Hunting Washington Forum

Community => Advocacy, Agencies, Access => Topic started by: NWWABOWHNTR on December 12, 2011, 06:59:48 AM

Title: SS process Lighted Nocks
Post by: NWWABOWHNTR on December 12, 2011, 06:59:48 AM: Overwhelming support on survey, pretty sad only 10% of those who were asked to take part in poll actually took the time to answer (that was on all the surveys not just this one). Will go to Commission with all other proposals.
Title: Re: SS process Lighted Nocks
Post by: dscubame on December 12, 2011, 08:08:43 AM: Overwhelming support...interesting.
Title: Re: SS process Lighted Nocks
Post by: Lcl 66 Tinner on December 14, 2011, 09:05:53 PM: Im not a bow hunter and was wondering the advantage to having lighted nocks?
Title: Re: SS process Lighted Nocks
Post by: dreamingbig on December 21, 2011, 02:15:00 PM: I took the survey and voted against it.
Title: Re: SS process Lighted Nocks
Post by: h20hunter on December 21, 2011, 02:17:55 PM: Im not a bow hunter and was wondering the advantage to having lighted nocks

They allow me to shoot further and make one shot drop right there kills on any game known to man..........

Kidding..........lots and lots of discussions and various opinions on what they do and don't do for hunters.
Title: Re: SS process Lighted Nocks
Post by: Archeryoutfitters on December 24, 2011, 05:33:48 PM: Quote from: dreamingbig on December 21, 2011, 02:15:00 PM
I took the survey and voted against it.
just woundering why a avid bow hunter would not vote for it? there is no advantage other than finding wounded game
in doing that will be helping our sport out, becouse it makes a persone feel like putting the bow up when we hit a animal and can't find it we have ALL been there. why not try to do everthing we can to help recover our game, I have to deal with this dayly during hunting season and finding your arrow can make all the differance in the world, in recovering your game. please inlighten me?
Title: Re: SS process Lighted Nocks
Post by: Machias on December 27, 2011, 07:58:40 AM: There's a thread down in the archery section which pretty clearly states both sides of the argument, over I think about 20 or 30 pages. It's been beat pretty hard here.