collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 223 or 243  (Read 6393 times)

Offline Wazukie

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 2674
  • Location: The Woods
  • Groups: NRA
Re: 223 or 243
« Reply #15 on: October 08, 2012, 07:48:47 AM »
Well, ok, I just checked and its not a 55gr bullet but a 40 grn in the .223, but still just over 4k fps, that's what my records say anyway.  But what ever.  Again why not have both?
Matthew 6:33

Offline C-Money

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 10937
  • Location: Grant County
  • Self proclaimed 3pt master
Re: 223 or 243
« Reply #16 on: October 08, 2012, 07:52:17 AM »
If you want a pure coyote/varmint gun, .223 is a great way to go. I would shoot the factory ammo, find the one the rifle shoots best and don't look back!
I felt like a one legged cat trying to bury a terd on a frozen pond!

Offline thinkingman

  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 2363
Re: 223 or 243
« Reply #17 on: October 08, 2012, 09:01:21 AM »
Screw .223 on anything but a AR platform. .243 is going to be the ticket to cover you for all varmint scenarios and second as a deer rifle.
It scares me when I agree with TinyHammer...But .243 reloads cover everything under 300lbs and do it well.
For my AR, 6X45 is on the docket.
“The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser men so full of doubts.”
― Bertrand Russell

Offline FALFire

  • Crazy Old Man with a Gun!
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 1471
  • Location: Planet Earth
Re: 223 or 243
« Reply #18 on: October 08, 2012, 11:24:53 AM »
Well, ok, I just checked and its not a 55gr bullet but a 40 grn in the .223, but still just over 4k fps, that's what my records say anyway.  But what ever.  Again why not have both?


Just out of curiosity......Have you actually speed tested the loads you are talking about? Because in the nearly 40 years of my reloading I have never been able to get 4000 plus FPS from a 223 using any powder including BLC2 and a 40 grain bullet.


What brand of Chronograph are you using?  :dunno:
Checkin' wind and makin' smoke.
That's how I roll...

Offline Wazukie

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 2674
  • Location: The Woods
  • Groups: NRA
Re: 223 or 243
« Reply #19 on: October 08, 2012, 01:24:17 PM »
I do use a F-1 Master Chrony.  Could it be off a little, yes, but that is what it said, at least what I wrote down  :dunno:

There are a lot of people on the net who claim to push well over 4k fps, not sure I'd want to push mine much more than what I do.  Wolf primers are known to be hard primers and I do get signs of just beginning flat primer, but no cupping or blow outs.

Nosler gives a max load of 23.5 grs of RL7 with their 40 gr varminter at just over 3.6k fps.  Is it really that un-realistic to push that load another 400 fps?  I don't think so.

Hornady lists there factor 223 Rem 35 gr NTX® Superformance at 4k fps at the muzzle and the 53 gr. at 3.5k fps.  Does it really do that?  Don't know but possible.

Maybe in your 40 years of experience you have not pushed the extremes with your rifle, I have a habit to do so.  Dangerous? yes, very.  I would not recommend it to most, it is something you have to decide for yourself. 

Again back to the OP, I like to have both a 223 and 243 and even the 25-06.  The .223 is nice to have when you can not have anything bigger in the field. just my  :twocents:
Matthew 6:33

Offline grundy53

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 12860
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Learn something new everyday.
    • facebook
Re: 223 or 243
« Reply #20 on: October 08, 2012, 01:33:06 PM »
If it's an AR then go .223. Bolt action I would say .243 although I love my .25-06 shooting CT ballistic silver tips in 85 gr.
Molôn Labé
Can you skin Grizz?

The opinions expressed in my posts do not represent those of the forum.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Sportsman Alliance files petition to Gov Ferguson for removal of corrupt WA Wildlife Commissioners by addicted1
[Yesterday at 10:11:08 PM]


Upland Side by Side by TitusFord
[Yesterday at 08:54:19 PM]


Public Land Sale Senate Budget Reconciliation by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 08:45:13 PM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by metlhead
[Yesterday at 07:43:57 PM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 07:08:53 PM]


3 days for Kings by Stein
[Yesterday at 06:45:11 PM]


Kinda fun LH rimfire rifle project by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 06:44:33 PM]


Can’t fish for pinks area 8-2? by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 05:22:46 PM]


GMU 247 Entiat bear hunting by GeoSwan
[Yesterday at 03:02:21 PM]


Evergreen youth livestock show and sale by HUNTIN4SIX
[Yesterday at 02:24:03 PM]


2025 NWTF Jakes Day by wadu1
[Yesterday at 02:19:48 PM]


Dandy Bull by Buckhunter24
[Yesterday at 01:29:37 PM]


Tricer AD tripod by gee_unit360
[Yesterday at 12:40:45 PM]


How a Product That Changed Hunting FOREVER was invented in the 1980's by jrebel
[Yesterday at 11:28:44 AM]


Ten Years, and still plugging along by JWBINX
[Yesterday at 10:22:55 AM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 10:04:16 AM]


3BR Condo in Tacoma with views of the Narrows and Olympic Mountains by Gentrys
[Yesterday at 09:44:45 AM]


Nooksack Archery Tag by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 09:37:52 AM]


Selkirk bull moose. by greenhead_killer
[Yesterday at 07:04:22 AM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by Turner89
[Yesterday at 06:47:37 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal