Post by: CementFinisher on March 25, 2012, 09:44:21 PM
Post by: rasbo on March 25, 2012, 09:47:28 PM
Well the bulls are still packing seen 40 or so elk today, 5 bulls smallest 3x3 all packing head gear.two were seen today one lost one horn,,,the other still had them..if it was me I would follow the other
Post by: CementFinisher on March 25, 2012, 09:53:14 PM
Post by: rasbo on March 25, 2012, 09:58:51 PM
awesome :tup:.......... Havent seen any buck packing though. been seeing plents of does though. even got a bear on a trail camsweet.Im taking a ride up in the am to see if I can reah the wood cutting area
Post by: CementFinisher on March 25, 2012, 10:00:48 PM
Post by: rasbo on March 25, 2012, 10:03:15 PM
Everywhere behind bridge gate was good today. the deepest the roads got was an inch.sweet,I need to get kim up and cut some wood
Post by: 75johndeere on March 25, 2012, 10:05:51 PM
Sent from my DROID X2 using Tapatalk
Post by: rasbo on March 25, 2012, 10:08:09 PM
They cleared the 3 road to mile 28 too didn't see any bulls today did see a bobcat standing in the middle of the road yesterday thoughhow deep was the snow off the road,at 2800 ft???
Sent from my DROID X2 using Tapatalk
Post by: 75johndeere on March 25, 2012, 10:41:02 PM
Post by: rasbo on March 25, 2012, 10:42:54 PM
forgot the gps today wasnt paying attention to the elevation the highest spot i got to today only had 12-16 inches topsthanks maybe to early to cut wood at 2800
Post by: bigtex on March 26, 2012, 09:46:47 PM
Hancock is a landowner not a location....
Post by: 75johndeere on March 26, 2012, 09:53:57 PM
Sent from my DROID X2 using Tapatalk
Post by: 280ackley on March 26, 2012, 09:56:34 PM
Post by: JBar on March 27, 2012, 05:08:55 PM
What is the point in everyone always saying that apparently we know what farm we are talking about
Sent from my DROID X2 using Tapatalk
:yeah: This was never a problem until Hancock picked up the Snoqualmie tree farm.
Post by: bobcat on March 27, 2012, 05:12:44 PM
Post by: JBar on March 27, 2012, 05:18:44 PM
Post by: bobcat on March 27, 2012, 05:49:21 PM
I guess I do know that if someone says "Hancock" without giving the location, it actually means the "Kapowsin Tree Farm."
Good to know. :tup:
Post by: 75johndeere on March 27, 2012, 06:46:07 PM
Sent from my DROID X2 using Tapatalk
Post by: Ryan308 on March 27, 2012, 07:31:09 PM
Post by: bigtex on March 28, 2012, 08:52:07 PM
What would it hurt to give the location instead of just the landowner? I'm with bigtex, when someone just says Hancock I don't know what area they're talking about. It's like someone asking where you hunt, and you answer "Weyerhaeuser." That could be anywhere, they own land all over the state! :bash:
:yeah:
Post by: bigtex on March 28, 2012, 08:52:38 PM
What is the point in everyone always saying that apparently we know what farm we are talking about
Sent from my DROID X2 using Tapatalk
:yeah: This was never a problem until Hancock picked up the Snoqualmie tree farm.
As far as I know Hancock bought White River and Snoqualmie before they bought Kapowsin....
Post by: christopheri on March 28, 2012, 09:16:22 PM
What is the point in everyone always saying that apparently we know what farm we are talking about
Sent from my DROID X2 using Tapatalk
:yeah: This was never a problem until Hancock picked up the Snoqualmie tree farm.
As far as I know Hancock bought White River and Snoqualmie before they bought Kapowsin....
Yes I believe that is correct. Wasnt it Champion before it was Hancock?
Post by: CementFinisher on March 28, 2012, 10:56:41 PM
Post by: madmack76 on March 28, 2012, 11:02:18 PM