Hunting Washington Forum

Equipment & Gear => Guns and Ammo => Topic started by: elkinrutdrivemenuts on May 03, 2011, 02:29:18 PM


Advertise Here
Title: Anyone have a older version of the nosler reloading book?
Post by: elkinrutdrivemenuts on May 03, 2011, 02:29:18 PM
I wanna load up 140 gr. Accubonds for my .264 win mag. The version 6 of the book does not contain the load data. I called nosler and they said use the data for the 140 partition. I am wondering of someone has an older book and can verify this is correct and maybe scan the page and send it to me? Any help would be greatly appreciated!  Thanks
Jon
Title: Re: Anyone have a older version of the nosler reloading book?
Post by: 6x6in6 on May 03, 2011, 02:33:02 PM
If nobody answers you before I get home, I'll see if it's in the earlier versions that I have.
Title: Re: Anyone have a older version of the nosler reloading book?
Post by: elkinrutdrivemenuts on May 03, 2011, 02:37:16 PM
Thanks that would be great.
Title: Re: Anyone have a older version of the nosler reloading book?
Post by: JimmyHoffa on May 03, 2011, 02:56:04 PM
I have fifth edition.  For 140 grains it references off of the Partition Spitzer.
Title: Re: Anyone have a older version of the nosler reloading book?
Post by: elkinrutdrivemenuts on May 03, 2011, 03:10:27 PM
Ok that's what I wanted to verify. Thanks
Title: Re: Anyone have a older version of the nosler reloading book?
Post by: Bofire on May 03, 2011, 05:13:39 PM
My Nosler #2 book has 140 grain spitzer(partition) but no other 140. What powder?
Carl
Title: Re: Anyone have a older version of the nosler reloading book?
Post by: elkinrutdrivemenuts on May 03, 2011, 08:50:55 PM
I bought the new book so I got the partition load data. I wish the would mention something about all the bullets they manufacture? I was just wondering if they had it in the older version by chance. Thanks guys
Title: Re: Anyone have a older version of the nosler reloading book?
Post by: JimmyHoffa on May 03, 2011, 09:06:38 PM
I've always thought that the bullet style was rather interchangeable for a given weight, assuming there wasn't a real change in seating depth (like the difference in a lead core vs a Barnes copper).  I can only think of a few differences in performance between different styles at the muzzle and nothing that would affect company liability.  I guess you could maybe argue that a round nose may impact the lands sooner than a spitzer and hence have a slightly higher pressure or something like that, but doubt it is much.  And the reloading manuals always play CYA by saying to load reduced and work your way up to a max safe operating load.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal