collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Mudflow access  (Read 8958 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10624
Re: Mudflow access
« Reply #15 on: April 05, 2013, 06:59:55 PM »
When you enter WDFW lands after hours or during a closed time of the year you are almost always charged for:

RCW 77.15.230 WAC 232-13-050.3

The above RCW states "(1) A person is guilty of unlawful use of department lands or facilities if the person enters upon, uses, or remains upon department-owned or department-controlled lands or facilities in violation of any rule of the department."

The WAC states it is illegal to violate a posted sign on WDFW lands, such as a no access sign or a sign saying open during daylight hours only.

It is essentially WDFW lands form of trespass.

Offline RClare1223

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 214
  • Location: Bonney Lake
Re: Mudflow access
« Reply #16 on: April 05, 2013, 07:33:52 PM »
Im not saying im gonna go in there before it opens i just say dont post that you will get points for turning someone in when you wont. Thats not what the point reward system is for.

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3489
  • Location: west coast
Re: Mudflow access
« Reply #17 on: April 05, 2013, 08:06:24 PM »
Im not saying im gonna go in there before it opens i just say dont post that you will get points for turning someone in when you wont. Thats not what the point reward system is for.

if its just a trespass violation why do gamies act like its murder ?? i hear/witness stories every year of gamies gone csi doing their best to prove everyone up there is making tracks on the mudflow.. idk if they just know they can maybe catch people  (they dont catch that many) or what but i see more gamies on 504 this time of year than any other..i feel like it would be easier to poach a big bull than it would be to snag alil ol shed  :dunno:

idk i guess i just cant get over the idea that tax $ is being spent more to protect dead bone than it is the elk themselves...yes i know its for the "health of the starving wintering elk" but..they dont care about all the other elk a few hundred yards north or south ?? a mile or two west ?? what about those elk ?? hmmmm wait they dont make tourist dollars off those elk so who cares right ?? ohh wait..these are the same elk they are going to let wolves one day eat ?? mhmmm...that makes sense

if they really want to protect the elk make that boundry alot bigger...so people wont even be tempted to go onto the flow

sorry..had to get that off my chest

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Archery Elk Advice by PsoasHunter
[Yesterday at 11:29:00 PM]


Share your out of state experience by dvolmer
[Yesterday at 11:05:49 PM]


Baker Lake Sockeye 2025 by RB
[Yesterday at 09:21:30 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by hunter399
[Yesterday at 08:52:27 PM]


Riffe Lake by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 08:50:21 PM]


Bow mount trolling motors by Ironhead
[Yesterday at 07:30:08 PM]


A question for any FFL holders on here by dreadi
[Yesterday at 07:28:54 PM]


Best/Preferred Scouting App by MuleyTracksWA
[Yesterday at 06:59:55 PM]


Wolf documentary PBS by Fidelk
[Yesterday at 06:17:50 PM]


Montana Breaks Elk by Magnum_Willys
[Yesterday at 05:45:34 PM]


MA-10 Coho by metlhead
[Yesterday at 03:32:38 PM]


Oregon special tag info by robescc
[Yesterday at 02:17:07 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal