collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: more wolf BS from the methow paper  (Read 10205 times)

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38427
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: more wolf BS from the methow paper
« Reply #15 on: November 29, 2012, 04:19:29 AM »
I just googles that lady who wrote that. She's all over the place as a pro wolf activist.

She probably spends half her free time writing newspapers. She might also be "paid" by Conservation Northwest or some other wolf loving group to write letters.
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline CementFinisher

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 1115
  • Location: Spanaway, wa
Re: more wolf BS from the methow paper
« Reply #16 on: November 29, 2012, 04:28:21 AM »
 :yeah: I believe they are that organized and well funded

Offline grundy53

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 12854
  • Location: Lake Stevens
  • Learn something new everyday.
    • facebook
Re: more wolf BS from the methow paper
« Reply #17 on: November 29, 2012, 05:11:40 AM »
 :mor: I like how she states that they are a keystone species and you can't have a healthy environment without them..... except we did for a hundred years...
Molôn Labé
Can you skin Grizz?

The opinions expressed in my posts do not represent those of the forum.

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: more wolf BS from the methow paper
« Reply #18 on: November 29, 2012, 06:24:25 AM »
The Sheriff I know that investigated these wolf killings said, that the wolves were coming onto the ranchers own PRIVATE property to kill the calves. The rancher has around 1500 acres of his own PRIVATE property where these terrorist wolves were supposedly whacked........ :tup:
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline netcoyote

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 1766
  • Location: Olympia, WA
Re: more wolf BS from the methow paper
« Reply #19 on: November 29, 2012, 06:30:36 AM »
villiageidiot said:
Quote
..."They do not have a clue as to the environmental effects cattle have.  All the govt. agencies that  graze cattle have a very specific criteria they follow for the cattlemen to adhere to.  You absolutely can not abuse the land or your lease will be pulled in a heartbeat.  This hogwash of cattle decimating the national forest is just that  HOGWASH.  ....

I wouldn't try to sell that argument. I'm a hunter and I've hunted in many areas that were open to grazing.  I've seen some pretty devastated areas. Not a lot, but you sure can't make the statement that abuse to public land due to grazing doesn't exist.
"...t'aint never a thing wrong with a man such that the mountains can't cure."

Offline poopooheaddad

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 326
  • Location: Stanwood, WA.
  • Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
Re: more wolf BS from the methow paper
« Reply #20 on: November 29, 2012, 06:51:32 AM »
Just starting a rumor :chuckle:   But I heard they are going to release 2 wolf packs in Seattle :chuckle:
"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38427
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: more wolf BS from the methow paper
« Reply #21 on: November 29, 2012, 06:55:47 AM »
villiageidiot said:
Quote
..."They do not have a clue as to the environmental effects cattle have.  All the govt. agencies that  graze cattle have a very specific criteria they follow for the cattlemen to adhere to.  You absolutely can not abuse the land or your lease will be pulled in a heartbeat.  This hogwash of cattle decimating the national forest is just that  HOGWASH.  ....

I wouldn't try to sell that argument. I'm a hunter and I've hunted in many areas that were open to grazing.  I've seen some pretty devastated areas. Not a lot, but you sure can't make the statement that abuse to public land due to grazing doesn't exist.


I think there are abuses in any user group, that's why we have LEO's, bios, and managers. I think villiageidiot was trying to say that proper grazing by responsible livestock producers is compatible and I would add that it's actually "beneficial". It's not cattle that are the problem, it's the occasional violator of grazing rules and the lieing environmentalists that put a black eye on grazing.  :twocents:
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38427
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: more wolf BS from the methow paper
« Reply #22 on: November 29, 2012, 07:01:46 AM »
Just starting a rumor :chuckle:   But I heard they are going to release 2 wolf packs in Seattle :chuckle:

What's fair for the rest of the west should certainly be fair for Seattle.  :tup:
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline netcoyote

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 1766
  • Location: Olympia, WA
Re: more wolf BS from the methow paper
« Reply #23 on: November 29, 2012, 07:54:40 AM »
villiageidiot said:
Quote
..."They do not have a clue as to the environmental effects cattle have.  All the govt. agencies that  graze cattle have a very specific criteria they follow for the cattlemen to adhere to.  You absolutely can not abuse the land or your lease will be pulled in a heartbeat.  This hogwash of cattle decimating the national forest is just that  HOGWASH.  ....

I wouldn't try to sell that argument. I'm a hunter and I've hunted in many areas that were open to grazing.  I've seen some pretty devastated areas. Not a lot, but you sure can't make the statement that abuse to public land due to grazing doesn't exist.


I think there are abuses in any user group, that's why we have LEO's, bios, and managers. I think villiageidiot was trying to say that proper grazing by responsible livestock producers is compatible and I would add that it's actually "beneficial". It's not cattle that are the problem, it's the occasional violator of grazing rules and the lieing environmentalists that put a black eye on grazing.  :twocents:

Agree. We just have to be careful about engaging in untruthful rhetoric if we are going to be taken seriously when trying to engage with, and counter, environmentalist rhetoric. It just ends up being a peeing contest that is a waste of time and doesn't change anyone's opinion. Unless opinions change, the status quo will continue.
"...t'aint never a thing wrong with a man such that the mountains can't cure."

Offline motg9_6

  • These animals are gods gift first before government's possessions. If it is illegal for a man to fend for himself then he can not be a man in his own right!
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2011
  • Posts: 951
  • Location: Klickitat county
Re: more wolf BS from the methow paper
« Reply #24 on: November 30, 2012, 10:49:15 AM »
anybody know the numbers or have access to, the amount of revenue brought in from state land cattle leases? love to throw that in their face.  where do they think their money for new roads and feel good projects come from??? :bash:

Offline JLS

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 4622
  • Location: In my last tracks.....
  • Groups: Support the LWCF!
Re: more wolf BS from the methow paper
« Reply #25 on: November 30, 2012, 10:59:54 AM »
villiageidiot said:
Quote
..."They do not have a clue as to the environmental effects cattle have.  All the govt. agencies that  graze cattle have a very specific criteria they follow for the cattlemen to adhere to.  You absolutely can not abuse the land or your lease will be pulled in a heartbeat.  This hogwash of cattle decimating the national forest is just that  HOGWASH.  ....

I wouldn't try to sell that argument. I'm a hunter and I've hunted in many areas that were open to grazing.  I've seen some pretty devastated areas. Not a lot, but you sure can't make the statement that abuse to public land due to grazing doesn't exist.

Agreed, I could show him some abused areas.  I'm not a grazing opponent.  In fact, I'm a sound proponent of proper rotational grazing on public lands and wildlife winter ranges, but the lack of oversight on some of these allotments is rather discouraging.
Matthew 7:13-14

Offline 270Flat

  • Chief
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 875
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • Getting skunked beats doing yard work!
Re: more wolf BS from the methow paper
« Reply #26 on: November 30, 2012, 11:08:32 AM »
Wait until one of the hikers comes across a pack of wolves without protection. And then ask them do you want to see cows or wolves...  :twocents:
fear no fish!!

Offline motg9_6

  • These animals are gods gift first before government's possessions. If it is illegal for a man to fend for himself then he can not be a man in his own right!
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2011
  • Posts: 951
  • Location: Klickitat county
Re: more wolf BS from the methow paper
« Reply #27 on: November 30, 2012, 11:26:40 AM »
i have a question for everyone on here. when you come across something wrong do you just post it on here or do you call DNR or the appropriate people to let them know. reading threw these forums i see alot of people complaining about over grazing, poor managment, we should do this or that but nothing ever really seems to get done about it. I ENCOURAGE PEOPLE THAT FIND THINGS WRONG TO REPORT THEM OR DO SOMETHING TO MAKE THEM BETTER.  thats what our founding fathers did and that what we as americans will have to do to make things better.

Offline wence5

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 975
  • Location: The Couve
Re: more wolf BS from the methow paper
« Reply #28 on: November 30, 2012, 12:23:29 PM »
I think the article clearly points out what the agenda is, get the cattle off the National Forest lands, and declare war on the ranchers and farmers that provide food for all of us. A byproduct of the wolf invasion is it will help stop sport hunting as we know it all across the west, another goal by the environmentalist left, and they can attract many in the cities that never spend any time in on public lands, hunt, or understand what our ranchers do for us by supplying them food for their tables. I will gladly take cattle being grazed on public lands over wolves any day!
The article was so full of BS I had to force myself to continue reading literary piece of garbage.
The worst day hunting is better than any day at work!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Desert Sheds by String Bender
[Today at 06:09:11 AM]


Nevada Results by 2MANY
[Today at 05:57:28 AM]


Best/Preferred Scouting App by Kascade_Killer
[Today at 12:50:28 AM]


Last year putting in… by wa.hunter
[Yesterday at 11:21:43 PM]


Search underway for three missing people after boat sinks near Mukilteo by Stein
[Yesterday at 09:30:24 PM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by jackelope
[Yesterday at 09:22:04 PM]


Sportsman’s Muzzloader Selection by VickGar
[Yesterday at 09:20:43 PM]


Vantage Bridge by jackelope
[Yesterday at 08:03:05 PM]


wyoming pronghorn draw by 87Ford
[Yesterday at 07:35:40 PM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by go4steelhd
[Yesterday at 03:25:16 PM]


New to ML-Optics help by Threewolves
[Yesterday at 02:55:25 PM]


Survey in ? by metlhead
[Yesterday at 01:42:41 PM]


F250 or Silverado 2500? by 7mmfan
[Yesterday at 01:39:14 PM]


Is FS70 open? by yajsab
[Yesterday at 10:13:07 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal