NRA News: UN Doomsday Treaty

[3nails]

first neighbore in need we will need to come to his aid. I would prefer open battle, but beleive that's a pipe dream. I bet it will be one home to the other in the dead of night all in the name of LAW enforcement!!!!.
Hope I'm wrong though.
I will come running though!!!

[Bean Counter]

+1

[b.roberts]

Forgive me If I'm wrong, but we (USA) are a member in the UN, if this passes we could just withdraw, correct? In which case, an organization which depends on its members to enforce its laws would be rendered unable to enforce anything without its largest militaristic ally...

They are trying to pass a treaty.  Obama may sign it, but there is no chance of that treaty being ratified in the Senate. 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using Tapatalk 2

[Heredoggydoggy]

Those light blue helmets should make attractive targets. 

UN forces come from member nations.  What nation on Earth would actually supply troops to round up American Arms?  Think our Military would allow it?

Heck, you think our PEOPLE would allow it?  Japan would'nt send troops to invade the US 70 years ago--you think they will NOW?

[jaymark6655]

Those light blue helmets should make attractive targets. 

UN forces come from member nations.  What nation on Earth would actually supply troops to round up American Arms?  Think our Military would allow it?

Heck, you think our PEOPLE would allow it?  Japan would'nt send troops to invade the US 70 years ago--you think they will NOW?

They just might.  It wouldn't be an invasion with the full support of the POTUS.

[Heredoggydoggy]

Those light blue helmets should make attractive targets. 

UN forces come from member nations.  What nation on Earth would actually supply troops to round up American Arms?  Think our Military would allow it?

Heck, you think our PEOPLE would allow it?  Japan would'nt send troops to invade the US 70 years ago--you think they will NOW?

They just might.  It wouldn't be an invasion with the full support of the POTUS.

That's an image I can see in my mind--one UN soldier flanked by 4 liberals armed with a Latte!    

[Jingles]

Forgive me If I'm wrong, but we (USA) are a member in the UN, if this passes we could just withdraw, correct? In which case, an organization which depends on its members to enforce its laws would be rendered unable to enforce anything without its largest militaristic ally...

correct but.... if you have a government (obama) as PRO U.N. our government will be for the agenda of the U.N. meaning our own troops will be forced to be the ones to take our guns.

Not necessarily the oath a service member takes says he will obey the lawful orders of the President and those appointed over them Unless it has changed since I retired I think the majority of the service members would elect to disobey that order knowing it is unconstitutional.  At least I hope that the military would make that decision if not then they become casualties as well

From my cold dead hands surrounded by a large pile of spent brass and a booby trapped body

[h2ofowlr]

Those light blue helmets should make attractive targets. 

UN forces come from member nations.  What nation on Earth would actually supply troops to round up American Arms?  Think our Military would allow it?

My guess is our military would follow the orders of the president who is also pushing this agenda.  Most would roll over.  Unfortunatley if ordered our military would take them from us.

[Heredoggydoggy]

Forgive me If I'm wrong, but we (USA) are a member in the UN, if this passes we could just withdraw, correct? In which case, an organization which depends on its members to enforce its laws would be rendered unable to enforce anything without its largest militaristic ally...

correct but.... if you have a government (obama) as PRO U.N. our government will be for the agenda of the U.N. meaning our own troops will be forced to be the ones to take our guns.

Not necessarily the oath a service member takes says he will obey the lawful orders of the President and those appointed over them Unless it has changed since I retired I think the majority of the service members would elect to disobey that order knowing it is unconstitutional.  At least I hope that the military would make that decision if not then they become casualties as well

From my cold dead hands surrounded by a large pile of spent brass and a booby trapped body

Imagine all the resignations when the surviving military see that It's not as easy as they thought it would be!

[MikeWalking]

...to protect the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic. 

[Bean Counter]

Those light blue helmets should make attractive targets. 

UN forces come from member nations.  What nation on Earth would actually supply troops to round up American Arms?  Think our Military would allow it?

My guess is our military would follow the orders of the president who is also pushing this agenda.  Most would roll over.  Unfortunatley if ordered our military would take them from us.

Most will roll over, and most military/LEO would obey orders. A few will disobey, and a handful of gun owners will have a backbone. I pray that there is enough for deterrent.

[addicted2hunting]

...to protect the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic. 

Is that the actual oath?

If so why arent they doing something???

[csaaphill]

I hope so too although and might shouldn't say online, but there is pvc pipe not for the blewy type of thing but they make really good time capsuls until needed.

[LeeMajors]

While you guys are conspiracy theorizing, please remember that all treaties must be ratified by congress.

[MikeWalking]

...to protect the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic. 

Is that the actual oath?

If so why aren't they doing something???

It's part of the oath I took when I enlisted in 1978.