collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Are wave machines legal?  (Read 43633 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10657
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #105 on: November 15, 2014, 09:47:33 PM »
Looks like Bigtex was correct  :chuckle:  :rockin:

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #106 on: November 16, 2014, 05:15:15 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10657
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #107 on: November 16, 2014, 08:07:10 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.
Until WDFW changes the WAC to say that a decoy is a plastic object that looks like a bird they will remain illegal.

Offline aaronoto

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 443
  • Location: NW WA
Re: Are wave machines legal?
« Reply #108 on: November 16, 2014, 08:12:25 AM »
Or maybe Bigtex is wrong along with the rest of the bunch at wdfw that says that wave machines are illegal. I don't  know how they can come to that conclusion the way it is worded, other than they likely will err on the side of saying it is illegal.

Yep, it's the courts job to interpret the law.  Now in a case like this a specific instance might need to go to court for a precedence to be set as to how the law is legally interpreted and therefore should be enforced.  I wouldn't want it to be me...

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Mushroom ID by jrebel
[Today at 07:57:13 PM]


The 33 year quest by hunter399
[Today at 07:55:06 PM]


Another Mushroom we need ID on by KP-Skagit
[Today at 07:14:05 PM]


GMU 368 Nasty Creek Rd Access (Gate) by Booner
[Today at 07:03:22 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by Britt-dog
[Today at 06:57:14 PM]


Blood trailing in the rain by Feathernfurr
[Today at 06:01:14 PM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by Caseknife
[Today at 05:42:25 PM]


Skagit Question by lovetogrouse
[Today at 05:40:00 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Shrimper
[Today at 04:14:10 PM]


Blue mountains deer permit by teanawayslayer
[Today at 02:53:47 PM]


Getting the hang of hanging on to mallards! by JBG
[Today at 09:33:34 AM]


A legend passed :( by Machias
[Today at 09:26:39 AM]


Flynn’s 1st rooster!!! by C-Money
[Today at 09:02:23 AM]


Chinook run by buglebuster
[Today at 08:39:03 AM]


2025 elk success thread!! by buglebuster
[Today at 08:31:55 AM]


King of the mountain caught sleeping by TeacherMan
[Today at 08:22:47 AM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by HntnFsh
[Today at 07:11:37 AM]


Anyone own a Hewescraft Sportsman 160? by FlyFish360
[Today at 06:48:21 AM]


How much do you think my truck is worth? by FlyFish360
[Today at 02:06:54 AM]


Bullet performance 2025? by Rigby416
[Today at 12:28:20 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal