collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 99 ranger 3.0L info?  (Read 1741 times)

Offline uplandhunter870

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 1322
  • Location: Wenatchee
99 ranger 3.0L info?
« on: September 06, 2012, 08:04:13 PM »
so i just picked up a new to me 99 ranger with the 3.0 v6 4x4.  was just curious if anyone here has any experience with this rig mainly with this engine. ive owned one ranger before it was a 2000 4L so i am familiar with the ranger species.

what im mostly curious about is are there any common issues with this engine/rig that a guy may be able to prevent before they become an expensive issue

dont get me wrong its a great looking and driving rig only driving issue is my inexperience with a manual trans, this is my first manual trans rig. figured with all the gear heads and mechanics here someone might have some experience with these trucks.

thanks
uplander

Offline Woodchuck

  • GO TEAM!!!
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 12147
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • HuntWA Woodblock
Re: 99 ranger 3.0L info?
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2012, 06:46:30 AM »
3.0 is the better of the two engines for longevity purposes. Keep the oil changed, they will sludge up if you don't
Antlered rabbit tastes like chicken


Inuendo, wasn't he an Italian proctoligist?

Offline docsven

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 532
  • Location: Kent
Re: 99 ranger 3.0L info?
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2012, 07:00:09 AM »
I had that engine, I sold it at 355,000.  Did head gasket at about 200,000.  Other than that, no problems.  I sold it when torque converter went out.

Offline cwuwildcat

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1000
  • Location: the 253
Re: 99 ranger 3.0L info?
« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2012, 07:55:52 AM »
Had one for three years, in auto and extra cab.  Never had a single problem.  Ran like a champ, ran smooth and started up every time.  Only thing was that they don't get that great of mileage, considering their size.  They get about the same as a full size.
The only difference between a butt kisser and a brown noser is depth perception.

Offline FC

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 3954
  • Location: Wa
Re: 99 ranger 3.0L info?
« Reply #4 on: September 12, 2012, 11:21:46 PM »
Keep the oil changed and the engine tuned. The biggest failing of the 3.0l was the headgaskets when the EGR system would get plugged up they would burn through the sealing ring in the gasket after a while.
The reason there are so many Ruger upgrades is because they're necessary.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Full moon and last week of September by vandeman17
[Today at 08:49:49 AM]


Best all around muzzy (updated) by JakeLand
[Today at 08:20:35 AM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by huntallyearlong
[Today at 06:40:46 AM]


3 days for Kings by Tball77
[Today at 06:35:22 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by CaNINE
[Today at 05:52:10 AM]


2025 Crab! by spin05
[Today at 05:11:11 AM]


Lynx kittens confirmed in the Kettle Range by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 11:21:59 PM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 10:29:26 PM]


50 inch SXS and Tracks? by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 08:08:34 PM]


Accura MR-X 45 load development by kyles_88
[Yesterday at 08:03:44 PM]


Oregon special tag info by Judespapa
[Yesterday at 12:24:57 PM]


wings wings and more wings! by birddogdad
[Yesterday at 11:27:43 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by CP
[Yesterday at 10:51:20 AM]


Archery elk gear, 2025. by Drewski
[Yesterday at 10:03:17 AM]


10 years ago- Now by MackDaddy509
[Yesterday at 08:57:48 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal