collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Swarovski spotting scope  (Read 3440 times)

Offline bassbuck07

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 5
Swarovski spotting scope
« on: August 20, 2012, 09:24:15 PM »
Im going to buy a Swarovski spotting scope and am looking for some opinions on them. Is it worth the money on buying the HD vs non HD? And is the 65mm better or the 80mm? Thanks for any advice that anyone has on these items

Offline colockumelk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 4910
  • Location: Watertown, NY
Re: Swarovski spotting scope
« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2012, 07:15:38 AM »
#1 Between the two (80mm vs 65mm) one is not better than the other. They are both like specific tools used for specific things. What will you be using the spotting scope for?  Are you doing most of your hunting in the timber, doing back country hunts? Or is most of it out of a truck or in the open sage/crp?  Because depending on your type of hunting, the situation will determine which is better.

#2 What is the price difference between HD and non HD. On the one hand if you have saved up enough for a non HD might as well keep on saving. But on the other hand most people cant tell the difference between the two. The HD will not have as much Chromatic Aberation, so if you notice that then yes pay for the HD. If you don't notice the CA then get the non-HD version. Both are clear and do well at low light and have a crisp image.  But the HD version has a lower Chromatic Aboration.
"We Sleep Safe In Our Beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those that would do us harm."
Author: George Orwell

Offline rbros

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 433
  • Location: Olympia, Wa
Re: Swarovski spotting scope
« Reply #2 on: August 21, 2012, 09:49:45 AM »
You will be happy with either one.  I have both the 65mm and 80mm in regular and one 65mm in HD.  The HD might be a smidge clearer in lowlight, but not worth the extra $$.  The 65mm is great for packing, the 80 is good for sitting in one spot or using out of the truck. 
R Bros Rifles
www.rbrosrifles.com

Offline Crunchy

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 5110
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: Swarovski spotting scope
« Reply #3 on: August 21, 2012, 10:25:14 AM »
I went with the 65 non hd.  It wasn't worth the extra cash for HD. 

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Swarovski spotting scope
« Reply #4 on: August 22, 2012, 02:17:24 PM »
I went with the 65 non hd.  It wasn't worth the extra cash for HD.
:yeah:

I was told the only people who can really see the difference in the HD is people using it to take pictures. I have taken a few pictures through mine but its not what I bought it for and was not worth the money to me. The 65 is fairly small and light and easily packs so thats why I chose it over the 80.

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8689
  • Location: NCW
Re: Swarovski spotting scope
« Reply #5 on: August 22, 2012, 04:15:15 PM »
Personally, if I'm spending the money on a Swaro spotter, I'd pay the few extra hundred and go HD. :twocents:

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21907
  • Groups: SCI, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Swarovski spotting scope
« Reply #6 on: August 22, 2012, 04:31:38 PM »
If you can, find a store that carries both an HD and a non-HD model and compare them side-by-side for yourself. I've done just that. To my eyes, the differences were negligible but your mileage may vary.

They don't necessarily need to be 65mm but it would certainly be helpful if they were similar Swaro models to what you are considering.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Discretion !!! by JDHasty
[Today at 01:10:05 AM]


Any fans of the 35 Rem, 358 Win, 35 Whelen, 9.3x62, or 45-70? by JDHasty
[Today at 01:00:03 AM]


12th Annual 'Pull For Scouting' Clay Crushing Classic by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 10:19:11 PM]


You Bear Slayers by bearhunter99
[Yesterday at 09:58:26 PM]


Laser engraving service in western washington by FlyFish360
[Yesterday at 08:50:46 PM]


Multi season elk by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 08:20:51 PM]


Hoof rot by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 07:59:40 PM]


Second Choice by CNELK
[Yesterday at 07:19:34 PM]


2026 turkey season! by pickardjw
[Yesterday at 06:41:44 PM]


Question about hunting wilderness areas by Shawn Ryan
[Yesterday at 06:32:30 PM]


Now we wait(Montana) by huntandjeep
[Yesterday at 04:49:46 PM]


Solar Generator by The scout
[Yesterday at 03:38:44 PM]


AR-15 and more by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 03:13:21 PM]


Manulife Timberlands closed in NE Washington by shorthair15
[Yesterday at 02:23:42 PM]


Big game season proposals by craigapphunt
[Yesterday at 10:03:09 AM]


September vs Everything after by throttlejocky20
[Yesterday at 07:45:20 AM]


Logical reason there should be a spring hunt by hunter399
[Yesterday at 07:42:26 AM]


Help me understand youth moose by throttlejocky20
[Yesterday at 07:40:40 AM]


Paint Job needed? by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 06:58:21 AM]


Sky Rover Binoculars. Alpha glass, bargain price. by Turdle
[April 15, 2026, 11:44:11 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal