collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wisconsin wolf article is flawed? How could that happen  (Read 1356 times)

Offline RG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 791
  • Location: Thorp
Wisconsin wolf article is flawed? How could that happen
« on: November 07, 2013, 07:42:07 AM »
Interesting news article about misinformation in the media.  I congratulate Wisconsin's DNR director for calling out the fallacies.  I would be willing to bet the ranch that nobody in Washington's WDFW would have the stones to have done what she did.

http://host.madison.com/news/opinion/column/dnr-s-cathy-stepp-wolf-management-is-an-art-as/article_91ab8d9d-d323-589d-ae18-82f79b8b336b.html
« Last Edit: November 07, 2013, 08:03:42 AM by RG »
And I think God must be a cowboy at heart
 He made wide open spaces from the start
 He made grass and trees and mountains and a horse to be a friend
 And trails to lead ol' cowboys home again

Chris Ledoux...

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15145
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: Wisconsin wolf article is flawed? How could that happen
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2013, 09:06:15 AM »
Good article. 

If you know anything about WI, you would see that the counties listed are all the ones with the highest wolf populations (I think as I didn't look in detail) and the ones impacted the most by them.  The liberal population centers are predominantly located in the south part of the state, and like Western WA, try to control the rest of the state using thier higher population levels.  I would bet you would have a similar east-west split here as the north-south one there, but WDFW won't have the guts to even look at the eastside's needs/wants.

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: Wisconsin wolf article is flawed? How could that happen
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2013, 09:12:02 AM »
Honestly, I think Midwest wildlife officials are handling things rather maturely as it relates to wolves. The problem is the general public and their initiatives.

I also think officials there feel more free to speak out because they have more backing there. The hunter numbers are much larger than in Washington.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2026 turkey season! by GeoSwan
[Today at 02:22:27 PM]


Ticks and turkey hunting by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 01:18:30 PM]


Discretion !!! by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 01:08:48 PM]


Choose Wisely by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 01:03:19 PM]


Late season in gods Country My big buck by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 01:00:02 PM]


WA wolf population increases 17%. by Rainier10
[Today at 11:33:48 AM]


Multi season draw odds by dilleytech
[Today at 11:26:24 AM]


WA 2nd Bear Tag. Is it still a thing? by dilleytech
[Today at 10:20:16 AM]


You Bear Slayers by dilleytech
[Today at 10:12:34 AM]


Camp Toilet by wadu1
[Today at 08:32:04 AM]


Rokon by GWP
[Today at 08:03:09 AM]


Damascus Feather Drop Point Hunter by rainshadow1
[Today at 07:55:46 AM]


Montana 101-50? by Shooter4
[Today at 07:36:02 AM]


Any fans of the 35 Rem, 358 Win, 35 Whelen, 9.3x62, or 45-70? by Carwash
[Yesterday at 09:24:00 PM]


Delay of commission investigation+Lorna Smith finally defending hunting??? by hughjorgan
[Yesterday at 02:56:08 PM]


Big game season proposals by hunter399
[Yesterday at 02:23:13 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal