collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Interstate hunting regulations???  (Read 1761 times)

Online CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7197
  • Location: Mukilteo
Interstate hunting regulations???
« on: July 31, 2012, 07:05:50 AM »
Say I take a road trip to North Dakota and shoot my possession limit of pheasants there.  Can I stop in Montana and hunt there if I still have the ND pheasants?  How about WA?

Anyone ever make such as trip?


Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25060
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2012, 07:26:11 AM »
Thats a good question that i'd like to know the answer to as well... I would guess that since you have Lic for both and as long as your Phesants from ND are processed then you would be ok.  :dunno:
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21825
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Interstate hunting regulations???
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2012, 07:11:45 PM »
That is an interesting question.  I will do some research. My initial thought: for big game such as deer there is no "possession limit": if you can legally kill a deer in 10 states, you could legally possess 10 deer.  For waterfowl which is federally managed, most interpretations would conclude that one "aggregate possession limit" does indeed add all U.S. kills together.  See page 6: http://www.fws.gov/le/pdffiles/50_CFR_20.pdf

Upland birds are probably more like big game, in that each state's limit would not be counted toward another state's possession limit.  This assumes, of course, that it could be clearly demonstated from which state the species in one's possession were legally killed.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Boring & relining .22 barrel, any recommendations? by Blacktail Sniper
[Today at 07:19:07 AM]


As He Lay by Pathfinder101
[Today at 07:13:39 AM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:54:56 AM]


Pheasant Release Program by Threewolves
[Today at 06:27:30 AM]


Moose's 2025 Upland Season by Threewolves
[Today at 06:21:20 AM]


A few grouse by Threewolves
[Today at 06:12:35 AM]


Chasing wild chickens. by 2MANY
[Today at 06:10:10 AM]


Japanese Kei truck? by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:05:20 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Martinhunter
[Today at 12:56:09 AM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 09:36:10 PM]


No tracking dogs in Weyerhaeuser by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 09:29:14 PM]


Yukon wolf by HUNTINCOUPLE
[Yesterday at 09:28:43 PM]


Daughters doubled up before 8am by Widgeondeke
[Yesterday at 08:37:02 PM]


SPIKE??? by carpsniperg2
[Yesterday at 08:08:17 PM]


49 DN Moose Success by Caseknife
[Yesterday at 05:54:46 PM]


2025 sheds….let's see em by PastorJoel
[Yesterday at 05:20:00 PM]


Rimrock Bull: Modern by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 04:03:17 PM]


Elk Outfitter in Elbe, WA by Jellymon
[Yesterday at 03:54:21 PM]


Talking About Barely Legal by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 03:05:57 PM]


Duck Boat Blind by gallion_t
[Yesterday at 02:59:14 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal