collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: bullet weight  (Read 5554 times)

Offline Andrew

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 206
  • Location: Bellingham
bullet weight
« on: July 09, 2012, 03:14:18 PM »
 I've been shooting 168 gr., nosler partition, balistic tip  308 in preparation for the high hunt, but am now (probably over thinking this) worried that I need to shift to something heavier like 175 or 180?  I realize that it is probably more important to practice and become one with your rifle for shots over 200 yards with a particular round.  However, I'm just wondering if I should sacrafice flatnest/velocity for weight (granted not the flatest caliber out there, but for what I have)?

308 users what rounds are you using?

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7201
  • Location: Mukilteo
Re: bullet weight
« Reply #1 on: July 09, 2012, 03:34:52 PM »
but am now (probably over thinking this) worried that I need to shift to something heavier like 175 or 180?

308 users what rounds are you using?

Why?  I'd go with 150g -

Offline ellensburgpo

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 1806
  • Location: Dry Side/Right Side
  • Groups: DU, Delta Waterfowl, NWTF
Re: bullet weight
« Reply #2 on: July 09, 2012, 03:37:10 PM »
I have my great grandfathers savage 99c in 308 and he used 150 gr core locks mostly. Killed more deer and elk than I will ever hope to and did it with open sights. I'm guessing your over thinking the issue. If you look there really isn't a huge difference between 150gr and 180gr in most factory loads as far as drop.

And I wouldn't say it is probably more important to practice with what you got versus stressing over minute differences in ballistics, it is more important. Which just means you get to spend time at the range which is fun.
KCCO

 The world breaks everyone and afterward many are strong in the broken places. But those that will not break it kills. It kills the very good and the very gentle and the very brave impartially. If you are none of these you can be sure it will kill you too but there will be no special hurry.
Ernest Hemingway, A Farewell to Arms, 1929

Offline C-Money

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 10988
  • Location: Grant County
  • Self proclaimed 3pt master
Re: bullet weight
« Reply #3 on: July 09, 2012, 04:28:03 PM »
I too would go with the 150gr in the 308win. I use the 150 Interlock from Hornaday and have killed many deer and one bull elk from a 30-06. Very deadly, knocked the bull down very quickly, only went a few steps. The 150 is plenty of bullet, so your current loads should be just fine!
« Last Edit: July 09, 2012, 04:42:08 PM by C-Money »
I felt like a one legged cat trying to bury a terd on a frozen pond!

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32939
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: bullet weight
« Reply #4 on: July 09, 2012, 04:36:55 PM »
 Its far more important to place your shot than worry about weight, a well placed 100gr. .243 will kill far more critters than a poorly placed 180 gr. .308 :twocents:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Houndhunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 3026
  • Location: Continental Divide
Re: bullet weight
« Reply #5 on: July 09, 2012, 04:45:40 PM »
Use what shoots best out of your gun and stick with that. I'd think 168 is on the heavy side anyways for a .308 :dunno:

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10706
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: bullet weight
« Reply #6 on: July 09, 2012, 05:18:04 PM »
My personal opinion is that the 165-168gr bullets in the .308 and most 30cals for that matter is the perfect balance between weight and velocity.  Also, unless I am mistaken, basically all snipers and long range shooters using the 308 shoot that range of bullet because of its performance in that cartridge.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: bullet weight
« Reply #7 on: July 09, 2012, 05:27:46 PM »
I think the 168 you are using is a good bullet out of the 308 Win. I wouldn't go any heavier, and as some have said, even a 150 grain bullet is a good choice in that cartridge. But I would probably stick with the 168 grain. It will shoot about as flat as anything.


Offline D-Rock425

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 13284
  • Location: Lake stevens
Re: bullet weight
« Reply #8 on: July 09, 2012, 05:29:59 PM »
Stick with what you got no problems with a 168 grain bullet.

Offline Andrew

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 206
  • Location: Bellingham
Re: bullet weight
« Reply #9 on: July 10, 2012, 02:06:10 PM »
Also, unless I am mistaken, basically all snipers and long range shooters using the 308 shoot that range of bullet because of its performance in that cartridge.
[/quote]

Sort of the reason why I went with 308 in the first place.  Figured if the US Armed Forces (who crank out some of the world's best snipers) use 308 its probably good enough for me...plus not to hard to find rounds!

Seeing that it appears to be 50/50 I'll grab a box of both and head to the range and see what I get at both 200 and 300.  Thanks all for your posts!

Offline D-Rock425

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 13284
  • Location: Lake stevens
Re: bullet weight
« Reply #10 on: July 10, 2012, 02:33:28 PM »
Let us know your results.

Offline skybusterbo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 401
  • Location: Yakima
Re: bullet weight
« Reply #11 on: July 10, 2012, 03:00:57 PM »
With a 308 you are better off with using 150 gr. for deer. 165 or 180 for elk.  :twocents:

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Supreme Court Declines to Hear Corner-Crossing Case by 71Shovelhead
[Today at 01:03:51 PM]


Comment against Ski Resort expanding into Colockum elk/deer habitat by BigredRusch
[Today at 12:52:38 PM]


Duck Boat Blind by metlhead
[Today at 12:44:56 PM]


Let’s see ur heavy pack out pics by Mtnwalker
[Today at 12:43:03 PM]


West side antler buyers by PastorJoel
[Today at 12:38:15 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by Crunchy
[Today at 11:53:33 AM]


Shadypass road / fs5900 closed by Transka
[Today at 11:48:56 AM]


New property cams checked by finnman
[Today at 11:36:13 AM]


Desert unit 290 October buck hunt by Mtnwalker
[Today at 11:32:12 AM]


Where do the bulls go? by pianoman9701
[Today at 11:31:15 AM]


Anyone use game carts? by HikerHunter
[Today at 11:22:58 AM]


Not quite by metlhead
[Today at 09:57:42 AM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by Gonehuntin01
[Today at 09:46:48 AM]


Mushroom ID Thread by pianoman9701
[Today at 09:45:05 AM]


Harlequin in weird places? by O. Nerka
[Today at 09:33:09 AM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by Gonehuntin01
[Today at 09:29:55 AM]


GMU 368 Nasty Creek Rd Access (Gate) by Booner
[Today at 09:13:23 AM]


East Side by BUCKHUNT
[Today at 09:00:34 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by TeacherMan
[Today at 08:44:21 AM]


49 DN Moose Success by Gonehuntin01
[Today at 08:35:00 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal