collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Swarovski spotting scope  (Read 3203 times)

Offline bassbuck07

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 5
Swarovski spotting scope
« on: August 20, 2012, 09:24:15 PM »
Im going to buy a Swarovski spotting scope and am looking for some opinions on them. Is it worth the money on buying the HD vs non HD? And is the 65mm better or the 80mm? Thanks for any advice that anyone has on these items

Offline colockumelk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 4910
  • Location: Watertown, NY
Re: Swarovski spotting scope
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2012, 07:15:38 AM »
#1 Between the two (80mm vs 65mm) one is not better than the other. They are both like specific tools used for specific things. What will you be using the spotting scope for?  Are you doing most of your hunting in the timber, doing back country hunts? Or is most of it out of a truck or in the open sage/crp?  Because depending on your type of hunting, the situation will determine which is better.

#2 What is the price difference between HD and non HD. On the one hand if you have saved up enough for a non HD might as well keep on saving. But on the other hand most people cant tell the difference between the two. The HD will not have as much Chromatic Aberation, so if you notice that then yes pay for the HD. If you don't notice the CA then get the non-HD version. Both are clear and do well at low light and have a crisp image.  But the HD version has a lower Chromatic Aboration.
"We Sleep Safe In Our Beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those that would do us harm."
Author: George Orwell

Offline rbros

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 433
  • Location: Olympia, Wa
Re: Swarovski spotting scope
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2012, 09:49:45 AM »
You will be happy with either one.  I have both the 65mm and 80mm in regular and one 65mm in HD.  The HD might be a smidge clearer in lowlight, but not worth the extra $$.  The 65mm is great for packing, the 80 is good for sitting in one spot or using out of the truck. 
R Bros Rifles
www.rbrosrifles.com

Offline Crunchy

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4940
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: Swarovski spotting scope
« Reply #3 on: August 21, 2012, 10:25:14 AM »
I went with the 65 non hd.  It wasn't worth the extra cash for HD. 

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Swarovski spotting scope
« Reply #4 on: August 22, 2012, 02:17:24 PM »
I went with the 65 non hd.  It wasn't worth the extra cash for HD.
:yeah:

I was told the only people who can really see the difference in the HD is people using it to take pictures. I have taken a few pictures through mine but its not what I bought it for and was not worth the money to me. The 65 is fairly small and light and easily packs so thats why I chose it over the 80.

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8686
  • Location: NCW
Re: Swarovski spotting scope
« Reply #5 on: August 22, 2012, 04:15:15 PM »
Personally, if I'm spending the money on a Swaro spotter, I'd pay the few extra hundred and go HD. :twocents:

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21744
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Swarovski spotting scope
« Reply #6 on: August 22, 2012, 04:31:38 PM »
If you can, find a store that carries both an HD and a non-HD model and compare them side-by-side for yourself. I've done just that. To my eyes, the differences were negligible but your mileage may vary.

They don't necessarily need to be 65mm but it would certainly be helpful if they were similar Swaro models to what you are considering.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

FFL preferences or warnings in Olympia or south Sound area? by JDHasty
[Today at 10:47:34 PM]


Boat registration by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 10:22:29 PM]


Bear behavior by jamesjett
[Today at 09:44:15 PM]


Norway Pass Archery Elk 2025 by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 09:14:45 PM]


Entiat Quality tag by WAcoueshunter
[Today at 09:05:06 PM]


Idaho 2025 Controlled Hunts by JDArms1240
[Today at 09:03:40 PM]


Palouse/Mica (GMU 127) Access for Trades Work by dr.derek
[Today at 08:29:53 PM]


Pearygin Quality by MADMAX
[Today at 07:55:09 PM]


Teanaway bull elk by Caveman123
[Today at 07:43:44 PM]


Oregon results posted. by Caveman123
[Today at 07:40:47 PM]


2025 Draw Results by Yeti419
[Today at 07:27:32 PM]


Mudflow Archery by Yeti419
[Today at 07:26:25 PM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by dilleytech
[Today at 07:14:35 PM]


Rehome for GWP by Feathernfurr
[Today at 06:43:07 PM]


Vashon Island deer tag by bowhunter_1
[Today at 04:32:43 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal