Question about number of shells

[h2ofowlr]

Just read the game regs as mentioned.  No limit if out in public areas, in the Puget Sound, CR or private lands.  It's the DFW controlled areas that may have restrictions along with refuges that allow hunting.  It varies from site to site.  Most of the ones in Skagit county will only allow 15 shells.  Ridgefield allows 25 shells.  When we sea duck hunt we usually bring a few boxes of shells.  Just keep them dry as the salt water will rust them up in a few hours.   

[Skagit_Hunter]

  if your not sure READ THE REGS THEN RE-READ THEM. IT'S NOT ROCKET SCIENCE LIKE FISHING. IF YOUR NOT SURE. CARRY 15 SHELLS AND DONT SKYBUST OR YOUR DAY WILL END SOON 

If birds are in range 15 is way more than you need

[Kola16]

He did read the regs. Read his post 

[kckrawler]

Page 26 of the Migratory Waterfowl Pamphlet if you want to read it

http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/01410/wdfw01410.pdf

[Skagit_Hunter]

He did read the regs. Read his post 

I can read them anyway I want. go for it. I dont care. Im not gonna get a big fat ticket. never had one in 42 yrs like im sure H2o hasn't because we read them right

[Atroxus]

Page 26 of the Migratory Waterfowl Pamphlet if you want to read it

http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/01410/wdfw01410.pdf

Thanks, I tried several times to find it, and missed that section every time. 

[Kola16]

He did read the regs. Read his post 

I can read them anyway I want. go for it. I dont care. Im not gonna get a big fat ticket. never had one in 42 yrs like im sure H2o hasn't because we read them right

What in the world are you saying 

[Skagit_Hunter]

He did read the regs. Read his post 

I can read them anyway I want. go for it. I dont care. Im not gonna get a big fat ticket. never had one in 42 yrs like im sure H2o hasn't because we read them right

What in the world are you saying 

Im saying it is black and white. read it front to back. It really hasn't change much in 42 yrs but for advertisement that the state gets payed for. what ever kids, read it

[Kola16]

He did read them. He just couldn't find where it talked about that. I still don't really get what you said 

He did read the regs. Read his post 

I can read them anyway I want. go for it. I dont care. Im not gonna get a big fat ticket. never had one in 42 yrs like im sure H2o hasn't because we read them right

[Skagit_Hunter]

well read the regs kola

[Kola16]

I have read the regs. That is why I was confused about the 15 shell rule. I was even more confused when I read the sign that said 15 shell limit because I thought that it was implying that that was always the rule. Reading the regs doesn't help what I was asking, but whatever.

[Atroxus]

Circular conversation is going in circles. A few posts back kccrawler directed me to the page it was on(page 26) I had just missed that section when I was looking previously. Sure reading and knowing all of the regs from page 1 to the last page would be ideal. I don't have perfect recall, so occasionally if I am not sure and can't find something in the regs I ask here, and usually someone can help me find the right page, or tell me that it's not documented in the regs, but is in RCW or something like that.

[Kola16]

Circular conversation is going in circles. A few posts back kccrawler directed me to the page it was on(page 26) I had just missed that section when I was looking previously. Sure reading and knowing all of the regs from page 1 to the last page would be ideal. I don't have perfect recall, so occasionally if I am not sure and can't find something in the regs I ask here, and usually someone can help me find the right page, or tell me that it's not documented in the regs, but is in RCW or something like that.

I was just asking what skagit hunter was saying NOT what the regs were saying. Even if I was talking about the regs, I guess there is no asking about them on here.

[Atroxus]

Circular conversation is going in circles. A few posts back kccrawler directed me to the page it was on(page 26) I had just missed that section when I was looking previously. Sure reading and knowing all of the regs from page 1 to the last page would be ideal. I don't have perfect recall, so occasionally if I am not sure and can't find something in the regs I ask here, and usually someone can help me find the right page, or tell me that it's not documented in the regs, but is in RCW or something like that.

I was just asking what skagit hunter was saying NOT what the regs were saying. Even if I was talking about the regs, I guess there is no asking about them on here.

Some people I guess are just not willing to give more help than "Check the regs" this is fine for people who have not tried looking there already as long as it is something that actually is in the regs. It's not very helpful in some cases though. Lets take for example deer baiting.

It's a common question because we have in the regs that you can't bait bear, but nothing about baiting deer. I know now that it is legal because it is not explicitly illegal. If someone asked here and was told "Check the regs" that would be some fairly useless information.

I commented that it was going in circles because at this point, I don't think you are going to convince Skagit that we have read the regs, or that just telling us to read them wasn't helpful. And I don't think he is going to convince us that it was helpful.

[Kola16]

Don't worry Atroxus, I have read the regs  Hopefully Kola comes back tired when we are done (and by Kola, I do not mean myself).