collapse
Zen-Ray Optics Advertise on Hunting-Washington

Author Topic: Ares BTR 4.5-27x50 FFP REVIEW  (Read 2647 times)

Offline Magnum_Willys

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 2852
Ares BTR 4.5-27x50 FFP REVIEW
« on: July 30, 2017, 10:33:50 AM »
Ares BTR 4.5-27x50 FFP arrived yesterday.  Amazon - $850.  Superb packaging, looks like a quality unit.

Strapped it on a stock for glass comparison at 500 yards today.  Compared to Leupold VX3-L 56mm and VX6-4x24 x 50mm using eye chart and .338 bullet holes.  Clarity was as good as both leupolds, not better but as good.  Was slightly dimmer it seemed.

The field of view at similar powers was noticeably less than the leupolds. 

The eyebox on the Ares is very narrow - you have to be very centered to get a view.  The good thing to that is that parallax is a non issue - you hardly even need an adjustment whereas the Leupold its critical to get parallax set right. 

Your stock and scope height will need to be perfect for the Ares ( it should be anyway of course).

The FFP makes the cross hairs very thin at 100 yards and heavier than I like at 500+ but useable.   Thats the nature of FFP.  Wind hold off will be easier than on the Leupold I think.

Have not had a chance to clamp it down and test the tracking yet.  Need to draw a box and see how it tracks.
The turrets click very nicely - not mushy.

The parallax adjustment maxes out at infinity too soon it seems.  At 500 yards I put it on max then had to move the focus ring way out to focus.  Not a problem just seemed different.  And the focus ring increases the power significantly as your turn it out.  Also something different.

Overall so far I Like it because it only weights 27 oz and has glass as good as the Leupold.   I don't like 2 pound plus scopes.
I would like it better if it had: 56mm for wider field of few, brighter and wider eyebox - but it would probably be the Chronus then with a lot more weight than I want.

For the price, it seems like a good value so far. 

Offline JDHasty

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 6777
  • Location: Tacoma
  • Groups: NRA Benefactor Member, GOA Life Member, Father of 3 NRA Life Members
Re: Ares BTR 4.5-27x50 FFP REVIEW
« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2017, 03:25:43 PM »
Ares BTR 4.5-27x50 FFP arrived yesterday.  Amazon - $850.  Superb packaging, looks like a quality unit.

Strapped it on a stock for glass comparison at 500 yards today.  Compared to Leupold VX3-L 56mm and VX6-4x24 x 50mm using eye chart and .338 bullet holes.  Clarity was as good as both leupolds, not better but as good.  Was slightly dimmer it seemed.

The field of view at similar powers was noticeably less than the leupolds. 

The eyebox on the Ares is very narrow - you have to be very centered to get a view.  The good thing to that is that parallax is a non issue - you hardly even need an adjustment whereas the Leupold its critical to get parallax set right. 

Your stock and scope height will need to be perfect for the Ares ( it should be anyway of course).

The FFP makes the cross hairs very thin at 100 yards and heavier than I like at 500+ but useable.   Thats the nature of FFP.  Wind hold off will be easier than on the Leupold I think.

Have not had a chance to clamp it down and test the tracking yet.  Need to draw a box and see how it tracks.
The turrets click very nicely - not mushy.

The parallax adjustment maxes out at infinity too soon it seems.  At 500 yards I put it on max then had to move the focus ring way out to focus.  Not a problem just seemed different.  And the focus ring increases the power significantly as your turn it out.  Also something different.

Overall so far I Like it because it only weights 27 oz and has glass as good as the Leupold.   I don't like 2 pound plus scopes.
I would like it better if it had: 56mm for wider field of few, brighter and wider eyebox - but it would probably be the Chronus then with a lot more weight than I want.

For the price, it seems like a good value so far.

That sounds a bit less of a concern than it actually ends up being if you are using the scope for real-world hunting purposes.  Often times while hunting I have had to just get as solid as I could despite terrain that was less than optimal... far less than optimal.  This left me having to fight to get my eye anywhere near where where I could see through the scope and there have been times when I have said to myself:  This is going to hurt like hell  -  before pulling the trigger knowing that I was going to be hit in the face with a scope.   I have had my foot under one leg of a Harris Bipod and there have been times when I knew time was running out and I was not going to get time to adjust anything and was going to have to just get as lined up enough to see through the scope and then pull the trigger.   

Offline Magnum_Willys

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 2852
Re: Ares BTR 4.5-27x50 FFP REVIEW
« Reply #2 on: August 04, 2017, 03:49:03 PM »


That sounds a bit less of a concern than it actually ends up being if you are using the scope for real-world hunting purposes.  Often times while hunting I have had to just get as solid as I could despite terrain that was less than optimal... far less than optimal.  This left me having to fight to get my eye anywhere near where where I could see through the scope and there have been times when I have said to myself:  This is going to hurt like hell  -  before pulling the trigger knowing that I was going to be hit in the face with a scope.   I have had my foot under one leg of a Harris Bipod and there have been times when I knew time was running out and I was not going to get time to adjust anything and was going to have to just get as lined up enough to see through the scope and then pull the trigger.

You mean the narrow eyebox should or shouldn't be a big concern ?  thx, I've never had one this narrow. 

Offline BrandonWatts

  • Virtual Campfire
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • *
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 310
  • Location: lost in the woods
Re: Ares BTR 4.5-27x50 FFP REVIEW
« Reply #3 on: August 04, 2017, 05:22:59 PM »
I don't care for a narrow eye box. My razor hd gen 1 I had was very narrow in the eye box. Had to have your head perfectly behind the scope. Kinda concerns me with the athlon being so narrow. I may look at the nightforce shv or leupold lrp.

Offline JDHasty

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 6777
  • Location: Tacoma
  • Groups: NRA Benefactor Member, GOA Life Member, Father of 3 NRA Life Members
Re: Ares BTR 4.5-27x50 FFP REVIEW
« Reply #4 on: August 04, 2017, 06:32:44 PM »


That sounds a bit less of a concern than it actually ends up being if you are using the scope for real-world hunting purposes.  Often times while hunting I have had to just get as solid as I could despite terrain that was less than optimal... far less than optimal.  This left me having to fight to get my eye anywhere near where where I could see through the scope and there have been times when I have said to myself:  This is going to hurt like hell  -  before pulling the trigger knowing that I was going to be hit in the face with a scope.   I have had my foot under one leg of a Harris Bipod and there have been times when I knew time was running out and I was not going to get time to adjust anything and was going to have to just get as lined up enough to see through the scope and then pull the trigger.

You mean the narrow eyebox should or shouldn't be a big concern ?  thx, I've never had one this narrow.

No, I mean it can be a deal breaker for me.  I need some latitude and longitude. 

We have gotten spoiled, I remember back to the days when it seemed that most people wanted to have target blocks on their varmint rifles and use a Super-Targetspot.  I was the outlier with a 6.5-20 Leupold and a 6-24 Buris Signature, but watched most people change over.  At first they went with Leupold 24X target scopes, but eventually they came around to my way of thinking.

A lot of it had to do with m wanting to setup away from the benches and the trucks and shoot off my bipod and they had a devil of a time with their scopes blacking out unless they were set up where they had a level place to shoot from.   

 

* Recent Topics

Cow tag by tman24
[Today at 08:34:08 PM]


Another Desert Tag! by 7mmfan
[Today at 08:33:10 PM]


Goose Prairie archery tag. Got drawn. by bench beast
[Today at 08:32:55 PM]


Eberlestock F4 Terminator Pack by usmc74
[Today at 08:14:44 PM]


Quality AK style rifle for 2018? by Tjkride
[Today at 08:03:20 PM]


Rimrock by JWEBB
[Today at 07:53:43 PM]


IT'S ON WDFW!!!!!! NO CONFIRMATION EMAIL!!!!!! REDRAW!!!! by JoeE
[Today at 07:48:20 PM]


FS: Kifaru Tut and Smith Cylinder Stove by sagerat
[Today at 07:20:48 PM]


Rule changes by metlhead
[Today at 07:16:05 PM]


Kifaru 20 Degree Slick Sleeping Bag- Standard Length and Width- $300 Like New by acts
[Today at 07:07:03 PM]


House by Ellensburg for sale by vandeman17
[Today at 06:27:02 PM]


2018 OIL's!!! by Limhangerslayer
[Today at 06:23:40 PM]


Wts: timney rem 700 trigger. by hogslayer
[Today at 06:21:10 PM]


Sheep Tag, Yahoo by lonedave
[Today at 06:04:37 PM]


2018 Sheds. Post them here! by _DarkTimber_
[Today at 05:53:54 PM]


FS Knight Disc Extreme .50Cal Muzzleloader Camo-Stainless by vaz,,66
[Today at 05:45:03 PM]


Chiwawa Quality Muzzy by Muleyslyr
[Today at 05:38:23 PM]


Bethel Muzzleloader Bull by Dan-o
[Today at 05:29:45 PM]


How big of a pack for deer? by Rainier10
[Today at 05:11:59 PM]


White river archery elk tag 653 by justyhntr
[Today at 05:08:18 PM]