collapse

Advertisement


Poll

Did you send a message to the Senate Natural Resources Committee?

Yes
53 (77.9%)
No
10 (14.7%)
Don't Care Either Way
3 (4.4%)
I want to do more (send bearpaw a message)
2 (2.9%)

Total Members Voted: 68

Author Topic: Eliminate Pro-Wolf Wildlife Commissioners Now! (poll added)  (Read 27177 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10622
Re: Eliminate Pro-Wolf Wildlife Commissioners Now! (poll added)
« Reply #75 on: March 27, 2013, 11:00:54 AM »
Response I got from Senator Kline (D-Seattle) in response to the Big Game Forever form letter:

Thanks for your note.  The Natural Resources and Parks Committee just heard all four appointees.  They appeared in person, and we asked questions that reflected our own preferences.  Some committee members seemed to insist that the candidates act in the way that their own constituents would like.  I prefer to see them as individuals who have the elected Governor’s confidence (though some preceded him by 18 months or more) because they are capable of negotiating to a statewide solution, rather than because they follow slavishly the desires of one or another stakeholder group, or the ideology of “urban” or “rural” residents—as if those were monolithic blocs.  The answers of all four gentlemen convinced me that they are willing to balance the conflicting needs of urban and rural Washington, whether in regard to wolf-management, fisheries management, or hunting.  I intend to vote to confirm all four, including the one who took a different position on wolf-management than I do.

If we legislators want to draft and pass our own wildlife management plans, I suppose we could do that.  We could legislate hunting seasons, even vote on where to assign staff.  But we delegate that to an agency because so much of these acts are decided on a case-by-case basis, and we don’t have the time or expertise on which to base good judgment.  So we have to respect the individuals who are willing to step forward to do it, and whom an elected Governor has appointed.  That means treating them with respect and giving them a degree of discretion.  We get to see them again in another four years, but in the meantime we need to trust them.  That’s not naďve; that’s pragmatic.

Thanks again for your advocacy.

Yours truly,
Adam

Online pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44626
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Eliminate Pro-Wolf Wildlife Commissioners Now! (poll added)
« Reply #76 on: March 27, 2013, 11:04:55 AM »
Response I got from Senator Kline (D-Seattle) in response to the Big Game Forever form letter:

Thanks for your note.  The Natural Resources and Parks Committee just heard all four appointees.  They appeared in person, and we asked questions that reflected our own preferences.  Some committee members seemed to insist that the candidates act in the way that their own constituents would like.  I prefer to see them as individuals who have the elected Governor’s confidence (though some preceded him by 18 months or more) because they are capable of negotiating to a statewide solution, rather than because they follow slavishly the desires of one or another stakeholder group, or the ideology of “urban” or “rural” residents—as if those were monolithic blocs.  The answers of all four gentlemen convinced me that they are willing to balance the conflicting needs of urban and rural Washington, whether in regard to wolf-management, fisheries management, or hunting.  I intend to vote to confirm all four, including the one who took a different position on wolf-management than I do.

If we legislators want to draft and pass our own wildlife management plans, I suppose we could do that.  We could legislate hunting seasons, even vote on where to assign staff.  But we delegate that to an agency because so much of these acts are decided on a case-by-case basis, and we don’t have the time or expertise on which to base good judgment.  So we have to respect the individuals who are willing to step forward to do it, and whom an elected Governor has appointed.  That means treating them with respect and giving them a degree of discretion.  We get to see them again in another four years, but in the meantime we need to trust them.  That’s not naďve; that’s pragmatic.

Thanks again for your advocacy.

Yours truly,
Adam

I guess the wolf problem isn't one for his voters, so no need for him to change anything. We really need some here on the wet side to wake these idiots up. :bash: :bash:
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10622
Re: Eliminate Pro-Wolf Wildlife Commissioners Now! (poll added)
« Reply #77 on: March 27, 2013, 11:08:46 AM »
Kline is about as far left as you can get. Luckily not in my district.

Offline snowpack

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2522
  • Location: the high country
Re: Eliminate Pro-Wolf Wildlife Commissioners Now! (poll added)
« Reply #78 on: March 27, 2013, 11:14:22 AM »
Kline was the one behind SB 5737--(three times over the years).  He's about as anti anything rural as I can imagine.

My senator (Hargrove) at least showed up and was awake, but he'll be getting another letter...basically for letting them be so easy on Kehne and Jennings.     

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Burrowing Animal by b0bbyg
[Today at 12:43:47 PM]


Cold bore or fouled barrel. by hunter399
[Today at 12:36:22 PM]


What's flatbed pickup life like? by CP
[Today at 11:54:44 AM]


Resetting dash warning lights by Sandberm
[Today at 10:15:50 AM]


Colorado Results by vandeman17
[Today at 09:50:06 AM]


Please Report Problems & Bugs Here by HntnFsh
[Today at 09:13:54 AM]


The time clock has started.....and go. by hunter399
[Today at 07:37:38 AM]


DIY Ucluelet trip by CP
[Today at 05:48:15 AM]


Oregon spring bear by time2hunt
[Yesterday at 08:03:28 PM]


Oregon Seed #'s by Doublelunger
[Yesterday at 07:35:15 PM]


WDFW falsely advertising preference points by hunter399
[Yesterday at 04:38:43 PM]


Black Eagle arrows deals by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 02:02:59 PM]


2025 Multiseason Deer General? by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 12:23:10 PM]


Last year putting in… by Dirtnap
[Yesterday at 11:48:14 AM]


Tag issues with "Get Outdoors" package by Encore 280
[Yesterday at 08:54:30 AM]


.300 Win Mag Rounds by W.Goomsba
[Yesterday at 08:29:32 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal