Post by: Curly on April 06, 2008, 04:55:46 PM
Post by: Red Dawg on April 06, 2008, 05:24:40 PM
Post by: PolarBear on April 06, 2008, 08:26:41 PM
Post by: Head-shot on April 06, 2008, 09:38:07 PM
Post by: mossback91 on April 06, 2008, 09:49:17 PM
Post by: smdave on April 06, 2008, 09:58:45 PM
Dave
Post by: Ray on April 06, 2008, 10:03:25 PM
Post by: JoshT on April 07, 2008, 07:38:30 AM
Post by: Armadillo on April 07, 2008, 08:25:26 AM
Post by: huntingnut on April 07, 2008, 12:31:06 PM
Post by: Curly on April 07, 2008, 01:13:03 PM
Quote
Aren't bulls cows?Are you serious?
Post by: huntingnut on April 07, 2008, 01:37:56 PM
Post by: TheHunt on April 08, 2008, 07:59:25 PM
Post by: dbllunger on April 08, 2008, 08:53:48 PM
Post by: Head-shot on April 08, 2008, 09:04:29 PM
Post by: Big Stick on April 08, 2008, 10:08:31 PM
Firstly,that 7WSM(it's mine) launching 162A-Max and their .625BC at an initial 3000fps on the nose,via it's 225yd zero at sealevel,digests but 12MOA to the 700yd line and arrives with 2017fps residual velocity and .85-ish second TOF(time of flight) and 1464ft lbs of "energy"(thus the perpetually swing plate,due to cadence).
It hits the 1000yd line with 1665fps residual,996ft lbs and a very modest 1.345 TOF,ala 22.7MOA elevation correction.
Moving shoulders during fireform from the parent 300WSM hull to the formed 7WSM hull does in fact account for some performance loss and I favor formed cases at 3150fps via the same rifle,though much remains easy even when in FF Mode.
The plate is sub 2MOA at 700yds(not that anyone here knows what that means).
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fv136%2FBigStick%2FStuff%2FRifle%2520Stuff%2FBarrelBreakInB.jpg&hash=1da5df48cef4a7c271599ab23fde79404de1adf6)
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fv136%2FBigStick%2FStuff%2FRifle%2520Stuff%2FBarrelBreakInA.jpg&hash=99dc6daea2e8f7cc36fc89f91a3360dc74d519e0)
Be sure to critique the balance of the footage I loaded...so as to keep the ball rolling.................
Post by: 257 Wby Mag on April 08, 2008, 10:16:37 PM
Post by: Big Stick on April 08, 2008, 10:19:04 PM
Assuming moly,Re-22 and a clue................
Post by: Big Stick on April 08, 2008, 10:23:48 PM
You want to see some Dead Critters,or do you prefer Day Dreams?...............
Post by: mossback91 on April 08, 2008, 10:24:08 PM
Post by: 257 Wby Mag on April 08, 2008, 10:26:13 PM
Post by: actionshooter on April 08, 2008, 10:29:18 PM
Whats up with throwing the rifle? If you testing the scope for shock at least throw a damned blanket down first. :chuckle:
Post by: Ray on April 08, 2008, 10:30:56 PM
Exactly.... Thats stupid
I don't care if someone throws around their rifle but I would definitely think that someone who does it either has money burning a hole in their pocket or they just don't have anything better to do than show off for a camera.
Post by: Big Stick on April 08, 2008, 10:31:57 PM
Stupidity is the propensity to discuss subject matter foreign to you and to feign a clue regarding same. I find MUCH reassurance in a sub 7lb rifle shooting in the .5MOA realm at 700yds,via makeshift field rest,tough atmospheric conditions and after having been put through some Real World turmoil.
Nice to bank on a rifle that doesn't shift POA impact,harbors incredible inherent precision potential and bolsters a most forgiving mannereism.
I'd rather something fail in the R&D process,as opposed to the field...but I take such things a little more than seriously......................
Post by: mossback91 on April 08, 2008, 10:37:01 PM
.5MOA realm at 700yds,via makeshift field rest,tough atmospheric conditions and after having been put through some Real World turmoil.
UH that sounds like alot of *censored*. I highly doubt that
Post by: Ray on April 08, 2008, 10:38:52 PM
Post by: Big Stick on April 08, 2008, 10:43:45 PM
I loaded the 700yd video,impact is easy to see(as is the wind),the picture with loaded rounds denotes the triangle of impact at 9 O'clock and COAL is 3.015". I've zero doubt that subtention troubles most.
Whatever you do,don't download the clips of shooting Grade A chicken eggs at 510yds via PacNor barreled 223AI in a McMillan A2 handle,nor the 11 second sub .5MOA agg at the same distance(same rifle),nor shooting a 12oz plastic water bottle at the 700yd line via #1 contoured PacNor 23" 25-284.
Don't download any of the Book critters getting killed either...................
Post by: Big Stick on April 08, 2008, 10:47:39 PM
You've grounds to file suit,regarding the shortcomings...............
Post by: mossback91 on April 08, 2008, 10:48:26 PM
Post by: Big Stick on April 08, 2008, 10:52:12 PM
Post by: Head-shot on April 09, 2008, 08:34:16 AM
What was the point of your vid. Some of it seems to be pointed in the direction of humor, i,e cow barrel vs bull barrel. Or was it just to get people talking so you could let us all know what a bunch of back woods rejects we are? No big words please I'm phonetically challenged.
Post by: thinkingman on April 09, 2008, 09:54:29 AM
Professional troll.
Wannabe expert.
You can find him on the Camp Perry hall of fame if you need more on his credentials.
The pics he posts set the unintentional comedy meter off the chart.
It gets better.....