods today and the clerk calls WDFW to exchange my tag, they say I can't because I put in for a special permit under my Western tag.  I was not selected for a special permit, but somehow this locks me in to my current tag.

Why should this prevent me from exchanging tags?!!!  I'm not hunting two seasons or owning two tags, and I'm not taking away a special permit from someone since I wasn't drawn?  This makes not sense!!

While I'm at it, I'd like to see the state do away with purchasing a tag prior to putting in for special permits!  Let people try for what they want, and if they don't get drawn, then let them buy a tag they will use.  There's no harm with this, as no matter what a person puts in for, the state has limited numbers for each draw.  Even if everyone put in for the same special permit, so what?!!  Only a certain number of tags will be issued.  All that will happen is it would increase the odds of getting drawn. 

The reason they won't let you switch is because everyone would do that if they allowed it.  A lot of people would love to apply for Little Naches or a Blue Mountains Big Bull Permit and if unsuccessful, they would then get a western WA elk tag so that they could hunt 3-point or bigger.  It states in the regs that you can't switch if you've applied for a permit, although I did read on this forum about a guy getting his tagged switched, so they don't always stick to their own rules.  Keep after it and you may get them to switch it.

The reason they won't do away with the requirement of purchasing a tag prior to applying for a special permit is due to money.  The elk tag sales would probably be 1/3 of what they currently are because of the fact that a lot of guys won't hunt spikes and only buy the tag in hopes of drawing a special permit that allows them to hunt big bulls.

I'm curious to see if InsideWDFW has any more insight, but that is my  :twocents:
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: tlbradford on October 23, 2010, 08:28:53 AM
What is your personal opinion of private ranches that receive public funds?  Specifically Buckrun.  Thanks
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: BlackRidge on October 23, 2010, 09:46:42 AM
Thanks InsideWDFW, this has been an eye opener for sure
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Special T on October 24, 2010, 09:55:00 PM
InsideWDFW I'm really surprised that they would not want you talking on a hunting/fishing board answering questions about non political issues. Basically you could have been limited to providing boiler plate answers that would clear things up and educate hunters in general. Was there any discussion by you or anyone else about the pros and cons of someone interacting with their customers? Had it ever been discussed in the past? If you cannot answer please say so... Thank you for elevating the discussion on this board.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: InsideWDFW on October 26, 2010, 06:29:06 PM
@Fireant11: Curly pretty much nailed it on the head.  Exceptions are made, but you have a better chance at winning the raffle than getting an exception.

InsideWDFW I'm really surprised that they would not want you talking on a hunting/fishing board answering questions about non political issues. Basically you could have been limited to providing boiler plate answers that would clear things up and educate hunters in general. Was there any discussion by you or anyone else about the pros and cons of someone interacting with their customers? Had it ever been discussed in the past? If you cannot answer please say so... Thank you for elevating the discussion on this board.

I tried getting something this rolling, specifically a WDFW sponsored forum for answering the standard questions.  Unfortunately the agency is very old fashion in some odd ways.  Those who would have to sign off on it aren't exactly the most tech oriented and don't understand the power of forums like this one.  I had to beg, borrow, and steal to get Dave Ware to go along with consolidating the drawing results (https://fishhunt.dfw.wa.gov/wa/specialhuntlookup (https://fishhunt.dfw.wa.gov/wa/specialhuntlookup)).  Also there was some concerns on who would moderate/answer the questions.  Public affairs is paranoid that wrong information from an official source would get out.  It's one thing for a customer service to give wrong information out over the phone, it's a whole 'nother thing to give it out in writing.  The agency is extremely paranoid about lawsuits.

What is your personal opinion of private ranches that receive public funds?  Specifically Buckrun.  Thanks

In all honesty I don't know much about the private ranches.  Though I don't think they get private funds.  From the little I did (creating the permits/log sheets), my understanding was that they were private lands that got x amount of permits, a certain percentage had to be given (sold/raffled) to the public.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Machias on October 26, 2010, 08:36:37 PM
Welcome back, glad you are taking the time to try and answer a few questions.  Very sorry about your job and I hope your able to bounce back quickly!

Who was the complete moron who decided coyote hunting with dogs was socially unacceptable?
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: nontypical176 on October 26, 2010, 09:05:38 PM
Seems to me like the WDFW is always looking for more ways to pinch pennys out of hunters and fisherman.  We continuously fork over more and more cash, yet we are the ones used to keep the game populations at the levels they need.  Where is all the money going?  Why constantly more more more.  I hear talk about these oportunities we are gaining in land access and such, but as far as I'm concerned things have been down hill since I started hunting and fishing.  Why is it always hunters/fisherman forced to pay for WDFW programs?  Is there anybody else in this state that pays for our wildlife, besides the fisheries money recieved from dams?  How do you feel about the way our money is being spent by the WDFW? 

And for the fish.  Lots of these smaller rivers in the west are getting either no more hatchery fish released or a small fraction of what they used to.  Basicly the rivers I grew up fishing steelhead on are now going to be almost all catch and release except for a few hatchery fish that come from other rivers.  Whats the plan here?  Will these rivers be off limits at some point?  If numbers are good do they plan on letting us keep natives....eventually?

How many times would I have to call the WDFW, email and write letters to make them give the Toutle unit to the general hunters?...lol.  Do you believe the reasons for a special permit unit as big as the toutle is strictly for the $$$$?  Its just a personal pet peeve of mine because it is so close to home, a huge unit, heavily poached because its too big for them to manage, the permit aint really that "special", has lots of special permit land nearby, and would open up a ton more room for general elk tag holders on the west side.

Sorry, I have a lot on my mind.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: gasman on October 27, 2010, 05:07:57 AM
Glad you back  :hello:
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: billythekidrock on October 27, 2010, 05:42:32 AM
Seems to me like the WDFW is always looking for more ways to pinch pennys out of hunters and fisherman.  We continuously fork over more and more cash, yet we are the ones used to keep the game populations at the levels they need.  Where is all the money going?  Why constantly more more more.  I hear talk about these oportunities we are gaining in land access and such, but as far as I'm concerned things have been down hill since I started hunting and fishing.  Why is it always hunters/fisherman forced to pay for WDFW programs?  Is there anybody else in this state that pays for our wildlife, besides the fisheries money recieved from dams?  How do you feel about the way our money is being spent by the WDFW? 

Hunters are actually paying less and less every year when you look at the big picture. Other outdoor user groups are quickly catching up (and some say paying more) and many programs are paid for from the general fund.

As for the game levels.....wait until the wolves really take hold. :bash:
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Special T on October 27, 2010, 07:00:32 AM
If other user groups are paying more or close what is the WDFW doing??? What activities are they doing that are not hunter fisherman related? Animal research is one big thing, but that is mostly funded by federal grants... BTKR you have anywhere to back that statement up?
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Fireant11 on October 27, 2010, 06:50:03 PM
Curly; you sound just like the guy I talked to at the WDFW.   :chuckle:  He sited the same reasons for tag exchange and permit purchases.  It's all about the Benjamen's for sure! 

I don't know if I agree that the state will lose such a large number of hunters by allowing special permits to be purchased without declaring a tag.  I also don't buy into the fact that the western half would be over-ridden with hunters.  The state doesn't limit the number of Eastside or Westside tags now, so what would they do if suddenly, everyone went and purchased an over-the-counter tag for one side of the state?  I know this would never happen, but under the current rules, everyone in the state could buy a Westside elk permit.  Using this as an argument against letting people put in for a permit prior to declaring a hunting method and side doesn't cut it.

I'm not upset with this, and will follow the rules.  It just doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: nontypical176 on October 27, 2010, 08:44:16 PM
I after many years of putting in for a tag drew the toutle bull.  Got a small bull but for me no more special permits.  I have posted it before, but look at the number of hunters that work construction or logging  (often seasonal or not full time), and need the work and money.  I can't logically apply for the permit no more starting back at 1 point and end up missing my season, because I need to work.  Several years my season has been cut short or don't get to hunt at all because of designating.  I want to bow hunt but the best hunt is early season close to home and I usually have work then, rifle season to short to take a chance missin that, so late muzzleloader is open near my house late and thats what I got to put in for not knowing if I will be working, but its a long season and my best chance to hunt if not drawn.

None of my buddys put in for tags because they don't know in the spring, what times they will have off in the fall.  A guy will take vacation for a Special Permit, I did this year and it cost me plenty to take the time off, but can't afford to take the general season off every year.  I hunt when I can afford to, where I can afford to (close to home).  The WDFW says its because of crowding we have to designate, but its unfair for those of us that think WORK IS IMPORTANT.  Something should have been changed a long long time ago.  I will now cause "crowding" because I will be buying my tag the day before the season that I'm not working. 

Keep thinking if enough of the people that feel the same as me start bit***** that something will change, thats why I keep posting it.  The WDFW knows how I feel on a pretty regular basis also(emails, calls, in person).   I get it... make us designate EAST/WEST and pay for a tag when we apply, not designate the weapon we will be using if not drawn.  They are just screwing the Working Man.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: meathunter on October 29, 2010, 09:21:52 PM
How many within the WDFW actually hunt?
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: meathunter on October 29, 2010, 09:27:47 PM
How many within the WDFW go out and hunt?
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Wenatcheejay on November 09, 2010, 12:17:58 PM
Mike,

Glad you are back. Sorry to hear about your job, that sucks. I have a question, if we, "The People of Washington" have a question about how WDFW sees a situation or how it works internally, why would "they" fear or loath that? Why do they make you, "fear for your job?" If you are not doing any more than a FOIA request, what is the big deal?

I have posted a few times that WDFW is becoming adversarial to hunters and fishermen, heck, the General Public for that matter. I don't just mean Game Wardens in the field. I mean at Offices & Regulations as well. I have met awesome people, Officers, and people in the Offices. I have received good information which I am grateful for. But, I don't understand the general mistrust. Especially here on this site. Most people here would turn in a person illegally taking game in a heart beat. (IMHO) Most of the questions the law is how to abide by it not how to get around it. Even when I have said things that were not in favor of WDFW it is no different than I would have commented in regard to a traffic stop.

Anyway, I for one am glad you are here to post.  :hello:
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: tritt007 on November 09, 2010, 12:45:14 PM
Q:I am currently in a law enforcment program and plan on going to college after hischool getting my 4yr degree and then i am going to try and get on board (get hired onto) wdfw, I will still be hunting (when I have the opportunity, if i get hired on) . But this was my real question, If a wdfw officer is out on patrol during season and has his tag (say elk season in example) and he sees an elk can he shoot it and toss it in his truck.?
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Wacenturion on November 09, 2010, 01:28:37 PM
Q:I am currently in a law enforcment program and plan on going to college after hischool getting my 4yr degree and then i am going to try and get on board (get hired onto) wdfw, I will still be hunting (when I have the opportunity, if i get hired on) . But this was my real question, If a wdfw officer is out on patrol during season and has his tag (say elk season in example) and he sees an elk can he shoot it and toss it in his truck.?

No....not anymore.  Ethics rules have come into play.  Wasn't frowned 30-40 years ago if they used common sense away from the crowds.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: bobcat on November 09, 2010, 07:28:33 PM
Q:I am currently in a law enforcment program and plan on going to college after hischool getting my 4yr degree and then i am going to try and get on board (get hired onto) wdfw, I will still be hunting (when I have the opportunity, if i get hired on) . But this was my real question, If a wdfw officer is out on patrol during season and has his tag (say elk season in example) and he sees an elk can he shoot it and toss it in his truck.?
:chuckle:   That's a good question actually. But yeah, probably wouldn't look good if a WDFW officer was hunting on state time, with state equipment. I've heard if you really like to hunt you don't want to be a game warden because you won't ever have time off during hunting season. May not be true though.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: whacker1 on November 09, 2010, 07:58:53 PM
welcome back
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: bigtex on November 09, 2010, 08:09:00 PM
Q:I am currently in a law enforcment program and plan on going to college after hischool getting my 4yr degree and then i am going to try and get on board (get hired onto) wdfw, I will still be hunting (when I have the opportunity, if i get hired on) . But this was my real question, If a wdfw officer is out on patrol during season and has his tag (say elk season in example) and he sees an elk can he shoot it and toss it in his truck.?
:chuckle:   That's a good question actually. But yeah, probably wouldn't look good if a WDFW officer was hunting on state time, with state equipment. I've heard if you really like to hunt you don't want to be a game warden because you won't ever have time off during hunting season. May not be true though.

You'll have time off, just not a significant amount to scout and hunt, especially if you have a family and other obligations. Which is one reason why many WDFW Officers either hunt archery (longer seasons and also not as busy for work) or out of state (different timeframe for seasons).
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: h2ofowlr on November 09, 2010, 09:50:49 PM
How long has the WDFW been releasing wolves into Washington State and what do they plan on doing when they have very low returns on deer and elk?
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: thomasmx on November 09, 2010, 11:01:29 PM
So you know of any future changes to the eastside going to 3pt min soon? Its so over populated with big bulls as i am sure the west side is too. Maybe give out more bull tags? What can be done? I am mainly talking unit 356
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Buckrub on November 10, 2010, 11:02:25 AM
How do I beat the system and get a tag every year?
like others with zero points?

Just kidding....  ;)

Welcome back
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: WDFW-SUX on November 10, 2010, 11:23:06 AM
I cant believe I missed this.....

I have a question:  Who decided that the inner workings of the department needed to be secret and that you would no longer be able to post on this forum?
 

I think they should be fired Yesterday.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Wacenturion on November 10, 2010, 11:36:38 AM
Q:I am currently in a law enforcment program and plan on going to college after hischool getting my 4yr degree and then i am going to try and get on board (get hired onto) wdfw, I will still be hunting (when I have the opportunity, if i get hired on) . But this was my real question, If a wdfw officer is out on patrol during season and has his tag (say elk season in example) and he sees an elk can he shoot it and toss it in his truck.?
:chuckle:   That's a good question actually. But yeah, probably wouldn't look good if a WDFW officer was hunting on state time, with state equipment. I've heard if you really like to hunt you don't want to be a game warden because you won't ever have time off during hunting season. May not be true though.


Absolutely false......they have time off like anyone else.  Busy season...yes, but always have some time if they choose to hunt.  Problem is....the hunt can turn into work as you're out there with the public, who always seem to present an opportunity to enforce the law. 
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: LongTatLaw on November 10, 2010, 11:58:27 AM
What specific public disclosure request would produce whatever documents the licensing dept and law enforcement uses to implement regulations? What's the name of the in-house processing. Guidelines?  I've spoken to multiple agents in different departments that all but verbatim quote very specific language that is NOT found in the wdfg booklet nor wac's... ?  If a member of the wdfg are failing their duties or conducting themselves unethically...what course of action is the most effective to get. The situation rectified?  As in... an email to D Ware fails to yield. Results...  what out of house office or agency has the weight to get it done?  Is there anything below the gov's desk?
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Wacenturion on November 10, 2010, 01:03:50 PM
What specific public disclosure request would produce whatever documents the licensing dept and law enforcement uses to implement regulations? What's the name of the in-house processing. Guidelines?  I've spoken to multiple agents in different departments that all but verbatim quote very specific language that is NOT found in the wdfg booklet nor wac's... ?  If a member of the wdfg are failing their duties or conducting themselves unethically...what course of action is the most effective to get. The situation rectified?  As in... an email to D Ware fails to yield. Results...  what out of house office or agency has the weight to get it done?  Is there anything below the gov's desk?


Letters to the Governors office is you best bet.  WDFW doesn't like those and creates a fairly quick turn around down the chain of command.  Governors office sets the reply time line and response back to you....not WDFW.  Expecting WDFW to reply to your complaint....you'll get the run around.

Public information requests is also irritating to them.  They have to pony up.

Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: meathunter on November 10, 2010, 09:03:25 PM
What say you InsideWFDW? I would really like to know how many in the department hunt (in this state). I'm wondering if any of the people that make the key decisions hunt to get a feel for what goes on in our state?
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: huntingfool7 on November 11, 2010, 07:20:28 AM
Meathunter- your ??? was answered on page 1

"Believe it or not I was the odd duck out and was one of the few who didn't hunt (not anti-hunting, just never had the chance).  The guys who are directly involved with land use and game management (people like Dave Ware, Jerry Nelson, ect.) are just about as hardcore about hunting as you are.  WDFW is one of those places where it's fairly easy to take a vacation during the summer, but almost impossible to get time off in the fall because everyone is out in the field."
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Wacenturion on November 11, 2010, 08:29:17 AM
Meathunter- your ??? was answered on page 1

"Believe it or not I was the odd duck out and was one of the few who didn't hunt (not anti-hunting, just never had the chance).  The guys who are directly involved with land use and game management (people like Dave Ware, Jerry Nelson, ect.) are just about as hardcore about hunting as you are.  WDFW is one of those places where it's fairly easy to take a vacation during the summer, but almost impossible to get time off in the fall because everyone is out in the field."



That isn't necessarily the case.  Not everybody is in the field during the fall.  Many years ago everyone for the most case worked opening weekend of hunting and fishing season.  Most old Dept. of Game field staff were commissioned and wrote tickets, whether agents, biologists or office managers.  With the change in enforcement duties and full police powers over the years, only Agents are out there for the most part.  You may have some biologists and others taking bag checks, checking signage, or whatever field duties during the season, but certainly not in the field checking folks like years ago.  So the inability to go hunting or fishing isn't there on opening weekend like it used to be, or any other time during the season.  They now can go if they so choose, in most cases. 

The office jockeys can take off whenever during the year.  Field staff are certainly in the field, but also have the same ability to take off, not just their weekends or prescribed days off, but vacation time as well.  The resource is also closer....like out the back door, so much easier to be hard core about it.  Hardcore means something entirely different than spending a couple days deer hunting or taking an occasional bird hunting trip, which most the office jockeys rarely do.  Many hunt, some more than others, but certainly not hardcore for most, at least not by my definition.  Hardcore is like many here, who when having the time to do so.....go, week in, week out.

Years ago, like during the 60's -80's as an example, if a steel-head hatchery manager wasn't working he was fishing.    The same was fairly evident on the hunting side....but again more so in the field than the main office.  Today you have managers who don't exactly hunt or fish the specific resource they manage like those folks of yesteryear.  Those managers of years ago looked at the resource as we do...users.  They managed for recreational opportunities as they too were users.  Today...not the same management approach, particularly if you don't pursue what you responsible for.  Just the way it is. 


Today personnel at WDFW are far more diverse than 30 or 40 years ago.  They come from less specific educational degree background so to speak.  At one time it was pretty much fish or wildlife management degrees, or experience for some jobs.  Today...ecological studies, wild-lands ecology, biology degrees from like Evergreen as examples are more the norm.  The evolution away from those desired degrees of yesterday and the personal makeup of those people who earned them, as in they all hunted or fished, to a more a politically correct makeup in my mind.  Therefore the new mix of birdwatchers, hikers, etc., are thrown into the management of WDFW.  I don't even think the Director has a fish and wildlife degree, at least that's my understanding.  I believe he comes from a charter fishing background.  Nothing personal...but should tell you something.  That new less specific, broader mindset, in itself, has changed the management landscape over the years to what it is today.  Sad in my opinion.  :twocents:

 
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Hangfire on November 12, 2010, 05:37:39 AM
         'Years ago, like during the 60's -80's as an example, if a steel-head hatchery manager wasn't working he was fishing.    The same was fairly evident on the hunting side.      '


  A friend of mine is a retired Game Department, fish hatchery manager.  In the past couple of years he has: Hunted Africa, Guided cougar hunt in Idaho and British Columbia, Drop camp horse  Elk hunt in Colorado, So far this year,  Archery buffalo in Cheney. Bear in Idaho, Bear in the Olympics, Elk hunt Montana, Muzzle loader deer and elk Washington, He is leaving today for a  deer hunt in Montana with a friend, will hunt white tail in northern Idaho with relatives, and late season muzzleloader in Washington. He has a drift boat and jet boat. This summer he fished Alaska, shrimped in Hood Canal, fished in Grays harbor and  steel head and salmon fished the west side.  He is in his mid 60's and often hunts/fishes by him self. His Olympics bear, he was by him self several miles from the trail head and camped over night. He carries a alarm in case of a problem. In his house are mounted Turkey, cougar, bear, mule deer, goat, 8 African animals, halibut tail, bobcat and pronghorn, the last I knew. This is the kind of person that used to be a Game dept employee.  He is lucky that his wife still works, with a well paying job.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Special T on November 13, 2010, 10:32:16 AM
Insides last active was oct 29th...Wonder if someone gave his ass a beating about talking???
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Wacenturion on November 13, 2010, 11:39:33 AM
Insides last active was oct 29th...Wonder if someone gave his ass a beating about talking???


Hopefully he out hunting. :chuckle:
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Wenatcheejay on November 21, 2010, 07:11:00 PM
My only real ?



Is there any hope for hunting in Washington????                            Is There Any Hope For Hunting In Washington????
[/size]
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: bobcat on November 21, 2010, 07:16:49 PM
My only real ?



Is there any hope for hunting in Washington????

Sure, great coyote, cougar, and wolf hunting.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Mr T on November 24, 2010, 11:36:13 AM
Hopefully the inside source got his job back and his only requirement was to keep his mouth shut!

 From this statement earlier..."If a member of the wdfg are failing their duties or conducting themselves unethically...what course of action is the most effective to get. The situation rectified?"   Years and years ago I was having trouble obtaining my teaching certificate in a timely manner from Olympia after I graduated.  I was a week away from working as long as my certificate came through in a time, however Olympia continually told me it could be another 2 months.  I WAS FURIOUS that I was about to lose my first job out of college over this.  I contacted some three of my local government represenatatives by phone and email.  Believe it or not I had my certificate in three days and all three representatives contacted my personally or had an assistant call me to be sure that I received it and that all was ready for me to begin work.   Your local officials may not have the same concern for hunting (especially here on the west side) but just a potential idea for you.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: InsideWDFW on November 30, 2010, 12:04:19 PM
Hey guys sorry to leave ya like.  As I mentioned originally I was fired and looking for work.  A few weeks ago I was doing some in-person follow ups on applications.  A couple of places informed me that when they called WDFW regarding my application, WDFW did everything they could, within the law, to black-ball me.  As one guy put it, what they didn't say and what they implied made me sound like the worst employee they've ever had.

I loved my job, and enjoyed helping you guys out while working for them and afterwards.  But I can't continue to help an agency that's actively trying to make my life hell.

At this point in time, the only advice I can give ya is to contact the agency with your questions.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: 400out on November 30, 2010, 12:11:22 PM
dude that blows! Just distance youself from all that and become just a friend to us all on here....  anjoy all that this great site has to offer  :twocents:  :hello:
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Special T on November 30, 2010, 12:14:50 PM
Thankyou for responding and giving us the 411..  :bash:
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Kc_Kracker on November 02, 2012, 09:11:33 AM
Mike, are you the guy mentioned on the news last night?  Just curious. 

I'm assuming you are talking about this http://www.theolympian.com/2010/10/19/1408857/former-washington-department-of.html (http://www.theolympian.com/2010/10/19/1408857/former-washington-department-of.html)?  Nope.

Basically I made the mistake a messing around with my boss.  She eventually got mad and had friends up on high.  So I got the crap audited out of me, and they found that I was using Firefox, had used the WILD system to look up an address of the a coworker for Christmas cards, and had looked a sub-shop's webpage to see what I was going to have for dinner.  Life lesson # 3454: Do not date co-workers, especially if she signs your evaluation.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: gotfish? on November 29, 2012, 07:29:16 PM
How about master hunter? why no class ? why so hard?
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: CP on November 29, 2012, 07:32:10 PM
How about master hunter? why no class ? why so hard?

What's so hard about it?
Title: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: elkinrutdrivemenuts on November 29, 2012, 07:39:50 PM
What are their plans with the elk hunting in the blues?  Are they going to issue more permits? Will they ever do away with spike only?  Or do they see it as a way to generate more revenue by leaving it as a trophy unit?

Thanks for getting on here and answering questions!
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: bobcat on November 29, 2012, 07:44:23 PM
This thread is two years old.

Nobody is going to answer your questions.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Tbar on November 29, 2012, 07:45:13 PM
Who are you asking questions? This thread is 2 years old
Title: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: elkinrutdrivemenuts on November 29, 2012, 08:07:19 PM
It came up in my unread posts as brand new? Wtf? I thought it just got posted! Oh well
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: csaaphill on November 29, 2012, 08:39:46 PM
ya weird i had all kinds of q's to ask lol oh well.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: 3nails on November 29, 2012, 08:55:35 PM
 OK great! I have a question. If I shoot a duck and am unsure of what kind it actually is, do you think it would be a good idea to post up a picture of it on this forum for all of the nice HW people to help me identify it?
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: JLS on November 29, 2012, 08:59:50 PM
OK great! I have a question. If I shoot a duck and am unsure of what kind it actually is, do you think it would be a good idea to post up a picture of it on this forum for all of the nice HW people to help me identify it?


 :yike::yike:

While you're at it, tell 'em you drew a permit but have never been to the GMU and want to know where to start scouting.
Title: Re: I'm back, let the questions begin.
Post by: Wacenturion on December 09, 2012, 01:31:36 PM
Just may to turn this into a Seance thread. :yike:
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal