collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 9mm vs .40 vs .45  (Read 24092 times)

Offline DBHAWTHORNE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 4463
  • Location: Cheney
  • Groups: Washington For Wildlife
Re: 9mm vs .40 vs .45
« Reply #75 on: January 11, 2013, 11:35:03 AM »
I really want a .357 mag but, I'm having trouble finding one that is 4", has 7rd capacity and in my price range.
I know a lot of people do not like Taurus but my 4"tracker is a great shooter and very reliable, as is the other two Taurus pistols I own. Two stay in the discussion though, I will say I like my .45.  10+1 and very easy to carry and conceal.

Nice Collection
The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of  the Department of Defense or any other entity of the US Government. The Department of Defense does not approve, endorse or authorize this posting.

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32895
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: 9mm vs .40 vs .45
« Reply #76 on: January 11, 2013, 11:41:57 AM »
Too me, it is all about control and rounds effectively on target where I place them....    Get the gun that you can control and put the rds where they count.
Same argument on these sights over 243, 270, 7mm, 300wm etc, the 243 kills just as effectively as all the others when you hit the target, it's all about shot placement.

In the Fort Hood shooting Hasan killed 13 people and wounded 30 with a relatively small caliber 5.7x28, before being put down with 5 shots from a military issued sidearm, and it didn't kill him. No idea what caliber it was. :dunno:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21747
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: 9mm vs .40 vs .45
« Reply #77 on: January 11, 2013, 12:01:05 PM »
These types of threads always generate lots of interest, be it the 9mm vs 10mm vs 45, or the 270 vs 30-06 vs. 458, etc.

I've come to believe, based primarily on hunting and killing big game, that there are a few laws of firearms and killing that generally apply to these topics:
1. Any gun is better than no gun.
2. No gun or bullet will instantly stop a living creature 100 percent of the time. Unless a spinal column or near spinal column hit is made, the creature may run/keep coming. I've seen too many lung/heart shot animals survive for 5 to 10 seconds (or longer) to believe that it wouldn't apply to humans in most instances as well.
3. Everything being equal, bigger bullets are better than smaller bullets. If shot placement is all that matters, we'd hunt elephants with .22s.
4. Everything isn't equal.

I believe there is a small advantage in stopping powder to larger caliber handguns versus smaller caliber handguns. However, calibers like 9mm have other advantages such as lower cost of ammunition which equals more practice, milder recoil, and increased magazine capacity which can tip the scales in favor of them.

Of far greater importance than caliber is the ability to think clearly and use whatever weapon you choose effectively when it matters. :twocents:
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline DBHAWTHORNE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 4463
  • Location: Cheney
  • Groups: Washington For Wildlife
Re: 9mm vs .40 vs .45
« Reply #78 on: January 11, 2013, 12:14:05 PM »
These types of threads always generate lots of interest, be it the 9mm vs 10mm vs 45, or the 270 vs 30-06 vs. 458, etc.

I've come to believe, based primarily on hunting and killing big game, that there are a few laws of firearms and killing that generally apply to these topics:
1. Any gun is better than no gun.
2. No gun or bullet will instantly stop a living creature 100 percent of the time. Unless a spinal column or near spinal column hit is made, the creature may run/keep coming. I've seen too many lung/heart shot animals survive for 5 to 10 seconds (or longer) to believe that it wouldn't apply to humans in most instances as well.
3. Everything being equal, bigger bullets are better than smaller bullets. If shot placement is all that matters, we'd hunt elephants with .22s.
4. Everything isn't equal.

I believe there is a small advantage in stopping powder to larger caliber handguns versus smaller caliber handguns. However, calibers like 9mm have other advantages such as lower cost of ammunition which equals more practice, milder recoil, and increased magazine capacity which can tip the scales in favor of them.

Of far greater importance than caliber is the ability to think clearly and use whatever weapon you choose effectively when it matters. :twocents:

Perfectly stated... but you just ruined the debate.  :chuckle:
The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of  the Department of Defense or any other entity of the US Government. The Department of Defense does not approve, endorse or authorize this posting.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21747
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: 9mm vs .40 vs .45
« Reply #79 on: January 11, 2013, 12:23:49 PM »
 :chuckle:

I think it will continue.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline DBHAWTHORNE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 4463
  • Location: Cheney
  • Groups: Washington For Wildlife
Re: 9mm vs .40 vs .45
« Reply #80 on: January 11, 2013, 12:33:04 PM »
:chuckle:

I think it will continue.

Yeah.. I don't think we have solved it just yet.  :chuckle: Eventually everyone will realize the 9mm is the way to go.
The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of  the Department of Defense or any other entity of the US Government. The Department of Defense does not approve, endorse or authorize this posting.

Offline deaner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2012
  • Posts: 979
  • Location: huckleberry
Re: 9mm vs .40 vs .45
« Reply #81 on: January 11, 2013, 12:35:35 PM »
okay so speaking of 9mm      has anybody had the chance to try out the kimber solo?  every time i go to a gun store i look but never seen one in stock.  read a lot of good things about it but im sure not going to lay down the cash to order a gun ive never even held.

Offline DBHAWTHORNE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 4463
  • Location: Cheney
  • Groups: Washington For Wildlife
Re: 9mm vs .40 vs .45
« Reply #82 on: January 11, 2013, 12:39:38 PM »
okay so speaking of 9mm      has anybody had the chance to try out the kimber solo?  every time i go to a gun store i look but never seen one in stock.  read a lot of good things about it but im sure not going to lay down the cash to order a gun ive never even held.

They look awesome.. this was the most current discussion I saw regarding the Solo

http://www.northwestfirearms.com/handgun-discussion/104703-having-problems-kimber-solo.html

The guy didn't know how to put it back together and was having failures as a result.
The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of  the Department of Defense or any other entity of the US Government. The Department of Defense does not approve, endorse or authorize this posting.

Offline deaner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2012
  • Posts: 979
  • Location: huckleberry
Re: 9mm vs .40 vs .45
« Reply #83 on: January 11, 2013, 12:53:52 PM »
yeah the guy on the video shows how to push in on the spring... seems like all the people having problems with it ust couldnt figure that one out.   id still like to try one out before plunking down 700 or 800 dollars on one

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32895
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: 9mm vs .40 vs .45
« Reply #84 on: January 11, 2013, 12:59:47 PM »
These types of threads always generate lots of interest, be it the 9mm vs 10mm vs 45, or the 270 vs 30-06 vs. 458, etc.

I've come to believe, based primarily on hunting and killing big game, that there are a few laws of firearms and killing that generally apply to these topics:
1. Any gun is better than no gun.
2. No gun or bullet will instantly stop a living creature 100 percent of the time. Unless a spinal column or near spinal column hit is made, the creature may run/keep coming. I've seen too many lung/heart shot animals survive for 5 to 10 seconds (or longer) to believe that it wouldn't apply to humans in most instances as well.
3. Everything being equal, bigger bullets are better than smaller bullets. If shot placement is all that matters, we'd hunt elephants with .22s.
4. Everything isn't equal.

I believe there is a small advantage in stopping powder to larger caliber handguns versus smaller caliber handguns. However, calibers like 9mm have other advantages such as lower cost of ammunition which equals more practice, milder recoil, and increased magazine capacity which can tip the scales in favor of them.

Of far greater importance than caliber is the ability to think clearly and use whatever weapon you choose effectively when it matters. :twocents:
+1, although you are not going to hit the target (heart) on a elephant with a .22, assuming you meant rimfire. ;)
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25038
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: 9mm vs .40 vs .45
« Reply #85 on: January 12, 2013, 08:16:31 AM »
Have you seen any good articles that describe/ show the different expandables? Within the same calibers?
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline hillbilli

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 555
  • Location: whidbey island
  • NAVY CHIEF
Re: 9mm vs .40 vs .45
« Reply #86 on: January 12, 2013, 11:46:23 AM »
used to be a website called "brassfetcher", that showed gelatin tests, recovered bullets etc for all the common calibers..

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25038
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: 9mm vs .40 vs .45
« Reply #87 on: January 12, 2013, 01:42:40 PM »
Here is the link regarding the 9mm vs the 45.
http://www.brassfetcher.com/index_files/9mmvs45ACP.htm
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline DBHAWTHORNE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 4463
  • Location: Cheney
  • Groups: Washington For Wildlife
Re: 9mm vs .40 vs .45
« Reply #88 on: January 12, 2013, 02:30:31 PM »
Here is the link regarding the 9mm vs the 45.
http://www.brassfetcher.com/index_files/9mmvs45ACP.htm


Thanks for posting those videos... I had never seen it before but it reinforced what I already knew......those speer dot gold +P in that 9mm are amazing..that's what I use in my shield.  :twocents:
The views expressed here are solely those of the author in his private capacity and do not in any way represent the views of  the Department of Defense or any other entity of the US Government. The Department of Defense does not approve, endorse or authorize this posting.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Lund Fisherman 1800 info/advice by Stein
[Today at 11:46:54 AM]


Knotty duck decoys by goosegunner
[Today at 11:45:58 AM]


Public Land Sale Senate Budget Reconciliation by dwils233
[Today at 11:36:36 AM]


Leupold Display fade by Stein
[Today at 10:21:55 AM]


Pocket Carry by birdshooter1189
[Today at 09:21:42 AM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Today at 09:21:15 AM]


Sheep Ewe - Whitestone Sheep Unit 20 by geauxtigers
[Today at 07:42:37 AM]


Any info on public land South Dakota pheasant hunts? by bornhunter
[Today at 07:19:46 AM]


Can’t fish for pinks area 8-2? by blackpowderhunter
[Today at 06:36:49 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by Schmalzfam
[Today at 05:36:10 AM]


idaho hunt 1001 by MackDaddy509
[Yesterday at 08:37:03 PM]


Game trails to nowhere? by TitusFord
[Yesterday at 06:40:56 PM]


Drew Pogue Quality by actionshooter
[Yesterday at 06:22:02 PM]


Idaho general deer area 5. by 3nails
[Yesterday at 05:33:03 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal