Post by: Wenatcheejay on June 05, 2011, 09:26:08 AM
http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x243/jaydore/0530111246.jpg (http://i185.photobucket.com/albums/x243/jaydore/0530111246.jpg)
6.8SPC AR15 115 Ultra Bonded Corelock.
I am thinking about a shoulder mount, what do you guys think? It was a nice shot, no?
Post by: bobcat on June 05, 2011, 09:33:20 AM
Any excuses?
Post by: Hunterman on June 05, 2011, 10:07:49 AM
Hunterman(Tony)
Post by: dscubame on June 05, 2011, 10:28:15 AM
Post by: Austrian Hunter on June 05, 2011, 11:20:08 AM
Post by: FC on June 05, 2011, 11:31:46 AM
Nice work on the vitals. No need for excuses that was well executed.
Hahahahahaha! I concur.
Post by: Bofire on June 05, 2011, 11:34:05 AM
Carl
Post by: carpsniperg2 on June 05, 2011, 12:27:02 PM
Post by: Heredoggydoggy on June 05, 2011, 12:44:35 PM
The modern version of "the crease in the hood" :chuckle:
Post by: Wenatcheejay on June 05, 2011, 12:57:06 PM
Ah, yes. Another AR-15 owner that failed to remember the distance between the bore and the scope. :yike:
The modern version of "the crease in the hood" :chuckle:
Guilty :DOH:
It was a good run though, 8 years and never an issue.
Darn EBR.
Post by: Lincoln4 on June 05, 2011, 05:37:48 PM
I think you put one right in the vitals :chuckle: At least you got good penetration :lol4:
That's unethical to use anything less than a .338 Magnum on a chrony... How was the expansion?
Post by: Jamieb on June 05, 2011, 05:57:12 PM
Post by: Huntbear on June 05, 2011, 06:16:28 PM
:chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
Yes, I am a smart ass...... :IBCOOL: :IBCOOL:
Now that is something you HAVE to mount and put on the wall in your man cave.... sorry but those are the rules.. Nice shot too.
Post by: Atroxus on June 05, 2011, 06:36:02 PM
Post by: carpsniperg2 on June 05, 2011, 06:49:20 PM
I think you put one right in the vitals :chuckle: At least you got good penetration :lol4:
That's unethical to use anything less than a .338 Magnum on a chrony... How was the expansion?
:chuckle: I also think that one is not able to go into the record books. I think it's a hybrid :chuckle: I think it was shot on the wrong side of the road and won't make the books :chuckle:
Another question is how far did you have to track it?????? :lol4: :whoo: :lol4:
Post by: yorketransport on June 05, 2011, 06:49:46 PM
Sometimes the best way to inform the Chrony that it's give false results is to offer a demonstration of how fast the bullet is really going.
I have one that took a 260gr Accubond to the vitals at 300 yards. I just wanted to know how fast the bullet was actually moving at that range. It was a pretty bad time to pull the shot low. :bash:
Andrew
Post by: 724wd on June 06, 2011, 11:45:50 AM
Another question is how far did you have to track it?????? :lol4: :whoo: :lol4:
pretty sure that one was DRT! :chuckle: :chuckle:
Post by: Curly on June 06, 2011, 12:12:22 PM
Every time I see one of those I can't help but wonder if those are designed to be shot so you have to replace them more often. Seems to me like they could separate the main electronics from the sensors with a couple feet of cable so you only have to replace a cable/sensor unit instead of the whole chrono when that happens. :dunno:
My chronograph is like you describe. CED Millenium (http://www.shootingsoftware.com/chronographs.htm)
Post by: bhylton on June 07, 2011, 10:32:02 PM
Post by: Alchase on June 08, 2011, 09:12:30 AM
I am thinking about a shoulder mount, what do you guys think? It was a nice shot, no?
No way, nothing but a full body mount on that bad boy!!
:tup: