collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Luminocks Legalized for Washington  (Read 14097 times)

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32895
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Luminocks Legalized for Washington
« Reply #45 on: April 14, 2013, 12:09:06 AM »
Either way was cool for me. I don't mind using them if they are legal but never felt like I had to have them.

From a tree stand if you get a pass threw chance are it will be sticking in the ground and easy to find

My thoughts about them exactly.  I never lost sleep over not having them.  But it is fun to watch my arrows again since my eyesight matured.

Good point on the treestand too.  If you never get out of the tree you probably could go your whole bowhunting life without losing an arrow.  Just look at arrow sales for the 11 western states compared to the rest of the country.  We only have about 9% of the bowhunting population and yet our arrow sales are way above that relative 9%.
That is very interesting for sure. :tup:

I hope Ray and his buddy's don't lose too much sleep over this new rule. :ACRY:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: Luminocks Legalized for Washington
« Reply #46 on: April 14, 2013, 12:29:51 AM »
You should see the lopsided numbers with 70+# bows, two piece quivers and 7 pin sights! 

That subject was brought up at the ATA show with one of our best customers.  An eastern big boy with sales figures that boggle the mind!  He said in over 20 years he had sold about four two piece quivers, had just sold his first 7 pin sight to a guy heading to Idaho for an elk hunt, and he guessed he sells fewer than six 70# bows per year.

Fun Fact:   Bear Archery did a "How many sight pins do you prefer?" poll not long ago. 356 archers cast a vote.  Choices were 1,3,5,7 or more and slider-style.  #1 answer was 3 pin!  Votes for a single pin were more than 3 times that of the votes for 7 or more pins.

They also did a poll on "What would you give for a new Anarchy bow?"  4,424 votes were taken.  #1 answer = My Girlfriend :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

Offline carpsniperg2

  • Site Sponsor
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+126)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 31528
  • Location: Goldendale,WA
Re: Luminocks Legalized for Washington
« Reply #47 on: April 14, 2013, 12:54:26 AM »
That's funny I would have guessed the number 1 to be wives! ROFLOL. At least I already have a anarchy  :chuckle:

That is pretty cool info Bryan. Never would have guessed the numbers to be that lop sided.
Owner: SPLIT DIAMOND TACTICAL
Firearms/Transfers/Parts/Optics
2011 HW Head Competition Winner

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32895
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Luminocks Legalized for Washington
« Reply #48 on: April 14, 2013, 12:57:29 AM »
You should see the lopsided numbers with 70+# bows, two piece quivers and 7 pin sights! 

That subject was brought up at the ATA show with one of our best customers.  An eastern big boy with sales figures that boggle the mind!  He said in over 20 years he had sold about four two piece quivers, had just sold his first 7 pin sight to a guy heading to Idaho for an elk hunt, and he guessed he sells fewer than six 70# bows per year.

Fun Fact:   Bear Archery did a "How many sight pins do you prefer?" poll not long ago. 356 archers cast a vote.  Choices were 1,3,5,7 or more and slider-style.  #1 answer was 3 pin!  Votes for a single pin were more than 3 times that of the votes for 7 or more pins.

They also did a poll on "What would you give for a new Anarchy bow?"  4,424 votes were taken.  #1 answer = My Girlfriend :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
I don't doubt it. I ran into a guy a few years back in Montana that was hunting with a outfitter. We were chasing elk in the SW and he was shocked that my bow had 5 pins and went to 60. I told him I had friends that easily shoot out to 80 but 60 was my max, he said a long shot for him back home in Iowa was 30 yards and that was the furthest he was set up to shoot.
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: Luminocks Legalized for Washington
« Reply #49 on: April 14, 2013, 02:11:26 AM »
I don't doubt it. I ran into a guy a few years back in Montana that was hunting with a outfitter. We were chasing elk in the SW and he was shocked that my bow had 5 pins and went to 60. I told him I had friends that easily shoot out to 80 but 60 was my max, he said a long shot for him back home in Iowa was 30 yards and that was the furthest he was set up to shoot.

What was his third pin set for?  Even with WA rated arrows and 62# I could not have a 10 yard pin or 10 and 20 would be just one big pin with my eyes.  I set a 20 yard pin for turkey hunting yesterday.  First time in about 10 years I've had a 20 yard pin.  Even my sliders usually start at 30.  I think if I was only shooting from a treestand and never took a shot over 35 yards I'd trash the three pin and go with just one.  Sure would save on the target panic from having three pins so close together.  Not sure I'd have much of a problem watching my plain ol' green nocked arrow all the way to the target either.
« Last Edit: April 14, 2013, 03:00:20 AM by RadSav »
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

Offline Kazekurt

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 483
  • Location: Ephrata
  • The trophy is in the hunt; the animal is a bonus!
Re: Luminocks Legalized for Washington
« Reply #50 on: April 14, 2013, 06:53:12 AM »
Before arrows got so expensive I was a sucker for big blue grouse.  That's where a lot of those Winthrop arrows were lost.  I still have a hard time passing up a big blue even with high end arrows and prototype broadheads. ;)  We also hunt blacktails around the blackberries in early season.  After a pint of blood I'm about done looking for an arrow!
I'm a sucker for grouse as well.  Me and a buddy lost or broke over $100 worth of arrows in one day in Montana.  We finally started putting a few cheap arrows in the quiver as we knew we couldn't resist the temptation:-)

Offline dreamingbig

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 2812
  • Location: Mukilteo, WA
Re: Luminocks Legalized for Washington
« Reply #51 on: April 14, 2013, 08:29:25 AM »
Zero of the elk and deer I have killed have been out of a tree stand.  My point is that you lose far less arrows in the woods than you think when you put in the practice ahead of time and make good ethical shot decisions in relation to your ability.
@mukbowhunt
Avid Bowhunter
Maxxis 35 / Trykon XL

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44755
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Luminocks Legalized for Washington
« Reply #52 on: April 15, 2013, 07:49:04 AM »
Now if we can get mechanical broadheads through, that'll be about it! Good deal.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32895
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Luminocks Legalized for Washington
« Reply #53 on: April 15, 2013, 11:39:13 AM »
Now if we can get mechanical broadheads through, that'll be about it! Good deal.
Not really, don't forget about the "slippery slope" all the doomsday archers complained about, now we need to legalize lights, scopes, rangefinders etc.......and then shorten the seasons. ;)
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline coachcw

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 8821
  • Groups: Team getsum !
Re: Luminocks Legalized for Washington
« Reply #54 on: April 16, 2013, 08:11:24 PM »
wow Rav the amount of info you have is nuts. I've sot luminocks at 305 fps out of my set up with 100 broadheads right at 420grains and 70 lbs with no accuarcy issues , my bow is in tune and with four fletchs flight is true . Ive never worried abot foc but do you think 125 grains bh would tighten up groups with the maxima 350's

Offline ghostshell

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2012
  • Posts: 64
  • Location: washington
Re: Luminocks Legalized for Washington
« Reply #55 on: April 16, 2013, 10:06:25 PM »
i shoot a bowtech asassain 29in draw 63.8 peak pounds... carbon express maxima hunters cut to 29.5. helical blazer vein with wraps, 100 grain broads and field points, weigh 395 goin through the air at 285 fps. nockturnals give me from 1/4 inch groups to 5 inch groups at 100 yards with my MBG ascent. anyone who sprays they make your arrow fly bad need to check their gear cuz mine fly extremely similar if not the same at any distance. i use them at my outdoor range with shots with random distance out to 70 yards wich you can step back 100 yards plus on targets . targets vary all natural steep incline decline, across revines etc, real deal stuff. i love them for seeing where i shot from long d, no binos needed. why the hell would anyone diss them? pope and young? who cares. i hunt for me not them. i agree with others its funny we can use a laser range finder, bait deer, use tree stands, ground blinds, scents etc but a lighted nock that you only see as the arrows released? in no way does that help your hunt. i personally am tired of finding garbage out in the woods, its wild to find mans trash deep in the middle of no wear. at least a choice to use them is present when in our jungle woods thats hard enough to find anything. i may or may not hunt with them for big game, i will for turkey and coyotes though. my only gripe is they even when paired with companys nock for my arrow (s)they def do not fit as tight, prob 30% less. they do stay in place but not like the carbon express cx precision nocks. happy hunting and cant we all just get along?............. :dunno:
« Last Edit: April 16, 2013, 10:39:26 PM by ghostshell »

Offline MDGrand

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 722
Re: Luminocks Legalized for Washington
« Reply #56 on: April 17, 2013, 01:24:31 PM »
Finally the debate is over and they are allowed.

I WILL be using them and I thank the committee for no longer minimizing my freedom on something that is an "after the fact" event.

Long time coming and glad they are here.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9623
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Luminocks Legalized for Washington
« Reply #57 on: April 17, 2013, 10:22:37 PM »
Rangefinders shouldnt be legal at all if you wanna talk electronics...You wanna talk about something giving a archers a direct advantage.

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: Luminocks Legalized for Washington
« Reply #58 on: April 17, 2013, 11:55:23 PM »
wow Rav the amount of info you have is nuts. I've sot luminocks at 305 fps out of my set up with 100 broadheads right at 420grains and 70 lbs with no accuarcy issues , my bow is in tune and with four fletchs flight is true . Ive never worried abot foc but do you think 125 grains bh would tighten up groups with the maxima 350's

More drag on the back end gives you similar results as weight on the front end - within reason.  I've found my best results at 12% FOC, but I do experience more flexibility in going lighter FOC when using four fletch Blazers.  Depending on your arrow length it may or may not be an issue.  Most range shooting conditions are the very best we can expect in the woods.  Just look at the Redding scores in years the weather is poor.  Scores reflect the issues varying weather conditions have on target arrows, champion level shooters and the best of the best equipment.  Now place a planning surface on the front end of those arrows in the same weather conditions.  That's when higher than 10% FOC really comes into play. 

Unlike some on here I myself can not shoot at a Randy Ulmer level of accuracy and consistency.  So when the weather puts odds against me with wind, rain and heavy snow I prefer to shoot a setup that gives me every advantage I can get.  Myself, along with most everyone else I hunt with, have found that short high profile fletching and 12-15% FOC has given us the best advantage in these conditions.  If some local range master disagrees with me - so be it!  But if one were to accept my advise I'd definitely try to stress a minimum FOC above 10%.

For you Coach - I can not give you much more advise than that without more details of the arrow/bow setup.  But I can tell you that if your arrows spine can handle it stepping up to a 125 grain point when you are shooting 305fps now surely will not hurt a thing.  Find a good windy day with rain and go shoot both head weights at your comfortable distance.  You just might end up like me and start believing that there is really something magical about 12%!  So much so in my mind that I make all my own brass or stainless inserts so no matter what arrow/head combination I choose to shoot my FOC is always at or above that magical 12%.
« Last Edit: April 18, 2013, 11:55:21 AM by RadSav »
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

Offline coachcw

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 8821
  • Groups: Team getsum !
Re: Luminocks Legalized for Washington
« Reply #59 on: April 18, 2013, 06:28:20 AM »
 :tup: I will give it a try thanks .

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

That "lake taste" in freshwater fish by Skillet
[Today at 01:21:57 AM]


Bear Scratch on Tree by dreadi
[Yesterday at 10:53:30 PM]


NEED ADVICE: LATE after JUNE 15th IDAHO BEAR by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 10:52:52 PM]


90's Yamaha no telltale? by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 10:04:40 PM]


Archery elk gear, 2025. by blackveltbowhunter
[Yesterday at 09:36:02 PM]


E scouting for bears by SpicyTacos
[Yesterday at 09:26:03 PM]


Grayback Youth Hunt by Big6bull
[Yesterday at 08:20:59 PM]


Pocket Carry by fly-by
[Yesterday at 06:35:19 PM]


Rimrock Bull: Modern by str8meat
[Yesterday at 06:25:53 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by HillHound
[Yesterday at 05:36:47 PM]


SWAKANE EWE by vandeman17
[Yesterday at 02:55:45 PM]


49 degrees north late Moose tag by Buzzsaw461
[Yesterday at 02:44:10 PM]


Video highlighting and discussing WDFW corruption by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 01:42:41 PM]


Tease 'l' by kellama2001
[Yesterday at 01:23:41 PM]


What barrel length 24”, 26” or 28” by Call em in
[Yesterday at 12:47:43 PM]


Game trails to nowhere? by addicted1
[Yesterday at 12:38:05 PM]


PROOF RESEARCH CLOSEOUT by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Yesterday at 12:35:23 PM]


Article on the beaver trapping ban in OR by Humptulips
[Yesterday at 12:27:08 PM]


Go kill some dogs! by fowl smacker
[Yesterday at 11:27:32 AM]


Athlon Rangecraft Chrono by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Yesterday at 11:09:00 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal