Post by: bearpaw on March 23, 2012, 03:10:45 PM
http://www.lifewithwolves.org/home/?p=12240
By Cory Hatch, Jackson Hole, Wyo.
March 21, 2012
Wolves killed or injured four dogs in Jackson Hole this month, even as residents and wildlife managers worked to come to grips with the predators expanding their territory and moving closer to humans. The most recent incident occurred in Buffalo Valley, where a pack killed three hounds that went missing from their yard near the Blackrock Ranger Station on March 7.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife personnel helped the dogs’ owner, Jack Hatch, find and retrieve the carcasses March 16.A fourth dog returned to Hatch’s cabin uninjured March 10.
The four dogs disappeared after Hatch heard them get into a scuffle.
“I usually give them a couple of hours in the morning to run in the yard,” he said. “I was in my tack room, and that’s when I heard a commotion.”
Hatch attempted to follow the dogs on snowshoes and horseback, but snow and high water made pursuit impossible, he said.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service personnel warned that wolves were nearby right after the dogs went missing, but the warning came too late.
“One of the wolf guys called and asked me if I had any problems because he tracked the wolves to my house,” Hatch said.
Hatch and his neighbors looked for the dogs for several days before Fish and Wildlife personnel said they found their carcasses.
“They found one of the dogs on a ridge, and then 200 yards away they found another dog, and then after another 200 yards they found another dog,” Hatch said.
The dogs were partially eaten.
“They’re family dogs,” Hatch said. “They were born and raised here from pups. They were trained to follow my horse. They’re [some] of the most personable, friendly dogs you could be around.”
Hatch and his wife considered giving the dogs away.
“I was afraid of this happening,” he said. “I have to lock them up in boxes at night.”
Hatch also built a 5-foot-high fence around a portion of his property to protect the dogs.
The incident in Buffalo Valley comes after a group of wolves that has roamed subdivisions in west Jackson, South Park and south of Wilson attacked and injured a dog last week. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wolf manager Mike Jimenez would not say where the incident occurred, but he has estimated two wolves are currently traveling together.
Jimenez’s unwillingness to disclose the location of the attack is a disservice to the community, said Alice Eve Richter, who lives in the Skyline Ranch subdivision west of Jackson and owns four dogs.
“I was very disappointed in Mike,” she said. “He refused to tell me where that wolf attack occurred. I don’t think that was right.
“An animal, if it becomes a pet, becomes part of the family, and I think you want to protect your family,” Richter continued. “Before you know it, you have an investment in those animals, a financial and emotional investment.”
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s refusal to release more information about the incident doesn’t help wolves or the people who live among them, said Chris Colligan, Wyoming wildlife advocate for the Greater Yellowstone Coalition.
“Agencies really run into difficulty when they aren’t transparent,” he said. “With transparency comes trust. Because there hasn’t been transparency, the public has some valid questions.”
Colligan was quick to say that Jimenez has done a good job keeping the public informed in the past.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service could better serve the public by educating people, not keeping them in the dark, Colligan said.
“Residents of Jackson Hole need to be proactive — keeping their dogs on a leash, keeping them contained and keeping pet foods away from all wildlife,” he said. “The better informed people are, the better decisions people can make in adapting their own behavior. This is cutting-edge wildlife management.”
Jimenez defended his decision not to disclose the location of the wolf attack, saying the incident occurred on private property. Also, wolves range widely and rarely attack in the same place, he said.
“Where these wolves were has little to do with where wolves are,” he said. “How many times do wolves kill in the same spot? Virtually never.”
“We’ve had 153 dogs killed in the three states since the early ’90s,” Jimenez said. “This is the whole point of saying this is an inappropriate place for a wolf.”
Colligan said Jackson Hole residents have begun to adapt to grizzly bears by enacting Teton County regulations on keeping garbage and other human sources of food secure. Residents will need a similar effort to adapt as wolves expand their territory.
“Where else in the lower 48 do we have an intact ecosystem will all four large carnivores?” Colligan asked. “Residents in and around the town of Jackson will need to become as proactive as someone who lives in Buffalo Valley. It’s no different than what we’ve seen with bears.”
Wildlife managers need to step up wolf management and give landowners more latitude when dealing with the predators, Hatch said.
“I don’t have anything against the wolf people,” he said, “but I think that there’s some things that need to change. You have to let people protect their personal property. It’s just being a poor neighbor turning these things loose and not managing them.”
Wildlife managers plan to capture and kill the wolves involved in the dog injury in west Jackson, but at least one outfitter says the wolves should be allowed to stay where they are.
“Those wolves are actually doing more good because that is the area where we can’t get a harvest on those elk,” said B.J. Hill, owner of Swift Creek Outfitters. “If the wolf lovers want these wolves, then they need to learn to live with them, especially when you live next to a national park.”
(These pics were taken after they found the dogs.)
Post by: humanure on March 23, 2012, 03:15:44 PM
Post by: jackmaster on March 23, 2012, 03:22:18 PM
Post by: humanure on March 23, 2012, 03:29:36 PM
Post by: bearpaw on March 23, 2012, 03:34:21 PM
Well, that will never happen. Wildlife live by rules that they are ingrained with, and that doesn't allow them to recognize civilization boundaries. We have to be more responsible and watchful of our pets, and learn to be aware of predators, their habits and where they are roaming. Habitual livestock and pet killers will be taken out, but the wolves will always be here now.
As bad as I hate to agree, you are most likely correct. :bash:
Post by: Kain on March 23, 2012, 04:29:22 PM
Post by: steen on March 23, 2012, 05:28:48 PM
Post by: HORSEPOWER on March 23, 2012, 05:32:31 PM
Post by: humanure on March 23, 2012, 07:01:02 PM
Post by: SpringerFan on March 23, 2012, 07:17:54 PM
We can make those judgements on dogs, as they are domestic animals. But the wolves are just being wolves. Thats why people should be allowed to 'harass' them if they are within city limits to discourage them.
Uh oh.....18 posts and pro Wolf.
A person should not have to worry about that happening to their dogs. It makes me sick to think that "wolves just being wolves" is ok.
So only when in the city limits? So it is ok if they just kill for sport outside the city limts. I see. Guess you are not a hunter or care about a real balance of wildlife.
Post by: DeerThug on March 23, 2012, 07:39:11 PM
Post by: humanure on March 23, 2012, 08:05:10 PM
Post by: hughjorgan on March 23, 2012, 08:36:57 PM
I'm both pro wolf and pro hunting. I hunt, as I've said elsewhere in this forum.
Your a troll... Someone asked you for pictures of kills and you stated you haven't been successful. Yet in another post you claim deer and elk in our state aren't as healthy to eat because we don't have wolves, really, wtf, make your mind up here. You sound like a leaf licking tree hugger.
Post by: TheHunt on March 23, 2012, 08:39:14 PM
Post by: MuleySniper on March 23, 2012, 08:42:15 PM
Post by: ICEMAN on March 23, 2012, 08:56:02 PM
Post by: humanure on March 23, 2012, 09:08:55 PM
I'm both pro wolf and pro hunting. I hunt, as I've said elsewhere in this forum.
Your a troll... Someone asked you for pictures of kills and you stated you haven't been successful. Yet in another post you claim deer and elk in our state aren't as healthy to eat because we don't have wolves, really, wtf, make your mind up here. You sound like a leaf licking tree hugger.
Make up my mind? I'm a beginning hunter who see's the benefit of having wolves back. If I were a tree hugger, than I would feel horrible about all the sheep that I slaughter.
Post by: hughjorgan on March 23, 2012, 09:37:17 PM
I'm both pro wolf and pro hunting. I hunt, as I've said elsewhere in this forum.
Your a troll... Someone asked you for pictures of kills and you stated you haven't been successful. Yet in another post you claim deer and elk in our state aren't as healthy to eat because we don't have wolves, really, wtf, make your mind up here. You sound like a leaf licking tree hugger.
Make up my mind? I'm a beginning hunter who see's the benefit of having wolves back. If I were a tree hugger, than I would feel horrible about all the sheep that I slaughter.
You are talking out your ass and only posting on topics about wolves. You are contradicting yourself in a couple threads and have yet provide any evidence to your claims about elk and deer meat being unhealthy because of the environment lacking wolves.
Post by: Johnb317 on March 23, 2012, 10:11:23 PM
Wolves were hunted out because they don't mix with people. (we are on their menu).
Post by: seth30 on March 23, 2012, 10:16:02 PM
Post by: Brushbuster on March 23, 2012, 10:38:35 PM
Post by: humanure on March 23, 2012, 11:44:20 PM
:yeah: If a beginning hunter, maybe you should learn some more.
Wolves were hunted out because they don't mix with people. (we are on their menu).
They were hunted because of intolerance of a possible competitor. They wanted to reap money off of ungulates that they didn't want predators to get to.
I'm a beginning hunter, but have been studying ecology for awhile and have taken knowledge from old timers here on Mt. Rainier. I ain't no city guy.
Post by: ICEMAN on March 24, 2012, 06:08:48 AM
:yeah: If a beginning hunter, maybe you should learn some more.
Wolves were hunted out because they don't mix with people. (we are on their menu).
They were hunted because of intolerance of a possible competitor. They wanted to reap money off of ungulates that they didn't want predators to get to.
I'm a beginning hunter, but have been studying ecology for awhile and have taken knowledge from old timers here on Mt. Rainier. I ain't no city guy.
Humanure, your chosen name is fitting. "I ain't no city guy?" You are trying really hard to fit in and it aint working. We are not a bunch of inbred hillbillies here.
You state you are a "beginning" hunter. What have you hunted? What is your goal with hunting?
What exactly are you studying on Mt Rainier? What school is your study associated with?
You stated you have studied wolves as a volunteer, under a researcher? And now you want to go hunting? Really?
Not fooling me.
Post by: humanure on March 24, 2012, 07:23:28 AM
:yeah: If a beginning hunter, maybe you should learn some more.
Wolves were hunted out because they don't mix with people. (we are on their menu).
They were hunted because of intolerance of a possible competitor. They wanted to reap money off of ungulates that they didn't want predators to get to.
I'm a beginning hunter, but have been studying ecology for awhile and have taken knowledge from old timers here on Mt. Rainier. I ain't no city guy.
Humanure, your chosen name is fitting. "I ain't no city guy?" You are trying really hard to fit in and it aint working. We are not a bunch of inbred hillbillies here.
You state you are a "beginning" hunter. What have you hunted? What is your goal with hunting?
What exactly are you studying on Mt Rainier? What school is your study associated with?
You stated you have studied wolves as a volunteer, under a researcher? And now you want to go hunting? Really?
Not fooling me.
My goal with hunting is to get off my ass instead of just hearing about my friends hunting expiditions. I've hunted deer, bear, and even camped out along the elk trails near my house.
My studies other than wolves have been in general predator-prey relationships, how either one effects the land with and without the other, subsistance farming, chemical free local sheep farming with Icelandic sheep(Yam-Lamb Sheep and Cattle Co.), wildlife rehabilition. I've studied under a Puget Sound wildlife rehab's liscence.
Believe it or not, their are researchers out the who are also for hunting.
Post by: Limhangerslayer on March 24, 2012, 07:24:54 AM
Post by: humanure on March 24, 2012, 07:32:19 AM
Post by: Limhangerslayer on March 24, 2012, 07:40:44 AM
Post by: humanure on March 24, 2012, 03:20:45 PM
Post by: stuckalot on March 24, 2012, 04:57:40 PM
Post by: pianoman9701 on March 24, 2012, 05:29:13 PM
When wolves are walking through the center of town looking for food, they're overpopulated, way beyond carrying capacity for them to be leaving the safety of the wilds. They should be severely thinned out and forced far back into the wilderness. There should be an open season until the wolves are in tightly controlled numbers.
The country is different and we have a large population of people here where they weren't before. Wolves can't be allowed to exist as they have before. It needs to be different according to the changes in our population. They were killed off before because of the damage they did. Now with a population about 5 times what it was then, incidents will be more frequent. Their recovery must be severely limited.
Post by: Houndhunter on March 24, 2012, 06:16:26 PM
the big picture to look at is wolves and people cant coexist together, especially with the population we have today in WA, the only way it works is to take man out of the environment completely. we replaced wolves and did an excellent job at filling in for them. With hounds, trapping, and other forums of hunting we were able to replace alot of predators and for the last 70 some years had no issues. you cant add the top predator in the world into a enviroment that hasn't seen them in almost a century and expect they will fit right in with no effect.
its really frustrating seeing peoples dogs get killed by wolves, nothing good comes from having them back. not saying SSS is the way to go but I'm not opposed to the idea ;)
Post by: kevinlisa06 on March 24, 2012, 07:48:29 PM
Post by: BOWHUNTER45 on March 24, 2012, 08:32:54 PM
Post by: humanure on March 24, 2012, 10:54:09 PM
Post by: humanure on March 24, 2012, 11:00:50 PM
Humanure, when these wolves start killing people, will you have a different outlook on this, or will it be the person's fault and just a natural predator/prey relationship?
Domestic dogs attack and kill more people every year than wolves have in recorded history. What say you on that? Like I said before, people should be aware of the wildlife they live around.
When wolves are walking through the center of town looking for food, they're overpopulated, way beyond carrying capacity for them to be leaving the safety of the wilds. They should be severely thinned out and forced far back into the wilderness. There should be an open season until the wolves are in tightly controlled numbers.
When the food supply thins, the wolves starve. Plenty of wolves die in the woods of starvation. Sure the numbers boom, but they falter as well.
The country is different and we have a large population of people here where they weren't before. Wolves can't be allowed to exist as they have before. It needs to be different according to the changes in our population. They were killed off before because of the damage they did. Now with a population about 5 times what it was then, incidents will be more frequent. Their recovery must be severely limited.
The wolves were killed off because of greed. How else do you think the land survived before the pilgrims came here? Yes, the numbers should be managed, but people should take responsibility and control our own over-reproductive rate. But thats another discussion altogether.
Post by: JimmyHoffa on March 24, 2012, 11:06:54 PM
All you have to do is look at Yellowstone without wolves compared to before exterpation and after reintroduction to see what happens to the landscape when you toy with the balance.People weren't allowed to control the ungulate populations in YNP (hunting).
Post by: bearpaw on March 24, 2012, 11:07:43 PM
Quote
Domestic dogs attack and kill more people every year than wolves have in recorded history. What say you on that? Like I said before, people should be aware of the wildlife they live around.
You can get rid of a bad dog, the government is not allowing people to take care of bad wolves.
Quote
When the food supply thins, the wolves starve. Plenty of wolves die in the woods of starvation. Sure the numbers boom, but they falter as well.
FACT: When the wild game thins wolves turn to livestock and pets.
Quote
The wolves were killed off because of greed. How else do you think the land survived before the pilgrims came here? Yes, the numbers should be managed, but people should take responsibility and control our own over-reproductive rate. But thats another discussion altogether.
The wolves were killed off because they eat livestock. Americans have already cut back their reproductive rate. Idahoans have cut back on the wolf reproductive rate. :chuckle:
Post by: humanure on March 24, 2012, 11:19:12 PM
Yes, they might/will turn to domesticated animals. Thats why we have to responsible for our animals and take the measures proven to be effective. How else does a huge sheep farm in Minnisota residing between two large packs have little to no predations? Lifestock guardian dogs and night shepherds. Plus its been proven time and time again, wolves represent less than 1% of the elemnts that cause livestock deaths every year.
Yes, the pilgrims did not want to lose livestock to wolves. Livestock non-native to our country in the first place. No matter how you paint it, it was intolerance and greed.
Post by: bearpaw on March 24, 2012, 11:39:02 PM
Post by: humanure on March 24, 2012, 11:43:27 PM
Post by: KFhunter on March 24, 2012, 11:45:23 PM
But when you have to put a dog down, the damage is already done. Meanwhile, wolf attacks on humans are rare at best, and must as everyone thinks they will just go rampant on humans, I don't see the rate increasing in any significant rate, but even then, will pale in comparison to dog attacks.
Yes, they might/will turn to domesticated animals. Thats why we have to responsible for our animals and take the measures proven to be effective. How else does a huge sheep farm in Minnisota residing between two large packs have little to no predations? Lifestock guardian dogs and night shepherds. Plus its been proven time and time again, wolves represent less than 1% of the elemnts that cause livestock deaths every year.
Yes, the pilgrims did not want to lose livestock to wolves. Livestock non-native to our country in the first place. No matter how you paint it, it was intolerance and greed.
how many adopt-a-wolf stickers you got on your lunch box?
Post by: humanure on March 24, 2012, 11:49:23 PM
Post by: bearpaw on March 24, 2012, 11:50:05 PM
But when you have to put a dog down, the damage is already done. Meanwhile, wolf attacks on humans are rare at best, and must as everyone thinks they will just go rampant on humans, I don't see the rate increasing in any significant rate, but even then, will pale in comparison to dog attacks.
Yes, they might/will turn to domesticated animals. Thats why we have to responsible for our animals and take the measures proven to be effective. How else does a huge sheep farm in Minnisota residing between two large packs have little to no predations? Lifestock guardian dogs and night shepherds. Plus its been proven time and time again, wolves represent less than 1% of the elemnts that cause livestock deaths every year.
Yes, the pilgrims did not want to lose livestock to wolves. Livestock non-native to our country in the first place. No matter how you paint it, it was intolerance and greed.
Dude it's greed on the part of you wolf lovers that is going to backlash. If you wolf huggers would have been saitisdfied with a few wolves you would have been more successful, but your greed wanted more and more wolves. It backlashed in Idaho and the people are now killing the hell out of wolves over there. :tup:
Your greed is going to push it too far in this state too becuase you can't help yourself, you are too greedy, when the backlash happens we are going to kill the hell out of wolves in this state too. :twocents:
Post by: humanure on March 24, 2012, 11:53:35 PM
You can think whatever you like, just like i can. Guess we'll have to see how it all plays out, now won't we?
Post by: Arteman on March 25, 2012, 12:09:30 AM
You can think whatever you like, just like i can. Guess we'll have to see how it all plays out, now won't we?It's not an opinion, its a fact. Look at Idaho to see how its already been played out. :dunno:
Post by: humanure on March 25, 2012, 12:14:30 AM
Post by: Arteman on March 25, 2012, 12:19:55 AM
Post by: humanure on March 25, 2012, 12:24:25 AM
Post by: Arteman on March 25, 2012, 12:35:39 AM
Post by: humanure on March 25, 2012, 12:37:58 AM
Post by: bearpaw on March 25, 2012, 04:47:00 AM
Thats why i lock my dogs up. I've lost a few to cougar and coyotes.
I doubt this is true, I am calling :liar:
Wolf lovers use this approach all the time to reationalize the existance of wolves. A lot of you folks live in the country and how many of you have lost a dog that you undeniably know was killed by a cougar or coyotes? This wolf lover claims he has lost a few that way, this is only an attempt to to rationalize the existance of wolves and I would bet a Ben Franklin that it's an outright lie. :tup:
Post by: MuleySniper on March 25, 2012, 07:52:27 AM
Thats why i lock my dogs up. I've lost a few to cougar and coyotes.
I doubt this is true, I am calling :liar:
Wolf lovers use this approach all the time to reationalize the existance of wolves. A lot of you folks live in the country and how many of you have lost a dog that you undeniably know was killed by a cougar or coyotes? This wolf lover claims he has lost a few that way, this is only an attempt to to rationalize the existance of wolves and I would bet a Ben Franklin that it's an outright lie. :tup:
:yeah:
Pretty easy to tell this guy is a wolf in sheeps clothing :chuckle: The ecosystem comparison is hilarious. This guy has probably never left downtown Seattle.
MS
Post by: HORSEPOWER on March 25, 2012, 08:22:46 AM
Because I see where wolves are not a problem due to people that are willing to take the measures to co-exist. Again, how does a sheep farm in Minnisota go without predations living in wolf country?
SSS??? :chuckle:
Post by: inchtowntracking on March 25, 2012, 08:36:41 AM
Post by: bearpaw on March 25, 2012, 09:04:56 AM
Post by: pianoman9701 on March 25, 2012, 09:06:23 AM
Post by: inchtowntracking on March 25, 2012, 09:19:01 AM
He said he camped once behind his house... :chuckle:
Silly greenie thinks that's camping. :chuckle:
Post by: Arteman on March 25, 2012, 10:16:36 AM
Post by: Arteman on March 25, 2012, 10:25:25 AM
Post by: Tbar on March 25, 2012, 10:52:58 AM
Post by: humanure on March 25, 2012, 12:10:43 PM
And I've lived in Tacoma for exactly one year when i was 22, and then went back to Mt. Rainier. That was too much to deal with, I could NEVER live in Seattle. I'd kill someone.
One of my dogs was one of the few along with my neighbors cow that was killed by an old cougar along the Nisqually. The game warden said it was an older one who was likely having troubles surviving and turing to domestic animals. I lost another to the coyotes that prowl my woods. I couldn't get him to come to the house after hearing them ringing off in the woods behind us, and never saw my dog again. I'd say its safe to say it was the coyotes.
When i first started hunting, yes, I set up on the elk trails(or as my friend called it when he tracked it, an elk highway). Where I live the Nisqually and ever stretching woods is just behind me.
Post by: Tbar on March 25, 2012, 12:15:59 PM
Post by: humanure on March 25, 2012, 12:37:38 PM
Post by: ribka on March 25, 2012, 12:40:16 PM
We can make those judgements on dogs, as they are domestic animals. But the wolves are just being wolves. Thats why people should be allowed to 'harass' them if they are within city limits to discourage them.
In this case "harass" equal hugs :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(
Wolf troll alert
Post by: ribka on March 25, 2012, 12:45:42 PM
We can make those judgements on dogs, as they are domestic animals. But the wolves are just being wolves. Thats why people should be allowed to 'harass' them if they are within city limits to discourage them.
In this case "harass" equal hugs :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(
Wolf troll alert
"Wolves being wolves"
And ticks are just being ticks when they bite you and give you Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever or Lymes Disease.
Going to start a "Ticker luvers" FB page now
Post by: humanure on March 25, 2012, 02:21:22 PM
Post by: steen on March 25, 2012, 03:28:00 PM
Post by: Arteman on March 25, 2012, 04:58:02 PM
Thats why i lock my dogs up. I've lost a few to cougar and coyotes.Idk, I guess I've always thought a few meant 3. My bad, I apologize. :sry:
Post by: Bob33 on March 25, 2012, 05:45:23 PM
Going to start a "Ticker luvers" FB page nowJust remember: you can harass them but don't kill them.
Post by: KFhunter on March 25, 2012, 05:46:59 PM
you need an avatar to suit your personality
may I suggest a few:
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wolfsanctuary.net%2F99-gen-photos%2FMerchandise%2520New%2F00-Bumper-Sticker_Web.jpg&hash=a0156de74a0dd99287e299babb6bf814c1a9d4ae)
or
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.defenders.org%2Fimages%2Fcoolstuff%2Fstickers%2Fsticker_wolf_heart_adopt.gif&hash=573f6446f1898af2d23948aaee992603ff0ca300)
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.defenders.org%2Fimages%2Fcoolstuff%2Fstickers%2Fsticker_ID_wolfhunt.gif&hash=30c983561ec263925eae78c29c074a43e55795e5)
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.defenders.org%2Fimages%2Ffactsheets%2Fadopt%2FWolf_Adopt_Ad_205x200.jpg&hash=33393eb8c11ca13e5ef588053a9601d95ba4b7db)
Also, when your out in public make sure you wear your 3 wolves howling tee-shirt
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fteejunkie.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F05%2F3wolves.jpg&hash=6b77d2108225df87c921ec4430520b0bd0534638)
Post by: KFhunter on March 25, 2012, 05:49:58 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Wolf_Moon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Wolf_Moon)
Post by: humanure on March 25, 2012, 05:57:16 PM
Post by: MuleySniper on March 25, 2012, 05:57:57 PM
Thats why i lock my dogs up. I've lost a few to cougar and coyotes.Idk, I guess I've always thought a few meant 3. My bad, I apologize. :sry:
Who can rule out it might have been a few rainbow people that strayed away from the herd with a craving for red meat instead of the daily rice and bean diet? :chuckle:
Post by: ribka on March 25, 2012, 08:07:32 PM
Going to start a "Ticker luvers" FB page nowJust remember: you can harass them but don't kill them.
Wife is a graphic designer by trade.
maybe some bumper stickers :
"Ticks can hug with 8 arms but humans can only hug with 2 arms"
" Ticks never designed nuclear weapons"
"A tick would rather suck the blood of a wolf than a human"
"A tick is just a wolf minus 6 arms, hair and canines"
I could go on all night.....
Post by: finnman on March 25, 2012, 08:38:45 PM
Post by: humanure on March 25, 2012, 08:43:41 PM
Post by: ribka on March 25, 2012, 08:46:50 PM
Agree with you.
Good post
The joker claims Bearpaws actions as un-Christ like and then out of his own mouth spews that he would kill someone if he had to live in Seattle, what a flipping hypocrite!!! We are all aware of the cloak of lies that most all wolf lovers sculk around under, we see clearly through their web of deceit, but to have a knuckle head like you come on hear an pretend to be pro-hunting or pro-wildlife management just irks me. Nuke his IP address if you ask me. :twocents:
Post by: ICEMAN on March 25, 2012, 08:47:22 PM
Again, that was figurately speaking. It's kind've a common thing for people to say if I had to live here, if I had to do this... i would kill someone. You know, figure of speech. Of all the things I've said and you latch onto THAT? Hilarious.
So why do you get your panties in a knot everytime somebody says to SSS? It is just speaking figuratively... :dunno:
Post by: humanure on March 25, 2012, 08:50:50 PM
And I ain't no eco-terrorist. Those Green Scare people belong in the prisons they are rotting in.
Post by: ribka on March 25, 2012, 09:03:23 PM
So If I sped up above the speed limit (breaking the law) to avoid hitting a magnificent animal like the wolf would that be ok in your world Humanure?
Or should I Obey the law and hit and kill the grey wolf introduced from Canada?
Because it condones the act of breaking the law. You can joke about it, but that phrase holds alot of weight.
And I ain't no eco-terrorist. Those Green Scare people belong in the prisons they are rotting in.
Post by: humanure on March 25, 2012, 09:05:49 PM
Post by: seth30 on March 25, 2012, 09:20:13 PM
Post by: ribka on March 25, 2012, 09:24:02 PM
Too damn funny
You need to go back to your masters for more instructions
FYI you'll have a difficult time banning hunting on a hunting web site troll.
maybe if you cross your Icelandic sheep -( invasive species) with Canadian grey wolves( invasive species) you could develop a species that consumes itself and solve the problem
Speed up to avoid collision? can't say I've heard of that tactic. But in my experience, I braced for the collisions rather than swerve to miss. Too many variables of extra damage if you do that.
Post by: seth30 on March 25, 2012, 09:25:16 PM
Post by: humanure on March 25, 2012, 09:27:37 PM
maybe if you cross your Icelandic sheep -( invasive species) with Canadian grey wolves( invasive species) you could develop a species that consumes itself and solve the problem
Thats actually REALLY FUNNY! Hahaha! I'm going to use that one later for sure(not joking).
I ain't baiting anyone. I mean every damn word I say.
Post by: ribka on March 25, 2012, 09:44:38 PM
Do you like lead ammunition?
Do you think it should be banned?
maybe if you cross your Icelandic sheep -( invasive species) with Canadian grey wolves( invasive species) you could develop a species that consumes itself and solve the problem
Thats actually REALLY FUNNY! Hahaha! I'm going to use that one later for sure(not joking).
I ain't baiting anyone. I mean every damn word I say.
Post by: KFhunter on March 25, 2012, 10:18:29 PM
here's a deep philosophic question for you:
So If I sped up above the speed limit (breaking the law) to avoid hitting a magnificent animal like the wolf would that be ok in your world Humanure?
Or should I Obey the law and hit and kill the grey wolf introduced from Canada?Because it condones the act of breaking the law. You can joke about it, but that phrase holds alot of weight.
And I ain't no eco-terrorist. Those Green Scare people belong in the prisons they are rotting in.
I gotta give that one to humanure, that was a stupid question :chuckle:
Post by: Whitpirate on March 25, 2012, 10:29:29 PM
Thats why i lock my dogs up. I've lost a few to cougar and coyotes.
I doubt this is true, I am calling :liar:
Wolf lovers use this approach all the time to reationalize the existance of wolves. A lot of you folks live in the country and how many of you have lost a dog that you undeniably know was killed by a cougar or coyotes? This wolf lover claims he has lost a few that way, this is only an attempt to to rationalize the existance of wolves and I would bet a Ben Franklin that it's an outright lie. :tup:
:yeah: BearPaw hit the same button I did when I read that. This hugger is FOS.
Post by: simondude on March 25, 2012, 10:58:39 PM
Because it condones the act of breaking the law. You can joke about it, but that phrase holds alot of weight.
Saying that if you lived in seattle you would kill someone also condones breaking the law.
Post by: whitetailslyr on March 25, 2012, 11:02:21 PM
Post by: jackmaster on March 26, 2012, 07:03:18 AM
Post by: PlateauNDN on March 26, 2012, 02:01:18 PM
Post by: humanure on March 26, 2012, 06:53:17 PM
What I think isn't important. I've stated how I felt on the issue. If wolves can be properly managed, I feel co-existence is possible. I've stated how I feel about the current management plan.
Post by: jackmaster on March 26, 2012, 08:15:20 PM
Post by: humanure on March 26, 2012, 08:17:17 PM
Post by: KopperBuck on March 26, 2012, 09:20:08 PM
You asked, but I honestly don't know enough about hound hunting to say whether I think it's right or not. What did you want me to say?
You didn't know?? You're either against them or for them! Decide for yourself who "them" is :rolleyes:
Post by: humanure on March 26, 2012, 09:30:38 PM
Post by: KopperBuck on March 26, 2012, 09:42:27 PM
Post by: humanure on March 26, 2012, 09:46:23 PM
Post by: KopperBuck on March 26, 2012, 09:48:58 PM
Post by: humanure on March 26, 2012, 09:55:38 PM
Post by: jackmaster on March 27, 2012, 06:59:21 AM
Post by: pianoman9701 on March 27, 2012, 07:04:55 AM
Post by: calib on March 27, 2012, 07:32:58 AM
You asked, but I honestly don't know enough about hound hunting to say whether I think it's right or not. What did you want me to say?You dont have to study or rite a paper to have an opinion
Post by: MuleySniper on March 27, 2012, 08:15:39 AM
MS
Post by: jordanramos_79 on March 27, 2012, 12:33:08 PM
Post by: hirshey on March 27, 2012, 12:40:14 PM
Do you honestly believe that? Hahaha. How un-Christ like...
I'm sorry... but I hate it when people mix religion with management issues.
SCIENCE / RELIGION
not..
SCIENLIGION
Post by: pianoman9701 on March 27, 2012, 01:02:59 PM
Post by: hirshey on March 27, 2012, 01:17:54 PM
Well, I'm not a Christian and believe we killed the wolves before for a reason. Wolves and people don't mix. They were here before because we weren't. Now we're here and we don't need them. This is going to get out of hand in a big fat hurry and lose me the right to hunt the critters I've helped come back from the brink.
:tup: :tup:
Post by: KopperBuck on March 27, 2012, 01:22:40 PM
Post by: jackmaster on March 27, 2012, 02:06:11 PM
Well, I'm not a Christian and believe we killed the wolves before for a reason. Wolves and people don't mix. They were here before because we weren't. Now we're here and we don't need them. This is going to get out of hand in a big fat hurry and lose me the right to hunt the critters I've helped come back from the brink.:yeah: DAMN SKIPPY, now all we need is to get people like human manure to keep his trap shut, so when we get a chance to vote for the right to kill all woves on sight we wont have to worry about *censored*s like him messn crap up like he and his kind screwed up trappin, baitn and hound huntn.... its a simple fact and i have said it a thousand times, noone and i mean noone truly cares about are animals as much as a sportsman does.... plain and simple.... do some research on that human manure.... :tup:
Post by: humanure on March 27, 2012, 06:54:02 PM
We, as in people, may not need wolves. But there are things bigger than us to worry about.
Again, the reason they were killed before, was to make money. They turned this region into an elk farm to cator to the hunting community. But thats just a theory like everything else.
Post by: ribka on March 27, 2012, 09:40:47 PM
Wolves give ZERO dollars a year for wildlife habitat.
All wolves do is carry very dangerous parasites that can be transferred to children and kill for fun
Do they wolves have a Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation that spends millions a year for elk habitat?
hunters do
case closed
My problem is with the phrase 'care about the animals'. Because to some, it's a better way of saying you want to be the only ones killing them. Not saying thats the case, but I see people coming to that conclusion alot.
We, as in people, may not need wolves. But there are things bigger than us to worry about.
Again, the reason they were killed before, was to make money. They turned this region into an elk farm to cator to the hunting community. But thats just a theory like everything else.
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 05:00:12 AM
Post by: seth30 on March 28, 2012, 06:30:36 AM
Every wild animal carries parasites. But without natural predators, ungulates parasites build up too much.:tinfoil:
Post by: jackmaster on March 28, 2012, 06:50:21 AM
Post by: Shed Stud on March 28, 2012, 07:19:52 AM
My problem is with the phrase 'care about the animals'. Because to some, it's a better way of saying you want to be the only ones killing them.
Pile of Humanmanure, You again referred to hunters as you, this is not the first time you have done this. Your true colors are starting to show, and they are not camo.
You should delete all your wolf posts go to the intro page and start over. Why don't you share a story of a hunt or a fishing trip or maybe a picture of a bow or a rifle or a bb gun, Something to get yourself some credit as even maybe a wannabe sportsman or woman.
Or go out by your elk trail where you camped once, dig a huge hole, throw yourself in it, and compost, thats what manure does best
Post by: GrainfedMuley on March 28, 2012, 09:18:15 AM
Post by: MuleySniper on March 28, 2012, 10:01:28 AM
My problem is with the phrase 'care about the animals'. Because to some, it's a better way of saying you want to be the only ones killing them. Not saying thats the case, but I see people coming to that conclusion alot.
We, as in people, may not need wolves. But there are things bigger than us to worry about.
Again, the reason they were killed before, was to make money. They turned this region into an elk farm to cator to the hunting community. But thats just a theory like everything else.
Nice quote from someone who apparently has so many logical facts supporting your statements... That is the problem with most antis, they only look at it that way. You probably have zero clue where the meat you eat and feed your family with comes from. The same type of irrational activist that fights slaughter house methods but take your kids through the drive threw at McDonalds for cheeseburger happy meals. Or you could be a total vegan extremist who believes all animals were put here to frolic while you sustain off of soy beans and lettuce.
Post by: jackmaster on March 28, 2012, 10:08:27 AM
Hey guy's, I think Humanturd is a paid plant to disrupt and stir up this site. I agree with Jackmaster. I don't think Humanturd even has a squirt gun. The only fishing he does is at Skippers. He wears wool socks with his sandals and goes to the Rainbow festival. :dunno: That goes with his rainbow sticker on his french fry oil powerd volkswagen.truer words have never been spoken :tup:
Post by: TheHunt on March 28, 2012, 10:20:50 AM
Concerned hunters give Millions of dollars a year to enhance wildlife habitat.
Wolves give ZERO dollars a year for wildlife habitat.
All wolves do is carry very dangerous parasites that can be transferred to children and kill for fun
Do they wolves have a Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation that spends millions a year for elk habitat?
hunters do
case closedMy problem is with the phrase 'care about the animals'. Because to some, it's a better way of saying you want to be the only ones killing them. Not saying thats the case, but I see people coming to that conclusion alot.
We, as in people, may not need wolves. But there are things bigger than us to worry about.
Again, the reason they were killed before, was to make money. They turned this region into an elk farm to cator to the hunting community. But thats just a theory like everything else.
Post by: inchtowntracking on March 28, 2012, 10:45:09 AM
Would that cause over grazing, then we would have to bring in wolves to thin the vegans down right. Or atleast that's what I am understanding.My problem is with the phrase 'care about the animals'. Because to some, it's a better way of saying you want to be the only ones killing them. Not saying thats the case, but I see people coming to that conclusion alot.
We, as in people, may not need wolves. But there are things bigger than us to worry about.
Again, the reason they were killed before, was to make money. They turned this region into an elk farm to cator to the hunting community. But thats just a theory like everything else.
Nice quote from someone who apparently has so many logical facts supporting your statements... That is the problem with most antis, they only look at it that way. You probably have zero clue where the meat you eat and feed your family with comes from. The same type of irrational activist that fights slaughter house methods but take your kids through the drive threw at McDonalds for cheeseburger happy meals. Or you could be a total vegan extremist who believes all animals were put here to frolic while you sustain off of soy beans and lettuce.
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 12:42:21 PM
Humanmanure, dude you just dont get it, sportsman dont spend money just so they can kill, being succesful in the field is just the bonus you recieve for doing things right during the season, i havent killed a deer or elk for the last 3 seasons, by CHOICE, i had my chances but did not take them, and will continue to do so until the time is right, and i promise you that there are alot of other SPORTSMAN that do the same as i do.... give me a place thats loaded with wolves and i will give them the proper diet they truly need. if you havent paid attention to neiboring states and the hell they are going through do to wolves then ya got a little more research to do. i wish you would fess up and tell everyone your true nature, why the hell you on a huntn site, i will be honest, your wolf loven attitude is seriously getting real irritating, and like i said before, its people like you that cause us to lose more and more rights, one day you will wake the hell up and wonder where all your rights went and then you will bitch about it ya friggin turn coat, you say your a hunter, i call B.S. you wouldnt know the first thing about being a sportsman if it bit you in arse, and i could tell when you stated that sportsman spend money so they are the ones that get to kill the animals, if you were a sportsman then you would have a clue, which i am sorry to say, but ya DONT... :hello:
Your right, I'm not a sportsman. Thats not something I want to be. I picked up hunting not for sport, but for skill.
Post by: BIGINNER on March 28, 2012, 12:45:51 PM
Humanmanure, dude you just dont get it, sportsman dont spend money just so they can kill, being succesful in the field is just the bonus you recieve for doing things right during the season, i havent killed a deer or elk for the last 3 seasons, by CHOICE, i had my chances but did not take them, and will continue to do so until the time is right, and i promise you that there are alot of other SPORTSMAN that do the same as i do.... give me a place thats loaded with wolves and i will give them the proper diet they truly need. if you havent paid attention to neiboring states and the hell they are going through do to wolves then ya got a little more research to do. i wish you would fess up and tell everyone your true nature, why the hell you on a huntn site, i will be honest, your wolf loven attitude is seriously getting real irritating, and like i said before, its people like you that cause us to lose more and more rights, one day you will wake the hell up and wonder where all your rights went and then you will bitch about it ya friggin turn coat, you say your a hunter, i call B.S. you wouldnt know the first thing about being a sportsman if it bit you in arse, and i could tell when you stated that sportsman spend money so they are the ones that get to kill the animals, if you were a sportsman then you would have a clue, which i am sorry to say, but ya DONT... :hello:
Your right, I'm not a sportsman. Thats not something I want to be. I picked up hunting not for sport, but for skill.
:dunno: :chuckle: :dunno: :chuckle: :dunno: dude... are you high?? lol :chuckle:
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 12:47:22 PM
Post by: pianoman9701 on March 28, 2012, 12:51:41 PM
Post by: jackmaster on March 28, 2012, 12:55:30 PM
Post by: BIGINNER on March 28, 2012, 01:26:30 PM
Post by: Kain on March 28, 2012, 01:36:30 PM
Post by: pianoman9701 on March 28, 2012, 01:40:41 PM
Post by: PlateauNDN on March 28, 2012, 01:57:34 PM
also speaking of skills, one of his posts said that he has't shot anything yet, but he missed a grouse with a bow once.... yep... skill :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
Sounds more like Napolean Dynamite to me. :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle: You wanna use some of my skills Pedro? :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
humanturd, dude that dont even make sense, you picked up hunting for skill, ya gotta help me understand that one dude, i will tell you why i hunt, because i love being in the hills and seing animals, or the thought of maybe seeing the buck of a lifetime, or fishn some creek way the heck and gone from others, the smell of the mountains, the sunsets especially when it reflects off of mt rainier, i could go on forever, as for you i have no clue what you stand for and i think i dont wanna know because i know you stand for everything that goes against sportsman.... :tup:
:yeah: This is what it's all about. The love for the outdoors.
He picked up hunting to sound more legit for his pro wolf opinions. In his head he believes it sounds better when he can stand in front of the commission and say "I am a hunter and I support more wolves". :dunno: Who's gonna fact check him? Then the anti huters can say "see even some hunters agree with us". :bash: :bash:
:yeah: X's 2 This is what I believe he is "trying" to accomplish. Come here and try and learn something and then go back and say I'm a hunter I'm accepted and apart of the Hunt-WA forum membership and this is what we talk about. He's a joke plain and simple.
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 06:31:43 PM
As far as this 'picking it up so that i can say...", plausable, funny even. But not true.
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 06:39:08 PM
sportsman spend money so they are the ones that get to kill the animals.
Dude, you just proved that conclusion I mentioned to be true. That statement screams selfishness.
Post by: Kowsrule30 on March 28, 2012, 08:43:39 PM
Post by: KopperBuck on March 28, 2012, 08:46:04 PM
sportsman spend money so they are the ones that get to kill the animals.
Dude, you just proved that conclusion I mentioned to be true. That statement screams selfishness.
I'm all for opinions, but this a prime example of taking something out of context. Ain't no better than any press. Worse so that copy and paste is an option. If a logical person read that entire statement... well nevermind, I'm not speaking to a logical individual if you pulled that out of this entire thread.
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 09:04:08 PM
Post by: Kowsrule30 on March 28, 2012, 09:05:20 PM
How much did your tags and license cost last year you hunted and what year was that??? Along with what tags and license you purchased??? What special permit apps as well???? :chuckle: What was your season with what set up???
:tup:
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 09:09:13 PM
How much did your tags and license cost last year you hunted and what year was that??? Along with what tags and license you purchased??? What special permit apps as well???? :chuckle: What was your season with what set up???
I think my tags were alittle over $100 last year. I forget how much I spent getting my license, but I took a weeks course over in Enumclaw at some guys church. I bought Bear, Elk, Deer, Cougar and small game tags. I got no kills those seasons last year. Sighted a doe and a bear, but couldn't get a clean shot on the bear while the doe wasn't in season yet. Almost took a shot on a coyote, but it turned out to be a recent mother and let it go. Some wouldn't agree with that, but whatev's. We've all got our ethics. I used a Savage 30-06 model 110.
Post by: KopperBuck on March 28, 2012, 09:12:07 PM
Its what everyones been doing to my words the whole time. Takes two to tango, and I can dance all night, lady.
But Mom, he did it too!!! Quit it.
Post by: Kowsrule30 on March 28, 2012, 09:14:58 PM
How much did your tags and license cost last year you hunted and what year was that??? Along with what tags and license you purchased??? What special permit apps as well???? :chuckle: What was your season with what set up???
I think my tags were alittle over $100 last year. I forget how much I spent getting my license, but I took a weeks course over in Enumclaw at some guys church. I bought Bear, Elk, Deer, Cougar and small game tags. I got no kills those seasons last year. Sighted a doe and a bear, but couldn't get a clean shot on the bear while the doe wasn't in season yet. Almost took a shot on a coyote, but it turned out to be a recent mother and let it go. Some wouldn't agree with that, but whatev's. We've all got our ethics. I used a Savage 30-06 model 110.
Where were you hunting??? GMU wise????
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 09:22:21 PM
Post by: Devinshoe on March 28, 2012, 09:33:24 PM
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 09:35:38 PM
Post by: Kowsrule30 on March 28, 2012, 09:40:41 PM
I didn't know what GMU meant, so I just gave a global position address.
My point exactly!!!!! LIAR!!!!! :chuckle:
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 09:41:23 PM
Post by: Kowsrule30 on March 28, 2012, 09:44:07 PM
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 09:45:25 PM
Post by: Devinshoe on March 28, 2012, 09:45:55 PM
Post by: BIGINNER on March 28, 2012, 09:46:57 PM
Post by: ICEMAN on March 28, 2012, 09:48:14 PM
Post by: BIGINNER on March 28, 2012, 09:48:34 PM
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 09:49:37 PM
So since you hunted and all this year you have to to submit a hunter report. And it ask you what gmu's you hunted in and how many days. So did you just typed in a bunch of random numbers since you dont know what a gmu is ?
Oh! Now I get what your talking about. Hahaha! I submitted by phone, but don't remember what unit it was. My other hunter friends who were with me told me what to say because I was on my last day to submit and had only a few minutes to get back to work. So I rushed the report and that was it. I honestly don't remember what the unit was.
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 09:52:24 PM
Also. What were you planning to hunt for with your smallgame tag?
To be honest, I did not know small game was included with the Elk tag(or so I was told). But you know, Grouse, mostly.
Post by: BIGINNER on March 28, 2012, 09:54:30 PM
:chuckle:Also. What were you planning to hunt for with your smallgame tag?
To be honest, I did not know small game was included with the Elk tag(or so I was told). But you know, Grouse, mostly.
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 09:56:05 PM
Post by: Pathfinder101 on March 28, 2012, 09:56:26 PM
Also. What were you planning to hunt for with your smallgame tag?
To be honest, I did not know small game was included with the Elk tag(or so I was told). But you know, Grouse, mostly.
hmmmmm....I just got here, but something doesn't add up with this story.... :chuckle:
Post by: ICEMAN on March 28, 2012, 09:58:05 PM
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 09:58:33 PM
Post by: Devinshoe on March 28, 2012, 09:59:39 PM
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 10:00:11 PM
Coyotes were categorized under small game, and you needed a small game license to hunt grouse?
To be honest, I bought small game just to cover my bases. Like I said, I didn't quite understand it all and just bought the tags and went home to get ready for the season. Alot of it still confuses me, actually.
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 10:00:46 PM
Hahaha So you just lied on your hunter report like you lie on here?
No. I asked my friends what unit we hunted and then submitted it.
Post by: ICEMAN on March 28, 2012, 10:01:07 PM
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 10:04:08 PM
Post by: Devinshoe on March 28, 2012, 10:05:10 PM
Must be some nice friends you have.Hahaha So you just lied on your hunter report like you lie on here?
No. I asked my friends what unit we hunted and then submitted it.
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 10:06:44 PM
Post by: Pathfinder101 on March 28, 2012, 10:08:37 PM
Don't you think you better do a bit of reasearch before you run out into the woods to shoot something?
Yeah, I mean good Lord. You could have accidentally shot a wolf.... :dunno:
Post by: KopperBuck on March 28, 2012, 10:12:52 PM
Don't you think you better do a bit of reasearch before you run out into the woods to shoot something?
Yeah, I mean good Lord. You could have accidentally shot a wolf.... :dunno:
:yike: :yeah: :yike: :chuckle:
Post by: Kowsrule30 on March 28, 2012, 10:32:12 PM
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 10:38:56 PM
Post by: Devinshoe on March 28, 2012, 10:44:38 PM
Post by: Kowsrule30 on March 28, 2012, 10:45:10 PM
Hahaha, that was pretty dumb. Funny, but dumb.
And there is nothing more honest than that..... :tup:
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 10:48:18 PM
umm humanure you find out what a gmu is ? or are your brothers still giving you the right coordinates??
Do you really want it that bad? Look up the coordinates I gave and find out for your own self. I'm not waking my friends up at this hour just to answer that question, and I'm not getting out the reg book to look it up either. get it yourself.
Post by: Devinshoe on March 28, 2012, 10:55:59 PM
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 11:00:34 PM
Post by: Devinshoe on March 28, 2012, 11:05:39 PM
Post by: Kowsrule30 on March 28, 2012, 11:05:49 PM
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 11:08:50 PM
Post by: Kowsrule30 on March 28, 2012, 11:14:18 PM
I only have my GED. All other studying was on my own time.
But yet post's ago you were working with scientist or some *censored* on a mountain..... :o :chuckle: Best ged in the state!!!
Post by: Devinshoe on March 28, 2012, 11:16:15 PM
Post by: humanure on March 28, 2012, 11:17:08 PM
Post by: Pathfinder101 on March 29, 2012, 05:58:26 AM
umm humanure you find out what a gmu is ? or are your brothers still giving you the right coordinates??
My brothers tried to take me snipe hunting once. I didn't fall for it. :chuckle: :chuckle:
On the other hand, I didn't walk into a bar full of hunters and try to "teach" them all about wolves after the first time I went hunting either (they didn't have internet forums back then-so I guess the closest thing here would be walking into TJ's Tavern in Kettle Falls about an hour after sunset on the 15th of October and trying to give the occupants there the benefit of my vast outdoors knowledge... :chuckle: )
Post by: BIGINNER on March 29, 2012, 06:49:36 AM
Quote
To be honest, I did not know small game was included with the Elk tag(or so I was told). But you know, Grouse, mostly.
OK,.. SO HERE YOU SAY THAT YOU ONLY GOT AN ELK TAG BECAUSE YOU FIGURED AN ELK LICENCE COVERS GROUSE.. AND THATS RIGHT..
Quote
I could be misquoting someone, but I remember being told that i didn't need to buy the small game tag. Was probably talking about coyotes tough, because thats what i thought they were catagorized under.
AND HERE AGAIN YOU SAID YOU DIDN'T BUY A SMALL GAME TAG,... OR RATHER LICENCE. :chuckle:
BUT...
Quote
To be honest, I bought small game just to cover my bases. Like I said, I didn't quite understand it all and just bought the tags and went home to get ready for the season. Alot of it still confuses me, actually.
SO,.. DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT BUY A SMALL GAME LICENCE.... YES ITS LICENCE.. NOT TAG. :chuckle: :dunno:
Post by: jackmaster on March 29, 2012, 06:52:30 AM
really dude, thats what you got out of my post, wow humanexcrement ya might want to go back and read it again. on another note its good to see that your just some dumb kid that got his outdoor education off of channel 9. i doubt you have evr really been huntn, and the part about your buddies being long bow hunters, and goin back to modern to help your sorry tree huggin ass out well thats probably B.S to. did you ever even take hunter ed? i am thinkn ya didnt because when my 8 year old son took hunter ed his knowledge and SKILL, was far above where your at little girl, oh and the best part where you talk about workn on your skill but you ment to say your survival skills in case ya got into a bad situation, well i would pay money to see how that worked out for ya, aint no mcdonalds in the mountains little lady, tell ya what, maybe you should leave the huntn to the people that actually have a clue. and you should stick to whatever it is you really dosportsman spend money so they are the ones that get to kill the animals.
Dude, you just proved that conclusion I mentioned to be true. That statement screams selfishness.
Post by: Shed Stud on March 29, 2012, 07:15:50 AM
:chuckle: :chuckle: "To be honest..." Thats one way to start of a line of BS. Pile of Humancrap you talk so much sh!t you can't even keep your stories straight. Still no photos of anything hunting related, or did you loose your camera while you were out "TREKING"?QuoteTo be honest, I did not know small game was included with the Elk tag(or so I was told). But you know, Grouse, mostly.
OK,.. SO HERE YOU SAY THAT YOU ONLY GOT AN ELK TAG BECAUSE YOU FIGURED AN ELK LICENCE COVERS GROUSE.. AND THATS RIGHT..QuoteI could be misquoting someone, but I remember being told that i didn't need to buy the small game tag. Was probably talking about coyotes tough, because thats what i thought they were catagorized under.
AND HERE AGAIN YOU SAID YOU DIDN'T BUY A SMALL GAME TAG,... OR RATHER LICENCE. :chuckle:
BUT...QuoteTo be honest, I bought small game just to cover my bases. Like I said, I didn't quite understand it all and just bought the tags and went home to get ready for the season. Alot of it still confuses me, actually.
SO,.. DID YOU OR DID YOU NOT BUY A SMALL GAME LICENCE.... YES ITS LICENCE.. NOT TAG. :chuckle: :dunno:
:violent1: :liar: :mor: :stup:
Post by: humanure on March 29, 2012, 12:12:53 PM
Post by: Arteman on March 29, 2012, 02:38:56 PM
Post by: jackmaster on March 29, 2012, 02:55:54 PM
On top of all this bs of not knowing the rules and regs, or even what gmu you was hunting in, you broke one of the biggest unwritten rules of hunting and gave out gps coordinates to your buddies hunting hole on a open forum. But... since you only seen one doe and a coyote, I feel nobody here is going to jump on it, your friends secrets are safe with the rest of us 10,000 HW members. :tup::chuckle: :chuckle: research that humanturd
Post by: humanure on March 29, 2012, 04:46:21 PM
Love, peace and chicken grease!
Post by: Pinetar on March 29, 2012, 05:06:00 PM
Post by: Pathfinder101 on March 29, 2012, 05:59:15 PM
Yeah well, if all I'm going to get is false sense of undeserved entitlement, I bore of this(finally) and am quite done here. I've had some good, fun and at times enlightening conversations here, but at this point we are just going in circles, so why waste eachother's time further?
Love, peace and chicken grease!
Good call. Report back to your "group" and tell them no one was fooled...
Post by: MuleySniper on March 29, 2012, 06:06:23 PM
MS
Post by: ribka on March 29, 2012, 06:17:16 PM
Yes I bought small game.
Well let's see some small game pics then serial liar :chuckle:
Post by: Kowsrule30 on March 30, 2012, 01:44:49 PM