collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolves do affect business  (Read 71448 times)

Offline Sitka_Blacktail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 3429
  • Location: Hoquiam, WA
Re: Wolves do affect business
« Reply #255 on: February 24, 2014, 10:32:13 PM »
There is no correlation between the success rates depicted in the chart and overall Elk population either.

No direct correlation. Not an animal to animal correlation. But how many times has it been argued here that lack of success is costing Idaho and other states hunters? So what is more important, how many elk Idaho has, or how many get harvested each year.  I'd say as long as you can maintain it, harvest numbers are more important than total numbers. But that's just me.

Doesn't do you any good to have the woods full of animals if you can't harvest them.
A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears. ~ Michel de Montaigne

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38980
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Wolves do affect business
« Reply #256 on: February 24, 2014, 10:42:36 PM »
There is no correlation between the success rates depicted in the chart and overall Elk population either.

No direct correlation. Not an animal to animal correlation. But how many times has it been argued here that lack of success is costing Idaho and other states hunters? So what is more important, how many elk Idaho has, or how many get harvested each year.  I'd say as long as you can maintain it, harvest numbers are more important than total numbers. But that's just me.

Doesn't do you any good to have the woods full of animals if you can't harvest them.

Pretty simple math for me, if you have 50,000 cows that calf, with a 40% survival you probably add 20,000 calves to the elk population. Hunters can probably take 15,000 or more elk each year.

If that same elk population is reduced by wolves to 20,000 cows calving, and wolves are holding the calf survival down to 10%, then you only add 2,000 calves to the population. If hunters continue to take 15,000 or more elk each year the math isn't going to work very long.  :twocents:
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34471
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: Wolves do affect business
« Reply #257 on: February 24, 2014, 10:43:33 PM »
Recess is over, it's time to take your seat.

 :chuckle:

bout time for me to hit the sack

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3611
Re: Wolves do affect business
« Reply #258 on: February 24, 2014, 10:45:38 PM »
KF- The graph I posted is from the IDFG elk management plan...the same plan/source data bearpaw is posting on recent harvest and population trends.  But thats nice you can draw  :tup:

I do believe the long-term trends in any population data, whether its yellowstone or Lolo or Idaho as a whole gives a better sense of some of the points many folks try to make on these forums: elk numbers are dynamic and lots of factors contribute to those changes.  I think we all generally agree on that  :dunno:  It is misleading to think that wolves aren't holding down elk numbers in specific units...it it equally misleading to think that elk numbers will rebound anywhere close to 1980s levels in the Lolo if we just get rid of/or significantly reduce wolves and other predators.

"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline JLS

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 4623
  • Location: In my last tracks.....
  • Groups: Support the LWCF!
Re: Wolves do affect business
« Reply #259 on: February 24, 2014, 10:49:44 PM »
it it equally misleading to think that elk numbers will rebound anywhere close to 1980s levels in the Lolo if we just get rid of/or significantly reduce wolves and other predators.

Burn it to the ground and you might see some significant rebound.
Matthew 7:13-14

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38980
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: Wolves do affect business
« Reply #260 on: February 24, 2014, 10:53:46 PM »
KF- The graph I posted is from the IDFG elk management plan...the same plan/source data bearpaw is posting on recent harvest and population trends.  But thats nice you can draw  :tup:

I do believe the long-term trends in any population data, whether its yellowstone or Lolo or Idaho as a whole gives a better sense of some of the points many folks try to make on these forums: elk numbers are dynamic and lots of factors contribute to those changes.  I think we all generally agree on that  :dunno:  It is misleading to think that wolves aren't holding down elk numbers in specific units...it it equally misleading to think that elk numbers will rebound anywhere close to 1980s levels in the Lolo if we just get rid of/or significantly reduce wolves and other predators.

It's in the Idaho plan to reduce wolves and improve habitat, can't agree more, but the wolves must be reduced too.  :twocents:

FYI - We have the same problem in NE WA, over aged forests due to hugger control of our USFS. We need logging and wolf reduction. Why burn it when locals need employment?
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3611
Re: Wolves do affect business
« Reply #261 on: February 24, 2014, 11:02:40 PM »
it it equally misleading to think that elk numbers will rebound anywhere close to 1980s levels in the Lolo if we just get rid of/or significantly reduce wolves and other predators.

Burn it to the ground and you might see some significant rebound.
:yeah: 
One of these days I'm going to go hand out fireworks and cases of beer to the camps I encounter when I'm up flyfishing on kelly cr.  :chuckle: 
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

First time coyote hunting by birdshooter1189
[Today at 01:23:38 PM]


End of Western WA Pheasant Release Program by EnglishSetter
[Today at 12:55:25 PM]


Boys coho catch fall ‘25 by AL WORRELLS KID
[Today at 11:49:59 AM]


Family Hunt Club by EnglishSetter
[Today at 10:35:07 AM]


Pheasant Release Program by WSU
[Today at 09:24:22 AM]


Another reloading newb question by Caseknife
[Today at 08:20:50 AM]


Leopard Cur Pups by Machias
[Today at 08:16:47 AM]


turkey hunting question series - question 2 by Henrydog
[Today at 08:02:26 AM]


Is this 1903 Remington finish original? by swanderek
[Today at 07:38:59 AM]


Tips for Field Judging Pronghorn by CarbonHunter
[Today at 06:51:16 AM]


Selling 12ga Non-Toxic Ammo (BOSS Bismuth and Steel) by Cast2Way
[Today at 12:53:59 AM]


Selling 12ga FAIR (Rizzini) Jubilee O/U shotgun by Cast2Way
[Today at 12:51:08 AM]


Wyoming 2026, who's in? by Craig
[Yesterday at 07:10:44 PM]


Area 7 Salmon Fishing by 3nails
[Yesterday at 05:23:45 PM]


Turkey Tactics - How Do You Play? by Ridgeratt
[Yesterday at 04:28:26 PM]


Ammo dump by metlhead
[Yesterday at 02:43:10 PM]


Flooded Corn: Senator Calls USFW To Conduct Formal Study by hdshot
[Yesterday at 02:10:57 PM]


when should i give up on a turkey and move on? by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 12:40:00 PM]


Oregon ballot measure to ban hunting, trapping, and ranching by Elkaholic daWg
[Yesterday at 12:30:53 PM]


Called in my first bobcat! by Aleebee156
[Yesterday at 11:49:04 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal