Hunting Washington Forum

Big Game Hunting => Bear Hunting => Topic started by: Gobble on August 06, 2008, 05:03:07 AM

Title: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: Gobble on August 06, 2008, 05:03:07 AM: On Tuesday, members of the online group Hunting Washington were upset over the accident, which they said gave true sportspeople and legitimate hunters a bad name.

"Those kids should have been supervised," said member Scott Green. "Even a sharp and safe kid should be supervised."

Green said the shooter broke a cardinal rule of hunting: He failed to positively identify his target with binoculars before firing.

"We do not condone or accept the actions taken by this person and feel that we, as a community, must take a stand against such blatant disregard for safety of those we share the woods with," wrote Green in an e-mail statement Tuesday.

The group would likely oppose additional hunting regulations, but has started a memorial fund to promote educational awareness and outreach programs in Almli's honor, Green said.

"There are already regulations on the books and there are so many hiking trails that there is no way you could do a setback from them," Green said.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: DeKuma on August 06, 2008, 06:41:09 AM: Not what I was hoping for, but could have been worse. No mention of Josh or our actions there, or the countless other things.
My quotes are not exact either, but not too bad.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: GoldTip on August 06, 2008, 06:42:44 AM: Pretty decent article, and presented the website and hunters in a good light, I thought.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: Machias on August 06, 2008, 08:54:23 AM: The only part I think was a mistake was naming the site, I think we are in for a rough ride, hope I'm wrong. :twocents:
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: DeKuma on August 06, 2008, 09:01:46 AM: I had that concern as well, but they can find it pretty easy anyway through google.
Expressed the concern to Ray, but in the end, we agreed it may not be all bad........
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: Gobble on August 06, 2008, 09:31:30 AM: Are we seeing an increase in new "members" today?
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: DeKuma on August 06, 2008, 09:33:50 AM: Currently 88 guests online............
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: Machias on August 06, 2008, 09:40:29 AM: Nope that's not a slam against you or Ray, I just have a bad feeling we are about to become inundated and it won't be pretty.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: Bean Counter on August 06, 2008, 10:23:06 AM: The 'Times can be fair and balanced on occasion. They endoresed Dino in 2004. They endorsed McGavick in 2006 (as a challenger, to boot).

Perhaps our excellent mods will get to use their :ban: privilege today. Another idea is to set a short moratorium for new registrations until the dust settles.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: huntnphool on August 06, 2008, 10:25:50 AM: Hey Ray, perhaps you could close new registration to the site for a couple weeks?
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: boneaddict on August 06, 2008, 10:29:15 AM: My Nuke botton is good to go and I ahve a new power source for my laptop at work. Let the games begin.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: Ridgerunner on August 06, 2008, 10:31:49 AM: Hopefully the firestorm from nwhikers doesn't carry over here, but if it does we have good moderators who will keep things like they always are.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: Ray on August 06, 2008, 10:54:27 AM: Quote from: boneaddict on August 06, 2008, 10:29:15 AM
My Nuke botton is good to go and I ahve a new power source for my laptop at work. Let the games begin.

I'm ready.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: boneaddict on August 06, 2008, 10:55:00 AM: Whats happening there, the antis versus the hiking hunters or something...
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: boneaddict on August 06, 2008, 10:58:30 AM: oh my...
Glad my boss left home sick today and I have my laptop with me. :chuckle:
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: Ray on August 06, 2008, 11:02:15 AM: Yes that goes back to my remarks on the other topic. I believe what we have is a group of anti hunters jumping up and down and some of them might even intend to pit hunters vs. hikers and climbers.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: Ridgerunner on August 06, 2008, 11:06:37 AM: There are a ton of people on that site very much against guns/hunting whenever it comes up over there it is a firestorm. You can take money to the bank they are going to try to pit the user groups against each other, when in reality the other backcountry users are very similar to us in terms of values and appreciation for the environment, with ONE major exception: They HATE GUNS and HUNTERS! Ok that was two, but can be considered one.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: MountainWalk on August 06, 2008, 11:11:07 AM: Maybe we should have a
"take a hiker hunting day".. Take them off the trail and show them the places they never see from the trail, and show them what we work for. It might show them that its not all bang bang bang bang. Show them there is so much more to the sport than shooting. Most hikers love critters, teach them more about them. I know its a pipe dream and wishfull thinking.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: Ray on August 06, 2008, 11:14:19 AM: The funny thing is that the one fellow who came over here to speak up was seemingly attempting to represent "climbers and hikers". Well guess what? I've been climbing and hiking in Washington state since about 1994 when I was stationed here in the military. I don't share the same views as a lot of the loud mouths on nwhikers.net but the distinction is that people like us can be considered mebers of both of those groups and hunters as well. I know of a few people here who avidly climb and I bet most people hike as well. The message I am making is that I don't believe firley was representing the whole but maybe a section of people among them.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: huntnphool on August 06, 2008, 11:37:19 AM: Up to 120 guests on right now
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: Gobble on August 06, 2008, 11:46:42 AM: Man, there are some nasty people over there :yike: Did you see the post where they were saying we were taking a collection for the hiker AND the 14 yr old suspect? They didn't read it close enough and were talking about Josh Holm, good thing Dave Workman straightened them out. They just want to hate us :dunno:
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: Ray on August 06, 2008, 11:47:55 AM: People like that don't intend to talk about the truth. They intend to spread misinformation and negative emotion. They don't want to read close enough. They are just looking for excuses and intend to incite a mob mentality based upon their personal political goals.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: ICEMAN on August 06, 2008, 11:51:11 AM: There really isn't a whole lot to be gained with arguing with any of those who are already convinced we are all evil. The battle will be to hold ourselves up, set a good example, and stay strong with our message. I am one who loves to take that "bait". I love a good fight. But I think I will really be watching my P's and Q's for a while...
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: Ray on August 06, 2008, 11:52:26 AM: I think the best action is to keep in close contact with legislators. We need to watch out for what comes down the pipes. Especially if you have kids who hunt then you will have a vested interest in any forthcoming changes.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: Gobble on August 06, 2008, 11:54:15 AM: Be prepared for a knee jerk response
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: ICEMAN on August 06, 2008, 11:54:53 AM: No doubt,... my son had the hunters ed deferral for Turkey season, then my son and daughter just passed hunters ed in July. I am very interested.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: ICEMAN on August 06, 2008, 12:01:29 PM: Another thought. As we prepare for attempts at legislation. We need to start digging up (researching) good statistical support for our cause, including information which contradicts the "hazardous and/or deadly" risk posed by hunters onto others. I would bet that far more hikers and climbers are lost each year in the woods, versus hunters. Fellow climbers who have died due to the negligence of team leaders. Family members who have died as ill prepared enthusiasts with GPS's decide to risk their families lives with ill conceived trips into the back country. Etc...
I think hunters as a group tend to take the woods more serisously than do other groups. We prepare better, plan better, and perform better in the outdoors, than do these other groups. We constantly contemplate the dangers involved with outdoor pursuit. When you put a gun or bow in your hand, you understand how serious things are. When you grab a climbing axe, hiking pole or GPS you generally do not.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: huntnphool on August 06, 2008, 12:04:06 PM: No doubt, this will be one upset little girl should they change anything. Notice the 10 powers around her neck!!!!
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: MountainWalk on August 06, 2008, 12:08:50 PM: Quote from: Iceman on August 06, 2008, 12:01:29 PM
When you grab a climbing axe, hiking pole or GPS you generally do not.

Thats kind of a blanket statement.

Quote from: Iceman on August 06, 2008, 12:01:29 PM
granola heads

Denigrating another user group will not solve matters. Remember, we dont want them denigrating us.

I believe all of us should be on our best most polite behaviour for awhile. We are a community of hunters and outdoorsmen and women, not a slander group. We musnt stoop to their level of name calling. :)
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: MountainWalk on August 06, 2008, 12:11:16 PM: Great picture Phool! THATS the kind of image I want to convey to non hunters and hikers.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: ICEMAN on August 06, 2008, 12:16:24 PM: Mntwalk, I hear your point. I will clean it up...

Huntphool, good idea to show kids with binocs in the field. I will add one too.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: MountainWalk on August 06, 2008, 12:18:49 PM: Thats a good one too ICE.. How old is the boy?
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: ICEMAN on August 06, 2008, 12:21:22 PM: 12 year old, just passed hunters ed. Pic from turkey hunt this spring.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: MountainWalk on August 06, 2008, 12:22:30 PM: Right on! Did you call one in for him?
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: waoutdoorsman on August 06, 2008, 12:34:59 PM: Quote from: Iceman on August 06, 2008, 11:51:11 AM
There really isn't a whole lot to be gained with arguing with any of those who are already convinced we are all evil. The battle will be to hold ourselves up, set a good example, and stay strong with our message.

I agree, well said.
Title: Re: Hunting Washington in the Seattle Times Today
Post by: DeKuma on August 06, 2008, 12:38:06 PM: All right, I will add one too. 15 years old and mad as hell about what has happened and could happen. She cannot figure out how in the world a mistake could be made if you use optics and safety.
(https://hunting-washington.com/cpg/albums/userpics/10707/IM004003.JPG)