collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Tribal hunting bills introduced  (Read 76498 times)

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #165 on: February 01, 2013, 11:11:55 AM »
So of the tribal members posting in this thread, can we just get a "yes" you support the bills, or a "no" that you do not?

Offline Practical Approach

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 691
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #166 on: February 01, 2013, 11:12:07 AM »
Doesn't matter who "trumps" who, what matters is conserving our wildlife for future generations, and I don't see the Yakama tribe doing that. Why is it that all of us non-tribal hunters can limit ourselves to one deer and one elk per year?

And that's not even what's actually harvested, since our success rates average around 10% for elk and 20% for deer, due to our short seasons at times of the year that favor the animals.

So basically we each get 1 deer every 5 years, and 1 elk every 10 years. Whereas if I was a Yakama member I could easily kill 10 elk and 10 deer every single year (just for example.)

How many Yakama members are killing hundreds of deer and elk every year? Well, there's no way to know, because the tribe does not have any way of keeping track, and no way of limiting the number of animals that each person takes.

Question for you, Warrior Ways-  how many Yakama members hunt deer and elk for the purpose of selling the meat and/or the head?
Wow.....Non tribal hunters are not limiting themselves on their own, they are being limited by a regulative authority.  Most non-tribal hunters if they werent in jeapordy of being fined would hunt more than one animal.  If there weren't so many people and so little game in Washington, non tribal hunters could be taking more than one deer or elk.  Hell, some states allow 5-6 deer. 

By sheer numbers of non tribal hunters, non-tribal poachers harvest more animals than all of the reporting tribes. 

Sounds a little unrealistic that Yakama members are killing hundreds of deer and elk.  I don't think populations in the area would allow for that all of these generations that Yakama members have been hunting.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32905
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #167 on: February 01, 2013, 11:15:15 AM »
Quote
By sheer numbers of non tribal hunters, non-tribal poachers harvest more animals than all of the reporting tribes.
And gates/motorized vehicle access help combat against them as well. :tup:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Warrior Wayz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 17
  • Location: where the wind blowz n the water flowz
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #168 on: February 01, 2013, 11:17:14 AM »
HuntnFOOL

Offline Warrior Wayz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 17
  • Location: where the wind blowz n the water flowz
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #169 on: February 01, 2013, 11:18:37 AM »
Them, you, us???? combat??? WOW

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32905
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #170 on: February 01, 2013, 11:18:53 AM »
HuntnFOOL
So you resort to name calling? :chuckle: You will have to do better than that, I have thick skin. ;)
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32905
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #171 on: February 01, 2013, 11:20:25 AM »
Them, you, us???? combat??? WOW
No comment about the bills?
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Warrior Wayz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 17
  • Location: where the wind blowz n the water flowz
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #172 on: February 01, 2013, 11:20:52 AM »
Calling like I see it, as it is written....

Offline Warrior Wayz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 17
  • Location: where the wind blowz n the water flowz
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #173 on: February 01, 2013, 11:22:20 AM »
hunting will go on no matter what happens, since time immorial...

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32905
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #174 on: February 01, 2013, 11:22:45 AM »
Calling like I see it, as it is written....
So you have no intelligent thought on the topic?
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Warrior Wayz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 17
  • Location: where the wind blowz n the water flowz
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #175 on: February 01, 2013, 11:24:45 AM »
Nope just here for you...

Offline RG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 791
  • Location: Thorp
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #176 on: February 01, 2013, 11:29:13 AM »
People really do need to contact their representatives on these.  Hans Dunshee is one of the sponsors of these bills, he's my representative.  I emailed him and said I believe this is a slap in the face to the sportsmen and women of Washington State, and to his constituents.  He always answers eventually.  The emails really do make a difference, especially if they are reasonable and to the point.  It's time to act now, rather than to whine about the results later.
And I think God must be a cowboy at heart
 He made wide open spaces from the start
 He made grass and trees and mountains and a horse to be a friend
 And trails to lead ol' cowboys home again

Chris Ledoux...

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32905
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #177 on: February 01, 2013, 11:30:05 AM »
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Green broke

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 311
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #178 on: February 01, 2013, 11:30:26 AM »
I will go into the book as a yes vote(i support them). I say this because i am concerned for the saftey of tribal members. another issue I would adress is it spreads the tribal hunters out therefore taking pressure off the few open areas. I also like the fact that it takes it out of the public eye so to speak. I have nothing to hide when it comes to the public eye, I would just rather its a more private setting(that may be percieved as selfish). Contrary to popular belief we very seldom target trophy animals, and parading them around is never been done(by myself or my kids).

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #179 on: February 01, 2013, 11:32:42 AM »
Practical Approach,

My point was that the Yakama tribe doesn't limit their members in any way, as far as how many animals they can take each year. (As we are)

Now the tribes are wanting to have motorized access behind gates where we don't.

Where does their greed end?

Neither of these bills are needed, they're a total waste of paper and ink. If tribal members want to hunt behind locked gates, they can walk like the rest of us.

You know, kind of like how in the treaty it says they can hunt "in common" with us?

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

CWD question by hunter399
[Today at 12:34:17 PM]


Bigfoot / Sasquatch Reports by NathanFooter
[Today at 12:23:15 PM]


Aggressive Drone? by Smokeploe
[Today at 12:13:48 PM]


Proud dad moment by CamoDup
[Today at 11:38:41 AM]


Looking for thoughts or opinions on 60/80 gallon air compressors by b23
[Today at 11:27:28 AM]


North Idaho Houndsmen Association Field Trial by Machias
[Today at 11:21:30 AM]


Early Archery in GMU 407 Van Zandt Dike by AMHLDO
[Today at 11:10:41 AM]


More Kings! by Stein
[Today at 11:01:09 AM]


Big bull at exit 85 by Gentrys
[Today at 09:59:22 AM]


Multi Season leftovers by emac
[Today at 09:35:29 AM]


peaches ridge rifle bull oct 20th hunt by Karl Blanchard
[Today at 08:54:41 AM]


Salvage of roadkilled BT deer now legal in all WA counties by b0bbyg
[Today at 08:03:11 AM]


Vintage Ammo by bearhunter99
[Today at 08:00:42 AM]


Berry Report? by ganghis
[Today at 07:38:45 AM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by MMCCAULEY
[Today at 07:21:45 AM]


For rent: Hunting cabin in East Okanogan by SpotandStalk
[Today at 06:58:11 AM]


2024 Hoof Rot Incentive Hunt by JPhelps
[Today at 06:46:24 AM]


Pinks! by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:23:35 AM]


Dirty Crooks by MADMAX
[Today at 05:39:06 AM]


Idaho Moose Tag Area 1-1 Hunt 3001 by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 11:25:37 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal