collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Egg fishing in anti snag rule area question  (Read 2838 times)

Offline duckmen1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 2553
  • Location: outdoors
Egg fishing in anti snag rule area question
« on: September 12, 2018, 08:36:46 PM »
What are your thoughts. While fishing eggs for salmon where anti snag rule is in effect is it safe  to use Beau macs weighted cheaters at your eggs to keep them in the strike zone? This is part of a lure bait combo, but does the rule outlaw this approach while this is a question that seems to be unclear.
Maturity is when you have the power to destroy someone who did you wrong but instead you breathe, walk away, and let life take care of them.

Offline fowl smacker

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 2219
  • Location: Castle Rock
  • Groups: DU, Delta Waterfowl, RMEF, Friends of the Cowlitz
Re: Egg fishing in anti snag rule area question
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2018, 09:02:48 PM »
Call WDFW 4 different times so you can get 4 different answers.  That should clear it up for ya!   :chuckle:

Sorry, I don't know about the cheater in that situation.

Online BigGoonTuna

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 2418
  • Location: Yelm
Re: Egg fishing in anti snag rule area question
« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2018, 09:35:06 PM »
if i remember correctly, i think your weight can't be "attached" less than 12" from your hook.  what's weird, is that using a jig is perfectly legal, as it's part of the lure.

me, i'd just simplify things and use a short leader.
you can still get gas in heaven, and a drink in kingdom come,
in the meantime, i'll be cleaning my gun

Offline duckmen1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 2553
  • Location: outdoors
Re: Egg fishing in anti snag rule area question
« Reply #3 on: September 12, 2018, 09:41:04 PM »
if i remember correctly, i think your weight can't be "attached" less than 12" from your hook.  what's weird, is that using a jig is perfectly legal, as it's part of the lure.

me, i'd just simplify things and use a short leader.

That is correct. But is that considered a weight In this situation? Or part of a lure egg combo.
If so I always here the term eggs are nutral boyant so would eggs fall under the non boyant part of the anti snag rule?
Maturity is when you have the power to destroy someone who did you wrong but instead you breathe, walk away, and let life take care of them.

Offline Jake Dogfish

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2017
  • Posts: 3816
  • Location: Des Moines
Re: Egg fishing in anti snag rule area question
« Reply #4 on: September 13, 2018, 06:15:50 AM »
It’s a good question.
  I think if it slides on your line, then it would not be legal. If it stays attached to the bait then it might be, but probably up to the game wardens interpretation.
Environmentalist Fundamentalist

Offline Jake Dogfish

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2017
  • Posts: 3816
  • Location: Des Moines
Re: Egg fishing in anti snag rule area question
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2018, 06:18:30 AM »
if i remember correctly, i think your weight can't be "attached" less than 12" from your hook.  what's weird, is that using a jig is perfectly legal, as it's part of the lure.

me, i'd just simplify things and use a short leader.

That is correct. But is that considered a weight In this situation? Or part of a lure egg combo.
If so I always here the term eggs are nutral boyant so would eggs fall under the non boyant part of the anti snag rule?
The weight just has to be at least 12” from whatever bait you are using. 
Environmentalist Fundamentalist

Offline Bullkllr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 4922
  • Location: Graham
Re: Egg fishing in anti snag rule area question
« Reply #6 on: September 13, 2018, 06:38:01 AM »
On a side note, throwing a gob of weightless eggs can be a very effective tactic. Learned it years ago and have almost never seen it used.

Obviously the current and depth need to be appropriate, and you need to use a spinning rod with light enough line to cast. Also a big enough cluster of eggs. It can be money when other presentations are problematic.
A Man's Gotta Eat

Offline 206

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2012
  • Posts: 621
  • Location: 206
Re: Egg fishing in anti snag rule area question
« Reply #7 on: September 13, 2018, 07:33:04 AM »
Not needed. Also reduces and obstructs hook gap.

Offline WSU

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 5501
Re: Egg fishing in anti snag rule area question
« Reply #8 on: September 13, 2018, 07:41:20 AM »
I agree not needed.  If you are fishing somewhere that you need additional weight on your leader, either fish a shorter leader or add split shot.

Offline 206

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2012
  • Posts: 621
  • Location: 206
Re: Egg fishing in anti snag rule area question
« Reply #9 on: September 13, 2018, 08:01:26 AM »
I use about an 20" leader and a big ol egg sinker above that for kings.

Offline AL WORRELLS KID

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2017
  • Posts: 2145
  • Groups: Washington State Trappers Association
Re: Egg fishing in anti snag rule area question
« Reply #10 on: October 01, 2018, 01:39:15 PM »
On a side note, throwing a gob of weightless eggs can be a very effective tactic. Learned it years ago and have almost never seen it used.

Obviously the current and depth need to be appropriate, and you need to use a spinning rod with light enough line to cast. Also a big enough cluster of eggs. It can be money when other presentations are problematic.
I could not agree more Bullkllr, add the weight of a water filled Bubble Bobber and you can toss it upstream in the river to those rising Kings.....deadly!
Doug
« Last Edit: October 06, 2018, 05:13:35 PM by AL WORRELLS KID »
"If you can't laugh out loud you've already got one foot in the grave!!!!!" - Author Unknown, But... (Still Laughing)

Offline Kc_Kracker

  • Sauceman
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 4125
  • Location: olympia
Re: Egg fishing in anti snag rule area question
« Reply #11 on: October 12, 2018, 07:55:56 AM »
NO!
You may not have weight within 12" of the bait.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Willapa Hills 1 Bear by Rem700LR
[Today at 08:47:09 PM]


Yard babies by MADMAX
[Today at 08:43:51 PM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Today at 08:06:11 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Today at 07:33:01 PM]


45 Winchester Magnum by poor_choices
[Today at 07:01:02 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by JKEEN33
[Today at 06:49:08 PM]


Jupiter Mountain Rayonier Permit- 621 Bull Tag by zwickeyman
[Today at 05:34:55 PM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by Crunchy
[Today at 03:21:50 PM]


erronulvin trail cam photos by kodiak06
[Today at 02:37:40 PM]


Sportsman Alliance files petition to Gov Ferguson for removal of corrupt WA Wildlife Commissioners by lewy
[Today at 10:30:15 AM]


If you've been following.... by timberfaller
[Today at 09:05:13 AM]


Area 11 2025 - Well? by BLH69
[Today at 08:58:57 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by mountainman
[Today at 08:48:35 AM]


1st Quality Deer tag in Washington and its a muzzleloader tag by raydog
[Today at 07:56:07 AM]


2024 deer. Let’s see um! by dreadi
[Today at 12:02:30 AM]


wyoming pronghorn draw by 280ackley
[Yesterday at 10:22:47 PM]


10 years ago- Now by Ridgerunner
[Yesterday at 09:49:05 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal