collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Ethics vs. legality  (Read 12228 times)

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44816
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Ethics vs. legality
« Reply #45 on: November 06, 2012, 02:40:51 PM »
READ this and remember it..

There are Fish and Wildlife Officers on here!!!  Take it form a guy that knows! they have copied some of my statements and sent them to the DA.  I could give a damn what they sent to the DA cause I have all the proof I need in my case...

BUT but your A** I'm not the first one they have done this too...  Just because your sitting behind a computer doesn't mean they dont know who you are...

food for thought...

RTSPRING

Lighten up, Francis. It's just a hypothetical discussion. :chuckle: :chuckle:
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline runamuk

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 17878
Re: Ethics vs. legality
« Reply #46 on: November 06, 2012, 02:41:21 PM »
"If you are hunting with someone who has an unfilled antlerless tag, and you see a cow who is OBVIOUSLY wounded, limping/dragging a leg, mouth hanging wide open and lagging behind the herd, what do you do?"

Most of these stupid answers affirm what I think of a lot of people on this site! How do you know someone didn't just shoot and wound the animal earlier in the day, or the night before, and they're tracking the animal??? So you shoot it, and your buddy tags it, and then the person who was tracking it shows up.......then what??? I get sick of how unethical some of you are. There are two types of hunters; a sportsman, and a dousch bag! We all have the same regulations to abide by. Is it really that tough?

I have a question for the participants in this thread: If you call someone a *censored* and misspell it, doesn't that fall under the double-*censored* rule and make you the *censored*? Feedback anyone?

thats intriguing in theory .....  :dunno:

but I also thought we were only supposed to call politicians and presidential candidates *censored*s  :dunno: not each other....so not sure where the ruling would be on this one

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: Ethics vs. legality
« Reply #47 on: November 06, 2012, 02:45:34 PM »
READ this and remember it..

There are Fish and Wildlife Officers on here!!!  Take it form a guy that knows! they have copied some of my statements and sent them to the DA.  I could give a damn what they sent to the DA cause I have all the proof I need in my case...

BUT but your A** I'm not the first one they have done this too...  Just because your sitting behind a computer doesn't mean they dont know who you are...

food for thought...

RTSPRING

Lighten up, Francis. It's just a hypothetical discussion. :chuckle: :chuckle:

 :yeah:     Nobody is claiming to have actually done anything illegal here. Simply a discussion, and there's no law against that- yet.

Believe me, if I break any laws, I won't be admitting to it on the Internet.

Offline rtspring

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 5604
  • Location: Hermiston Oregon
Re: Ethics vs. legality
« Reply #48 on: November 06, 2012, 02:52:41 PM »
READ this and remember it..

There are Fish and Wildlife Officers on here!!!  Take it form a guy that knows! they have copied some of my statements and sent them to the DA.  I could give a damn what they sent to the DA cause I have all the proof I need in my case...

BUT but your A** I'm not the first one they have done this too...  Just because your sitting behind a computer doesn't mean they dont know who you are...

food for thought...

RTSPRING

Lighten up, Francis. It's just a hypothetical discussion. :chuckle: :chuckle:

PIANO,  since your a mod, can you qoute where I said anyone was writing a confession on here???   If so please quote me on that!!  I was simply putting it out there.

FRANCIS???  your vocabulary speaks volumes of who you are!! I know private forum, you can say as yo wish.....   Like always YOU resort to name calling!  But yet always jump on me for bashing people...  I would like to know where I bash people?? I would actually help you too if you wern't such a bad mood type of guy....

RTSPRING
I kill elk and eat elk, when I'm not, I'm thinking about killing elk and eating elk.

It doesn't matter what you think...

The Whiners suck!!

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21759
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Ethics vs. legality
« Reply #49 on: November 06, 2012, 02:54:23 PM »
I have a question for the participants in this thread: If you call someone a *censored* and misspell it, doesn't that fall under the double-*censored* rule and make you the *censored*? Feedback anyone?
Article 4, subsection 3, paragraph 2, clause 14 deals with this in detail. The law is clear: calling another hunter a *censored* by the use of incorrect or improper spelling, as defined by Webster's 43rd version, invalidates the claim and results in subrogation and sequestration of the original accusation.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Online Woodchuck

  • GO TEAM!!!
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 12147
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • HuntWA Woodblock
Re: Ethics vs. legality
« Reply #50 on: November 06, 2012, 02:55:39 PM »
 :yeah: In easy to understand terms  :tup:
Antlered rabbit tastes like chicken


Inuendo, wasn't he an Italian proctoligist?

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44816
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Ethics vs. legality
« Reply #51 on: November 06, 2012, 03:00:37 PM »
READ this and remember it..

There are Fish and Wildlife Officers on here!!!  Take it form a guy that knows! they have copied some of my statements and sent them to the DA.  I could give a damn what they sent to the DA cause I have all the proof I need in my case...

BUT but your A** I'm not the first one they have done this too...  Just because your sitting behind a computer doesn't mean they dont know who you are...

food for thought...

RTSPRING

Lighten up, Francis. It's just a hypothetical discussion. :chuckle: :chuckle:

PIANO,  since your a mod, can you qoute where I said anyone was writing a confession on here???   If so please quote me on that!!  I was simply putting it out there.

FRANCIS???  your vocabulary speaks volumes of who you are!! I know private forum, you can say as yo wish.....   Like always YOU resort to name calling!  But yet always jump on me for bashing people...  I would like to know where I bash people?? I would actually help you too if you wern't such a bad mood type of guy....

RTSPRING

RT, I'm not bashing anyone. You really take life way too seriously. Like I said, lighten up Francis.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44816
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Ethics vs. legality
« Reply #52 on: November 06, 2012, 03:01:43 PM »
I have a question for the participants in this thread: If you call someone a *censored* and misspell it, doesn't that fall under the double-*censored* rule and make you the *censored*? Feedback anyone?
Article 4, subsection 3, paragraph 2, clause 14 deals with this in detail. The law is clear: calling another hunter a *censored* by the use of incorrect or improper spelling, as defined by Webster's 43rd version, invalidates the claim and results in subrogation and sequestration of the original accusation.

Thank you, Bob. I knew about the existence of the rule, but couldn't find it in the library!  :tup:
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline Kc_Kracker

  • Sauceman
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 4125
  • Location: olympia
Re: Ethics vs. legality
« Reply #53 on: November 06, 2012, 03:52:54 PM »
you watch nature take its course, it may heal, or it may be part of the food chain, either way nature will decide and i will not be going to jail for pretending to be nature.  :tup:

Offline Kowsrule30

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 3044
Re: Ethics vs. legality
« Reply #54 on: November 06, 2012, 04:04:00 PM »
Been in this position a few times.... I let them go... Once I was able to get my friend and track it to it's bed where he put it down....  I had a cow tag for Cowichie one year and three shots go off in a quick time period very close.... A string of cows run past me without a shot offered... Then one dragging it's leg all hunched up moving slow enough to where I could get to her and put one in her head at 10 yards....  She was gut shot twice and her left rear leg was dangling.... I cringed... Then 3 guys came up just as I started gutting saying it was theirs..... I told and talked to them about shot placement, laws, and shooting at running elk with a muzzy.... Only one had a cow tag.... I let them have it....

Offline runamuk

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 17878
Re: Ethics vs. legality
« Reply #55 on: November 06, 2012, 04:05:30 PM »
you watch nature take its course, it may heal, or it may be part of the food chain, either way nature will decide and i will not be going to jail for pretending to be nature.  :tup:

ummm except humans are part of nature we are an apex predator and we play a huge part in nature in modern times as we alter where and how wildlife lives and are thus also responsible for our role in this management, why is it better for the animal to die a slow death, be taken by a bear cougar wolf all predators as well instead of the human predator taking the animal. 

It is another one of my beliefs that our continued insistence that we are not part of nature and also allowing ourselves to be blamed for destroying nature that has let the environmental movement go to crazy places.  We are as much a part of nature as a tree a wolf or an ant, every creature on this planet plays a role in the way it works and none exist inside a bubble or vacuum  :dunno:

Offline deadwoodbuck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 447
  • Location: Bellingham.
  • predator outsmarting prey
  • Groups: NRA
Re: Ethics vs. legality
« Reply #56 on: November 06, 2012, 04:11:04 PM »
Quote
Article 4, subsection 3, paragraph 2, clause 14 deals with this in detail. The law is clear: calling another hunter a *censored* by the use of incorrect or improper spelling, as defined by Webster's 43rd version, invalidates the claim and results in subrogation and sequestration of the original accusation.
:yeah:
there are many animals running around town with broken legs...life is tough survival is tougher...then they die and the life that was in them is past onto another life.  on the original question...find someone with a cow tag to shoot the elk if possible if not that animal will feed the needs of others out there trying to survive.  just my :twocents:
"How, given the canine teeth and close-set eyes that declare the human animal to be a predator, had we come up with the notion that oat bran is more natural to eat than chicken?"

"Winners take responsibility...Losers blame others"

Offline Kowsrule30

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 3044
Re: Ethics vs. legality
« Reply #57 on: November 06, 2012, 04:12:17 PM »
"If you are hunting with someone who has an unfilled antlerless tag, and you see a cow who is OBVIOUSLY wounded, limping/dragging a leg, mouth hanging wide open and lagging behind the herd, what do you do?"

Most of these stupid answers affirm what I think of a lot of people on this site! How do you know someone didn't just shoot and wound the animal earlier in the day, or the night before, and they're tracking the animal??? So you shoot it, and your buddy tags it, and then the person who was tracking it shows up.......then what??? I get sick of how unethical some of you are. There are two types of hunters; a sportsman, and a dousch bag! We all have the same regulations to abide by. Is it really that tough?

I have a question for the participants in this thread: If you call someone a *censored* and misspell it, doesn't that fall under the double-*censored* rule and make you the *censored*? Feedback anyone?

thats intriguing in theory .....  :dunno:

but I also thought we were only supposed to call politicians and presidential candidates *censored*s  :dunno: not each other....so not sure where the ruling would be on this one


For some reason I'm going to have to agree about the *censored*..... I spell wrong all the time.... But when you wanna name call and spell it wrong that's just bad mojo....

Offline Kc_Kracker

  • Sauceman
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 4125
  • Location: olympia
Re: Ethics vs. legality
« Reply #58 on: November 06, 2012, 04:39:33 PM »
you watch nature take its course, it may heal, or it may be part of the food chain, either way nature will decide and i will not be going to jail for pretending to be nature.  :tup:

ummm except humans are part of nature we are an apex predator and we play a huge part in nature in modern times as we alter where and how wildlife lives and are thus also responsible for our role in this management, why is it better for the animal to die a slow death, be taken by a bear cougar wolf all predators as well instead of the human predator taking the animal. 

It is another one of my beliefs that our continued insistence that we are not part of nature and also allowing ourselves to be blamed for destroying nature that has let the environmental movement go to crazy places.  We are as much a part of nature as a tree a wolf or an ant, every creature on this planet plays a role in the way it works and none exist inside a bubble or vacuum  :dunno:

sorry seems i misread it, i first thought he was asking if he should shoot it w/o a tag. sorry

Offline Colville

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 689
  • Location: Snohomish
Re: Ethics vs. legality
« Reply #59 on: November 06, 2012, 04:49:32 PM »
While misspelling *censored* in the midst of a rant, is usually *censored*ry itself, the proper response is not simply pointing it out directly.

It's to mock the poster by suggesting he's the dewsh. Or that maybe he's an idoit or maron. ITG's hate being mocked leading to additional ranting with misspelled rejoinders.

Then tell them it's not personal and to lighten up, but seriously don't be a *censored*.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by Karl Blanchard
[Today at 01:12:28 PM]


Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by lonedave
[Today at 12:58:20 PM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by washingtonmuley
[Today at 12:00:55 PM]


MA 6 EAST fishing report? by washingtonmuley
[Today at 11:56:01 AM]


Kings by Gentrys
[Today at 11:05:40 AM]


Nevada bull hunt 2025 by High Climber
[Today at 10:32:52 AM]


2025 Crab! by ghosthunter
[Today at 09:43:49 AM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Dan-o
[Today at 09:26:43 AM]


Survey in ? by hdshot
[Today at 09:20:27 AM]


Bear behavior by brew
[Today at 08:40:20 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Today at 07:57:12 AM]


A lonely Job... by Loup Loup
[Today at 07:47:41 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by bear
[Today at 06:06:48 AM]


Accura MR-X 45 load development by kyles_88
[Today at 05:27:26 AM]


Son drawn - Silver Dollar Youth Any Elk - Help? by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 09:42:07 PM]


MA-10 Coho by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 02:08:31 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal