Hunting Washington Forum
Equipment & Gear => Guns and Ammo => Topic started by: sebek556 on June 02, 2012, 11:17:26 AM
-
http://www.krem.com/news/local/156720105.html
:dunno: I could see this leading to problems with getting a concealed permit.
-
Are you saying, that your crazy????? :)
-
:dunno: in todays world you do not measure your sanity, everyone else does. :chuckle:
-
Are you saying, that your crazy????? :)
This bit has nothing to do with your sanity, California uses the exact same language for their permit, you might have noticed that it is a bit difficult to get a permit in Ca. :sry:
-
Did the shooter in Seattle have a concealed carry permit? Seems to me he would no have cared if it was illegal for him to carry concealed....
His thoughts "I'm planning to go shoot someone... make sure I have my conceal license to keep my gun hid" :bash:
-
Yes, he did actually have a CPL but he also had a pending DV charge which I believe at least temporarily revokes it.
-
I think the concealed carry permit would be temp revoked just for charges--no conviction needed like FC says, in addition possession of the firearms would also be forfeited so someone couldn't even have them at home. I remember when we would come back from deployment there would always be a few guys that would get home to find sugar with a new playmate and rack up a DV charge. Then we'd have to go through the whole process of kicking them out because they couldn't be near a firearm, making them useless.
-
What does the shooters status with a CPL have to do with anything? He still could have bought a gun without it. He had no criminal CONVICTIONS, and no documented record of mental illness. The CPL is a distracting issue, as there is no indication he bought the firearms within the 5 day waiting period that you get to bypass with a CPL. Criminals carry concealed without a CPL, almost 100% of the time. Ask Swatson how many times he's come across a felon in possession of a firearm open carrying it in a traditional fashion. Want to guess the answer is anything other than never?
-
cwu you are completely right here, the CPL is the talking point that the anti's have adopted in an attempt to get the language for issuance of CPL's changed.
-
I always like how these absolutely ignorant libs think denying a guy who already owns guns, a carry permit, would have stopped the whole thing. they are all to the man and women bloom(berg)ing idiots.
I also like how these elitest liberal thugs, seem to ignore all the shootings when Blacks are involved, and only have an interest in gun restrictions when Whites are the victims.
-
CPL or no CPL..... He would have done it either way. What a rediculous article and campaign.
-
it is too bad that the guy who hit the shooter with a stool didnt have a cpl and a gun.
-
The anti need to win one. They have been on a losing streak.
They want to make it sound like the police had no choice to give this mentally ill guy a CPL because of "shall issue"
No one knows when this guy started going south. Or how long he had a CPL. He could of got it years ago.
It is another ploy to chip away our right.
-
WELL....Nobody is better at filling in the blanks than the media.
