collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Swarovski spotting scope  (Read 3397 times)

Offline bassbuck07

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 5
Swarovski spotting scope
« on: August 20, 2012, 09:24:15 PM »
Im going to buy a Swarovski spotting scope and am looking for some opinions on them. Is it worth the money on buying the HD vs non HD? And is the 65mm better or the 80mm? Thanks for any advice that anyone has on these items

Offline colockumelk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 4910
  • Location: Watertown, NY
Re: Swarovski spotting scope
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2012, 07:15:38 AM »
#1 Between the two (80mm vs 65mm) one is not better than the other. They are both like specific tools used for specific things. What will you be using the spotting scope for?  Are you doing most of your hunting in the timber, doing back country hunts? Or is most of it out of a truck or in the open sage/crp?  Because depending on your type of hunting, the situation will determine which is better.

#2 What is the price difference between HD and non HD. On the one hand if you have saved up enough for a non HD might as well keep on saving. But on the other hand most people cant tell the difference between the two. The HD will not have as much Chromatic Aberation, so if you notice that then yes pay for the HD. If you don't notice the CA then get the non-HD version. Both are clear and do well at low light and have a crisp image.  But the HD version has a lower Chromatic Aboration.
"We Sleep Safe In Our Beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those that would do us harm."
Author: George Orwell

Offline rbros

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 433
  • Location: Olympia, Wa
Re: Swarovski spotting scope
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2012, 09:49:45 AM »
You will be happy with either one.  I have both the 65mm and 80mm in regular and one 65mm in HD.  The HD might be a smidge clearer in lowlight, but not worth the extra $$.  The 65mm is great for packing, the 80 is good for sitting in one spot or using out of the truck. 
R Bros Rifles
www.rbrosrifles.com

Offline Crunchy

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 5043
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: Swarovski spotting scope
« Reply #3 on: August 21, 2012, 10:25:14 AM »
I went with the 65 non hd.  It wasn't worth the extra cash for HD. 

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Swarovski spotting scope
« Reply #4 on: August 22, 2012, 02:17:24 PM »
I went with the 65 non hd.  It wasn't worth the extra cash for HD.
:yeah:

I was told the only people who can really see the difference in the HD is people using it to take pictures. I have taken a few pictures through mine but its not what I bought it for and was not worth the money to me. The 65 is fairly small and light and easily packs so thats why I chose it over the 80.

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8679
  • Location: NCW
Re: Swarovski spotting scope
« Reply #5 on: August 22, 2012, 04:15:15 PM »
Personally, if I'm spending the money on a Swaro spotter, I'd pay the few extra hundred and go HD. :twocents:

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21871
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Swarovski spotting scope
« Reply #6 on: August 22, 2012, 04:31:38 PM »
If you can, find a store that carries both an HD and a non-HD model and compare them side-by-side for yourself. I've done just that. To my eyes, the differences were negligible but your mileage may vary.

They don't necessarily need to be 65mm but it would certainly be helpful if they were similar Swaro models to what you are considering.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

6.5 PRC advice by 92xj
[Today at 01:55:02 PM]


Returned Idaho tags by trophyhunt
[Today at 12:17:23 PM]


Called in my first bobcat! by brokentrail
[Today at 11:13:17 AM]


Best bird taxidermist in washington state? by Special T
[Today at 10:48:43 AM]


Stick with the 50's by Ghost Hunter
[Today at 10:46:38 AM]


What's flatbed pickup life like? by Fastass350
[Today at 10:44:06 AM]


Drew Moose Tag by highside74
[Today at 09:25:30 AM]


A cougar tries to steal my cat by redi
[Today at 08:31:26 AM]


LINCOLN !! by pd
[Yesterday at 10:20:02 PM]


Idaho Non-Res draw results by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 08:10:44 PM]


Are all case trimmers created equal? by HighlandLofts
[Yesterday at 07:00:40 PM]


Very Little Trapping Posts by Naches Sportsman
[Yesterday at 06:52:01 PM]


Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by RileyH
[Yesterday at 06:08:45 PM]


2024 Quality Buck coming home by RB
[Yesterday at 01:38:21 PM]


Idaho Trapping Journal 2025/26 by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 01:34:08 PM]


Taneum Elk Cow tag problem by boneaddict
[Yesterday at 11:21:24 AM]


great podcast on cougar by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 07:36:43 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal