collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Pope & Young and minimums  (Read 8942 times)

Offline carpsniperg2

  • Site Sponsor
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+126)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 31528
  • Location: Goldendale,WA
Re: Pope & Young and minimums
« Reply #30 on: October 04, 2012, 11:31:45 AM »
They do for most, so that is not a issue :tup:
Owner: SPLIT DIAMOND TACTICAL
Firearms/Transfers/Parts/Optics
2011 HW Head Competition Winner

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: Pope & Young and minimums
« Reply #31 on: October 04, 2012, 01:21:22 PM »
I think the definition of a "trophy class" animal has changed in your mind, and you would like to see the books changed to match your definition of trophy.  As I look through the minimum scores all I see are trophy animals at those minimums; yes, I consider your 2x2 blacktail that is 90+ inches to be a trophy with a bow.  Boone and Crockett Club maintains world-class animal records for all weapon types; Pope and Young maintains archery trophy animal records: two very different categories and thus very different minimums. 

I, too, have taken critters that meet the minimums but have never entered them.  My reason is that entering an animal costs money and that money can be gained by entering more and more animals instead of the books being used as a true record of trophy class animals which would only be obtained by free entry and free information distribution.  I salute them for what they've done for hunting, but I choose not to financially support them.

I've been waiting for you to chime in!  I respect your opinion and was very interested in what you had to say.  But, "trophy class" has not changed in my mind.  A 90+ 2X2 might be a "trophy" in a 2X2 class of their own.  But I do not and never have believed they should ever be considered a shinning example of the species.

I do beleive a "Youth" catagory and a "2X2" blacktail and muledeer catagory would be something worthwhile to discuss. I like the way the Washington State record book has done it.
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

Offline Todd_ID

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 2926
  • Location: Clarkston
  • Hunt Hard!
Re: Pope & Young and minimums
« Reply #32 on: October 06, 2012, 08:11:50 AM »
I see your point about the 2x2's not needing to be part of the books or maybe a separate category.  I'm ok with that.  However, the youth category I don't think we need; what's the next step, a category for the rich, how about one for natives?  I think it should just stay one category for all hunters.  That way it can be a record of the animals instead of the hunters.  I'd really like to see them leave the hunter's name off the listings.  That would solve many of the problems in the industry.

Bring a GPS!  It's awkward to have to eat your buddies!

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Pope & Young and minimums
« Reply #33 on: October 06, 2012, 09:10:20 AM »
I dislike the idea seperation for youth.  How about one for over 65,  and maybe one for left handed people.  I also don't like a two point one.  Its an "inferior" animal of the species, though I have seen some I wish I had shot or that I wish I would have shot.  There, we have discussed it. LOL :)

Offline jess

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2011
  • Posts: 375
  • Location: republic
Re: Pope & Young and minimums
« Reply #34 on: October 06, 2012, 09:22:47 AM »
I agree bone, a big two point should not be in the books although he is big he is still a "cull buck" and is not a exeptional animal of that species..

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

90's Yamaha no telltale? by Crunchy
[Today at 08:40:12 AM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by Practical Approach
[Today at 08:17:14 AM]


E scouting for bears by hunter399
[Today at 08:04:13 AM]


That "lake taste" in freshwater fish by hunter399
[Today at 08:01:07 AM]


Bear Scratch on Tree by JWBINX
[Today at 06:58:38 AM]


RDS Scope ring height by blackpowderhunter
[Today at 06:05:07 AM]


Rimrock Bull: Modern by bowguy
[Today at 05:59:49 AM]


No trespassing, hunting, fishing signs posted along Skykomish river by Night goat
[Today at 04:28:57 AM]


NEED ADVICE: LATE after JUNE 15th IDAHO BEAR by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 10:52:52 PM]


Archery elk gear, 2025. by blackveltbowhunter
[Yesterday at 09:36:02 PM]


Grayback Youth Hunt by Big6bull
[Yesterday at 08:20:59 PM]


Pocket Carry by fly-by
[Yesterday at 06:35:19 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by HillHound
[Yesterday at 05:36:47 PM]


SWAKANE EWE by vandeman17
[Yesterday at 02:55:45 PM]


49 degrees north late Moose tag by Buzzsaw461
[Yesterday at 02:44:10 PM]


Video highlighting and discussing WDFW corruption by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 01:42:41 PM]


Tease 'l' by kellama2001
[Yesterday at 01:23:41 PM]


What barrel length 24”, 26” or 28” by Call em in
[Yesterday at 12:47:43 PM]


Game trails to nowhere? by addicted1
[Yesterday at 12:38:05 PM]


PROOF RESEARCH CLOSEOUT by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Yesterday at 12:35:23 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal