Free: Contests & Raffles.
I'd certainly like to give them a try before making a judgement.
Why would almost every pro out there be using some sort of mechanical broadhead if they didn't work?
Its an old law written when the early expandables were unreliable. Early designs were weak and only forward opening. They required up to 30% of a leagal arrows energy to open, and had the tip reccest to far towards the bades causing them to cartwheel on quartering shots. Todays mechs are much better but still not on par with a good fixed blade. That being said I've seen plenty of fixed blades that are crap and only designed to seperate you from your wallet. State law says a 40# bow and a 300grn arrow is the minimum requirement and you won't see mechs here until that changes. Plus this is washington, land of big roosevelt elk, blacktail and mulies not german sheperd sized whitetail. The state wants you to build an arrow for when everything goes wrong, not for when everything goes right!
Quote from: bullfisher on February 25, 2014, 01:45:57 PMIts an old law written when the early expandables were unreliable. Early designs were weak and only forward opening. They required up to 30% of a leagal arrows energy to open, and had the tip reccest to far towards the bades causing them to cartwheel on quartering shots. Todays mechs are much better but still not on par with a good fixed blade. That being said I've seen plenty of fixed blades that are crap and only designed to seperate you from your wallet. State law says a 40# bow and a 300grn arrow is the minimum requirement and you won't see mechs here until that changes. Plus this is washington, land of big roosevelt elk, blacktail and mulies not german sheperd sized whitetail. The state wants you to build an arrow for when everything goes wrong, not for when everything goes right!Wow, That saved me a bunch of typing. Thank you
Aww, c'mon Rad! I've been watching this thread, waiting for you to chime in!
Here's a guy that tested a bunch of heads for penetration, sharpness, durability, sharp before impact, and sharp after categories. Look where most of the expendables ended up. Results- https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?key=0AgJEvQwzfDRZdGxzdC15R0JIZDJGQ1J4bVpGV1pTWHcInfo- http://www.archerytalk.com/vb/showthread.php?t=1790525
I believe he did those tests at 30yds. It would be interesting to throw a few variables in the mix.
The swacker isn't considered an expandable. b/c they are held together by a rubber band you can shoot them either way open or closed. on impact if in closed position, they open.