Free: Contests & Raffles.
Sonny Crockett carrried a S&W 4506 .45acp.Must have been Tubbs With the 10mm??
Quote from: Bigshooter on January 09, 2013, 05:10:07 PMQuote from: Biggerhammer on January 09, 2013, 05:05:24 PMOne needs to ask their self.What would I rather be shot with? 9mm, .40 or .45?Then go to the other end of the spectrum and holster it up. A 9mm may expand but a .45 bullet sure isn't going to get any smaller.I would rather start at 230grs and .451 caliber. Than 125grs and .355 caliber. I'd rather not be shot by any of them. However, if I ask myself this...would I rather the bad guy be holding a 9mm, .40 or .45.... I would rather him have the .40 or .45...two reasons.... less rounds and probably slower or less accuracy from the shooter.
Quote from: Biggerhammer on January 09, 2013, 05:05:24 PMOne needs to ask their self.What would I rather be shot with? 9mm, .40 or .45?Then go to the other end of the spectrum and holster it up. A 9mm may expand but a .45 bullet sure isn't going to get any smaller.I would rather start at 230grs and .451 caliber. Than 125grs and .355 caliber.
One needs to ask their self.What would I rather be shot with? 9mm, .40 or .45?Then go to the other end of the spectrum and holster it up. A 9mm may expand but a .45 bullet sure isn't going to get any smaller.
Quote from: DBHAWTHORNE on January 09, 2013, 06:11:54 PMQuote from: Bigshooter on January 09, 2013, 05:10:07 PMQuote from: Biggerhammer on January 09, 2013, 05:05:24 PMOne needs to ask their self.What would I rather be shot with? 9mm, .40 or .45?Then go to the other end of the spectrum and holster it up. A 9mm may expand but a .45 bullet sure isn't going to get any smaller.I would rather start at 230grs and .451 caliber. Than 125grs and .355 caliber. I'd rather not be shot by any of them. However, if I ask myself this...would I rather the bad guy be holding a 9mm, .40 or .45.... I would rather him have the .40 or .45...two reasons.... less rounds and probably slower or less accuracy from the shooter. It's all personal preference, I'd shoot a tango into the ground with all three. Anyone who has spent time with a handgun knows how frikn fast a mag can be changed( Measured in low single digit seconds). I prefer mass.
a million years ago, i was the first on scene to an undercovers involved shooting at a bar in Pierce county. a hitman was hired to kill him, probably not even knowing he was a cop, well anyways, he walked into a bar at closing, walked right up to the officer,and pulled a .375, the officer was able to draw a little faster, as he was anticipating this , and pressed his 9mm to the mans heart and pulled the trigger. rather than dropping, the man, shot the officer, who had to runaway for a better position and the two exchanged abit of fire. the man was killed, but it took another half dozen winchester silvertips to end it. not sure i am a fan of winchester silver tips, they tend not to expand, but it was that incident that compelled me to go to a .40
interestingly enough just two weeks ago my cousin and were discussing this very topic and did the math on them to determine the "lethality" of each one to base a decision on. The 9mm had a LF of 1.0 which was our baseline. Using kinetic energy and cross sectional density we came up with the following lethality chart.9mm=1.040= 1.4745 acp= 1.5110mm=1.88and just for fun the 50 Cal. muzzleloader was 6.12 So purely based on how much damage one can do vs. another the 10mm is the big dog for personal protection. Of course we run the numbers on anything to compare too.
but if I had to guess he would stash it in the pack or in the front with the junk.