Post by: sooperfly on April 10, 2012, 12:19:11 AM
Fellow locals will recognize some of the interview subjects!
feature=relmfu
Post by: JimmyHoffa on April 10, 2012, 02:06:20 PM
Post by: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on April 10, 2012, 03:43:43 PM
Post by: WA hunter14 on April 10, 2012, 03:47:05 PM
5 mins is all I had to see that's a joke stupid hippies. I wouldn't mind if a pack of wolves found her.
thats halarious! :chuckle:
Post by: MtnMuley on April 10, 2012, 03:51:28 PM
Post by: humanure on April 10, 2012, 07:37:56 PM
Post by: humanure on April 10, 2012, 07:44:37 PM
Post by: Elkaholic daWg on April 10, 2012, 07:49:03 PM
This documentary was made for the city people and others who have no clue, it has nothing to do with the truth
Post by: humanure on April 10, 2012, 08:04:45 PM
Post by: JimmyHoffa on April 10, 2012, 08:16:02 PM
Post by: humanure on April 10, 2012, 08:21:26 PM
Portrayed the hunters/ranchers as a bunch of Yosemite Sams.
These guys painted heir own self portraits.
BTW, what the meaning of 'JimmyHoffa' as your screen-name?
Post by: JimmyHoffa on April 10, 2012, 08:34:12 PM
Screen name is because I often go missing for long periods of times somewhere in the woods.
Post by: BOWHUNTER45 on April 10, 2012, 08:52:15 PM
Post by: WAcoyotehunter on April 11, 2012, 07:31:17 AM
5 mins is all I had to see that's a joke stupid hippies. I wouldn't mind if a pack of wolves found her.
thats halarious! :chuckle:
Hard to believe we could come off sounding like a bunch of Yosemite Sams...
Post by: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on April 11, 2012, 08:46:29 AM
Post by: hirshey on April 11, 2012, 11:07:35 AM
Well, there's a lot of editing that can occur to get 30 seconds of someone that could've been interviewed for a couple of hours.
Agreed. The footage they used at the beginning of the show is the summation of all the most pointed things the interviewees said. Watching even the length of video they allowed some of those interviewees later on, you see a little more insight to their arguements than the "S-S-S, poison-them-all" attitude they portrayed early on.
It's funny; after being subject to an interview for the Methow Valley News on my experience with those wolves this last fall, I certainly feel for anyone who doesn't have control over how their point of view or experiences are painted in a final product.. :dunno:
Post by: humanure on April 11, 2012, 12:10:56 PM
Not unlike the similar and sometimes worse treatment of livestock in slaughterhouses.
Post by: hirshey on April 11, 2012, 12:16:58 PM
"Can you imagine what that poor animal suffered through as it died?!"
Not unlike the similar and sometimes worse treatment of livestock in slaughterhouses.
Its good to recall that both sides are using emotional warfare. What about all those "poor wolves suffering at the hands of the knuckle-dragging hunters"?
A lot of name calling, emotionally-charged ventures from both sides.
I would like to see management remain science-based; which means neither side will be satisfied because wolves will remain, but in lesser numbers than some would hope.
Post by: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on April 11, 2012, 12:51:16 PM
Post by: washelkhunter on April 11, 2012, 01:42:25 PM
Post by: BOWHUNTER45 on April 11, 2012, 02:12:52 PM
Post by: Alchase on April 11, 2012, 02:39:52 PM
I seriously hope the WDFW changed the code to their HQ with all those weapons in there, 42 minute, lol
Isn't this the video that was supposed to show Idabooner's interview?
Post by: hoytem on April 11, 2012, 05:44:46 PM
Post by: ghosthunter on April 11, 2012, 07:24:17 PM
Not any more, I think they are giving those elk to the wolves.
Kinda of gutsy to show the locations of the packs the way most people feel about wolves.
I hunted the lookout area for years and recognized several locations.
Post by: hoytem on April 11, 2012, 07:28:59 PM
Post by: whuppinstick on April 12, 2012, 05:43:38 AM
Hirshey, I agree with you on how people are painted in videos and I have no question that the simplistic nature in which they portrayed some of the 'experts' in the movies would annoy them just as much as selectively pulling "shoot 'em all" clips might have misrepresented the Twisp guys. It goes both ways, I'm sure, so hopefully it balances out?
Post by: danderson on April 12, 2012, 06:40:23 AM
Post by: Idabooner on April 14, 2012, 04:48:59 PM
Code 6328?
Isn't this the video that was supposed to show Idabooner's interview?
I guess they couldn't get me to say what they wanted to hear. LOL
Post by: GrainfedMuley on April 15, 2012, 06:07:28 AM
Code 6328?
I seriously hope the WDFW changed the code to their HQ with all those weapons in there, 42 minute, lol
Isn't this the video that was supposed to show Idabooner's interview?
And really.........what was the point of conducting an interveiw of a poached ANYTHING in a evidence room filled with guns? The only relationship was the animal was shot. Becuase it was a BBC interview, in England they are not allowed to touch firearms, they wanted to make us westerners look like somebody before said. A bunch of Yosemity Sams. When they first talked about the "wild west" they show a scene of the main street in Winthrop. Trying to make it look like this is still the 1860's gold rush.
Post by: villageidiot on April 15, 2012, 02:19:35 PM
Post by: TheHunt on April 15, 2012, 03:03:02 PM
THose fools do NOT want hunting. They are planning on saying that hunting is NOT needed any more as the wolves are keeping the balance.
Post by: whuppinstick on April 15, 2012, 06:36:40 PM
I haven't watched the film yet but it appears they are...
You should watch the films.
Post by: Alchase on April 16, 2012, 11:37:10 AM
Code 6328?
Isn't this the video that was supposed to show Idabooner's interview?
I guess they couldn't get me to say what they wanted to hear. LOL
I was looking forward to your interview. That was during all the denial by the WDFW.
Post by: bearpaw on April 27, 2012, 07:24:32 AM
I am in no way surprised that they make locals look like the bad guys, I expected that.
What I find the most interesting is that this video shows wolves in numerous locations of the north cascades. At the time this was filmed wasn't the WDFW still claiming there was only one wolf pack in the cascades and that there were only two wolves left in the lookout pack?
Here is video proof here that at the time this was filmed they knew there were wolves in several locations in north central WA. I question the timing of their knowledge that additional wolves existed and their continued claims that there are so few wolves in WA until only recently. How many more wolves has WDFW known about that they have refused to admit existed. :dunno:
Post by: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on April 27, 2012, 07:59:48 AM
Post by: humanure on April 27, 2012, 11:43:35 AM
Post by: seth30 on April 27, 2012, 11:56:16 AM
The department has every right and reason to keep such info to themselves. The threat of poaching and giving them the locations to go to being the obvious.Do grizzly bears and wolverines get the same denial by WDFW?
Post by: humanure on April 27, 2012, 11:57:23 AM
Post by: seth30 on April 27, 2012, 11:59:58 AM
I don't work for the department, so i do not know.hmmm but you know about them keeping wolf data from us :dunno: :dunno:
Topic Summary
Posted by: humanure
« on: Today at 11:57:23 AM » Insert Quote
You are ignoring this user. Show me the post.
I don't work for the department, so i do not know.
Posted by: seth30
« on: Today at 11:56:16 AM » Insert Quote
Quote from: humanure on Today at 11:43:35 AM
The department has every right and reason to keep such info to themselves. The threat of poaching and giving them the locations to go to being the obvious.
Do grizzly bears and wolverines get the same denial by WDFW?
Posted by: humanure
« on: Today at 11:43:35 AM » Insert Quote
You are ignoring this user.
The department has every right and reason to keep such info to themselves. The threat of poaching and giving them the locations to go to being the obvious.
Post by: humanure on April 27, 2012, 12:09:04 PM
Post by: seth30 on April 27, 2012, 12:16:42 PM
It's that I know something people don't, it's just logical and common sense.Oh wow you have ESP, maybe you could start your own hotline and charge people 2.99 a minute :IBCOOL:
Post by: humanure on April 27, 2012, 12:22:59 PM
Post by: bearpaw on April 27, 2012, 12:57:32 PM
The department has every right and reason to keep such info to themselves. The threat of poaching and giving them the locations to go to being the obvious.
So you are suggesting it's legitimate, perfectly OK for the WDFW to lie to the people?
Very few people call the WDFW the "department" unless they are employees, exactly who are you humanure, why do you call yourself "humanure" and why do you incite people to make the worst comments about wolves?
Post by: humanure on April 27, 2012, 01:15:39 PM
I am just a guy who raises German Shepherds, runs around the mountains, fishes, hunt's and volunteer's at a sheep/cattle farm and injured wildlife rehab's and sanctuaries. I don't work for the department.
I call myself 'Humanure' because it's my favorite Cattle Decapitation album. I might incite people to say things, but it takes two to tango. It's certain comments that incite me to voice my opinion and idea's.
Post by: TWG2A on April 27, 2012, 01:18:11 PM
The department has every right and reason to keep such info to themselves. The threat of poaching and giving them the locations to go to being the obvious.
So you are suggesting it's legitimate, perfectly OK for the WDFW to lie to the people?
Very few people call the WDFW the "department" unless they are employees, exactly who are you humanure, why do you call yourself "humanure" and why do you incite people to make the worst comments about wolves?
Far too may glassy eyeds have no idea who works for whom. The "Department" is accountable TOTALLY to We, The People. Not We, the glassy eyed MOB.
Post by: seth30 on April 27, 2012, 01:19:37 PM
Yep a lot of groups out there think that WDFW only works for there intrests :bash:The department has every right and reason to keep such info to themselves. The threat of poaching and giving them the locations to go to being the obvious.
So you are suggesting it's legitimate, perfectly OK for the WDFW to lie to the people?
Very few people call the WDFW the "department" unless they are employees, exactly who are you humanure, why do you call yourself "humanure" and why do you incite people to make the worst comments about wolves?
Far too may glassy eyeds have no idea who works for whom. The "Department" is accountable TOTALLY to We, The People. Not We, the glassy eyed MOB.
Post by: hoytem on April 27, 2012, 03:36:51 PM
The department has every right and reason to keep such info to themselves. The threat of poaching and giving them the locations to go to being the obvious.
You are saying it's acceptable for a public agency to lie to the public?!!!! If you could share what ever you're smoking so my head stops hurting it would be appreciated. :bash:
Post by: humanure on April 27, 2012, 04:16:42 PM
Post by: JODakota on April 27, 2012, 05:12:11 PM
I don't agree that they maintained that there was only one pack. They should have been more vague about what they said. I do agree that, yes, it is legitimate to withhold information for the sake of safety, preventing unlawfulness, etc.
I am just a guy who raises German Shepherds, runs around the mountains, fishes, hunt's and volunteer's at a sheep/cattle farm and injured wildlife rehab's and sanctuaries. I don't work for the department.
I call myself 'Humanure' because it's my favorite Cattle Decapitation album. I might incite people to say things, but it takes two to tango. It's certain comments that incite me to voice my opinion and idea's.
Hey manure, what rehab centers do you volunteer at? just curious?
Post by: humanure on April 27, 2012, 05:15:58 PM
Post by: TWG2A on April 27, 2012, 05:40:00 PM
Post by: humanure on April 27, 2012, 05:42:36 PM
You can say I'm a liar all you want, that doesn't make it any more true than... well, I'll just stop there.
Post by: TWG2A on April 27, 2012, 08:58:57 PM
You're also an amatuer. I know your alinsky better than you do.
I win. You lose. PERIOD.
Post by: humanure on April 27, 2012, 10:10:06 PM
Post by: GrainfedMuley on April 28, 2012, 03:51:08 AM
Post by: humanure on April 28, 2012, 04:02:30 AM
I don't do demonstration's. Sure, I'll go to farmers market's and help educate the uses of home grown wool and other tool's of living, but you won't find me throwing firebombs at an Occupy demonstration. I hate rabble-rousing mob's, so I wouldn't be involved in any of the. Plus I HATE Seattle. Every time I go there for a concert, I can't wait to leave because of how that city is. The most fukked roadways ever! And I hate yuppie Seattlites.
Post by: TWG2A on April 28, 2012, 08:19:04 AM
Broad, you ain't won *censored*. All you have done is slander an individuals character. Nothing more, nothing less. You have not proven to me that wolves from Canada weren't here before, and you have not proven a *censored* accusation about who I am, you especially ain't established that I am a liar. You keep saying it, but that don't make it any more true. You have not explained what a psyop is, what an NWO grunt is nor who this Alinsky *censored* is. Your about as much as winning as Charlie Sheen(and sound just as *censored* in the head). I mean seriously, you sound JUST LIKE those Jesus Freaks and Scientologists who scream louder and louder in people's faces without responding to their words.
1) "Broad"? LOL!
2) Yes, I did.
3) No, I didn't
4) Yes, I did
5) Your posts proved what you are.
6) Once again, yes I did, liar.
7) You know what they are. You just don't know them as well as I do.
8) I'm immune to your ridicule and demonization, manure. Been fighting you limp wristed sissy freaks for nearly eight years. I know how you roll. I DETEST you SOB's and I'm not going to let you lie here without correcting those lies.
Brace yourself, tool
Post by: smokepole assassin79 on April 28, 2012, 10:02:48 AM
Post by: seth30 on April 28, 2012, 10:12:04 AM
twg2a you rock.:yeah:
Post by: TWG2A on April 28, 2012, 10:28:01 AM
He's an alinsky wanna-be desciple. Thinks he knows how to change your mindss on the issues.
But I know his alinsky FAR better than he does, and I'm not playing his dirty little game.
Post by: humanure on April 28, 2012, 11:48:03 AM
Broad, you ain't won *censored*. All you have done is slander an individuals character. Nothing more, nothing less. You have not proven to me that wolves from Canada weren't here before, and you have not proven a *censored* accusation about who I am, you especially ain't established that I am a liar. You keep saying it, but that don't make it any more true. You have not explained what a psyop is, what an NWO grunt is nor who this Alinsky *censored* is. Your about as much as winning as Charlie Sheen(and sound just as *censored* in the head). I mean seriously, you sound JUST LIKE those Jesus Freaks and Scientologists who scream louder and louder in people's faces without responding to their words.
1) "Broad"? LOL!
2) Yes, I did.
3) No, I didn't
4) Yes, I did
5) Your posts proved what you are.
6) Once again, yes I did, liar.
7) You know what they are. You just don't know them as well as I do.
8) I'm immune to your ridicule and demonization, manure. Been fighting you limp wristed sissy freaks for nearly eight years. I know how you roll. I DETEST you SOB's and I'm not going to let you lie here without correcting those lies.
Brace yourself, tool
Lie's, every last one of those point's of yours. If you really believe all that crap... you are nuttier than Charlie Sheen!
Post by: TWG2A on April 28, 2012, 11:56:43 AM
A gift for you.
Post by: humanure on April 28, 2012, 12:04:15 PM
Post by: TWG2A on April 28, 2012, 12:07:33 PM
Most congratulated me and told me I "rock".
Now be nice, manure. I gave you a smiley and the least you could do is say "Thanks".
Post by: humanure on April 28, 2012, 12:21:53 PM
Post by: TWG2A on April 28, 2012, 12:27:09 PM
I don't know you personally, but I've seen you a zillion times in the years I've been on this particular battlefield.
It is my duty to show people what you and your ilk are up to.
Besides..... I'm highly fuctioning autistic. It is impossible for me to tell a lie. I'm also extremely diligent where facts and details are concerned. I spend every day, all day long researching what's going on because I can't help it.
And I will fight you and your ilk until my dying breath.
Now thank me for the smiley.
Post by: humanure on April 28, 2012, 12:33:49 PM
I'm actually quite embarrassed of how the last two threads have gone. Not for anything I've said, but for responding to your childish attack's. I realize I only did so because you mixed in view points worth debating, otherwise i would have ignored your petty slandering.
(and BTW, you still have not proven that Canadian wolves weren't here before. The records from the turn of the century and before in the books I've mentioned have stated that among the Cascades Mountain wolf(or Brush wolf), the Coastal Rainforest wolves were here as well(which can be found in BC and The Great Bear Range) as well at canus occidentalis).
Post by: TWG2A on April 28, 2012, 12:42:19 PM
It has also been a blessing AND a curse where current events are concerned. I wish I didn't know any of the things that I now know about what we're facing. I have spent a jaw-dropping amount of time and energy researching the facts and sifting through the smoke and mirrors and I know exactly what's happening. Like I said.... I am extremely detail oriented because of my Aspergers.
If there were a pill I could take to delete my memory, I'd take it without hesitation.
Ignorance would truly be bliss today.
Now thank me for the smiley.
Post by: humanure on April 28, 2012, 12:51:06 PM
Back to the issue, I found this little detail on a wolf case in MI recently that was interesting:
According to Sunset Road resident Clara May Lynn, her husband Robert turned on the back porch light one evening and saw two wolves approximately 10 yards from their door. The wolves ran away when the light was turned on. The next morning he investigated and found the carcass of a deer the wolves had killed. Before he had a chance to move the deer carcass, wolves came back and devoured it.
So they kill for fun and leave it? Doesn't seem to be the case this time. The came back and finished the kill. Not saying that happens every time, but whenever you guys find an uneaten carcass out there, it doesn't mean the wolves won't be coming back for it.
Post by: TWG2A on April 28, 2012, 12:57:01 PM
It's all over the place here in Montana. Talk to any rancher and they'll describe the horrific scenes they come across almost daily
I've seen a pregnant cow, hamstrung by wolves. The wolves tore her belly open, pulled the calf out and ate it's tongue. The mama cow was left on the ground with her gut torn open, her eyeball on the ground, connected my some kind of tendon, and her calf lay dead with it's tongue chewed out.
I've seen MANY wolf kills, manure. What am I going to believe? You? Or my lyin' eyes? They're sport killing machines with a particular taste for pregnant cattle and elk and for the tongues of baby cattle and elk.
You have no clue.
Post by: humanure on April 28, 2012, 01:02:41 PM
Post by: TWG2A on April 28, 2012, 01:12:01 PM
Those cattle are livestock. They belong to humans, and they put food on the table.
You and your ilk put humans on the same level as wolves, and that's just wrong in so many ways.
When you've seen a hamstrung cow, deer, dog or elk, you will change your mind real quick.
The Canadian Grey wolves are NOT native here and our ecosystem can NOT support them. It's the same as if we moved grizzlies down to Florida.
You think you're right all the time, but you are dead wrong, manure. Facts are stubborn things. You claim to care about the ecology and environment, but I contend that you do NOT care about it. Otherwise, you would perform due diligence ion learning the facts and doing what is necessary to support ecological systems.
You see, the difference between you and i is very simple....
I am a "Conservationist". I believe in managing wildlife, respecting the delicate nature of our ecosystems and doing everything I possibly can to ensure I'm not doig anything destructive. That I am a good steward to our land and our wildlife.
You, on the other hand, are an "environmentalist". or what is commondly referred to as a "ECOTERRORIST". You don't have the facts. You base your opinions on whatever this pack of global elitist LIARS are feeding you, and you're doing their dirty work to accomplish their diabolocal schemes. You have no first hand experience on wolves, yet you wag your scrawny hoof at anyone who states facts that are contrary to what your global eitist puppeteers have brainwashed you to believe.
I know the facts.
You do not.
And that's all I need to know.
Post by: humanure on April 28, 2012, 01:16:50 PM
I don't believe in the Christian faith, so i don't feel us humans are stewards of the land. But if you want to go to that level, here's something a clergyman of the church said at the Spokane wolf meeting:
"God mandates that we have dominion... which DOES NOT translate into domination..."
And again, the records and accounts from the past that I've read have shown that one or more species of wolf that were found here were also found in Canada.
And, you are putting YOUR livestock in the lands that the wild inhabits. You do the math.
Post by: TWG2A on April 28, 2012, 01:25:29 PM
I'm not. I am human, and for that, I am superior to worms and snakes.
We're not on the same level, manure, and I am fed up with the idea you and your ilk spew about us humans being equal to a 3" minnow or a spotted cockroach.
Post by: TikkaT3-270Shortmag on April 28, 2012, 01:26:48 PM
Post by: humanure on April 28, 2012, 01:28:10 PM
Post by: TWG2A on April 28, 2012, 01:30:40 PM
I have a broken hip right now, and nothing better to do than to lay here and correct you all day long.
Are we going to spend the day together, manure?
Post by: humanure on April 28, 2012, 01:36:33 PM
Post by: TWG2A on April 28, 2012, 01:42:41 PM
Just stay out of the way when the real fight begins.
You are just another "Pawn in the game" and useful idiot. Stay that way.
Post by: humanure on April 28, 2012, 01:52:17 PM
This documentary could have been done better without the female on there. I really didn't see her as an asset to the objective of the documentary, besides creating a warm, fuzzy feeling.
Post by: GrainfedMuley on April 29, 2012, 02:37:21 AM
Back to topic:
This documentary could have been done better without the female on there. I really didn't see her as an asset to the objective of the documentary, besides creating a warm, fuzzy feeling.
As you can see, your opinion means *censored* here.............. :dunno:
Post by: TWG2A on April 29, 2012, 06:56:55 AM
Back to topic:
This documentary could have been done better without the female on there. I really didn't see her as an asset to the objective of the documentary, besides creating a warm, fuzzy feeling.
As you can see, your opinion means *censored* here.............. :dunno:
manure hates humans.. particularly female humans....... He's a racist, too
:chuckle:
Post by: humanure on April 29, 2012, 01:05:29 PM
Post by: humanure on May 04, 2012, 09:44:42 PM
(sorry, just didn't feel that question warranted a new thread)
Post by: GrainfedMuley on May 07, 2012, 03:09:06 AM
So someone sent me a message saying that the woman who I put on ignore called me a racist. How am I racist?
(sorry, just didn't feel that question warranted a new thread)
Blah, Blah, Blah............
Post by: humanure on May 07, 2012, 04:59:22 AM
It's cute that you like to hit on me, but I am spoken for, so thanks but no thanks.
Aren't we a bit old for such elementary punching-my-arm-cuz-you-have-a-crush-on-me-but-thats-how-you-show-it?
Post by: GrainfedMuley on May 07, 2012, 06:26:50 AM
Hoo-wee! *censored*, do you fuking love me or what, Muley? Hahahaha! :tup: :hello:
It's cute that you like to hit on me, but I am spoken for, so thanks but no thanks.
Aren't we a bit old for such elementary punching-my-arm-cuz-you-have-a-crush-on-me-but-thats-how-you-show-it?
Nice try, but I am not gay like you are. It would not be a cute punch in the arm either.
Post by: humanure on May 07, 2012, 06:38:23 AM
Post by: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on May 07, 2012, 07:29:19 AM
Uh, what led you to think I was homosexual? Because although I'm not homophobic and think gay's should have the same rights as everyone else, I'm not into dudes(I thought you were a chick, BTW). I BE horrible at being gay. I gag just from hocking a loogie! Hahahaha!
:yeah: It's official. Humanure is gay.
Post by: humanure on May 07, 2012, 09:51:34 AM
Lets say you are right(which u aint) and i was gay. Would it matter? I dont think it would be smart for your cause to look like homophobes.
Post by: hoytem on May 07, 2012, 03:04:15 PM
Uh, what led you to think I was homosexual? Because although I'm not homophobic and think gay's should have the same rights as everyone else, I'm not into dudes(I thought you were a chick, BTW). I BE horrible at being gay. I gag just from hocking a loogie! Hahahaha!
:yeah: It's official. Humanure is gay.
It's official x2
Post by: humanure on May 07, 2012, 05:14:16 PM
Uh, what led you to think I was homosexual? Because although I'm not homophobic and think gay's should have the same rights as everyone else, I'm not into dudes(I thought you were a chick, BTW). I'd be horrible at being gay. I gag just from hocking a loogie! Hahahaha!
Post by: hirshey on May 07, 2012, 09:13:47 PM
Post by: lewy on May 07, 2012, 10:14:06 PM
Alright this thread is WAY off topic. Anyone else watch the documentary since last time I was on here?I just watched the first one. It was one sided and made me sick......havent made it to the others yet
Post by: danderson on May 07, 2012, 10:56:43 PM
Post by: humanure on May 07, 2012, 11:01:32 PM
You act as if the pack can survive if the herds are decimated. As the herds dwindle, so does the pack. Wolves die for various reason quite often. Starvation, parvo, injuries from fighting and hunting, parasites and worms leading to a weakened immune system, etc. Most pups from a wolf litter don't survive.
Post by: GrainfedMuley on May 08, 2012, 10:56:17 AM
None is more important than the other. The moose has a place in the ecosystem just as the wolf, the coyote, the elk or the owl.
You act as if the pack can survive if the herds are decimated. As the herds dwindle, so does the pack. Wolves die for various reason quite often. Starvation, parvo, injuries from fighting and hunting, parasites and worms leading to a weakened immune system, etc. Most pups from a wolf litter don't survive.
Blah, Blah, Blah......................................
Post by: bearpaw on May 08, 2012, 11:18:11 AM
Post by: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on May 08, 2012, 12:29:17 PM
I have watched it and thought it was nothing more than a liberal leaning sales pitch for wolves. They put locals in a bad light and made it look like wolves might not make it in Washington. Wolves are actually spreading repidly in Washington, so I give it a 1 on a scale of 1 to 5 as far as being a factual unbiased documentary.
Not to forget that was expected. I watched it when you posted it. What it exposed about wdfw lying should be looked at. There science is conducted by pro woofers and its bias. Elk herds and deer herds estimates high and wolf counts way low. It's only getting worse. Until they are legal to hunt there is no management that's effective. The wolfs were in California when this was made. So there all over Washington.